[1. RZN25-013: Rezone – Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Update of the Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study. Amendment to replace the 2021 Capital Improvement Plan and Development Impact Fee Study with the 2026 updated plan and study. The proposed land use assumptions and a copy of the proposed capital improvements plan are available for public review at the Planning Division Office, address listed below. Any member of the public affected by the capital improvements plan, or this amendment have the right to appear at the public hearing and present evidence regarding the proposed capital improvements plan or amendment.]

TO GO TO THE. OUR FIRST ITEM, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, WHICH IS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT UPDATE OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY.

AND WE WILL FIRST HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS WADE CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. IT'S GOOD TO BE WITH YOU. THANK YOU FOR SERVING ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION. FIRST AND FOREMOST, THE FIRST ITEM BEFORE YOU IS ACTUALLY I'M JUST INTRODUCING IT TO YOU. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR MUNICIPAL SERVICES DIRECTOR, PAM ALEXANDER, WITH US THAT WILL ACTUALLY BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM AS WELL AS ONLINE. WE HAVE COLIN FROM TISCHLER BICE, WHO DRAFTED THE IMPACT FEE STUDY. SO WHAT WE'RE HERE TO DO IS WE'RE IT'S A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, AND IT'S TO UPDATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY. AND EVERY FIVE YEARS WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS WHENEVER WE ADOPT IMPACT FEES PER STATE STATUTE. SO THE LAST CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND IMPACT FEE STUDY WAS DONE IN 2021. SO IF YOU ADD FIVE TO THAT WE'RE 2026. SO HENCE WHY THIS IS BEFORE YOU.

THIS IS SCHEDULED TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 23RD OF 2026. SO ANYONE AFFECTED OR WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THAT AS WELL. THERE WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK ON THAT AS WELL AT THAT PUBLIC HEARING. AND WITH THAT, I WILL TURN THE TIME OVER TO PAM ALEXANDER AND LET HER PRESENT TO YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME AGAIN THIS EVENING. I WAS BEFORE YOU PROBABLY A COUPLE MONTHS AGO, AND IT WAS A VERY GOOD EXPERIENCE. AND SO I'M PLEASED TO BE HERE THIS EVENING. JUST TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE OF WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THE IMPACT STUDY. FIRST, AS DIRECTOR SANDER MENTIONED, MY NAME IS PAM ALEXANDER, BUT I'M ALSO THE IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CITY. IT IS AN APPOINTED POSITION, AND I WAS APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL FOR THE POSITION. AND I'M ALSO THE MUNICIPAL SERVICES DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. SO WITH THAT, I DO WANT TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE OF WHERE WE'RE AT. AND THEN IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, AS SANDRA MENTIONED, WE HAVE OUR CONSULTANT, COLIN, AND I THINK YOU HEARD FROM HIM BEFORE, BUT WE'RE JUST GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS AS AN UPDATE REALLY QUICKLY AND HOPEFULLY NOT TAKE TOO MUCH OF YOUR TIME. SO WE DID PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW IN YOUR PACKET. IT'S A DRAFT 2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY IS STATED. DRAFT AS OF MARCH 26TH.

WE DID REVIEW THIS WITH OUR CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 30TH, AND WE DID HAVE OUR CHAIR FROM THE IMPACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE THERE AS WELL. WE HAD A COUPLE OF OPPORTUNITIES TO INTERACT WITH THE IMPACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ALONG WITH COUNCIL, AND I BELIEVE SOME OF YOU MIGHT HAVE BEEN AT THE ONE THAT WE DID HAVE. I BELIEVE IT WAS IN JANUARY, MAYBE ACTUALLY, PARDON ME, IT WAS FEBRUARY, BECAUSE IN MY NOTES HERE IT SAYS THAT WE HAD A WORK SESSION ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD, AND THERE WAS PARTICIPATION FROM THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WE HAD ABOUT THREE MEMBERS THAT WERE THAT WERE THERE. SO THIS DRAFT THAT YOU SEE HERE, IT INCLUDES MINOR EDITS. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE WERE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT, AND I THINK OUR CONSULTANT HAS DONE A REALLY GREAT JOB, IS IF YOU REMEMBER GOING TO COLLEGE AND YOU HAD TO WRITE YOUR PAPER AND YOU RESEARCHED IT AND YOU KNEW ALL OF THE ELEMENTS, AND AS YOU WROTE IT, YOU WROTE IT FROM WHAT YOU KNEW, AND IT WAS REAL. IT CAME REALLY EASY TO YOU

[00:05:03]

BECAUSE YOU DID ALL THE RESEARCH. SO ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE DONE WITH THIS PARTICULAR VERSION OF THIS STUDY IS WE'VE PUT MINOR EDITS IN TO HELP WALK THE VIEWER, WALK SOMEONE THROUGH WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND IMPACT FEES OR HAS NEVER EXPERIENCED THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH IMPACT FEES OR IMPACT FEES, STUDY ITSELF TO WALK THE VIEWER THROUGH KEY ELEMENTS OF THE CAPITAL PLANS THE STUDY UPDATES, AS WELL AS THE METHODOLOGIES. THERE'S A LOT OF MATH ON THESE PAGES, AND I'M GLAD THAT COLIN, ACTUALLY OUR CONSULTANT, LIKES TO DO MATH BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH I'M ABLE TO FOLLOW IT, IT'S IT'S A LOT OF MATH, AS YOU CAN SEE WITH THE STUDY, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, WE DID HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL, THE WORK SESSION, AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE PARKS CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE. THERE IS AN UPDATE TO THAT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT OUR PARKS AND REC DIRECTOR DID, HE TOOK OUT ONE OF THE PROJECTS, WHICH WAS AN AQUATICS SLIDE, WHICH IS CONSIDERED AN AMENITY, AND HE PUT IN A SECOND SHEET OF ICE BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT WE'RE HEARING THAT WE NEED IN THIS COMMUNITY. SO I THINK KUDOS GO OUT TO OUR PARKS AND REC DIRECTOR TO HEARING THE HEARING THE COMMUNITY AND INCORPORATING, EVEN THOUGH IT REQUIRED A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA WORK FROM OUR CONSULTANT TO HEARING THE COMMUNITY AND LOOKING AT PUTTING THAT ADDITIONAL SHEET OF ICE INTO THAT PLAN, THE POLICE VEHICLES, THERE WAS A LOT OF CONVERSATION WITH OUR IMPACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ABOUT THE POLICE VEHICLES. THE THE CONSENSUS OF THE IMPACT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WAS, IS THAT THE POLICE VEHICLES DO NOT BELONG IN THE IMPACT FEE STUDY. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS, IS THAT THEY FELT THAT THE CITY COULDN'T DEMONSTRATE HOLDING THOSE VEHICLES UP TO TEN YEARS.

AND SO CITY COUNCIL LISTENED TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. AND THOSE VEHICLES ARE NOW OUT OF THIS PARTICULAR STUDY UPDATE. THEY'RE NO LONGER INCLUDED.

THEY AT ONE POINT IN ONE OF THE DRAFTS, PROBABLY ONE OF THE ONES YOU SAW IN FEBRUARY, WE HAD TEN CATEGORIES OF DWELLING UNITS. THAT WAS ACTUALLY REVISED DOWN TO THREE. AND THE REVISED CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM SUPPORTABLE FEES, THERE'S A CATEGORY THAT'S 15 UNDER 1500, 1500 TO 2999, 3000 OR MORE SQUARE FEET. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. SO THAT WAS AN IMPROVEMENT WE HAD WITH THAT. AND THAT WAS A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH WITH OUR IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. ONE OF THE AREAS THAT THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND THE COUNCIL DID NOT COME TO CONSENSUS WITH WAS THE REMOVAL OF THE UNFINISHED BASEMENTS.

THAT'S STILL IN THE STUDY. IT'S STILL IN THE CALCULATIONS. THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, THE COUNCIL JUST FELT LIKE WE REALLY NEEDED TO MOVE FORWARD AND MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS INCLUDED. THE MAXIMUM SUPPORTED FEE FOR THIS UPDATE IS 100% FOR PARKS AND RECREATION, TRANSPORTATION, POLICE, FIRE AND EMS. OUR CURRENT STUDY IS 100% FOR STREET AND TRANSPORTATION, AND THEN 75% PARKS AND REC, POLICE, FIRE, EMS. SO THAT'S A CHANGE FOR THIS UPDATED ONE. AND THEN NONRESIDENTIAL REMAINS THE SAME 900 SQUARE 100,000 SORRY, 1000FT■!S. AND THEN THE REVISED CALCULATION OF THE NONRESIDENTIAL MAXIMUM SUPPORT FEE WAS INCLUDED IN THIS STUDY AS WELL. SO THE NOTIFICATION PROCESS AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, IT WAS UPDATED ON THIS DRAFT STUDY THAT YOU SEE HERE, MARCH 27TH. IT'S OVER 103 PAGES LONG. SO OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS A LOT OF, OF, OF, OF REVIEWING OF THE DRAFTS, BUT WE WERE ABLE TO GIVE THEM A RED LINE DRAFT, IF YOU WILL. IT SHOWED WHERE THE CHANGES HAD OCCURRED. WE DID MEET WITH THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MARCH 10TH. THAT WAS OUR LAST OFFICIAL MEETING THAT WE HAD WHERE WE GATHERED COMMENTS, AND THEN WE HAD THOSE COMMENTS AVAILABLE FOR OUR CITY COUNCIL AT THE MARCH 30TH WORK SESSION.

WE ALSO UPDATED THE CITY'S IMPACT FEE IN IDAHO FALLS WEB PAGE ON FRIDAY, THE SAME DAY THAT WE RECEIVED THE DRAFT STUDY. AND THEN FINALLY WE ATTENDED. WE HAD A FEW CITY REPRESENTATIVES ATTEND EAST EAST IDAHO HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION LUNCHEON ON THURSDAY, MARCH 12TH. HAD SOME DIALOG WITH THE DEVELOPERS IN THAT GROUP AND THAT WAS A REALLY WELL ATTENDED EVENT AS WELL AS OUR MAYOR. MAYOR BERTENSHAW ATTENDED THAT AS WELL AND WAS ABLE TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS. AND THEN WE HAD, AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, THE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ON MONDAY, MARCH 30TH. OKAY, ALIGNMENT WITH THE. THERE WE ARE. OKAY, SO THE TIMELINE. SO HERE'S WHERE WE'RE AT. WE'RE HERE THIS EVENING AND I'M VERY

[00:10:02]

PLEASED TO BE IN FRONT OF YOU THIS EVENING. THEN OUR NEXT STEP IS A PUBLIC HEARING. AS DIRECTOR SANDER MENTIONED ON THURSDAY, APRIL 23RD, IT HAS BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER.

WE PUBLISHED IT LAST FRIDAY, AND THEN WE'RE ALSO GOING TO PUBLISH IT THIS FRIDAY. WE'RE NOT REQUIRED TO DO TWO CONSECUTIVE, BUT WE'RE ONLY REQUIRED TO DO AT LEAST A 15 DAY. BUT WE REALLY WANT TO GET IT OUT THERE AS PART OF OUR COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, WE'LL LOOK AT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT STUDY, THE ORDINANCE AND PROPOSED FEE RESOLUTION. AND SO THAT'LL BE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THURSDAY, APRIL 23RD. AND THEN WITH THE PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION DATE AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF MONDAY, JUNE 1ST. AND WITH THAT, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME OR FOR OUR CONSULTANT WHO'S ONLINE RIGHT NOW? DOES THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR PAM? OKAY, I HAVE ONE. YOU PROBABLY WENT OVER IT. IS THIS THE. I FEEL LIKE WE. YEAH, WE WERE HERE A FEW MONTHS AGO. IS THE REASON WE'RE BACK AT IT AGAIN IS JUST SIMPLY BECAUSE CITY COUNCIL FELT THAT THEY NEEDED TO REWORK IT BEFORE IT WAS PASSED. AND SO IT HAD TO GET SOME REVISIONS. IS THAT WHY IT'S BACK AT IT IN FRONT OF US AGAIN? BECAUSE THINGS CHANGED.

IS THAT OR AM I WRONG? NO, COMMISSIONER, YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. ONE OF THE ITEMS WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL, WE ACTUALLY PROVIDED THE DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES THAT WE HAD. I BELIEVE IT WAS ON NOVEMBER 5TH, NOVEMBER 7TH. AND AND BASED ON THAT REVIEW, IN CONSULTATION WITH OUR MAYOR, WE WENT BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND HAD SOME CONVERSATIONS, SOME MORE IN-DEPTH CONVERSATIONS WITH OUR MP ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AS WELL AS A COUPLE OF WORK SESSIONS. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I THINK WE REALLY DID WELL JUST RECENTLY WAS ACTUALLY GIVE THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTERACT WITH COUNCIL IN A WORK SESSION ENVIRONMENT. THEY HAD TWO OPPORTUNITIES FOR THAT, AND I THINK THAT THAT REALLY HELPED SOLIDIFY THE VOICES THAT WERE THAT AT ONE POINT WERE FEELING LIKE THEY WEREN'T BEING HEARD. AND SO THAT'S THAT WAS A GOOD PROCESS FOR US TO KIND OF REGROUP AND START OVER AGAIN, NOT START OVER ALL THE WAY, BUT JUST HAVING MORE DIALOG AND PARTICIPATION. RIGHT. OKAY. MAKES SENSE. I CAN'T REMEMBER IF WE HAD PASSED IT OR NOT, BUT IT'S GOOD THAT IT'S COMING BACK TO HER ANYWAY. JUST I LIKE, I LIKE TO SEE THAT IT'S BEEN ACTUALLY TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. AND, AND TO ADD ON THAT, COMMISSIONER, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK THAT THIS COMMISSION GAVE US AS WELL, BECAUSE WE WERE ABLE TO ARTICULATE THAT TO THE COUNCIL. AND I THINK THAT THAT WAS REALLY HELPFUL TO SAY THAT PERHAPS WE NEED TO SPEND MORE TIME AND MORE PARTICIPATION, NOT ONLY FOR THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, BUT ALSO FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.

THAT'S GREAT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER SCOTT, HAVE YOU SORT OF IMPLIED, OR AT LEAST I GATHERED, THAT THERE'S SOME DISCUSSION STILL ABOUT THE UNFINISHED BASEMENT. WHAT IS.

IS THAT STILL UNDER DISCUSSION AT ALL? COMMISSIONER SCOTT? NO, THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE UNFINISHED BASEMENT AND A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, FULLY THE ADVISORY, THE CONSENSUS FROM THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WAS THEY WERE NOT RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL INCLUDE THE UNFINISHED BASEMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE. AFTER HAVING A COUPLE OF CONVERSATIONS AT WORK SESSION WITH THE ADVISORY IMPACT ADVISORY CHAIR AND A COUPLE OF THE OTHER MEMBERS DURING THOSE WORK SESSIONS, COUNCIL HAS OPTED NOT TO TAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION FROM THE IMPACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE STUDY AS IT IS, INCLUDES THE UNFINISHED BASEMENTS. AND THE GOAL FOR THAT IS JUST REAL QUICKLY, IF I MAY JUST SPEND A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME, OUR COUNCIL PRESIDENT WAS VERY CLEAR. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRANCIS WAS VERY CLEAR THAT THE IMPACT HE SHOULD BE A ONE TIME FEE. AND THE CONCERN WAS, IS IF WE JUST DIDN'T PUT EVERYTHING TOGETHER AT ONE TIME, THAT THERE MAY BE, YOU KNOW, THE INTENT THAT THAT PEOPLE WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK AND PAY ADDITIONAL AN ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEE FOR THEIR TO FINISH THEIR BASEMENT. AND SO THE COUNCIL FELT THAT THE CLEANEST WAY IS JUST TO INCLUDE THE UNFINISHED BASEMENTS. AND THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS AWARE OF THAT, THAT THAT THAT WAS THEY DID NOT TAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION. BUT THERE'S OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE COUNCIL DID TAKE ON BEHALF OF THE IMPACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. OKAY. THANK YOU. I WAS AT THAT COUNCIL MEETING. I COUNCILMAN FRANCIS OBJECTIONS TO IT. THAT'S WHY I WAS CURIOUS IF THERE YOU KNOW, IF THIS WAS SETTLED THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN IN THIS PLAN. SO TO CLARIFY, WE DID GET COUNCIL DIRECTION FROM

[00:15:01]

STAFF FROM CITY COUNCIL AT THAT WORK SESSION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE STUDY, WITH THE UNFINISHED BASEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS WORK TO INCLUDE THOSE IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. OKAY.

JUST ONE SUGGESTION THAT I WOULD MAKE. AND BY THE WAY, I COMMEND EVERYONE THAT'S BEEN INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS. I'M REALLY IMPRESSED WITH THE LEVEL OF INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY, FROM THE COMMITTEE, FROM THE COUNCIL MEMBERS, FROM THE STAFF. JUST EXCELLENT. OUTSTANDING.

ONE SUGGESTION THAT I WOULD MAKE THE NEXT GO ROUND. HEAVEN FORBID. WHEN WE BRING IT BACK FOR A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF WE COULD HAVE A REDLINE COPY SO THAT WE CAN SEE THE CHANGES THAT WERE MADE, AND THAT WAY IT'S A LOT EASIER TO FOCUS IN ON THE CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE AND, AND THEN FOCUS THE DISCUSSION ON THOSE CHANGES. SO JUST ONE SUGGESTION IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU. YEAH. JUST TO ECHO IT, I AGREE WITH THAT AS WELL. JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE OUR PACKET AND I WAS HAVING A HARD TIME FULLY UNDERSTANDING WHAT CHANGED BETWEEN NOW AND LAST TIME. BUT COMMISSIONER MEEHAN, THANK YOU. I'LL ECHO COMMISSIONER STEWART.

I THINK THE. PLAN THAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS VERY THOROUGH AND VERY WELL PREPARED. SO THANKS FOR THAT. I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS. I'M ON PAGE 13. THERE'S FIGURE SIX. IT'S THE TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL USES. I UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE BREAKING THESE UP BY THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. I THINK THAT MAKES A GREAT SENSE TO ME. I'M CURIOUS JUST HOW YOUR TEAM AND OUR CONSULTANT ARRIVED AT THE DIFFERENT NUMBERS FOR RETAIL, OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL, INSTITUTIONAL. I LOOK AT THESE AND I SEE RETAIL, YOU KNOW, FIRE EMS AT NEARLY TEN TIMES AN INDUSTRIAL USE. AND I WONDER WHETHER THAT'S BASED ON WHAT WE THINK THEY'RE GOING TO DEMAND OF THOSE SERVICES OR WHAT. YEAH. COMMISSIONER, IF I MAY, I WILL HAVE OUR CONSULTANT ANSWER THAT QUESTION FOR YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, YES. YEAH. YEAH. SO OFFICIAL ADVICE JUST FOR THE RECORD. 999 WEST MAIN STREET, BOISE, IDAHO. AND THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, COMMISSIONER. WE WE LOOK AT WHAT WE CALL SORT OF DEMAND FACTORS OR SERVICE UNITS THAT, THAT COME FROM THOSE DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENT TYPES. AND SO LIKE THE TRANSPORTATION FEE IS CALCULATED BASED ON TRIP GENERATION RATES PER 1000FT■S. THE FIRE FEES BASED ON THE ACTUAL CALLS GOING TO THOSE LOCATIONS ANNUALLY. AND THAT GETS TO SORT OF THE, THE PROPORTIONALITY OF THE IMPACT FEES. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S, YOU KNOW, ROUGHLY OR, YOU KNOW, ACCURATELY CAPTURING THE DEMAND FROM THOSE DIFFERENT LAND USES. THANK YOU. DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. I THINK YOU'RE YOU GUYS ARE GOOD FOR NOW. SO NOW I'M GOING TO GO TO SINCE YOU'RE ALSO CITY STAFF, I GUESS YOU'RE BOTH. SO NOW I'M GOING TO GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THE MEETING. SO I'M GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS, JUST COME UP. KEEP YOUR COMMENTS SOMEWHAT BRIEF. GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS JUST FOR THE RECORD. AND. YEAH, WE'LL GO FROM THERE. THANK YOU. SAYING WE DON'T HAVE ANY TAKERS. I AM GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT IT AMONGST OURSELVES. I WILL START US OFF BY JUST SAYING, I JUST REALLY APPRECIATE THAT THIS WASN'T JUST RUBBER STAMPED THROUGH. I REMEMBER HAVING A LOT OF CONCERNS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.

AND SO I'M HAPPY, ESPECIALLY THE FACT THAT THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE HADN'T FELT LIKE THEY HAD MUCH SAY IN IT. AND SO I DO LIKE THAT. THEY'VE HAD PLENTY OF SAY IN IT. NOW.

THEY WENT IN, YOU KNOW, CITY COUNCIL HAS REALLY WORKED WITH THIS. I YOU KNOW, WE SAW THAT FIRSTHAND. SO I'M HAPPY THAT WE'RE SEEING THIS A SECOND TIME, ESSENTIALLY, BECAUSE IT GOES TO SHOW THAT WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY ACTUALLY DOES MATTER. SO. I'LL AGREE WITH THAT. I THINK A NUMBER OF THE THINGS THAT I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT IN THE, IN THE VERSION WE SAW A FEW MONTHS AGO WERE ADDRESSED, I KNOW THAT CITY COUNCIL'S CONCERNS SEEM LIKE THEY'VE BEEN ADDRESSED HERE TOO. I THINK WE ALL SAW THE TABLE OF RESIDENTIAL SIZES BEFORE AND FOUND IT TO BE

[00:20:01]

OVERWHELMING AND CONFUSING. AND I THINK THREE CLASSIFICATIONS INSTEAD OF TEN IS A REALLY GOOD POINT TO BE AT. I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT ONE OF THOSE IS UNDER 1500 SQUARE FEET, AND THAT WE ARE INCENTIVIZING NEW STARTER HOME DEVELOPMENT. I THINK THAT'S GREAT. I KNOW THE ITEM ON CLIMATE CONTROL, SQUARE FOOTAGE, WAS CONTROVERSIAL. I'M AMONG THOSE WHO THINKS IT'S A GOOD THING THAT IT'S INCLUDED HERE. I THINK WHEN YOU BUY A HOME, YOU SHOULD KNOW WHAT YOU'RE GETTING AND WHAT IT'S GOING TO COST YOU TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS ON THAT HOME. AND I DON'T LIKE THE IDEA OF HIDDEN FEES FROM THE CITY LATER ON, SO I'M GLAD TO SEE IT MORE UPFRONT NOW. THE CHANGES TO THE PARK'S PLAN LOOK GREAT TO ME. YOU KNOW, JUST SEEING WHAT'S PLANNED FOR THAT AREA DOWN BY SANDY DOWNS AND WHAT'S IN THE SCHEDULE IS GOING TO BE A REALLY TREMENDOUS ASSET FOR THE CITY. WHEN THAT IS DEVELOPED, THERE'S SOCCER FIELDS, BASEBALL SOFTBALL FIELDS. THERE'S A WALKING TRAIL, THERE'S A WATER FEATURE. THERE'S A LOT OF REALLY GREAT STUFF PLANNED FOR THAT. I THINK THAT ALLEVIATES NOT JUST SOME OF THE CONCERNS ON WHAT THE MONEY IN THIS FEE IS GOING TOWARDS, BUT ALSO SOME OF THE CONCERNS WE'VE HEARD FROM THE COMMUNITY ON DEVELOPMENT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE CITY AND HAVING AMENITIES DOWN THERE. SO I THINK THAT'S GREAT. AND ALSO GLAD TO SEE THE POLICE CRUISERS REMOVED WHEN WE COULDN'T DEMONSTRATE THAT WE WERE ACTUALLY GOING TO KEEP THEM FOR TEN YEARS. SO OVERALL, I'M REALLY, REALLY HAPPY TO SEE THE CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE DOCUMENT SINCE THE LAST VERSION WE SAW. SO THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? NO. OH, COMMISSIONER. SCOTLAND. OKAY, JUST JUST A COMMENT THAT WHENEVER WE START PULLING NUMBERS OUT AND PUTTING THEM DOWN ON PAPER, AND WHAT I'VE SEEN IN, IN PREVIOUS WORK IS THEY TEND TO BECOME SORT OF SET IN STONE JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY CAME UP WITH A NUMBER. AND YOU CAN ALWAYS FIND REASONS TO NITPICK ON THOSE NUMBERS. AND THERE ARE SOME OF THESE THAT I MIGHT NITPICK WITH. BUT OVERALL, I THINK THIS IS REALLY AN AMAZING DOCUMENT. I THINK WHAT'S BEEN DONE IN THIS IS REALLY TO BE COMMENDED. YES. OKAY. WELL, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. PERFECT. I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACCEPT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY, AS AMENDED AND UPDATED. PERFECT.

WOULD ANYONE LIKE ME TO SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT BEAT YOU. BEAT YOU? GREAT. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE. COMMISSIONER, OFTEN I CANCER, I MEAN, I I I, I SAW I PARKER I MOTION PASSED PERFECT. OKAY. WELL, PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER ONE DONE. SO NOW WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM

[2. ANX26-002: Annexation and Initial Zoning of R3, Multiple Dwelling Residential for approximately 11.154 acres in the SE ¼ of Section 5, Township 1 North, Range 38 East. Located north of E 65th South, east of S 11th East, south of E 49th South, and west of S 15th East.]

NUMBER TWO OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, WHICH IS THE ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF R3 FOR JUST RIGHT THERE ON 15TH EAST. SO DO WE HAVE A APPLICANT? YEAH. NOPE. ALL RIGHT. THEN I GUESS WE CAN GO TO CITY STAFF. ALL RIGHT. SO TONIGHT THIS IS ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF R3 MULTIPLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL. IT IS LOCATED ON SOUTH 15TH EAST AND SOUTH OF EAST 49TH SOUTH. SO THIS IS. SO TONIGHT IT IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION INITIAL ZONING OF R3 TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THIS PROPERTY ANNEXATION WAS REQUESTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND IT IS IN THE AREA OF IMPACT. AND YOU CAN SEE HERE IT BORDERS THE CITY LIMITS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. SO THE PROPOSED ZONE IS R3. THERE IS ADJACENT TO R3, WHICH IS GOING TO BE THE GROUND. THE R3 HAS THE BLUE, SO THERE'S R3 AND R3 TO THE NORTH. SO THE R3 IS ADJACENT TO IT. THIS AREA IS ALSO IN THE GENERAL URBAN TRANSECT OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND SO THE R3 ZONE IS GOING TO PROVIDE A RESIDENTIAL ZONE, WHICH IS CHARACTERIZED BY A VARIETY OF DWELLING TYPES WITH A DENSER RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT. YOU CAN ALSO SEE THAT THIS ANNEXATION WILL INCLUDE THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG SOUTH EAST. SOUTH 15TH EAST IS A MINOR ARTERIAL. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE CITY. THIS PARCEL IS CONTIGUOUS CITY LIMITS TO THE NORTH AND STAFF HAS FOUND THAT IT MET THE. CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN AND THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF R3. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? CAN. OKAY, NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND DO THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM, THE SAME AS LAST TIME. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND WE'LL

[00:25:06]

GO FROM THERE. SO I'M GOING TO OFFICIALLY OPEN IT. LET'S SEE. WE HAVE NO TAKERS. I'M GOING TO NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM AND TALK ABOUT AMONGST THE COMMISSION. SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD TO ME CONSIDERING WE DON'T HAVE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE OR EVEN AN APPLICANT. YOU MUST FEEL PRETTY CONFIDENT IN IT. SO IT SEEMS STRAIGHTFORWARD TO ME.

SO ANYONE DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO SAY. I'D. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION? OKAY, I MOVE THAT THE COMMISSION. RECOMMENDED ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION. INITIAL ZONING OF R3, MULTIPLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS PROPERTY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, IS THERE A SECOND? SECONDED. PERFECT. THANK YOU. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL, PLEASE. COMMISSIONER OGDEN. HI. SCOTT HANSON. I MEAN, I, I, I, I STORE I HARVARD A PERFECT THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'RE NOW GOING

[3. ANX26-003: Annexation and Initial Zoning of LC, Limited Commercial for approximately 7.692 acres Part of the SW ¼ of Section 25, Township 2 North, Range 37 East. Located north of W Sunnyside Road, east of Snake River Parkway, south of Event Center Drive, and west of Milligan Road.]

TO GO TO PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER THREE, WHICH IS THE ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING OF LC LIMITED COMMERCIAL. THEY'RE JUST IN SNAKE RIVER LANDING. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? WE'LL HEAR FROM CITY STAFF. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS ONE IS ANOTHER ANNEXATION ZONING. THIS ONE IS LC LIMITED COMMERCIAL WITH THE AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE OF CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS ONE YES IS SNAKE RIVER LANDING. THIS WAS ALSO REQUESTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS ONE IS ALSO IN THE AREA OF IMPACT. AND IT'S CONTIGUOUS TO CITY LIMITS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES. THE ZONING AROUND IS LC. YOU DO SEE AN INDUSTRIAL NEXT TO IT. WHEN THE REQUEST WAS PROPOSED, IT WAS DISCUSSED FOR LC. JUST BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY IT'S MOVING. WE'RE NOT SEEING INDUSTRIAL BY THE RIVER ANYMORE. SO THAT LC REQUEST THERE IS REALLY AS AS IT CONTINUES TO DEVELOP, THAT WOULD BE A BETTER SUITED ZONE, EVEN THOUGH YOU DO SEE THE INDUSTRIAL NEXT TO IT.

THIS ONE DOES HAVE THE CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT ZONE. AND AGAIN, I PUT IN YOUR STAFF REPORTS KIND OF THAT THAT ONE SECTION WHERE ESSENTIALLY IT DOESN'T HAVE A SEPARATE USE TABLE, IT'S JUST GOING TO HAVE MAYBE A COUPLE EXTRA REQUIREMENTS IF IT MEETS THOSE REQUIREMENTS FOR IT. THIS PROPERTY IS ABOUT 7.692 ACRES. IT IS A COUNTY ENCLAVE IN THE LC ZONE. IT'S GOING TO BE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL. AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE SEEING IN THIS AREA, IT'S ALSO THE MIXED USE CENTERS AND CORRIDORS TRANSECT. SO THE LC ALSO ALIGNS WITH THAT. THIS ONE'S PRETTY SIMPLE AGAIN. AND SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ANNEXATION AND THE APPLICATION. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING CODE AND THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION INITIAL ZONING. OKAY, GREAT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? MR. MAYOR? BASED ON THE COLORED MAP THAT WE HAVE, AND THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT IT IS AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE TO THE EAST, BECAUSE SOMETIMES THOSE GRAY ONES CAN BE TOUGH TO TELL ON THE ON THE COLORED MAP, WHETHER THAT'S AN ENCLAVE OR NOT. SO THANK YOU. ARE WE MISSING AN OPPORTUNITY TO ANNEX MILLIGAN ROAD ALONG HERE AS WE TAKE THIS PROPERTY INTO THE CITY? IT'S ALREADY BEEN ANNEXED. IT IS OKAY. OKAY. EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT COLORED. YEAH. RIGHT AWAYS ARE NOT COLORED. PERFECT. THANK YOU. THAT'S MY ONLY QUESTION. SO THEN WHY IS IT COLORED NORTH OF THAT ON MILLIGAN? MILLIGAN GOES ALL THE WAY THROUGH. WHAT? I'M JUST BECAUSE IT'S RIGHT AWAYS AREN'T COLORED THAT WAY. RIGHT. BUT IT'S STILL A RIGHT OF WAY. SO THAT PART MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN DEDICATED YET. GOT IT. OKAY. THANK YOU. I PROMISE I'M NOT TRYING TO BE THE SMART KID IN CLASS. I'M GENUINELY JUST CURIOUS. SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, PERFECT. OKAY, SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO DO THE PUBLIC HEARING. DITTO AS THE OTHER TWO.

SO I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SEE, WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE FOR THAT. I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY? NOPE. OKAY. SWEET. WELL, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION? I'LL MOVE. COMMISSIONER, I MOVE THAT WE ANNEX AND MOVE THAT WE APPROVED THE ANNEXATION OF 7.692 ACRES, PART OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25

[00:30:06]

TN2R 37 E. INITIAL ZONING OF LC LIMITED COMMERCIAL AND AIRPORT OVERLAY OF CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT. PERFECT. SECOND. GREAT. THANK YOU. WE WERE ALSO. CAN I JUST ASK A QUESTION? IS IT A RECOMMENDATION OR IS IT APPROVAL? I DID CATCH THAT, BUT I JUST DIDN'T KNOW FOR SURE.

YEAH. YOU SAID APPROVAL. IT IS A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. MY APOLOGIES. I WAS THINKING AS AN ANNEXATION, IT WAS OURS TO APPROVE THAT WE RECOMMENDED IT. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION. THANK YOU. SECONDED. IT. THANK YOU, MR. SCOTT. SCOTT.

OGDEN, I GOT A PANTHER. I MEAN, I, I, I, I STORE I I PERFECT, OKAY, THE EASIEST THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS WE'VE EVER HAD. SO I, YEAH, I WAS EXPECTING THAT TO TAKE AN HOUR. NOT NOT GOING TO

[4. PLT26-004: Final Plat for Stillwater Apartments. Part of the SW ¼ of Section 7, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of W Anderson Street, east of US Hwy 20, south of Science Center Drive, and west of N Boulevard.]

LIE. SO ANYWAY, SO NOW WE'RE ON TO THE BUSINESS SECTION OF THE AGENDA. SO FIRST WE'RE GOING TO DO THE FINAL PLAT FOR STILLWATER APARTMENTS. WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR THAT. YES.

FINALLY AN APPLICANT. THANKS FOR COMING. I'M MIXING WITH H L 101 SOUTH PARK AVENUE. THIS IS JUST A SINGLE LOT. FINAL PLAT. IT'S NORTH OF ANDERSON STREET, KIND OF SOUTH OF SCIENCE CENTER DRIVE. THERE'S REALLY NOT MUCH TO THIS. WE DO HAVE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS IN PLACE FOR CONTINUITY TO THE REMAINING UNDEVELOPED LAND, AS WELL AS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS.

AND THEN THERE IS ALSO A PEW AROUND THE OUTSIDE OF THE LOT LINE FOR UTILITIES. BUT AS FAR AS THAT, THAT'S PRETTY MUCH ALL THERE IS TO IT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I HAVE JUST ONE QUICK QUESTION. ARE THOSE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS BEING RECORDED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER YET? I BELIEVE THEY ARE ON THE PLAT. I DON'T I'M NOT SURE IF THEY'VE BEEN. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. GO AHEAD. OH YEAH. I BELIEVE THEY ARE RECORDED ON THE PLAT HERE THAT WE HAVE IN OUR PACKET BECAUSE. OH YEAH. I THINK WE'RE GOOD. THANK YOU. SWEET. OKAY, SO NOW WE'LL HEAR FROM CITY STAFF. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER THE 630 TIMESLOT. IT'S WORKING GREAT.

THIS IS A VERY SIMPLE, STRAIGHTFORWARD SINGLE PLOT, SINGLE LOT PLAT. AND THE APPLICANT COVERED MOST EVERYTHING I WOULD YOU DO SEE, AND I KNOW YOU'RE POINTING OUT THAT CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS, THOSE THAT ARE EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. SO THERE'S ONE ON THAT EAST BORDER. AND THEN THERE'S ALSO ONE ON THE THE WEST SIDE AS WELL. AND YOU CAN SEE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PLAT, AND I APOLOGIZE IF IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT SMALL ON YOURS, BUT THERE IS AN EXISTING INSTRUMENT NUMBER AND THE DATE OF THE RECORDING. SO THE ONES, THE ONES ON THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT HAVE BEEN RECORDED IN OUR IN PLACE, THE ONES THAT ARE SHOWING ON THE PLAT IN FRONT OF YOU. THOSE WILL GET ENACTED AT THE TIME OF THE PLAT RECORDING. AND THOSE. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THOSE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS ALSO EXTEND TO THE EXTENTS OF THE PROPERTY. THE INTENT OF THAT IS TO PROVIDE FUTURE CROSS ACCESS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY, AS IT'S ALSO UNDEVELOPED. THIS PROPERTY IS UNIQUELY SITUATED.

THERE IS NO DIRECT ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 20 OR TO SCIENCE CENTER DRIVE BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY THERE OF THE OFF RAMP. AND THEN WE DO JUST HAVE SOME PICTURES OF THE PROPERTY. WEIRD. IN IDAHO FALLS, THIS PROPERTY ACTUALLY HAS TOPOGRAPHY, WHICH YOU DON'T SEE A LOT OF.

UNFORTUNATELY, THE REASON THERE'S TOPOGRAPHY IS BECAUSE OF LAVA IN THE AREA, SO IT WILL BE DIFFICULT AND CHALLENGING TO DEVELOP. SO THEY'RE PICKING OUT THOSE PIECES THAT MAKE THE MOST SENSE. BUT WITH THAT, I WOULD TRY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. IF YOU HAVE ANY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR SAM? NOPE. OKAY. SWEET. SINCE THERE'S NO PUBLIC HEARING, EXCUSE ME, WE'LL GO

[00:35:07]

AHEAD AND DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY CONCERNS, QUESTIONS OR WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? JUST A QUICK COMMENT FOR US HISTORICAL BUFFS. THIS AREA USED TO BE A MARSHY LAKE. MANY, MANY YEARS AGO.

WE'VE TOTALLY LOST THAT CONCEPT. BUT IF YOU GO OUT AND LOOK AT IT, YOU CAN STILL SEE THE REMNANTS OF THAT LAKE. YOU KIND OF SEE IT ON THE OUTLINE, LIKE THE CURVE. INTERESTING. THANK YOU. WELL, WITH THAT, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? SURE. OKAY. COMMISSIONER, I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL OR THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR STILLWATER APARTMENTS TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. ANYONE LIKE TO. SECOND, SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER OGDEN. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE. COMMISSIONER OGDEN. HI, SCOTT.

HI. I MEAN, I, I, I STORE, I MOTION PASSES. PERFECT. OKAY. NOW WE'RE GOING TO DO THE FIFTH

[5. PLT26-006: Final Plat for Swire Pacific Division No. 1. NW ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 37 East. Located north of W 65th South, east of S Yellowstone Highway, south of Professional Way, and west of the Butte Arm Canal.]

ITEM, WHICH IS FINAL PLAT FOR SWIRE PACIFIC DIVISION. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? YEAH.

PERFECT. LET'S. HELLO, I'M NICK HANSEN ARCHITECTS. MY 990 JOHN ADAMS PARKWAY, IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO. THIS IS SO OUR CLIENT IS LOOKING TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY. AND THIS IS JUST A PLAT TO RECORD THE EASEMENTS AND EMPLOYEE. THAT'S THAT'S THE EXTENT OF THAT PLAT. SO OKAY.

SORRY. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I THINK YOU'RE. THANKS FOR COMING.

WE'LL HEAR FROM. THE APPLICANT BEING A LITTLE MODEST THIS THIS PROPERTY IS WAS RECENTLY ANNEXED AND IS JUST A SINGLE PARCEL AND THEREFORE DOESN'T NEED TO PLAT. THE APPLICANT IS DOING THE PLANNING, AS WAS INDICATED, TO ESTABLISH THE EASEMENTS AND DEDICATE RIGHT OF WAY. STAFF WOULD ALWAYS RECOMMEND THAT THIS IS THE CLEANEST AND BEST WAY TO MOVE FORWARD. BUT AGAIN, THEY DON'T HAVE TO. SO WE'RE JUST GLAD THAT THEY'RE THEY'RE CHOOSING TO DO THAT. IT'LL MAKE THINGS EASIER AS WE PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL. WE ARE. I ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT. WE ARE IN THE SOUTH OF TOWN ISH. SOUTH KEEPS KIND OF GROWING. SO SOUTH ISH NEAR BUSH AND THE SILOS THERE, IF YOU CAN KIND OF PICTURE THAT ALONG 15TH WEST. SO WE ARE IN INDUSTRIAL PART OF TOWN. 15TH WEST IS A DESIGNATED AS A MINOR ARTERIAL. SO THE LONG TERM BUILD OUT OF THAT ROAD WILL BE TO MANAGE THE INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC FOR BOTH EMPLOYEES AND TRUCKS AND OTHER THINGS AS WELL. THE PLAT HAS INDICATED IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. IT'S JUST A SINGLE LOT, BUT DOES ESTABLISH THOSE EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY. THE AND THEN JUST MOVING FORWARD, KIND OF LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY, THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, LARGELY. KIND OF OPEN AREA. THERE ARE SOME RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS BOTH TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH, NOT SOMETHING THAT WILL AFFECT THE THE PLAT. BUT AS WE MOVE FORWARD TO SITE DEVELOPMENT, THE ZONING CODE HAS BUILT INTO IT BUFFERS THAT ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY'RE ALREADY WORKING THROUGH AND HAVE ALREADY ESTABLISHED, BOTH WITH LANDSCAPING AND FENCING. SO THOSE RESIDENCES SHOULD BE WELL BUFFERED FROM THE THE NEW USER THERE ON THE SITE. BUT WITH THAT, I'D ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROJECT QUESTIONS.

NOPE. OKAY. WITH THAT. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS. CONCERNS. NOPE. OKAY. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL DO IT. OKAY. COMMISSIONER SCOTT, I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR SMART PACIFIC DIVISION. NUMBER ONE, THE MAYOR'S ENDORSEMENT. OKAY.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? THANK YOU. LET'S DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE, PLEASE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER

[00:40:03]

OGDEN, I GOT A PANTHER. I MEAN, I, I I I I PARKER, I MOTION PASSES. PERFECT. OKAY, ON TO

[6. PLT25-004: Final Plat Extension for Pacific Steel Commercial Plaza. SE ¼ of Section 7, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of E Anderson Street, east of N Boulevard, south of Technology Drive, and west of Boge Avenue.]

OUR FINAL ITEM OF THE AGENDA, WHICH IS THE FINAL PLAT EXTENSION FOR PACIFIC STEEL COMMERCIAL PLAZA. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR THIS? NOPE. OKAY. WE'LL HEAR FROM CITY. THANK YOU.

COMMISSION AGAIN WHERE THIS IS AN EXTENSION. WE DON'T TYPICALLY REQUEST THE APPLICANT BE IN PRESENT. BUT THIS PLAT CAME TO YOU ALMOST A YEAR AGO. AND THE APPLICANT HAS CONTINUALLY BEEN WORKING ON THE PLAT. THIS IS PACIFIC STILL. WE'RE IN THE INDUSTRIAL TOWN JUST NORTH OF ANDERSON, THEREBY IDAHO STILL. OR MAYBE YOU KNOW WHERE THE BREAD STORE IS HEADED IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. I KNOW WHERE THE BREAD STORE IS, THE AREA AROUND IT'S INDUSTRIAL.

THE SUBDIVISION PLAT IS JUST TWO LOTS. THE PROPERTY CAME BEFORE YOU LAST MAY, AND THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN CONTINUALLY WORKING ON THE PROJECT, TRYING TO MOVE THINGS FORWARD. AS YOU SEE IN YOUR MEMO THERE, THEY RUN INTO SOME DIFFERENT FINANCIAL CHALLENGES THAT HAVE KIND OF SLOWED THE PROCESS FOR THEM, BUT THEY'RE HOPING TO CONTINUE IT, AND THEY WERE ACTUALLY LOOKING FORWARD FOR IT TO BE TO CITY COUNCIL IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS. BUT BECAUSE WE'RE RUNNING UP ON THAT YEAR DEADLINE, WE TYPICALLY BRING IT BACK TO YOU AND WE JUST DIDN'T WANT A CHANCE, YOU KNOW, HAVING TO START OVER AND DO ALL OF THAT.

SO WE THOUGHT WE WOULD WE'D GO AHEAD AND PROCEED WITH THAT. NOTHING HAS CHANGED REGARDING THE PLAT SINCE YOU SAW IT LAST A YEAR AGO, THE SAYING NOTHING HAS CHANGED IN CITY CODE WITH OUR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, OUR ZONING ORDINANCE, THAT IS SOMETHING WE WOULD NEED TO ADDRESS OR LOOK AT AGAIN TONIGHT. STAFF WOULD CONTINUE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND RECOMMEND THE EXTENSION WITH THEIR QUESTIONS. I TRY TO ANSWER THEM ANY QUESTIONS? NOPE.

I THINK WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? CONCERNS? NOPE. OKAY. WOULD ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? WHAT? ABOUT NOTHING? OKAY, PERFECT. ARE WE RECOMMENDING OR APPROVING ON THIS ONE? RECOMMENDED. THANK YOU. CARRIE, I MOVE THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT EXTENSION FOR PACIFIC STEEL COMMERCIAL PLAZA. PERFECT.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER SCOTT. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE, PLEASE. COMMISSIONER. SCOTT, HI, MEAN, I, I, I. HI, HI HI. MOTION PASSED. PERFECT. WELL, WITH THAT, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. YES, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THAT. WE ASK CITY STAFF TO GIVE US MORE MEETINGS LIKE THIS IN THE FUTURE. YEAH. SECOND, ABSOLUTELY. OUR CHAIRMAN IS GETTING VERY EFFICIENT. YEAH, YEAH, I'M JUST GETTING EFFICIENT OR. YEAH, YEAH. I WONDER IF THE 630 TIME MAYBE IS ONE. NO ONE SHOWED UP AT SEVEN. SO I JUST CAME. SO THAT'S GREAT.

[Additional Item]

THANK YOU EVERYONE. I DO HAVE A QUESTION WITH THE CHANGE. THERE'S SOME NEW HIGH PROFILE BILLS THAT WERE PASSED WITH THE IDAHO STATE LEGISLATURE CONCERNING HOUSING. COULD YOU, I GUESS, TELL US MORE ABOUT THOSE OR ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TRAINING ON THOSE OR ARE LIKE, WHAT'S THAT GOING TO LOOK LIKE? HOW DOES THAT AFFECT US AND YOU GUYS? AND HOW MUCH DO WE NEED TO WORRY ABOUT? WELL, WE'RE ALL BEEN HOLDING QUESTION. WE'VE ALL BEEN HOLDING OUR BREATH FOR A LITTLE BIT. AND NOW THAT THINGS ARE DONE, WE'RE TRYING TO SEE WHERE THINGS SETTLE.

STAFF IS REVIEWING THE BILLS. SOME OF THE BILLS HAVE DIFFERENT TIMETABLES. SOME REQUIRE US TO BE IN COMPLIANCE BY OCTOBER, OTHERS BY JANUARY. SO YOU WILL SHORTLY BE SEEING SOME ORDINANCE CHANGES COMING FORWARD TO TRY TO ADDRESS THAT. PRIOR TO YOU SEEING SOME ORDINANCE CHANGES COMING TO YOU. MY ASSUMPTION IS ON A COUPLE OF THE BILLS, ESPECIALLY THE STARTER HOME SUBDIVISION. ONE, THAT ONE'S INTERESTING. I THINK THERE'S SOME EASY FIXES FOR US IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADDRESS IT. I DON'T THINK THERE WILL BE MUCH IN THE CHANGES THOUGH. CHALLENGE. I THINK THAT WE HAVE AND NEEDS TO PROBABLY DO A WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL AND GET A LITTLE BIT OF DIRECTION. THAT ONE LIMITS THE LOT SIZE. WE'RE ALREADY SORT OF

[00:45:03]