[1. Call to Order]
[00:00:06]
SORRY. ALRIGHTY. WELL, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND START THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING FOR MARCH 3RD, 2026. THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT. FIRST THING WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER IS
[2.I. Minutes: February 03, 2026]
THE MINUTES. DID EVERYONE HAVE A CHANCE TO LOOK AT THE MINUTES? ANY CHANGES ARE ALL GOOD THERE OKAY PERFECT. WELL I'D LIKE IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES. MINUTES BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. DOES ANYONE WANT TO SECOND THAT SECOND? PERFECT.WE'LL JUST DO A. VOICE VOTE. SO FOR ALL THOSE WHO APPROVE, THE MINUTES SAY I, I. ALL RIGHT. WE ARE. YOU'VE ANNOUNCED IT. OKAY. PERFECT. SO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ITEM NUMBER TWO
[3.II. ANX25-006]
FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANNEXATION AND INITIAL ZONING. ZONING OF I AND M FOR PROPERTY OFF OF WOODRUFF THERE. SO DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? PERFECT. AND AND JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. THANK YOU. DON'T BREAK DON'T BREAK THE MIC ON. SCREEN IS ON. THERE YOU GO. TALK TO MY DAUGHTER. BEFORE THIS, WHEN SHE WAS GOING THROUGH DRIVER'S ED CARITAS GO AND STUFF LIKE ENGINEERING AT 2295 NORTH HOLSTON HIGHWAY IN SUITE SIX, REPRESENTING WHO WAS ON THIS PROPERTY. SO WE BELIEVE THIS IS FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD AND BASIC WITH WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO REQUEST FOR THE ANNEXATION TONIGHT WITH THE IN ONE. OBVIOUSLY IT'S OVER IN THE AREA WHERE YOU SEE A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING TYPE USES. AND SO THE USE THAT IS BEING REQUESTED AND THE PLAN TO GO THERE FITS WITHIN THAT. I AM ZONING DESIGNATION IS AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S JUST NORTH OF YELLOWSTONE HIGHWAY AND NORTH OF NORTH 15TH, EAST WEST OF THE ANDERSON BUSINESS PARK. THAT'S ALL THAT'S GOT CITY UTILITIES AND A PORTION OF IT WITH SEWER AND THE NEW FIRE STATION. I THINK THIS IS GOOD WORK, RIGHT? NO, DON'T PUT IT THAT WAY. NEED A WHOLE LOT. THAT. SO USUALLY IT'S GOT THE WHOLE AREA WHICH WHAT DID YOU PUSH THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD JUST GETS DELAYED. HOLD IT. SO ANYWAY, THE NEW FIRE STATION IS IN THAT LOCATION RIGHT NOW. THERE'S CITY WATER THAT'S DOWN HERE IN NORTH YELLOWSTONE. AND THE SEWER LINE IS EXTENDED UP AND THEN GETS UP INTO THE ADDRESS OF BUSINESS PARK, WHICH BECAME ADJACENT TO THE CITY, THE FIRE STATION COMING IN. AND SO AS PART OF THIS PROPERTY TO DEVELOP THE CITY, WATER AND SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED THROUGH THE PROPERTY AND SERVICES THROUGH THE CITY. SO THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY AT THIS POINT OR COME BACK UP AFTER STAFF IS THERE. YEAH. GO AHEAD. JUST ONE QUESTION OCCURRED TO ME WAS THIS PROPERTY EVER USED AS A CAR LOT JUNKYARD? I DON'T REMEMBER IT WAS NOT. IT WAS A STORAGE LOT THAT THAT ENDED IN EXCESS OF 30 YEARS AGO. AS YOU CAN SEE, THAT LIGHTER AREA ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF IT. MAHLER HAD SOME CARS THERE. IT WAS NOT USED FOR DISMANTLE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT HAS HAD PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL. ALL THAT HAS BEEN CLEARED JUST JUST REAL QUICK. RECALLED THAT THAT'S TOO LONG AGO FOR ME TO REMEMBER. JUST. YEAH. JUST. YEAH. JUST REAL QUICK. JUST JUST FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. THANK YOU. SORRY. NO. YOU'RE GOOD. JAMES BOONE, REPRESENTING MY ENTERPRISE FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER. OKAY. PERFECT. DO YOU WANT ME TO RESTATE WHAT I JUST SAID? NO, NO, NO. IT'S OKAY. WE JUST NEED AN ADDRESS. OH, YEAH.NO. YEAH. ADDRESS, PLEASE. THANK YOU. FOR WHAT? MY ENTERPRISE IS 3009 NORTH 15TH EAST IDAHO FALLS. PERFECT. THANK YOU. SORRY. GO AHEAD. YEAH. THE ONLY REASON I RAISED THAT ISSUE SOMETIMES YOU DO HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WITH THOSE RED CAR LOTS. SO UNFORTUNATELY, THE FACT THAT PAST THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL ALREADY WOULD HELP WITH THAT. YEAH. OKAY. YEP. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT.
PERFECT. THANK YOU. THANKS. OKAY. WE WILL HEAR FROM CITY STAFF NOW. ALL RIGHT.
COMMISSION BRIAN STEVENS, CITY STAFF. THANKS FOR. HEARING US OUT. SO THE APPLICANT BASICALLY STOLE MY THUNDER. THERE'S NOT A WHOLE LOT OF EXCITING THINGS TO TALK ABOUT HERE. IT'S IN COUNTY.
I AM THREE IS THE EXISTING DESIGNATION. TO THE NORTH IS COUNTY. ITEM THREE. TO THE
[00:05:07]
SOUTH IS COUNTY INDIAN THREE, AND TO THE WEST IS COUNTY ITEM THREE. AND THEN THE CITY PORTION WHERE THE FIRE HOUSE IS, IS ALSO IN EM. SO IT'S IT'S A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD ZONE REQUEST. AND THEN THE REQUESTED ACTION IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL.THE ANNEXATION, INITIAL ZONING BY THEM, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AND OR RECOMMENDATION. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM, BUT I I'M BLAKE KIND OF COVERED EVERYTHING I WOULD HAVE HID ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF? I'LL TAKE ONE. OKAY, GREAT. I JUST WANT TO DOUBLE CHECK APPLICANT COVERED IT. THE PACKET THAT WE WERE GIVEN DOES CALL OUT SPECIFICALLY THAT THERE'S SALVAGE LOTS ADJACENT. AND SATELLITE IMAGERY SHOWS THAT THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE PLANNING FOR THIS LAND. RIGHT. BECAUSE OUR CODE SPECIFICALLY. WELL SO ANYTHING IN THE USE TABLE WOULD BE ALLOWED. APPLICANT CAN SPEAK TO WHAT THEIR PLANNING TO DO, BUT WE TYPICALLY TRY AND JUST GO BASED ON THE USE TABLE. OKAY. RIGHT. I THINK THAT'S A USE IT'S NOT IN ARGUES TABLE. IT SHOULD BE IN OUR USE TABLE. ACTUALLY JUST JUST JUST JUST OKAY. SORRY. EXCUSE ME. THANK YOU. GOOD. YES YES YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. WELL NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE SINCE THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THIS ITEM. SO IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS ITEM JUST COME UP, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. KEEP YOUR COMMENTS, YOU KNOW, SOMEWHAT BRIEF TO FIVE MINUTES. AND THIS ISN'T A Q AND A, IT'S JUST MOSTLY JUST IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ABOUT IT. AND WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO HELP POINT YOU IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION IF YOU DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. SO WITH THAT. FLOOR IS ANYONE'S. GUESS.
NO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL THEN WITH THAT I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND NOW WE'LL JUST TALK ABOUT AMONGST THE COMMISSION. I MEAN THIS IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD TO ME.
MAKES SENSE. ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? NO I AGREE JUST COMMENT THAT I MEAN WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHAT'S GOING IN THERE, BUT IT'S PRETTY EXCITING I THINK, TO SEE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN HAPPENING UP THERE ALONG WOODRUFF. AND I'M DEFINITELY IN FAVOR OF THIS, AND HOPEFULLY SOMEDAY WE'LL GET THAT ROAD FIXED. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND, YOU KNOW, AS THE MORE THE MORE THE CITY ANNEXES UP IN THIS AREA, THE EASIER IT IS FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS. AND AND I MEAN, THIS IS, YOU KNOW, A VERY, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY INDUSTRIAL AREA AND WE HAVE ALL THE BUSINESSES THERE. SO WHY NOT BRING CITY SERVICES THERE TO HELP SUPPORT THE CLEAN UP THE WHOLE AREA? YEAH FOR SURE. I DO BELIEVE INDUSTRIAL CAN LOOK NICE OR OPERATE VERY NICELY AND VERY PROFESSIONALLY. AND I THINK THE STANDARDS THE CITY HAS IS WILL HELP POINT US IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. SO WITH THAT, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL TACKLE IT IF NEED. OKAY, I MOVE THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION. WITH THE INITIAL ZONING OF I AND M PERFECT. DOES ANYONE WANT TO SECOND THAT? SECOND PERFECT. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL VOTE. COMMISSIONER PATRICK I SCOTT I MEAN I TYLER I STORE I. MOTION PASSED YEP. PERFECT OKAY AWESOME. WELL NOW WE'RE GOING
[4.I. PLT26-001]
TO GO TO THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA BUSINESS ITEM FINAL PLAT FOR RECYCLE ROAD COMMERCIAL PARK. DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT FOR THAT? NO. WE DO ON THIS ONE. YEAH, I'M PLANNING. SORRY. AT LEAST YOU GOT THEM IN BOTH. YEAH, YEAH, AT LEAST YOU GOT THEM BOTH ON THE SAME NIGHT.THAT'S NICE. I GOT ONE MORE ON THE SCHEDULE. YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO GET TIRED OF ME, TOO.
THAT'S ALL RIGHT. AGAIN, BLAKE JOLLY WITH ENGINEERING. I KEEP WANTING TO SAY 1150 DRIVE. AND I WAS LIKE, SIX YEARS AGO. 2295 NORTH YELLOWSTONE HIGHWAY, SUITE SIX. THIS IS FOR A ONE
[00:10:02]
LOT PLAT. THAT'S EARLIER. WE SUBMITTED THIS IN TWO FLATS. WE ENDED UP HAVING TO BREAK IT UP.SO THIS IS JUST THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD THAT YOU'VE ALREADY APPROVED. IT'S RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THIS, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SO IF WE WE ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT HERE, YOU'VE GOT THE NEW MAVERICK THAT'S UP THERE. I LEWISVILLE HIGHWAY US 20 AND COMING AROUND WEST 33RD AND ON THE CORNER OF RECYCLE ROAD. ONE LOT PLAT FOR FOR THE HIGHWAY. COMMERCIAL USES AND ALL THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND EVERYTHING WILL HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE CURRENT CODES AND REGULATIONS OF THAT THAT WE'VE ALREADY TALKED THROUGH. AND I KNOW THE SITE PLANS HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED ON THIS PROPERTY. WE'VE BEEN WORKED THROUGH ON THAT ASPECT AS WELL. SO IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. NO OKAY. THANK YOU. GOOD FOR NOW. WE WILL HEAR FROM CITY. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONER. THE REQUESTED ACTION TONIGHT IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR RECYCLE ROAD COMMERCIAL PARK TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. THE PROPERTY WAS IN THE CITY IN 2020, WITH AN REVIEW OF AC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL. THIS PROVIDES A COMMERCIAL ZONED FOR RETAIL AND SERVICE USES, SERVING THE TRAVELING PUBLIC. THERE ARE NO MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM LOT SIZES IN THIS COLUMN, AND NO HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES MAINTAIN AREAS, MIXED USE CENTERS AND CORRIDORS, WHICH DENOTES AREAS PEOPLE TEND TO EAT, SHOP AND GATHER, AND THESE AREAS CAN ALSO INCLUDE MIXED USE BUILDINGS, RECREATION CENTERS, COMMERCIAL USES AND OTHER COMMERCIAL USES WOULD BE VARIED IN SCALE, FROM LARGE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL CENTERS TO SMALLER COMMERCIAL ROCKETS. THIS IS, AS THE APPLICANT MENTIONED, IT IS IN PROXIMITY TO THE CURRENT ALIGNMENT OF U.S. HIGHWAY 20 AND EAST 33RD NORTH, WHICH IS A MINOR ARTERIAL, AS WELL AS LEWISVILLE HIGHWAY FOR NORTH 50S, WHICH IS A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. THE. THE PROPERTY AGAIN LOCATED ON RECYCLED ROAD, WHICH COMES UP HERE TO THE HATCH PIT, AND AS 33 NORTH CURVES UP TO ME 50. SO RIGHT ON THE INTERSECTION, THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT IS APPROXIMATELY 7.26 ACRES OF LAND, INCLUDES ONE BUILDABLE LOT AND ALL. THEY WILL BE ALLOWED IN ACCESS FROM RECYCLE ROAD AND WITH ACCESS FROM 33 PARK BECAUSE THEY'RE ON THE CORNER. BUT THOSE AXES WILL NEED TO MEET THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND WE'VE WORKED EXTENSIVELY WITH THE APPLICANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THOSE AXES ARE DETERMINED EARLY ON IN THE PROCESS. THE STAFF HAS REVIEWED. THE FINAL FINDINGS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY.
PERFECT. AND COMMISSIONER SCOTT, THIS IS JUST A GENERAL QUESTION FOR MY INFORMATION, BUT FOR ZONING, HIGHWAY, COMMERCIAL, ARE THERE ANY INDICATIONS OF HOW CLOSE IT SHOULD BE TO A HIGHWAY? OR ISN'T THAT NOT NECESSARILY A FACTOR? IT THE PURPOSE OF THE ZONING IS TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE TRAVELING PUBLIC. SO IT MAKES MORE SENSE IF IT IS IN PROXIMITY TO THOSE HEAVIER USED ROADS, SUCH AS THE INTERSTATE OR REGIONAL HIGHWAYS, WHERE REGIONAL TRAFFIC CAN REACH THEM. IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A REQUIREMENT, THOUGH WE COULD PROBABLY FIND SOME AGENCY THAT'S IN PROXIMITY, THAT'S NOT IN PROXIMITY TO THOSE MAJOR HIGHWAYS, BUT THEY PROBABLY STILL ARE IN PROXIMITY TO OUR ARTERIAL STREET NETWORKS. OKAY.
THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE I APPRECIATE YOU CLEARING THAT UP FOR I HAVE A QUESTION HOW THIS IS ON A BIG LONG CORNER HERE. AND I, I HEARD WHAT YOU WERE SAYING ABOUT THE ACCESS ALONG 33RD NORTH AND RECYCLE ROAD. AND YOU ALSO GO OFF OF THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN. DOES IT ALSO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SIGHTLINES, BECAUSE THIS CORNER IS KIND OF LONG AND SWOOPY. AND YEAH, IF IT'S TOO CLOSE TO RECYCLE ROAD THEN THAT MIGHT MESS WITH THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT
[00:15:02]
PLAN. BUT IF IT'S DOWN ON THE CORNER, THAT MIGHT ALSO BE AN ISSUE. I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF THAT WAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. RIGHT. SO IT WAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. AND SO THE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE, THIS PLOT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AND WE HAVE AN APPROVED SITE PLAN. AND SO THAT ACCESS FOR THE CURVE WAS DETERMINED TO BE RIGHT AROUND HERE. AND THEN WE JUST PICKED THE OPPOSITE SIDE. SO THEY LINE UP. AND PUBLIC WORKS WAS LESS CONCERNED ABOUT SIGHTLINES ON THE INSIDE OF THE TURN THAN THEY WERE ON THE OUTSIDE. AND I THINK THE OPPOSITE. BUT MAYBE I'M BACKWARDS IN MY BRAIN. BUT BUT IT SOUNDS GOOD. THEY DID.THEY DID WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE LINED UP. OKAY. SOUNDS GOOD. AND I'M ASSUMING IF YOU GUYS, ONCE YOU GUYS SEE A SITE PLAN, IT'LL MAKE SURE THERE'S NOTHING LIKE ALONG THAT CORNER THAT MIGHT BLOCK THE VIEW OR WHATEVER. YEAH. AND. RIGHT. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH. SOUNDS GOOD.
WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THOSE THINGS ARE CLEAR. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY.
THREE. ALL RIGHT. ANY THOUGHTS ON THIS OR SHOULD WE JUST APPROVE IT? IT'S UP TO YOU GUYS.
IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THIS IS RIGHT IN LINE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S HAPPENING OUT THERE. SO I DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH IT. SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU I AGREE. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION? I'LL TAKE THIS ONE. OKAY. I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR RECYCLED ROAD COMMERCIAL PARK TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. PERFECT.
ANYONE? SECOND THAT I'LL SECOND. PERFECT. DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER, I SCOTT, I MEAN I EITHER I I MOTION PASSES PERFECT OKAY NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO TO ITEM
[4.II. PLT26-002]
NUMBER FOUR FINAL PLAT FOR RMC SIMPSON DIVISION. MR. CHAIR, BEFORE WE START, I WANT TO RECUSE MYSELF FROM THIS ITEM. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT, DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT? PERFECT. COME ON UP. THANK YOU. I'M NOT TRYING TO MAKE A FASHION STATEMENT WITH THE GLASSES. I HAD THE WRONG. I DIDN'T HAVE ANY MORE OF MY TICKETS. I THINK THEY LOOK GREAT. SO, FRANK WITH PETERSON LAND SURVEY. AND WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE PLANNING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF RMC SIMPSON, DIVISION NUMBER FOUR. THIS IS SOMEWHAT OF A CONTINUATION OF THE FIRST THREE RMC SIMPSON FLATS AND IS, I WOULD SAY, SIMILAR IN NATURE. THE PLAT IS CONSISTING OF TWO BUILDABLE LOTS. THE TOTAL. 3.8 ACRES. THESE TWO LOTS WILL BE LIMITED TO ONE ACCESS ON WEST 33RD NORTH. THE ACCESS WILL BE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER, SO THE TOP LEFT CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PIECE AS IT'S SHOWN THERE. WE WENT THROUGH. THIS IS DESIGNATED AS A SPECIAL USE THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE CAMPUS AREA. AND WE WENT THROUGH WE MET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY STAFF REVIEW. AND WE ARE LOOKING FOR THE FINAL PLAT APPROVAL LIKE I MENTIONED. SO IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL SURE TRY AND ANSWER THEM. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT FOR NOW. NO. OKAY. I THINK YOU'RE GOOD FOR NOW. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. NOW WE WILL HEAR FROM CITY STAFF. SO THIS ACTUALLY SEEMS TO BE AN EASY NIGHT. PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR FOR THE. WHAT THE SITE IS. IT'S CONTINUATION OF THE INITIAL PROPERTIES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION IS SPECIAL USES STAFF'S REVIEWED. THE FINAL PLAT FINDS IT'S CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PLAT ALSO MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. I DON'T HAVE A LOT TO ADD. IT'S A BIG RECTANGLE BEING DIVIDED INTO TWO REALLY LARGE LOTS AND THE AND AND YOU KNOW, THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF BUILDING RIGHT NEXT DOOR. AND THEY'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO BUILD HERE. BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'M HAPPY TO TRY AND ANSWER THEM OR THAT COME THAT COME. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CITY STAFF?[00:20:02]
I'LL JUST GO AHEAD. I'M SORRY. I'M JUST LOOKING AT THE JUST LOOKING FOR ACCESS TO THAT BACK LOT. SO IF WE LOOK AT THE LET ME OKAY. THANKS, GARY. SO IT'LL BE THROUGH. AN ACCESS EASEMENT ALONG THIS EDGE IS MY UNDERSTANDING OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT. IT DOES LINE UP DIRECTLY SOUTH OF COVE PORTE I BELIEVE IS THE EXISTING ACCESS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT ROAD THERE. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT MISREPRESENTED. WE'VE MOVED IT SO THAT IT LINES UP DIRECTLY WITH THAT EXISTING ACCESS TO THE NORTH. OKAY. SO THAT WILL BE BASICALLY A THROUGH STREET THERE AND THAT WILL CROSS 33RD NORTH. RIGHT. THERE WILL BE NO THROUGH LOW DOWN TO RMC SIMPSON OKAY. GOT IT THROUGH INTO THE PARKING LOT. GOT IT. THANK YOU. DID I HEAR THAT RIGHT. THERE WILL BE NO STREET COMING DOWN TO LOT SEVEN. CORRECT. YEAH. THAT THERE WILL BE NO STREET.SO WHEN YOU SAY LOT SEVEN, IT'LL BE A ACCESS EASEMENT, RIGHT? RIGHT. SO IT'LL BE CONSIDERED PARKING LOT AND A LARGE DRIVE AISLE. SO I DO HAVE A QUESTION. IF THERE'S SUPPOSED SUPPOSED TO BE AN EASEMENT, I'M NOT AN ENGINEER. WOULDN'T THE SHOULDN'T THE PLAT SHOW THAT OR SAY THAT I'M NOT SEEING ANYWHERE MENTIONING OF A WHAT? OKAY. THANK YOU. I'M JUST TRYING TO LEARN THE WHAT THESE MAPS MEAN TO SAY MY NAME AGAIN. ARE WE OKAY? YOU'RE OKAY. SO WE WENT THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SURVEY DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS. PART OF THE REVIEW PROCESS ON THIS WAS SHOWING THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT. BUT THIS PLANT HERE IS THE FIRST SUBMITTAL. PART OF THE REVIEW PROCESS STATED THAT WE WOULD SHOW THAT CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT, AND IT IS IN THE AREA THAT WAS POINTED OUT PREVIOUSLY.
OKAY. SO ON THE SUBMITTAL AFTER THE REVISIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, IT WILL BE ON THAT PLAN. OKAY. QUESTION. IN THAT REGARD, IS THERE ANY REASON WHY YOU'RE NOT DEDICATING THAT, LEAVING IT AS A ACCESS ONLY? I'LL GIVE MY BEST IDEA. AND MY BEST IDEA IS THAT THE FLOW OF THE TRAFFIC FOR THE USE OF THESE TWO LOTS WILL NOT ALLOW FOR THE USE OF A THROUGH STREET, BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ENOUGH TRAFFIC FLOW. I'M THINKING IT'S MORE OF AN ACCESS THAT JUST SERVICES THE TWO LOTS AND WHATEVER ELSE MIGHT COME LATER. NOW, THE REASON I'M CONCERNED, AND THIS IS A CONCERN I VOICED MANY TIMES BEFORE, THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REQUIRES THERE BE FULL FRONTAGE ON A DEDICATED STREET AND ACCESS, AND MY CONCERN IS THAT I DON'T KNOW HOW WE FIND THAT THIS MEETS THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE WHEN THERE'S NO FRONTAGE ON THE DEDICATED STREET. MAYBE STAFF CAN ANSWER THAT. I KNOW WE'VE ADDRESSED THAT ISSUE BEFORE. SO? SO WHEN WE LOOK AT THESE, WE WE LOOK AT THEM AS RETAIL CENTERS AND WE'RE ORGANIZED UNDER AN HOA OR AN AGREEMENT. SO THAT ACCESS EASEMENT GIVES THEM THE ACCESS AND FRONTAGE, BECAUSE THEY'RE THEY'RE UNIFIED. IT'S QUITE LIKELY THAT THIS SECONDARY BUILDING BECOMES AN EXPANSION OF THAT FRONT BUILDING RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD. AND AND IT'S NOT AN UNCOMMON PRACTICE. WE DO THIS ALL OVER THE CITY WHEN WE GET INTO CENTERS. RIGHT. IF AS LONG AS YOU HAVE THOSE TWO LOTS OR, YOU KNOW, ESSENTIALLY FUNCTION AS ONE, THEN THEN I THINK THAT WOULD MEET MY CONCERN. BUT OTHERWISE WE'RE BREAKING THEM UP INTO LOTS. HOW DO WE HAVE AN ASSURANCE THAT THAT'S THE WAY IT WILL BE DEVELOPED? IF I CAN ADDRESS THAT AS WELL, IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE PLOT LINE. SO THIS PARTICULAR PLAT, BOTH LOTS ACTUALLY DO HAVE DIRECT FRONTAGE TO 33RD NORTH. YOU CAN SEE ONE IS A FLAT LOT. LOT SEVEN IS A FLAT LOT THAT HAS ACCESS. LOT SIX ALSO HAS FRONTAGE ONTO 33RD. IT'S NOT FRONTAGE IT'S ACCESS. AND THERE'S A DIFFERENCE. SO THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES BOTH. YEAH. SO FRONTAGE IS TAKEN CARE OF.
ACCESS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED THROUGH A CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT WHICH THEY WILL HAVE AND WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED. THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ALSO SAYS THAT IT WILL. IT REFERS TO THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE AS TO THE AMOUNT OF FRONTAGE THAT IS REQUIRED. AND IN COMMERCIAL ZONES, THE AMOUNT OF SPECIFIC FRONTAGE ONTO A CITY STREET IS ZERO. THAT IS WHAT ALLOWS YOU
[00:25:05]
TO HAVE SORT OF AN INTERNAL LOT THAT DOESN'T HAVE IMMEDIATE ACCESS OR FRONTAGE TO A CITY STREET. SO AGAIN, WE ALWAYS MANAGE IT THROUGH CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS. IF YOU THINK A LITTLE BIT TOO ABOUT THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THE SPACING REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED ON ARTERIAL ROADS OR COLLECTOR ROADS, COLLECTOR ROADS, IT'S 330FT BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS ON AN ARTERIAL STREET. IT'S 660FT BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS ON A STRATEGIC ARTERIAL. IT'S 1320 OR 30, 30, 1330 FEET BETWEEN ACCESS POINTS. YOU SEE, I DON'T WE CAN'T HAVE THE RESTRICTIONS OF THE ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN, AS WELL AS HAVING ACCESS FROM FOR EVERY LOT TO THE CITY STREETS. IT IS A QUESTION OF ACCESS THAT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT. IT'S MAKING SURE THAT YOU HAVE THE ABILITY FOR POLICE AND FIRE TO GET TO IT. THAT'S A DIFFERENT ISSUE THAN ACCESS.NOW, IF THERE'S A SPECIFIC PROVISION IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, I WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE TO DEFER TO THAT. I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH IT. THAT'S WHY FIRE REQUIRES THE EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT, SO THAT THEY HAVE A DIRECT EASEMENT THAT PROVIDES THEM ACCESS TO WHERE THEY NEED TO GO. OKAY. CAN I ASK A QUESTION REAL QUICK? IF SO, IF YOU HAVE THE EASEMENT, ARE, YOU KNOW, ON THE FINAL PLAT, RIGHT. WHEN THE SITE PLAN IS DEVELOPED, ARE THERE CERTAIN STANDARDS THAT THE BUILDER OR DEVELOPER HAS TO FOLLOW WHEN IT COMES TO THAT SPECIFIC CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT TO MAKE SURE FIRE OR POLICE COULD GET ACCESS TECHNICALLY TO THAT LOT? ESSENTIALLY THERE ARE. SO IT MIGHT NOT BE A DEDICATED ROAD, BUT WHEN YOU'RE ACTUALLY THERE LOOKING AT IT, IT LOOKS LIKE, YEAH, THIS IS A THROUGH AREA THAT FIRE CAN SAFELY ANY FIRE ACCESS ROAD. THE FIRE CODE REQUIRES TO BE A MINIMUM OF 26FT WIDE. AND SO THE FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT CAN BE ESTABLISHED WITH A PLAT. OR IT COULD BE ESTABLISHED SEPARATELY AS JUST AN EASEMENT THAT'S RECORDED. AND THAT'S OFTENTIMES HOW THAT HAPPENS SOMETIMES AFTER THE PLAT, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ENTIRELY SURE OF THE LOT OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT WHERE THE DRIVE AISLES WILL BE JUST YET. AND SO TO PUT AN EASEMENT ON THE PLAT, IT MIGHT SHIFT OR CHANGE. AND SO THAT IS SOMETHING THAT OFTEN TIMES COMES WITH THE SITE PLAN. BUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL REQUIRE THAT TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE THEY SIGN OFF ON A SITE.
GOTCHA. SO THE SITE PLAN HAS TO FOLLOW ALSO OTHER ADDITIONAL STANDARDS CORRECT WHEN IT COMES TO THAT EASEMENT. SO THAT WAY IT'S VERY CLEAR. CORRECT. THIS IS A SAFE RIGHT. AND YOU MIGHT REMEMBER BACK TO THE MALL PLAT. IT'S BEEN A LITTLE WHILE, BUT WE DID A NEW PLAT FOR THEM ALL.
YEAH. THOSE ACCESS EASEMENTS FOR FIRE AT THE MALL ARE BEING ESTABLISHED. AN EASEMENT DOCUMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE FINAL PLAT DOCUMENT. OKAY, THAT'S THE PREFERENCE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER AND HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO ESTABLISH THOSE. IT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT THAT THEY BE ESTABLISHED WITH THE PLAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND THIS AREA IS CONSIDERED. SO WE DID OVER A 30 ACRE R&D ZONE HERE. RIGHT. AND AND GIVEN IT HAS A SINGLE ACCESS OR THE BOULEVARD AND THEN ALL OF THESE THROUGH ALL OF THESE PARKING LOTS ARE INTERCONNECTED WITH THESE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS. RIGHT. AND THAT'S THAT'S THE WAY THIS CAMPUS AND THE R&D HAS WOULD LIKE TO OPERATE. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO SUPPORT THAT. BOTH OF THESE LOTS ARE UNDER A SINGLE OWNERSHIP. AND THAT INDIVIDUAL HAS DEVELOPED I BELIEVE I BELIEVE THIS IS DIVISION ONE AND THEN DIVISION TWO AND DIVISION THREE AND NOW DIVISION FOUR. AND SO THEY'RE THEY'RE STRATEGICALLY GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS. AND AND GARY'S BEEN DOING THIS FOR QUITE A WHILE AND I HAVEN'T SEEN THAT HE'S EVER LAND LOCKED HIMSELF OUT OF DEVELOPMENT OF A PIECE OF PROPERTY. AND SO I JUST WANTED TO GET INTO LIKE THE OVERALL BIGGER PICTURE OF THIS AREA.
AND OUR SUPPORT FOR I KNOW IT'S A QUESTION IN MY MIND IS, IS AS LONG AS THOSE TWO FUNCTION WITH, YOU KNOW, FOR INSTANCE, THE LARGE PARKING AREA WHERE THEY IN ESSENCE FUNCTION AS A SINGLE LOT, THEN YOU DON'T HAVE THE ISSUE THAT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT. WHAT MY CONCERN HAS ALWAYS BEEN IS WHEN YOU HAVE A SINGLE ROAD AND YOU DON'T KNOW HOW THAT ROAD IS GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED, YOU DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GOING TO BE PLOWED, YOU DON'T KNOW THE BASE IS GOING TO BE DONE RIGHT.
AND SO IT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU MAINTAIN THAT ABILITY FOR FIRE AND SAFETY TO BE ABLE TO GET TO IT. IF IT'S A COMMERCIAL LOT, YOU HAVE A LARGE PARKING LOT, THEN I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM
[00:30:03]
WITH IT, BUT IT'S A DIFFERENT ISSUE IN MY MIND AT LEAST, THAN JUST HAVING ACCESS TO THE STREET. IT'S A QUESTION OF NOT HAVING TO MAINTAIN A SEPARATE ROADWAY WITH DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS RIGHT THROUGH THE SITE DESIGN PROCESS. THERE'S A LOT OF COMMUNICATION AND A LOT OF APPROVAL FROM THE IDAHO FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT BECAUSE OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS, LIKE KERRY STATED A LITTLE BIT EARLIER. SO EVEN THOUGH WE WILL HAVE A DEDICATED ACCESS FOR THE EMERGENCY RESPONDERS, ALL OF THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT THERE'S ENOUGH ROOM AND WIDTHS WITH WHATEVER THE REQUIREMENTS ARE. AND IT ALSO LEAVES ACCESS BY WAY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE ABLE TO GET CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE BUILDING FOR THE EQUIPMENT THAT'S NEEDED IN CASE A FIRE DOES COME OUT. THAT'S THE ISSUE. ALL OF THAT'S TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, AND IT'S ALL THROUGH THE APPROVAL AND THROUGH THE SITE DESIGN PROCESS. SO THAT'S THAT WILL FOLLOW THAT WILL FOLLOW THIS PROCESS. THAT'S THE ISSUE BECAUSE YOU NEED TO HAVE THAT ASSURANCE THAT THAT FIRE AND POLICE CAN GET AT IT. AND THAT'S THE FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT. AND THIS WILL BE A LARGE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS. RIGHT. SO. I MEAN THAT I'M NOT SURE WHAT, WHAT, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE IN A STAFF ASSURANCES. I'M NOT SURE IT'D BE IN THE BUILDING CODE OR WHERE WE CONTROL THE SITE DEVELOPMENT FIRE CODE, I BELIEVE. THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS SITE DEVELOPMENT IS CONTROLLED BOTH THE FIRE CODE, BUT ALSO THE ZONING CODE DICTATES THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT. SO IF THIS IS KIND OF LIKE I GUESS MY QUESTION WOULD BE WHAT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND? SO THIS ISN'T AN ONGOING CONCERN FOR YOU. WELL MY WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND IS SPECIFIC PROVISION IN THE IN THE SITE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AND PROVISIONS THAT ALLOWS THE THE AS LONG AS THEY FUNCTION AS ONE LOT. IN ESSENCE THEN IF THERE'S PROVISIONS THAT WOULD GUARANTEE THAT, THEN I'M FINE WITH IT. BUT WHEN I SEE TWO DIFFERENT LOTS, EITHER ONE OF WHICH CAN BE SOLD OFF, THAT'S WHEN I GET THE CONCERN IS THAT WE HAVE THAT NAILED DOWN, THAT THAT IS NOT GOING TO DISAPPEAR IF AND WHEN THOSE LOTS ARE SOLD OFF. ALL RIGHT. AND SO I CAN ENSURE THERE WILL BE A FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THAT DOES COME WITH THE SITE PLAN QUESTION IN MY MIND OF. MAKING SURE THAT YOU HAVE PROPER DEVELOPMENT WITH THAT ROAD THAT IT'S PLOWED, YOU HAVE PROPER BASE, YOU HAVE GRAVEL THICKNESS APPROPRIATE, AND YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO REGULATE, TO ENSURE THAT THAT ACCESS OR THAT THAT ACCESS IS NOT BLOCKED BY TRAFFIC. AND YOU GET THAT WITH IF YOU HAVE FRONTAGE DIRECTLY ON THE STREET, BUT WHEN YOU HAVE IT BACK BEHIND, THAT'S WHEN I GET THE CONCERN. WELL, AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE THE EASEMENT IN PLACE, AND THAT WILL ENSURE THAT WE GET BACK TO THE LOT BACK BEHIND, RIGHT WITH OUR WITH OUR ACCESS MANAGEMENT, WE HAVE THIS ISSUE. BUT NORMALLY ACTUALLY THESE ARE IN CONTROL OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS. THAT JUST PROVIDES A LOCATION OF WHERE THE ROAD WOULD BE. BUT NORMALLY YOU DON'T SEE THIS STANDARDS OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION SET FORTH IN THE EASEMENT AGREEMENT. THAT'S WHY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT FIRE HAS DEVELOPED A VERY SPECIFIC CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE THAT DICTATES ALL OF THAT BEING OPEN, BEING MAINTAINED, BEING PLOWED, ALL OF THOSE THINGS RELATED TO THE FIRE CODE. AND THAT'S ALL BUILT INTO THE EASEMENT DOCUMENT THAT THEY THAT I NEED TO LOOK AT. OBVIOUSLY, I'LL TAKE YOUR WORD ON IT. OKAY.THROUGH THE IMPROVEMENT, THROUGH THE DESIGN APPROVAL PROCESS AS WELL, THEY'RE HELD TO A STANDARD THAT ENSURES THAT IT'LL BE BUILT TO THE STANDARD THAT IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE QUESTIONING REGARDING THE DURABILITY, THE QUALITY, OR THE MATERIALS USED. AND THAT PART IS HELD, LIKE I SAID, THROUGH THE DESIGN PROCESS, THROUGH THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN ITSELF, TO THE STANDARDS. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER? YEAH. THANK YOU. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? NO. ALL GOOD OKAY. THANK YOU. GUYS ARE GOOD. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YES. THANK YOU. PERFECT. YOU MADE YOUR CASE. DO YOU HAVE MORE CASE TO PLEAD OR. I'VE GOT MY VOICE BACK, BUT I WON'T TAKE
[00:35:05]
ADVANTAGE OF THAT. OKAY. SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY, WELL, I'M. I THINK THAT THIS WILL BE DEVELOPED VERY PROPERLY, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE'RE IN THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, WHICH DOES HAVE HIGHER STANDARDS AND STUFF. SO THEY'RE ALSO HELD TO A PRETTY HIGH STANDARD TOO. SO I'M NOT TOO WORRIED ABOUT IT. BUT I DO ALWAYS APPRECIATE YOUR OPINIONS AND TAKING A SECOND LOOK OR CLOSER LOOK AT CERTAIN THINGS REALLY HELPED ME LEARN ABOUT EASEMENTS AND ALL THESE THINGS.SO I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS. SO WITH THAT, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO RECOMMEND A MAKE A WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? OH, OKAY. PERFECT. THANK YOU. I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT CUNNINGHAM K SIMPSON DIVISION NUMBER FOUR THAT I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. PERFECT. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO SECOND IT. SECOND PERFECT.
THANK YOU. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE COMMISSIONER PANZER. HI, SCOTT. I I I I PERFECT. THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'LL INVITE COMMISSIONER MEEHAN BACK UP AND WE'LL GO TO THE NEXT ITEM ON
[4.III. PLT26-003]
THE AGENDA, WHICH IS FINAL PLAT FOR SKYLINE. COMMENTS. DO WE HAVE A APPLICANT FOR THAT? GARY? YOU. GENETIC ENGINEERING AT 2295 NORTH HILLS HIGHWAY, SUITE 6.20. I TURNED IT OFF. BLAKE JOLLY WOULD CONNECT ENGINEERING, 2295 NORTH HIGHWAY, SUITE SIX. HERE WE GO. SO WE'RE THE PLAQUE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF BROADWAY, WEST BROADWAY AND SKYLINE. SKYLINE DRIVE BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF TOWN. YOU'VE PROBABLY IF YOU'VE DRIVEN OUT THAT DIRECTION, THERE'S BEEN SOME STUFF TAKING PLACE. THEY TORE DOWN THE OLD BANK AND KIND OF CLEARED THE SITE OUT A LITTLE BIT IN PREPARATION FOR WHAT THEY'RE WANTING TO DO HERE. SO. YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE. I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER EXACTLY. THERE'S YOU'VE GOT SEVEN BLOCKS ON HERE, AND A LOT OF THAT IS STRATEGICALLY PLACED FOR WITH THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN THAT'S THERE AND FLEXIBILITY FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AS IT HOPEFULLY COMES. SO. THIS IS ALSO IN THE ZONE. YEP. YEAH. SO ANYWAY THERE'S NOT A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS THAT TAKE PLACE ON THIS ONE. WE'VE ALREADY WORKED OUT SINCE ACCESS IS ALWAYS A BIG QUESTION I PUSH THIS BUTTON TO GET ACCESS. WE'VE MADE, I DON'T KNOW, NUMEROUS MEETINGS OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS ON THIS PARCEL, AND IT'S KIND OF SETTLED DOWN ON THE WILL BE GIVEN OR GRANTED TO ACCESS AS ONE OF THE SKYLINE RIGHT HERE AND THEN MICHAEL BUTTON AGAIN. THE OTHER ONE IS GOING TO BE APPROXIMATELY IN THIS LOCATION RIGHT THROUGH HERE. AND THERE'LL BE AN FROM AN INTERNAL THROUGH STREET. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A PUBLIC STREET. IT'LL BE A PRIVATE STREET, BUT HAVE ALL THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ON THE PREVIOUS ONE ASSOCIATED WITH IT, SO THAT ALL LOTS WILL HAVE ACCESS THROUGH THERE. IT WILL BE DESIGNED, BUILT SIMILAR TO THE MALL, COMMERCIAL ACCESS FOR MULTIPLE DIFFERENT USES. SO WITH THAT, I GUESS IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME, HAPPY TO ANSWER OR DISCUSS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THAT? NO. PERFECT. THANK YOU. OKAY, NOW WE'LL HEAR FROM CITY STAFF. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. SO TONIGHT THE REQUESTED ACTION IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR SKYLINE. COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. SO THIS PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED IN DIFFERENT PARTS BETWEEN 1955 AND 1973. COME FROM THE WEST SIDE MOVING TO THE EAST WITH IN HC1 ZONE. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED H C HIGHWAY. COMMERCIAL. AS FAR AS THE HISTORY OF THE PLATTING.THERE'S BEEN LOTS OF DIFFERENT PLATS THROUGHOUT THE DECADES ON THIS, A LOT OF DIFFERENT PARCELS PLATTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES. SO REALLY PLATTING ALL OF THIS AT ONCE IS A REALLY BIG CLEANUP, ACTUALLY. AND AND KIND OF TAKES UP SOME SPOTS THAT WEREN'T PLATTED BEFORE AND MAKES IT A LITTLE BIT MORE CLEANER, INCLUDING THAT YOU'LL SEE EXTRA RIGHT OF WAY THAT AGAIN, OVER THE YEARS, RIGHT AWAY WAS INCLUDED. THIS ONE KIND OF PUTS ALL THOSE LITTLE REMAINING RIGHT AWAY PIECES IN THE PLAT AS WELL. SO IT IS ABOUT SEVEN ACRES WITH SEVEN BUILDABLE LOTS. THERE ARE NO PROPOSED STREETS, TALK ABOUT I'M GOING TO I'M GOING TO GO TO
[00:40:02]
THE PLAT. YOU CAN SEE THE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT, ACCESS EASEMENT HERE AND HERE. SO ALL LOTS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO IT THROUGH THIS EASEMENT. AND I'M GOING TO CLARIFY THAT THIS LOT HERE YOU MIGHT SEE DOESN'T HAVE ACCESS EASEMENT YET. IT WILL MULTIPLE REVIEWERS. AGAIN THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW. MULTIPLE REVIEWERS HAVE ADDRESSED THAT. SO THAT CORNER LOT WILL HAVE ACCESS THAT WILL THAT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE IT MOVES FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL. SO THAT'S WHY THE STAFF REPORT DOES SAY THAT THEY ALL HAVE ACCESS IN ADDITION TO THE BLAKE WAS AGAIN, CORRECT WITH THE MANY MEETINGS WE'VE HAD. SKYLINE IS A MINOR ARTERIAL.BROADWAY IS A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL. YOU CAN SEE HERE THERE'S LOTS OF DIFFERENT ACCESSES AS THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. WITH THIS NEW PLAT, THOSE ACCESS IS ACTUALLY GO AWAY. AND SO AT THE LEFT WITH THE ONE AXIS HERE AND THE ONE AXIS HERE.
SO THIS MAKES IT BETTER BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE AS MANY ACCESSES FROM THE INTERSECTION. AND SO IT BECOMES MORE CONCISE, WHICH IS WHAT WE WANT. AND THOSE ARTERIALS ON TOP OF THAT BROADWAY IS A STREET OWNED. IT'S AN ICD STREET SITE, A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
THEY HAVEN'T INCLUDED ON THESE ON THESE CONVERSATIONS. THEY HAVE SEEN THE PLAT AND THEY APPROVE OF THESE ACCESSES AS WELL. AND SO AGAIN, THIS ZONE, AS WE'VE HEARD THROUGHOUT THE NIGHT, IT'S A COMMERCIAL ZONE FOR THOSE RETAIL AND SERVICES USES. SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE FINAL PLAT. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE YOU CAN SEE IN YOUR PACKET AS WE'VE ADDRESSED IN THE OTHER ONES, THE HC ZONE DOES NOT HAVE A SITE WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK. SO THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE STREET FRONTAGE, RIGHT. BUT THEY CAN BE THEY DO HAVE THOSE ACCESSES TO IT. AND IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM. I HAVE A QUESTION REAL QUICK IS THE REASON LOT 14 RIGHT THERE ON THE CORNER. YOU SAID IT WILL HAVE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT EVEN THOUGH IT'S ON THE STREET THERE. IT THE WHOLE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IT'S JUST TOO CLOSE TO THAT INTERSECTION. AND IT'S BETTER TO HAVE THE CONNECTIVITY THROUGH CORRECT THE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS WILL GO AWAY. THE PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL HAS THAT 660FT BETWEEN ACCESSES WITH ROADS THAT ARE REDEVELOPING WHERE THERE'S IT'S BEEN BUILT THROUGHOUT THOSE DECADES. THIS IS A WAY OF HOW WE WORK TO KIND OF WORK THROUGH THAT WITH NEIGHBORS. SO NO ONE'S TRYING TO PULL OUT ON THE BROADWAY, TRYING TO TURN LEFT, RIGHT, WHICH I STILL SEE PEOPLE ALL OVER THE CITY DO. YES. THAT'S CORRECT. AS IT AS IT DEVELOPS, THE ACCESS WILL GO AWAY. OKAY. PERFECT. AND IN THOSE DRIVEWAYS WILL BE TAKEN OUT OF THE SIDEWALK AND WILL GET READ. YES. OKAY. PERFECT. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? JUST ONE FURTHER QUESTION. I'M NOT TRYING TO BE SAME ISSUE HERE WITH LOTS TEN, 11 AND 12, BUT OCCURS TO ME THAT I GUESS MY CONCERN IS THERE'S A DISCONNECT BETWEEN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE OTHER PROVISIONS GOVERN SITE DEVELOPMENT, PERHAPS SUGGEST THAT MAYBE THE CITY TAKE A LOOK AT INCLUDING THE CROSS REFERENCE IN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO THE PROVISIONS IN THE SITE DEVELOPMENT CODE, SO THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT, THAT THE SITE DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO GOVERN THAT COMMERCIAL LOT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OF THE ACCESS, JUST THAT CROSS REFERENCE WOULD MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE, AT LEAST IN MY MIND. CODE IN THE CODE. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT YEAH, YOU CAN'T GET A BUILDING PERMIT. YOU CAN'T DEVELOP IT UNTIL IT MEETS ALL THIS CODE. RIGHT? OKAY. PERFECT. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. WELL, WITH THAT, FOR ME, THIS IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. IT'S GOOD TO. I REMEMBER THE CITY STAFF HAD US ACTUALLY DO A SURVEY. THEY WANTED US TO GO WALK AROUND THIS AREA LIKE, TWO SUMMERS AGO. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE DID IT, BUT I DID IT. IT WAS LIKE JULY AND REALLY HOT. AND I DEFINITELY PUT IN THE SURVEY LIKE, MAN, THIS AREA STINKS TO WALK AROUND AND AND SO I'M GLAD TO SEE SOME ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING IN THE AREA. AND I DO LIKE SEEING THAT WE'RE MAKING THOSE DRIVE AISLES MORE CONCISE SO PEOPLE AREN'T TRYING TO TURN LEFT ONTO A BUSY STREET WHERE THEY DEFINITELY SHOULD NOT BE.
SO I'M HAPPY TO. DEFINITION STINKS. YES. OKAY. NOT FUN. HOW ABOUT THAT? SO JUST A COUPLE OF COMMENTS. YES, I ALSO DID THE WALKING TOUR AND I SAW A COUPLE KIDS ALMOST GOT RUN DOWN ON ON
[00:45:01]
BROADWAY GOING ACROSS THERE. I THINK THAT IS A CONCERN. BUT I WILL JUST AS A SIDE COMMENT, WHEN I FIRST MOVED TO IDAHO FALLS ABOUT 30 YEARS AGO, I HAD A FRIEND THAT LIVED IN LEWIS COUNTY RIGHT ON THE SOUTH END OF THAT, AND I STAYED WITH HIM FOR A WHILE. I'M SO HAPPY TO SEE THIS AREA BEING DEVELOPED. IT'S BEEN CRYING FOR IT FOR A LONG TIME. YES, ABSOLUTELY.IT'S JUST BEEN LIKE THIS EMPTY AREA FOR SO LONG AND NOT CONCISE. SO PEOPLE ALWAYS SAYING THE WEST SIDE NEEDS MORE. WELL, THIS IS A CHANCE FOR THE WEST SIDE TO FINALLY GET MORE AND GET THEIR OWN THING. SO I'M VERY HAPPY WITH IT. I THINK I WOULD USE THIS SUCKS. THERE WE GO. I ACTUALLY THOUGHT ABOUT SAYING THAT, BUT I'M LIKE, WELL, WE'RE OUT OF THAT PUBLIC MEETING, SO I DON'T KNOW IF. ALL RIGHT, FINE. IT SUCKS. IT SUCKED TO WALK THROUGH THERE.
SO PERFECT. THANK YOU. WELL, WITH THAT, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? SURE. SORRY, COMMISSIONER. MAN. THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR SKYLINE COMMONS TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. ANYONE LIKE TO SECOND THAT? I'LL SECOND IT. PERFECT.
THANK YOU. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE, PLEASE. COMMISSIONER PATRICK. HI, SCOTT. HI. HI, TYLER. I SAW A MOTION PASS. PERFECT. NOW WE'RE GOING TO GET MORE STUFF ON THE LEFT SIDE.
PERFECT. SO. THAT'S IT FOR ALL THE BUSINESS ITEMS. THANK YOU TO EVERYONE COMING OUT. THE
[5.I. Planning Commission Meeting Time Change Discussion]
LAST THING WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT, JUST AS A COMMISSION, IS JUST THE TIME CHANGE OF OUR MEETING. WE BRIEFLY DISCUSSED IT LAST MEETING. SOME WERE IN SUPPORT OF IT. SOME WERE LIKE, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY THOUGHTS THEY'D LIKE TO GIVE? RIGHT OFF THE BAT, I HAD JUST ONE THOUGHT IN TERMS OF MY PERSONAL DESIRES, IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE TO ME WHETHER IT'S 6 OR 7, BUT I THINK THE ORIGINAL PURPOSE, THE REASON WHY IT WAS SET FOR SEVEN, IS WE HAVE QUITE A LARGE PORTION OF OUR WORKFORCE WORKS AT INL, AND THEY COME OFF THE SITE IN BUSSES, AND THEY REALLY DON'T HAVE A LOT OF TIME TO GET TO A PUBLIC SECURITY. AND MY CONCERN IS THAT IF WE MOVE THAT UP TO 630, THEN THAT REALLY PUTS A TIGHT CRUNCH ON PEOPLE'S ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN PUBLIC HEARINGS. SO THAT'S THE ONLY CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS WE DON'T WANT TO DISCOURAGE PUBLIC INPUT. AND WE'VE GOT GOOD PUBLIC INPUT. I WOULD ADD I'VE SEEN IT OVER THE YEARS I'VE BEEN HERE. YEAH. ANYTHING NEW? WE'RE STILL LOOKING FOR IT. I LEARNED A LOT. ABSOLUTELY. I WISH I HAD AN ANSWER OR HAD AN IDEA OF, YOU KNOW, WHEN THOSE BUSSES COME IN, BECAUSE I SEE HIM COMING IN EVEN AT, YOU KNOW, 4 OR 5, 6:00 SO DID THEY USED TO BE A LOT LATER OR. I MEAN, ALWAYS SEVEN LIBRARY COLLECTION. THERE'S A FEW DIFFERENT OPTIONS THERE. YOUR QUESTION FROM THE EMAIL, I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. I'M SORRY. YEAH. MY UNDERSTANDING IS BUS RIDERS AT INL WHO ARE COMING OUT FROM THE SITE OR COMING BACK FROM THE SITE HAVE A FEW DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR BUS TIMINGS IF THEY CAN GET ON. I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY SOMETHING OUR CITY COUNCIL IS CONSIDERING AS WELL. THEY RECENTLY MOVED THEIR TIMES TO 630 FOR MY LIKE. LIKE YOU, I DON'T HAVE A PERSONAL PREFERENCE. I HAVE SEEN ANECDOTALLY, IT FEELS LIKE SOME OF OUR MEETINGS HAVE GONE QUITE LATE RECENTLY. I THINK IT MAKES IT MORE ACCESSIBLE FOR SOME PEOPLE TO COME EARLIER VERSUS STAYING LATER. IF THEY HAVE CHILDREN AT HOME OR A JOB TO WAKE UP AT AND GET ON A BUS AT 5:00 IN THE MORNING, IT'S A TRADE OFF. I DO THINK GOING TO 630 CREATES A LITTLE MORE PREDICTABILITY FOR FOLKS WHO HAVE NOW SEEN THE CITY COUNCIL MAKE THAT MEETING EARLIER, I THINK IT BRINGS US IN LINE WITH THEM. IS THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECISION? THEY'RE CHANGING. THEY HAVE THEY THEY HAVE MADE THE CHANGE NOW OFFICIALLY TO 630 FROM 730. SO THE IDEA IS, IS, WELL, PLANNING AND ZONING IS ALSO 630. THEN WE'RE EXACTLY THE SAME TIME THEY ARE. AND SO IT'S EASY FOR THE PUBLIC TO REMEMBER THE TIME BECAUSE BEFORE THEY WERE AT 730 AND WE WERE AT SEVEN. AND SO IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, GOT WEIRD.YEAH. THANK YOU. YEAH. THERE'S A REASONABLE TO GET INPUT FROM STAFF WHILE THEY. YES I'M SURE THAT'S FINE. YEAH. WE I DON'T KNOW THAT WE PER SE HAVE A PREFERENCE. WE'D LIKE TO DO WHAT IS MOST CONVENIENT FOR THE PUBLIC AND MOST CONVENIENT FOR YOU. WE RECOGNIZE YOUR VOLUNTEERS AND WE VALUE YOUR TIME, AND WE WANT TO RESPECT THAT. WE HAVE HAD A COUPLE
[00:50:01]
INSTANCES IN THE PAST WHERE PEOPLE HAVE MIXED UP THE TIME BETWEEN CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION, AND HAVE COME AT THE WRONG TIME. SO THAT IS DEFINITELY SOMETHING TO CONSIDER. AND THEN THE LIKE THE LATE AGENDAS, LIKE YOU TALK ABOUT SOMETIMES WE DO END UP WITH A PRETTY FULL AGENDA, BUT WE ALSO KNOW YOU ALL HAVE JOBS AND THINGS THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO TRANSITION BETWEEN TOO. SO I THINK IT'S REALLY JUST AT WHAT THE COMMISSION DESIRES AND WHAT THEY, WHAT THEY WANT TO DO. IT MAKES WE GET PAID TO BE HERE. SO WE'LL BE OKAY. PERSONALLY, I'M WITH COMMISSIONER STEWART. MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE TO ME, BUT I AM CONCERNED THAT WE ACCOMMODATE THE PUBLIC SO THAT THAT IS A CONCERN. AND YEAH, I FOR ME AS WELL, IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE FOR ME. SO. I THINK, YOU KNOW, YEAH, IF WE MOVE TO 630 MAYBE SOME PEOPLE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO GO I DON'T KNOW. IT'S ALWAYS A WIN WIN OR A LOSE LOSE. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE EVERYONE. BUT I THINK AS A COMMUNICATION STANDPOINT THAT I KNOW THAT THE MAYOR IS DEFINITELY FOCUSED ON TRYING TO BE MORE OPEN WITH THE COMMUNITY AND BE VERY CLEAR AND CONCISE WITH THE COMMUNITY. I THINK THAT'S MORE IMPORTANT THAT WE'RE ALIGNED WITH CITY COUNCIL. SO THAT WAY, AGAIN, IT'S NOT CONFUSING TO THE PUBLIC AND IT'S JUST PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. IT'S ALL JUST ABOUT THE DAY, I THINK JUST YEAH, BEING PREDICTABLE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN TRYING TO ANECDOTALLY FIGURE OUT, WELL, WHO WHO CAN COME AND WHO CAN'T COME, BECAUSE THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE A CIRCUMSTANCE FOR EVERYONE. SO THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. SO. AND YOU MIGHT THINK TO A LOT OF, I MEAN, MOST OF THE ITEMS THAT COME TO YOU ARE RECOMMENDED THEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL. SO IF YOU THINK ABOUT A PROPERTY OWNER WHO'S RECEIVING A NOTICE IN THE MAIL OR DRIVING BY A SIGN ONE TIME, IT'S GOING TO BE A ONE HOUR OR THE NEXT TIME THAT THEY'RE HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, IT'S AT A DIFFERENT TIME. SO THAT ALSO MIGHT CREATE A CONFUSING SITUATION FOR THE PROGRESSION OF AN ITEM. FOR THE VERY EXACT, THE SAME ITEM AS IT GOES THROUGH. YEAH, YEAH FOR SURE. HOW WOULD WE GO ABOUT DO WE JUST IF WE WANT TO VOTE. YES, WE JUST SOMEONE MAKES A MOTION TO CHANGE THE TIME AND THEN WE JUST LET LEGAL FIGURE OUT LATER HOW TO DO THAT. SO THE DOES IT HAVE TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL OR CAN WE. IT DOES NOT. YOU CAN JUST MAKE A MOTION. THE SPECIFIC TIMING OF YOUR MEETING IS NOT LISTED IN YOUR BYLAWS OR IN IN CITY CODE. IN THAT REGARD, YOU SET YOUR MEETING SCHEDULE. WE GENERALLY WILL ADOPT THE MEETING SCHEDULE OF FIRST OF THE YEAR FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR, JUST SO THAT IT'S KNOWN, AND PEOPLE HAVE AN IDEA OF WHEN IT'S WHEN IT'S OCCURRING REGULARLY. SO REALLY, IF YOU DID WANT TO MAKE A CHANGE, YOU WOULD JUST NEED A MOTION. OKAY. PERFECT. WELL, DOES ANYONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? I WOULD PERSONALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THE CHANGE FOR THE REASONS WE'VE DISCUSSED. I'M HESITANT TO DO IT ON A NIGHT WHEN WE HAVE A RELATIVELY SMALL NUMBER OF OUR COMMISSIONERS HERE. I DO WANT TO BE CONSCIOUS OF OF, YOU KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING WE WOULD DECIDE TONIGHT THAT WOULD AFFECT EVERYONE GOING FORWARD. IN THE ABSENCE OF THREE OF OUR COMMISSIONERS, I'M NOT SURE TONIGHT'S THE NIGHT TO MAKE THAT MOTION. YEAH. HOW MANY WERE MISSING? GLENN? VIENNA AND MARY AND MARY. YEAH. MY MEMORY. THOSE ARE DISCUSSION LAST TIME IS THOSE THREE WERE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE CHANGE. AND I THINK WITH ANNE REACHED OUT TO EVERYBODY TO JUST KIND OF GET A PULSE THERE WASN'T THEY WEREN'T CONCERNED WITH. YEAH. BECAUSE MARY WAS HERE LAST TIME AND GLENN AND AND AND. YEAH. AND I'M SURE IF THEY DID HAVE A THEY KNEW IT WAS A THING. SO THEY PROBABLY WOULD HAVE REACHED OUT TO ANNE AND SAID, NO, I DON'T LIKE IT. BUT THE FACT THAT THEY HAVEN'T OKAY, SEEMS TO ME THAT WE'VE GOT A QUORUM HERE. AND WHAT WE'RE GOING TO WAIT UNTIL EVERYBODY'S HERE AND WHO KNOWS WHEN THAT MIGHT BE, RIGHT? AND THEY KNEW WE WERE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THIS, RIGHT. YEAH, I THINK THAT'S WHAT I SAID. I DON'T SEE THE BIG RUSH TO BRING IT INTO CONFORMITY. I'M OKAY EITHER WAY. BUT YEAH, I THINK THAT. OKAY.CAN WE LEAVE EMOTION OPEN AND LET PEOPLE VOTE? I, I DON'T THINK I DON'T THINK THAT'S NOT LEGAL, IS IT. NO, I DON'T THINK WE GET A SECOND. DID WE. NO, I, I DIDN'T MAKE A MOTION, I JUST I WAS MAKING HE WAS DISCUSSING. YEAH. HE WAS JUST DISCUSSING BEFORE I MADE A MOTION. I THINK IF OUR, IF EVERYONE ON THE PANEL IS COMFORTABLE WITH IT, IT'S ALSO LIKE CARRIE SAID, SOMETHING THAT'S NOT DEFINED BY STATUTE. RIGHT. SO IF WE FIND THAT IN A MONTH FROM NOW, THAT WAS A BAD IDEA. AND MOST OF OUR COMMISSIONERS CAN'T MAKE IT. WE'LL TRY IT AGAIN. YEAH, WE
[00:55:01]
CAN ALWAYS CHANGE IT, YOU KNOW, A MONTH OR TWO FROM NOW TO SEE HOW IT GOES. SO IN THAT CASE, I MOVE THAT THIS COMMISSION CHANGE THE STANDARD TIME OF OUR MEETING FROM 7 P.M. TO 6:30 P.M. ON TUESDAYS, ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF EACH MONTH. PERFECT. ANYONE WANT TO SECOND THAT? I'LL SECOND. PERFECT. WE'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL. COMMISSIONER. PATRICK. HI, SCOTT. HI, LIANE.HI, TYLER. HI, MR. I. SO SINCE WE DID THAT THERE, THAT WOULD IMMEDIATELY GO INTO EFFECT FOR THE NEXT MEETING. WE DIDN'T HAVE TO SPECIFY SPECIFICALLY WHEN THAT TAKES PLACE. CORRECT.
WE'LL MAKE THE ADJUSTMENT WITH ALL THE NOTICES TO GO TO PROPERTY OWNERS, AS WELL AS JUST THE AGENDA AND EVERYTHING ELSE. SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER UPDATES, ITEMS? ANYTHING YOU NEED TO MENTION TO US? YES. SO IMPORTANT ITEM. WE DID HIRE A NEW PLANNER. MIKE THROWER IS TAKING NATURE'S POSITION. NICE. WELCOME, MIKE. MIKE COMES TO US FROM WEST VIRGINIA. VIRGINIA. VIRGINIA. VIRGINIA. REGULAR. REGULAR. VIRGINIA. REGULAR. REGULAR.
VIRGINIA. PERFECT. YEAH. WHERE? HE JUST STARTED YESTERDAY. SO NICE. YOU'LL BE SEEING HIM IN MONTHS TO COME. AWESOME. GREAT. HOW DOES NEXT MONTH LOOK? NEXT MONTH IS FAIRLY LIGHT. OKAY. 3 OR 4 ITEMS. YOU MIGHT. YOU MOST LIKELY WILL SEE IMPACT FEES IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COME BACK TO YOU. BUT I THINK AFTER THE LAST MEETING THAT YOU WERE ALL AT, YOU KIND OF PROBABLY INFERRED THAT. SO YEAH. AND THEN JUST A COUPLE REGULAR BUSINESS ITEMS, I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT COUNTS AS A MEETING IF THE BACK PAGE. YEAH, IT MIGHT BRING OUT ITEMS, BUT THAT'S A BIG ONE. YEAH. IT'LL BE STARTING EARLIER. SO YEAH YOU'LL GET THAT AT THE SAME TIME. IS THE THE IMPACT FEE. IS IT, ARE THEY JUST AMENDING A FEW OF THE ITEMS FROM THE BIG THING THAT WE HAVE. IT WOULD BE IMPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. I HAVEN'T SEEN A DRAFT OR SO. I DON'T KNOW HOW SIGNIFICANT THE CHANGES ARE. SO. SOUNDS GOOD.
OKAY, WELL, CAN I DO ONE THING BEFORE WE ADJOURN? YEAH. I WANT TO GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO OUR RECORDING SECRETARY, BECAUSE I READ 14 PAGES OF MINUTES AND THEY WERE EXCELLENTLY DONE. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. YES, ABSOLUTELY. I, I GET TALKING AND I START FEELING I GENUINELY TRY TO KEEP IT CONCISE OR STRAIGHTFORWARD, PURELY JUST FOR YOU. I DON'T LIKE THE PUBLIC CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT I'M SAYING, BUT LIKE, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE'RE THREE HOURS IN AND YOU'RE STILL TYPING AWAY, I'M LIKE, MAN, I BETTER WRAP IT UP. SO YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. WE APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT YOU DO. SO SWEET. WELL THANK YOU. WELL, WITH THAT,
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.