[Call to Order and Roll Call]
[00:00:08]
ALL RIGHT. GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. WELCOME TO THE IDAHO FALLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION.
AS COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A PREFACE, I WILL NOTE WE HAVE A LONG AGENDA. BUT. AND SO WE'RE GOING TO GET GOING WITH THAT. I'D LIKE TO INVITE THE CITY CLERK TO CALL THE ROLL. AND LET ME FIRST SAY THAT. COUNCILOR BURTON, SHE IS AWAY TODAY. AND NOT JUST MISSING IN ACTION.
SHE'S HAD HAD ARRANGED A FAMILY TRIP PRIOR TO, WELL, EARLIER THIS YEAR. AND SO SHE'S GONE.
ACTUALLY, WE DO HAVE HER ON TV. JUST WE HAD SOME TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES, BUT IT JUST HAPPENED. IT WASN'T PLANNED THAT SHE'S GOING TO BE ON, BUT SHE IS ON NOW. PERFECT. PERFECT. OKAY.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT BURTENSHAW MAY HAVE LOST HER. SHE WAS ON JUST A SECOND AGO. WE'LL COME BACK.
COUNCILOR RADFORD, PRESENT. COUNCILOR DINGMAN HERE. COUNCILOR FREEMAN HERE.
COUNCILOR. FRANCIS HERE. COUNCILOR LARSON HERE. MAYOR, YOU HAVE A QUORUM, AND I'LL LET YOU KNOW WHEN SHE'S BACK ON. OKAY? AND IT SOMETIMES TURNS OUT TO WHEN DOING REMOTE, DEPENDING ON THE CONDITIONS AND THE INTERNET QUALITY. AND SOMETIMES IT'S JUST EASIER TO WATCH THE LIVE STREAM. BUT WE'LL NOTE THAT SHE'S AT LEAST TRYING TO TRYING TO PAY ATTENTION. AND LISA, IF IT JUST ENDS UP HAPPENING THAT YOU NEED TO WATCH IT, YOU CAN ALWAYS TEXT WHEN YOUR COLLEAGUES
[Airport]
IF YOU HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE. BUT ANYWAY, HERE WE GO. THE VERY FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ONE THAT IS NOT JUST A PASSIVE LISTENING, LEARNING, TALKING ABOUT THINGS. THIS IS SOMETHING WHERE DIRECTOR TURNER REQUIRES SOME WHAT'S THE WORD AT A VERY PARTICULAR ACTION. HE NEEDS AN APPROVAL AND HE'LL EXPLAIN THAT PROCESS AND WHY AND THE DEADLINES INVOLVED. AND SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND TURN IT TO YOU. DIRECTOR TURNER FROM THE AIRPORT. THANK YOU. MAYOR. AS I MENTIONED AT LAST MONTH'S AIRPORT BOARD MEETING, I FOUND OUT AT THE END OF JULY THE STATE WAS CONSIDERING ANOTHER ROUND OF EITHER LEADING IDAHO OR IDAHO FIRST GRANTS. THE AMOUNT WAS $450,000, AND THE IT BOARD DID APPROVE THAT. SO THE ACTION ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THAT GRANT OF $450,000. THERE IS NO LOCAL MATCH REQUIRED ON THIS ONE, AND IT IS WRITTEN FOR ANY CURRENT PROJECT. AND SO BUT IT CAN CHANGE DOWN THE ROAD. RIGHT NOW, THE INTENT IS TO LOWER THE LOCAL MATCH ON THE TERMINAL EXPANSION. OKAY. AND YOU'RE SEEKING APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION THAT'S ATTACHED TO THE PACKET. CORRECT. SO THAT THERE CAN BE A SIGNATURE AND EXECUTION ON THAT RESOLUTION. SO I DON'T KNOW. COUNCIL MEMBER, SINCE YOU STUDIED YOUR PACKET, DID YOU FIND THAT YOU HAD ANY PARTICULAR QUESTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MONEY OR THE GRANT SOURCE? ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES? IT SOUNDS LIKE IT COULD BE USED FOR PROJECTS, RIGHT? ALL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OKAY. AND THAT'S WHERE OUR BIGGEST NEED IS. RIGHT? SO OKAY, SO WE HAVE A NEED I GUESS IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, WE HAVE A NEED FOR A MOTION. AND I'LL TAKE THAT FROM ANY COUNCIL MEMBER I MOVE COUNCIL APPROVE THE RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE IDAHO AIRPORT AID PROGRAM NUMBER F25. S I'D A PROJECT SP DASH ZERO THREE AND APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. IF YOU COULD JUST ADD THAT I DID APPROVE THE RESOLUTION. OH IT STARTED OUT SORRY I, I ONLY HEARD EXCEPT FORGIVE ME. ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK. WILL YOU CONDUCT A ROLL? COUNCIL MEMBERS.EVERYBODY CLEARER THAN I WAS ON THE MOTION. READY TO GO. ALL RIGHT, CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT A VOTE, FRANCIS A FREEMAN? YES. DINGMAN. YES. LARSON. YES. RADFORD. AYE. AND BURTENSHAW IS STILL OFFLINE. OKAY. WE'RE WORKING THROUGH IT. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT.
[Idaho Falls Downtown Development Corporation]
THANK YOU. COUNCIL. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. DIRECTOR. ALL RIGHT. WELL THE NEXT ITEM ON OUR AGENDA AND I WALKED OUT IN SUCH A HURRY THAT I DIDN'T CHANGE FROM THE COMPUTER GLASSES TO MY REGULAR ONES. AND SO EVERYTHING THAT ISN'T RIGHT HERE, I CAN'T SEE VERY WELL, SO I APOLOGIZE. BUT YOU'RE TURNING TIME OVER NOW TO THE IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. THE NEW DIRECTOR, CARRIE HAMMOND, IS HERE, AND IT HAS BEEN IN THE PAST THAT IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT HAS WORKED THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. JUST BECAUSE THERE WAS A GOOD TIGHT FIT THERE. WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING A CHANGE, AND SO THAT TIGHT FIT WILL BE THERE FOR SOME THINGS RELATED TO CDS, BUT AS FAR AS ADMINISTRATIVELY[00:05:01]
FACILITATING THE NEEDS OF IFDC WITHIN THE CITY, THAT IS GOING TO NOW BE COORDINATED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOLKS OR NOT FOCUSED PERSON. BUT THAT WOULD BE CATHERINE MCCLURE.CATHERINE WOULD BE HERE, BUT SHE IS OUT TODAY. AND SO WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN IT TO YOU, DIRECTOR SANTER, FOR ANYTHING YOU MAY WANT TO SHARE. AND DIRECTOR SANDERS SEAT IS EMPTY BECAUSE HE'S PASSING OUT PACKETS RIGHT NOW, BUT HE'S ON HIS WAY BACK. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I'M AS YOU SAID, I'M A BIT OF A RENTAL FOR CATHERINE, BUT I'M JUST HERE TO INTRODUCE CARRIE HAMMOND, WHO'S THE DIRECTOR OF IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. IF YOU REMEMBER, IFDC HAD COME TO YOU ABOUT METERED PARKING AND HAD PRESENTED TO YOU BACK IN NOVEMBER OF 2024. THERE HAS BEEN SOME CHANGES IN THE DIRECTOR ROLE. AND SO THEY'RE HERE BEFORE YOU. WE ARE LOOKING FOR SOME SOME DIRECTION AS STAFF, BUT ALSO FOR THEM TO PRESENT THE PROPOSED PARKING METER FOR OUR DOWNTOWN, METERING FOR OUR DOWNTOWN AND PARKING ENFORCEMENT. SO WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO CARRIE. I NEED NO INTRODUCTION. HAVING BEEN TO THE EMPLOYEE FOR A GREAT MANY YEARS, EVERYBODY SEEMS TO BE PRETTY COMFORTABLE IN KNOWING YOU, BUT WE'RE ANXIOUS TO HEAR FROM YOU IN WHICH YOU'RE GOING TO BRING TO THE TABLE TODAY.
THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. I DID GO BACK AND WATCH THAT COUNCIL MEETING FROM NOVEMBER, SO HOPEFULLY I ANSWER ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP IN NOVEMBER, BUT FEEL FREE TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS AS THEY COME UP. SO IF YOU I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH THIS INFORMATION, THERE'S A LOT OF INFORMATION IN THESE SLIDES WITH THE INTENT OF EDUCATING NOT ONLY YOU, BUT ALSO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO MAY BE WATCHING THIS PRESENTATION, BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF HISTORY TO OUR OUR DOWNTOWN PARKING. SO I'LL KIND OF SPEED THROUGH THE HISTORY OF DOWNTOWN PARKING AND THEN GO RIGHT INTO THE NEEDS AND THE FUTURE OF DOWNTOWN AND WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY. SO FIRST I EVERYBODY'S GOT TO PLAY WITH I SO I PLAYED WITH I THIS MORNING ASKING IT TO GENERATE SOME KIND OF ICE BREAKING IMAGE ABOUT DOWNTOWN PARKING. AND THIS IS WHAT IT CAME UP WITH. SO I THOUGHT IT WAS KIND OF FUNNY, BUT I NEED SOME WORK. BUT I GOT TO TAP INTO THAT RESOURCE TODAY.
I WANTED TO START WITH THE MISSION OF IFDC. IT ADVANCES OUR HISTORICAL DOWNTOWN AS A REGIONAL CENTER FOR COMMERCE, CULTURE AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES FOR RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. AND EVERYTHING WE DO GOES RIGHT BACK TO THAT MISSION. SO WE LIKE TO PUT IT FIRST AS A REMINDER OF WHY WE'RE HERE AND WHAT WE DO. TODAY'S AGENDA TEAMS AND PARTNERS, STAKEHOLDERS, OBJECTIVES. SO THIS IS JUST A LIST OF WHAT WE'LL GO THROUGH TODAY. I WANT TO LEAVE PLENTY OF TIME AT THE END. MAYOR SAYS WE HAVE ABOUT 15 MINUTES. SO DIRECTOR SANDERS CAN KIND OF HELP ME KEEP KEEP ON TRACK AND WRAP UP THE. THAT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. TEAMS AND PARTNERS. AS I SAT DOWN AND WROTE DOWN A LIST OF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT ARE INVOLVED IN DOWNTOWN PARKING, I'M SURE I MISSED SOMEBODY OR SOME ENTITY, BUT IT'S NOT DONE JUST BY IFDC.
WE WORK CLOSELY WITH THE CITY. I THINK CITY STAFF CAN ATTEST TO THE AMOUNT OF PHONE CALLS I'VE MADE OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF MONTHS. JUST ASKING QUESTIONS, GETTING HISTORY. THEY'VE BEEN PHENOMENAL TO WORK FOR OR WORK WITH. I DO WANT TO MENTION, FIRST OF ALL, OUR PARKING AMBASSADOR. HE'S A STAFF WITH DDC AND THAT'S JUAN. SO HE'S THE BOOTS ON THE GROUND GETTING THINGS DONE. HE'S EXCELLENT AT CUSTOMER SERVICE AND DOES A FANTASTIC JOB WITH OUR PARKING.
NOT JUST ENFORCEMENT, BUT ALSO EDUCATION. OUR PARKING COMMITTEE, WE HAVE OUR COMMITTEE CHAIR. AS I RAISE, RAISE YOUR HAND AS I MENTION YOUR NAME, IF YOU WILL, JAKE. BRANDI NEWTON, JILL HANSEN, KEVIN CUTLER, MATT JACOBSON, AND I DON'T THINK CHIP IS HERE, BUT I THINK I GOT EVERYTHING RIGHT THAT I MENTIONED EVERYBODY. SO I ALSO APPRECIATE THEIR TIME. THEY'VE BEEN LIKE SO MUCH SUPPORT AND SO MUCH HELP TO ME, ESPECIALLY CATCHING ME UP. I KNOW KNEW SOME ABOUT DOWNTOWN PARKING FROM WORKING FOR THE CITY, BUT OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A LOT OF NUANCES. SO THAT PARKING COMMITTEE HAS BEEN FANTASTIC WITH HELPING ME GETTING UP TO SPEED. STAKEHOLDERS. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT DOWNTOWN PARKING, THERE ARE A LOT OF ENTITIES THAT USE DOWNTOWN PARKING AND A LOT OF STAKEHOLDERS INVOLVED THAT WE RECOGNIZE. WE LOOK AT, WE TALK ABOUT OFTEN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE MEETING THE NEEDS FOR ALL OF OUR USER GROUPS. SO THIS IS JUST A REVIEW OF ALL THE STAKEHOLDERS. I WON'T GO THROUGH AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST, BUT JUST REALIZE WHAT AND WHO DOWNTOWN PARKING IMPACTS. RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES, VISITORS AND
[00:10:02]
CUSTOMERS. CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF COURSE. IFDC PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION. I'VE BEEN WORKING QUITE A BIT WITH THIS STREET SUPERINTENDENT, BRIAN CARDIN, ON THESE EFFORTS. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, OF COURSE, MAYOR'S OFFICE, WORKING CLOSELY WITH CATHERINE, I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY LUNCHES I'VE HAD WITH CATHERINE TO GET UP TO SPEED ON PARKING AS WELL. I APPRECIATE HER ASSISTANCE AS WELL AS ELECTED OFFICIALS, CITY AS WELL, AS WELL AS THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHO ARE WERE MADE AWARE OF THIS MEETING TODAY AND THAT PARKING CHANGES MAY BE COMING. DOWNTOWN. THE HEART AND SOUL OF OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE THE RIVERWALK CUISINE, COCKTAILS, COFFEE, MUSIC, ART, LOCAL ARTISANS SERVICES, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, CULTURE, COMMUNITY EVENTS. THESE WERE JUST SOME OF THE WORDS THAT CAME UP WHEN I WHEN I THOUGHT ABOUT DOWNTOWN. IT'S VIBRANT. IF YOU'VE BEEN TO ANY OF THE EVENTS LATELY, YOU'LL NOTICE HOW PACKED THEY ARE. THEY'RE JUST THEY'RE BECOMING PRIME PLACES TO GO. SO OUR DOWNTOWN IS THRIVING AND IT'S EXCITING TO SEE. DOWN OKAY. SO OBJECTIVES. SO CREATING A CUSTOMER CENTRIC APPROACH BY OFFERING A VARIETY OF CONVENIENT AND FLEXIBLE OPTIONS FOR HOW PEOPLE CHOOSE TO EXPERIENCE DOWNTOWN. SO I KNOW THAT CATHERINE HAD STARTED THIS WHEN WE ROLLED OUT THE LAST PARKING INITIATIVE. I BELIEVE IT WAS CATHERINE. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT WE STILL OFFER THAT FIRST PARKING CITATION, THAT DOWNTOWN PARKING CITATION THAT SOMEBODY GETS. WE USUALLY DISMISS THAT WE PROVIDE EDUCATION, GIVE THEM DIFFERENT PLACES TO PARK ALTERNATIVES. SO WE'RE STILL PRACTICING THAT METHOD. AND WE CONTINUE TO WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES THAT WE HAVE COMING UP, CREATE A SORRY, I HIT 50 AND NOW THESE ARE REQUIRING CREATE A UNIQUE AND INVITING DOWNTOWN AREA THAT IS EASILY ACCESSIBLE FOR ALL FOR ALL RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS. SO THOSE ARE A COUPLE OF HIGHLIGHTS OF THE OBJECTIVES.I WON'T GO THROUGH ALL OF THEM SINCE THEY'RE IN FRONT OF YOU, BUT I DO WANT TO DISCUSS THE HISTORY, BECAUSE THERE'S STILL A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND THE IDAHO FALLS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT. SO THIS IS A SUMMARY OF OUR BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, JUST A REMINDER OF OUR BOUNDARIES, WHICH IS YELLOWSTONE. OVER TO MEMORIAL DRIVE AND CLIFF UP TO D STREET WITH THE NEW FIRE STATION ONE IS LOCATED. IN HISTORY. THE PACKET THAT I HANDED OUT TO ALL OF YOU, I INCLUDED. THIS IS JUST A RECAP OF THE METERED PARKING ZONING ORDINANCE. SO THIS IS WORD FOR WORD. WHAT I GOT FROM THE ORDINANCE, A COUPLE OF THINGS I WANTED TO HIT ON THE THIRD BULLET DOWN, IT SAYS THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE, LIMIT AND CONTROL TRAFFIC AND PARKING WITHIN ITS BOUNDARIES.
CONSIDERING THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS AND ITS AUTHORITY, AS WELL AS PLACE CARE FOR AND REMOVE PARKING METERS. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PARKING METERS TODAY, CONSIDER THAT THAT COULD BE MECHANICAL. OR THEY COULD BE APP BASED, TECHNOLOGY BASED METERS. BECAUSE USUALLY WHEN PEOPLE HEAR THE WORD METER, THEY'RE THINKING OF A PARKING METER. SO I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT PARKING METERS, THE LAST BULLET MECHANICAL OR APP BASED I INSERTED THAT ARE INTENDED TO RELIEVE CONGESTION, PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE TURNOVER OF ON STREET PARKING SPACES. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT ON STREET PARKING, REMEMBER THAT THE TURNOVER THAT IS OUR GOAL. JUST LIKE WHEN YOU GO TO A RESTAURANT AND YOU SIT DOWN AT A TABLE, THEY'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE TURNOVER. IT'S BUSY RESTAURANT, RIGHT? YOU WANT TO TURN OVER THOSE TABLES AND GET MORE CUSTOMERS IN. THAT'S THE INTENT OF THE ON STREET PARKING AS WELL. I DID HAVE SOMEBODY RECENTLY SAY, YOU KNOW, I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW A NONPROFIT MEANING IFDC CAN ENFORCE PARKING. SO THIS I WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS GIVES US THAT THROUGH AN MOU AND THROUGH AN ORDINANCE THAT WE HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE PARKING DOWNTOWN. SO HISTORY, IF YOU MOVE TO THE NEXT PAGE, IS OUR MOU OR OUR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. THIS IS JUST A RECAP OF THAT. WE RECENTLY UPDATED THAT WITH AN AMENDMENT THROUGH THE CITY'S CITY ATTORNEY. SO SECOND BULLET DOWN CITY PAYS IFDC 92,200 PER YEAR TO MANAGE AND ENFORCE ON STREET AND OFF STREET PARKING IN DOWNTOWN. WE COLLECT THE REVENUE FROM THE PARKING PROGRAM THAT ARE ACCOUNTED FOR AND USED EXCLUSIVELY ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OR MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF CITY STREETS, PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES AND PUBLIC PROPERTY. AND THEN ONE, TWO, THREE, THE FOURTH ONE DOWN. NOTHING IN THE MOU PRECLUDES
[00:15:05]
IFDC FROM RETAINING MONIES COLLECTED IN EXCESS OF IFDC PROGRAM EXPENSES AS A RESERVED FUNDS FOR FUTURE DOWNTOWN PARKING IMPROVEMENTS. AND THEN TOWARD THE BOTTOM IFDC TO PROVIDE ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORTING TO THE CITY. LIKE DIRECTOR SANDRA SAID, WE'VE HAD A CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP AT DDC, SO THAT HASN'T BEEN DONE. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DONE IN JUNE. I'VE INCLUDED SOME OF THOSE NUMBERS IN TODAY TO SERVE AS KIND OF A DUAL PURPOSE OF THOSE REPORTING THAT YOU REQUESTED. AND I'M SURE SOME OF YOU HAVE BEEN PRESENTED WITH THE CARL WALKER STUDY THAT WAS DONE. I'M NOT GOING TO GO OVER THAT EXTENSIVELY, BUT IF YOU WOULD LIKE A COPY OF IT, JUST LET ME KNOW. BUT I DID PULL A COUPLE OF NUMBERS FROM THERE. AND 1084 ON STREET PARKING SPACES AND 3054 OFF STREET PARKING SPACES. AND THAT WAS DONE IN WHAT YEAR? 2009 2009? CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG. OKAY. CURRENT DOWNTOWN PARKING FACILITIES. SO I KNOW IN THE PACKET I PRINTED THIS OFF IN BLACK AND WHITE, BUT IF YOU LOOK UP ON THE SCREEN, IT'LL KIND OF GIVE YOU A LEGEND. WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT ON STREET. TWO HOUR PARKING THROUGHOUT THE BID. AGAIN, THIS IS JUST IN THE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 755 SPACES. WE HAVE TEN 20 MINUTE LOADING AND UNLOADING ZONES. I LOOK INTO OPTIONS TO SEE IF WE CAN EXPAND THAT. OF COURSE, IF YOU ADD MORE LOADING ZONES, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE AWAY SOME PARKING PARKING SPACES. SO THAT'S NOT AN OPTION RIGHT NOW. PAID PARKING LOTS.THESE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE MANAGED BY IFDC A LOT, WHICH IS BEHIND IDAHO MOUNTAIN TRADING 75 SPACES, B LOT BEHIND CHANNEL BED BLEND AT 63 SPACES. CAPITAL LOT, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT'S NEAR THE COUNTY ELECTIONS OFFICE, 63 SPACES. THE BROADWAY PARKING GARAGE. THERE ARE 44 PERMITS IN THAT GARAGE. THEN WE HAVE, OF COURSE, FREE DATE FREE ALL DAY PARKING, WHICH IS ON THE MAP AS WELL. FREE PARKING THROUGHOUT THE BID FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES THERE. THERE IS NO CHARGE FOR THAT. SO THEY PARK, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DESIGNATED SPOTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THEY THEY DON'T GET A PARKING CITATION FOR PARKING IN FRONT. SO EVEN IF THEY'RE NOT IN DESIGNATED SPOT, AS LONG AS THEY HAVE THE REAR VIEW MIRROR. YEAH. CORRECT. FREE ON STREET PARKING FOR GENERAL PUBLIC AFTER 6 P.M. ON WEEKENDS. THIS IS CURRENTLY AND DURING FEDERAL HOLIDAYS. AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE BIKE RACKS FOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS THAT CHOOSE TO RIDE THEIR BIKE DOWNTOWN. FIVE PAY STATIONS LOCATED IN FOUR DIFFERENT PARKING LOTS. WE HAVE ONE AT THE BROADWAY PLAZA BEHIND SMOKE AND FINS ON CAPITOL AVENUE BETWEEN A AND B STREET. THE B PARKING LOT BEHIND CHANNEL BLEND. AND THEN THERE ARE TWO IN OUR A LOT BECAUSE THAT'S OUR BIGGEST LOT. THEY'RE BEHIND IDAHO MOUNTAIN TRADING. SO WE CURRENTLY HAVE FIVE PAY STATIONS WHERE PEOPLE CAN GO UP AND PAY FOR PARKING IN THOSE LOTS. ALL FIVE PAY STATIONS ARE PAID OFF, BUT THEY ARE VERY DUE FOR MAINTENANCE AND UPGRADES. ON SOME OF THOSE. WE USED TO HAVE SIGNAGE ABOVE THESE PARKING METER OR IF YOU WILL PAY STATIONS. IT USED TO BE LIKE A.
MATERIAL KIND OF FLIMSY. THOSE HAVE BEEN REMOVED. AND I'M PROPOSING THAT WE ADD THE NEW PAY STATION SIGNAGE THAT IS COMPLIANT WITH MUTCD. THAT'S ON THAT PAGE AS WELL. SO I WORK WITH BRIAN ON THAT SO THAT THAT SYMBOL. I'M JUST CURIOUS. COUNCIL MEMBERS, THAT IS AN INTERESTING SYMBOL TO ME BECAUSE I IT DOESN'T SCREAM TO ME, OH, THIS IS A PAID PARKING SPACE.
BUT WILL WE WILL IT REPLACE THE P FOR PARKING OR WILL IT ACCOMPANY IT. THIS IS JUST IN THE COMPANY. AND THIS IS JUST FOR AT THE CURRENT PAY STATIONS THAT WE HAVE. SO IT'LL JUST GO MAYBE JUST LIKE A STICKER MOUNTED ON THERE BELOW THE IT CAN BE PUT ON A SIGN, THE ONE BEHIND ACTUALLY ON THE BROADWAY PLAZA. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AT SOMETHING DIFFERENT BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE A POLE RIGHT THERE CURRENTLY. SO WE'RE WORKING WITH JILL ON THAT, WHERE WE WOULD PUT THAT SIGNAGE. BUT GETTING STANDARDIZED SIGNAGE THAT WE CAN ALSO INCLUDE IN ALL OF OUR PUBLIC EDUCATION WHERE YOU GO TO PAY. SO THEY'RE LOOKING FOR THAT ICON, IS ONE OF THE THINGS WE'RE PROPOSING MOVING FORWARD WITH, YOU KNOW, JUST CURIOUS. I'VE HEARD COMMENTS AND WE ALL HEAR THEM. YOU KNOW, WHEN KINDLE CAME OUT, PEOPLE SAID BOOKS ARE GOING TO BE OBSOLETE. WELL, EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE YOU HEAR THAT COINS ARE GOING TO BE OBSOLETE. AND SO I THAT I JUST FIND THAT TO BE INTERESTING. MAYBE WHATEVER I HEARD ABOUT COINS BECOMING
[00:20:01]
OBSOLETE IS LIKE 50 YEARS PREMATURE. BUT ANYWAY. AND THEY CAN PAY WITH COINS OR CARDS.YES. TWO OF THOSE. YEP. AND WE DO GO AROUND AND EMPTY THOSE COINS AND INTERESTING.
THANKFULLY I HAVE ONE TO HELP ME WITH THAT. OUR CURRENT PARKING RATES AND FEES. SO THE PAY STATION ON BROADWAY PLAZA, YOU CAN SEE THAT HOURLY AND THE DAY RATES THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE, PUBLIC PARKING FEES. AND THIS IS ACCORDING TO THE FEE SCHEDULE. IT'S UNDER THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WHERE THOSE FEE SCHEDULES FOR THE CITATIONS RESIDE. CURRENTLY PAID STATION FEES. HISTORICALLY, THESE ARE HISTORICALLY AVERAGE FEES, AND THEY FLUCTUATE DEPENDING ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE TRANSACTION. AND I'LL TELL YOU WHY. AS WE GET FARTHER INTO THE PRESENTATION. BUT 35% AVERAGE EPS IS OUR PROVIDER. SO WHEN YOU SEE IPS REFERENCED, THIS IS WHO WE USE FOR OUR PARKING SOFTWARE AND SOME OF OUR HARDWARE. AND THEN OF COURSE THERE'S A 25 CENT AVERAGE MERCHANT SERVICES. WHEREVER YOU GO, YOU PAY WITH YOUR CREDIT, CREDIT OR DEBIT CARD. THERE'S A MERCHANT SERVICE PROCESSING FEE. PARKING REVENUE SOURCES, THE PARK. IF CITY SUPPORT THAT WE GET FROM THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS IS 92,200 ANNUALLY. PARKING CITATION. THIS IS AVERAGE OVER TWO YEARS. HISTORY. ABOUT $50,000 A YEAR. SORRY. CITATIONS. OUR PARKING LOT PERMITS 187,000 PER YEAR, APPROXIMATELY, SO THE TOTAL AMOUNT IS $329,200 APPROXIMATELY. ANNUAL PARKING EXPENSES. PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE IS ABOUT 36,500.
ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE THROUGH THE IPS 32,500 AND SALARIES. THIS IS ESTIMATED AT 142,000, SO THE TOTAL ANNUAL PARKING EXPENSES ON AVERAGE IS 211,000 APPROXIMATELY YEARLY.
THIS WAS INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST FOR THE REPORTING THAT WE GIVE TO THE CITY ANNUALLY. SO I BROUGHT UP SOME FIGURES. AGAIN, THIS IS FROM JULY TO JULY, SO IT CAN GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE'RE DOING. AND MONTHLY. I THOUGHT IT WAS INTERESTING BECAUSE I DID HAVE A LADY COME IN AND SHE THOUGHT FOR SURE SHE WAS GETTING TARGETED, WOULD TAKE LESS TICKETS IN THE WINTER MONTHS. AND IF YOU LOOK AT JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, THOSE ARE HISTORICALLY ACTUALLY LAST YEAR WERE HIGHER. DECEMBER IS LOWER. I'M ASSUMING THAT'S BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY AND THE TIME THAT WE HAVE OFF WITH STAFF. FUTURE OF DOWNTOWN PARKING. INSTEAD OF SIMPLY FINDING A PARKING SPOT SPOT, OUR GOAL IS TO ENSURE CUSTOMERS EFFORTLESSLY ARRIVE, IMMEDIATELY LOCATE AND CONVENIENTLY ACCESS PARKING RIGHT AT THE DOORSTEP OR NEAR THEIR DESIRED DESTINATION DOWNTOWN. WE WANT THEIR FIRST IMPRESSION TO BE ONE OF SEAMLESS EASE, NOT FRUSTRATING SEARCHES EVEN I WHEN I FIRST STARTED, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF EFFORTS TO IMPROVE OUR PARKING SITUATION, BUT IT TOOK ME A MINUTE. ONE HAD TO DRIVE ME AROUND QUITE A BIT AND TEACH ME A LOT ABOUT OUR DIFFERENT PARKING SPACES THAT NEED MORE WAYFINDING. THEY NEED IMPROVEMENTS, AND THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TODAY IS ONE WAY TO GET THERE. I NOTICED ON ONE OF THE POPULAR FACEBOOK GROUPS OUT THERE RECENTLY, I DON'T KNOW IF ALL OF YOU HAVE BEEN WATCHING IT, BUT THERE WAS THE QUESTION SHOULD. I DON'T KNOW WHO POSED IT, BUT THERE WAS A POLL. SHOULD DOWNTOWN HAVE A PARKING GARAGE? AND LOTS OF COMMENTS FOLLOW THAT. SO I THOUGHT I WOULD PUT A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE IN THERE. FOR THOSE THAT YOU KNOW, THAT PARKING GARAGE BEING A BUZZ WORD THAT WE'VE ALL HEARD. I'VE HEARD IT SINCE I STARTED WORKING HERE TO THE CITY. AND OF COURSE, NOW WHY NOT JUST BUILD A PARKING GARAGE? AND I THOUGHT THIS WAS A GREAT SUMMARY THAT I FOUND AN INVESTOR LOOKING TO BUILD AN EXPENSIVE DOWNTOWN PARKING GARAGE FACES SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL HURDLES HURDLES PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING POLICY, OFFERS PRIME CURBSIDE PARKING FOR FREE. THIS CREATES A DIRECT AND FORMIDABLE COMPETITOR, MAKING IT DIFFICULT FOR PAID GARAGE TO ATTRACT CUSTOMERS AND GENERATE THE REVENUE NEEDED TO JUSTIFY HIGH CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATING COSTS. THE DEMAND FOR PAID PARKING WON'T MATERIALIZE AS SOON AS LONG AS FREE OPTIONS REMAIN ABUNDANT. THE CURRENT FREE PARKING POLICY ESSENTIALLY DEVALUES PARKING AS A COMMODITY.
I REMEMBER ONE OF MAYOR'S COMMENTS WHEN I REVIEWED THE PRESENTATION IN NOVEMBER WAS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT, WHERE I GIVE SOMETHING OF VALUE AWAY FOR FREE, UNLESS THE CITY AND ITS DOWNTOWN AUTHORITY IS WILLING TO ADJUST ITS POLICIES, IMPLEMENT METERS, LIMIT TIME
[00:25:04]
LIMITS, OR CHANGE FOR CURB CHARGE FOR CURBSIDE SPOTS, THE COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE WILL REMAIN UNFAVORABLE. UNFAVORABLE FOR PAID PARKING STRUCTURE. SO FOR THOSE THAT ARE WONDERING WHY DON'T WE JUST DO IT? THIS IS KIND OF A SUMMARY. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S MORE INTO IT. BUT BEFORE WE GET INTO THE FUTURE OF DOWNTOWN PARKING, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE HISTORY THAT I CAN HELP ADDRESS OR CLEAR UP, OR IF I CAN ADDRESS IT, I CAN CERTAINLY LOOK UP THAT INFORMATION AND FIND IT FOR YOU AND GET BACK FOR YOU, WITH YOU. I'M JUST CURIOUS, WHEN WE TOOK METERS OUT, HOW LONG AGO WAS THAT PUSH? I MEAN, I'VE LOOKED BEHIND ME FOR 60 SOMETHING 1960S IN THE 60S. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, I THINK IT WAS LATER THAN THAT BECAUSE I THINK MALL WAS BUILT IN LIKE 84, 84 SOMETHING. IT WASN'T THERE WAS A MALL BUILT HERE. OR DO YOU MEAN COUNTRY CLUB? YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I THINK. I'LL HAVE TO LOOK INTO IT. BUT A LONG TIME AGO. A LONG TIME AGO.YEAH. WE HAD TO THROW OUT ONE THAT STOPPED ME. RIGHT? THERE. FAULT. I WOULD CHECK WITH IDA HARDCASTLE. THAT'S YOUR FIRST STOP. THERE YOU GO. OKAY, SO THE FUTURE OF DOWNTOWN PARKING PARK SMARTER. THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING, THAT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE KEY FEATURE. NOW THIS IS AN APP AGAIN, AS WE REFER TO METERS MOVING FORWARD. THIS IS WHAT WE'RE REFERENCING. AND OF COURSE WE HAVE OUR PAY STATIONS THAT EXIST CURRENTLY THAT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE FOR NOW. THIS IS AN APP. SO THIS IS ANOTHER OPTION. AND THIS IS MOVING FORWARD WITH TECHNOLOGY. A SINGLE SIGN ON USING THE SAME CREDENTIALS. IT HELPS YOU ACTUALLY FIND A SPOT. SO IF YOU GO ON THERE NOW IT IS LIVE BUT IT'S JUST NOT WORKING TO ITS FULL CAPACITY YET. BUT YOU CAN SEE THE SPOTS THAT ARE AVAILABLE. SO IT'S TO HELP YOU FIND SPOTS, REAL TIME NOTIFICATIONS. SO IT ACTUALLY ALERTS YOU INSTEAD OF YOU WATCHING FOR ONE GO WALKING BY.
THIS ALERTS ALERTS YOU THAT YOUR TIME ON THE METER. REMEMBER WHEN I SAY METER I REFER TO APP IS ALMOST UP AND PEOPLE CAN ACTUALLY GO ON TO THEIR APP METER AND APPLY MORE MONEY IF THEY WANT TO STAY THERE LONGER. IT'S OFTEN THAT I GET PHONE CALLS FROM PEOPLE THAT GET PARKING CITATIONS THAT ARE IN THE SALON, NOT ANTICIPATING THAT THEIR APPOINTMENTS GOING TO TAKE THAT MUCH TIME, AND THEY NEED TO ADD MORE INSTEAD OF GOING OUT AND MOVING THEIR CAR. THIS WILL TAKE CARE OF THAT STUFF IN THEIR HAIR. YEAH, OKAY. ABILITY TO PAY AND EXTEND PARKING ALLOWS MULTIPLE VEHICLES AND CREDIT CARDS UNDER ONE ACCOUNT. YOU GET LIVE REPORTS, YOU GET LIVE ALERTS, REPORTING AND DATA ANALYTICS. I'M A HUGE FAN OF ANALYTICS, SO THIS IS ANOTHER IMPORTANT TOOL FOR US TO BE ABLE TO USE. AND THEN IT EASILY INTEGRATES WITH OUR IPS METERS THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. CARRIE, I'M PRETTY SURE THAT BOISE USES PARK MOBILE. WHAT MADE US DECIDE TO GO WITH A DIFFERENT APP? I MEAN, NOT THAT IDAHO HAS TO HAVE THE SAME OR THAT ALL CITIES HAVE TO BE THE SAME, BUT I IMAGINE YOU LOOKED AT MORE THAN ONE SERVICE BEFORE LANDING ON THIS ONE. DO YOU KNOW WHAT SOME OF THE CRITERIA WERE THAT MADE YOU CHOOSE THIS ONE? GOOD QUESTION.
AND THAT WAS ACTUALLY THAT'S ONE FOR THE PARKING COMMITTEE, BECAUSE SOME OF THAT WAS DONE BEFORE I ARRIVED. OKAY. BUT ONE OF THE OPTIONS, ONE OF THE THINGS WE LOOKED AT IS IPS AS OUR CURRENT PROVIDER. AND SO MOVING FORWARD WITH OUR PROVIDER AND MAKING IT SEAMLESS, AND WE'RE MAKING ENOUGH CHANGES RIGHT NOW THAT THAT WASN'T ONE WE WERE WILLING AND MAYBE THAT WAS TAUGHT TO US IN NOVEMBER AND I JUST DIDN'T REMEMBER, SO I APOLOGIZE. NO THAT'S FINE. GOOD QUESTION. A COUPLE OF MORE HOW IT WORKS. PEOPLE DOWNLOAD THE APP, THEY ENTER THEIR CUSTOMER INFORMATION. SO IT'S A LITTLE MORE TIME CONSUMING THE FIRST TIME YOU SET IT UP. JUST LIKE WITH ANY APP, SET THE TIME YOU DESIRE AGAIN, IT SENDS YOU A NOTIFICATION. WHEN YOU'RE ABOUT YOUR TIME IS ABOUT TO EXPIRE, YOU CAN ADD MORE AND THEN THE USER PAYS FROM WITHIN THE APP.
CREDIT DEBIT CARDS MOBILE PAYMENT OPTIONS INCLUDING APPLE PAY AND GOOGLE PAY, OR TEXT TO PLAY TO PAY. AND THEN THERE IS A DEMO. OF ARE YOU ABLE TO? OKAY, SO HERE'S A QUICK DEMO. CONTROL OF YOUR SERVICE OKAY. THANK YOU. ROLLING IT OUT. SO THE WAY WE PROPOSE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS
[00:31:53]
IS IN PHASES IN A PILOT PROGRAM. SO PHASE ONE. NEXT PAGE. THE PHASE ONE AREA WE'RE PROPOSING IS BROADWAY NORTH TO BUT NOT INCLUDING THE STREET. AND FROM YELLOWSTONE WEST TO MEMORIAL DRIVE. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE SOUTH OF BROADWAY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON THE WATER TOWER IN THE PARKING LOT RIGHT NOW, SO WE CHOSE TO HOLD OFF ON THOSE. AND ALSO DOING IT IN PHASES WILL ALLOW US TO FINE TUNE SOME THINGS. SO WE KNOW THERE'S ATTENTION THAT'S NEEDED SOUTH BROADWAY, BUT WE WILL ADDRESS THAT ANOTHER TIME. I JUST FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION, WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON PHASE ONE. ON STREET PARKING CHANGE FROM TWO HOUR PARKING TO METERED PARKING VIA THE PARK SMARTER APP IS WHAT WE'RE REQUESTING. CONSTITUTION WAY IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHERS BECAUSE IT DOES HAVE A CENTER ROW. CURRENTLY THAT IS HAS NO SIGNAGE AND IS FREE PARKING, AND WE HAVE ENCOUNTERED SOME ISSUES WITH THAT, NOT HAVING EITHER BEING A LOT OF SOME SORT OR ON STREET OR ANY SORT OF CONTROL. IT'S KIND OF BECOME FREE FOR ALL USERS, IF YOU WILL, SOME OVERNIGHT TRYING TO GET BY WITH PARKING THERE OVERNIGHT. SO WE'RE PROPOSING THAT CONSTITUTION WAIT, TURN TO THE PAY TO PARK AS WELL DOWN THE CENTER AS IT IS ON BOTH SIDES. CITY HALL, YOUR LOADING ZONES OUT FRONT, AS WELL AS YOUR SIGNAGE THAT SAYS 8 A.M. TO 5 P.M. PARKING THAT WILL NOT CHANGE. THAT WILL BE THE SAME FOR CITY HALL AND THEN THE VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING. THERE'S PARKING SIGNAGE OUT FRONT OF THAT FOR USERS OF THAT. THAT WILL NOT CHANGE EITHER. SO WE HAVE ACCESS TO THAT BUILDING FOR OUR VETERANS. PHASE TWO PAY TO PARK PROGRAM. PHASE TWO AREA WOULD BE BROADWAY SOUTH TO CLIFF STREET AND THEN YELLOWSTONE WEST WOULD BE TO MEMORIAL DRIVE, YELLOWSTONE TO. SHOUP. NO SORRY.PARK CAPITAL ON STREET PARKING CHANGED FROM TWO HOUR PARKING LIMIT TO METERED PARKING VIA THE PARK SMARTER APP AND IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL IFDC MANAGED PARKING LOTS, INCLUDING THOSE LOCATED IN PHASE ONE. SO WE HAVE IMPROVED WAYFINDING, WHICH IS MUCH NEEDED. I RECOGNIZE THAT I THINK WE ALL DO MAINTENANCE INTEGRATED IPS TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE PARKING LOTS, INCREASING EFFICIENCIES AND STREAMLINING PROCESSES. SO CURRENTLY WHAT WE USE WITH STAFF IS SPREADSHEETS AND NUMEROUS OTHER DIFFERENT METHODS TO KEEP TRACK OF OUR, OUR OUR PARKING PERMITS. IPS DOES HAVE A SOLUTION AVAILABLE, BUT OF COURSE THERE'S IT COSTS MONEY TO DO SO TO HAVE THEM HELP US MANAGE OUR, OUR PERMITS AND OUR PARKING LOT. SO THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER FEATURE THAT WE WOULD LOOK INTO WITH PHASE TWO. AND THEN TIMELINE OR THE BENEFITS OF A PHASED APPROACH IS TIME TO LEARN AND FINE TUNE THE SYSTEM. FOLLOWING PHASE ONE, THERE'S GOING TO BE THINGS THAT COME OUT
[00:35:05]
WHEN WE ROLL OUT THE PHASE ONE THAT WE DIDN'T REALIZE THAT WE NEED TO FINE TUNE. TIME FOR DUST TO SETTLE ON THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. I KNOW YOU ALL ARE FINISHING UP THE WATER TOWER, AND SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THOSE ARE DONE. PARKING LOT CHANGES IN THE LIBRARY ARE DONE BEFORE WE WORK WITH THE CITY ON MAKING SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THOSE, AND IT WILL GIVE US ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM PHASE ONE TO PAY FOR PHASE TWO IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS WAYFINDING PARKING SOFTWARE IN FORT. WE NEED ANOTHER. WE HAVE TO DECIDE IF WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ANOTHER ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE, OR IF WE PUT THAT PERSON ON BIKE THAT HASN'T BEEN BEEN WORKED OUT YET. AND THEN OF COURSE, PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE. WAS THAT MY TIMER? OKAY. THIS IS THE SLIDE WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS ON QUITE A BIT. AND THEN WE'LL RETURN TO IT BECAUSE I DO HAVE SOME EXAMPLES, BECAUSE I KNOW YOU LIKE TO LOOK AT OTHER CITIES AND WHAT THEY'RE DOING. FOR EXAMPLES. THIS IS THE THESE ARE THE PROPOSED RATES. THESE ARE NOT SET. THEY'RE UP FOR DISCUSSION. THIS IS ONE OF THE PRIMARY REASONS WE'RE HERE TODAY. SO THE PROPOSED HOURLY RATES AND THIS IS COMING THROUGH BOTH DISCUSSIONS WITH IFDC BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS WELL AS OUR PARKING COMMITTEE. THE FIRST HOUR WOULD EITHER BE A 1 TO $2 AND THEN THE SECOND HOUR $2, $2 AN HOUR. THE THIRD HOUR WOULD BE $2, AND THE FOURTH HOUR WOULD BE ANYWHERE I'VE HEARD FROM 5 TO 20. AGAIN, IT'S OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. WHY IT JUMPS UP THAT MUCH IS BECAUSE WE WANT TO TURN OVER THOSE PARKING SPOTS. SO CURRENTLY THERE ARE TWO HOUR. DO WE WANT TO LIMIT IT TO YOU ONLY GET FOUR HOURS. AND THEN THAT FOURTH HOUR THIS IS HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST. OR ARE WE EXTENDING THOSE HOURS. SO THIS IS ALL UP FOR DISCUSSION. AS WE DISCUSSED THAT ONE OF THE THINGS WE NEED TO LOOK AT IS THE PARKS MASTER APP FEES THAT ARE NOT THERE PER TRANSACTION. AND THEY'RE NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-NEGOTIABLE. SO THESE ARE OUT OF THESE ARE PART OF THE FEES.SO YOU NEED TO CONSIDER WHEN WE'RE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FEES FOR EACH HOUR. 35 CENT IPS PROVIDER PARK SMART OR CONVENIENCE FEE. THEN THERE'S THE 30 CENT AVERAGE AMD. AMD IS THE PROVIDER. THE MERCHANT SERVICES THAT WE USE PROCESSING FEE FOR SMALL AMOUNTS. SO WE GET A REDUCED RATE FOR THOSE SMALL AMOUNTS. AND THIS IS WHO IPS USES QUITE A BIT. IS THE AMD THE THRESHOLD OF WHEN THE MERCHANT PROCESSING FEES INCREASE TO 2 TO 3%? IT DEPENDS ON THE TOTAL TRANSACTION FEE. SO WHEN IT REACHES ABOUT 10 TO $15 OF THE TOTAL TRANSACTION IS WHEN YOU GET CHARGED ADDITIONAL FEES FROM MERCHANT SERVICES. BOTH FEES ARE PAID BY THE CONSUMER AND BOTH FEES ARE APPLIED WITH EACH NEW TRANSACTION. THAT INCLUDES WHEN A CONSUMER ADDS MORE TIME TO THEIR PARKING APP METER. I KNOW THERE WAS DISCUSSION LAST TIME I WATCHED THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ABOUT POSSIBLY GIVING AWAY THE FIRST 30 MINUTES FOR FREE, BUT THE INDUSTRY STANDARD BEST PRACTICES IS NOT TO DO THAT. IT LEADS TO AN ENFORCEMENT ISSUE AND IS A LITTLE MORE CHALLENGING TO CONTROL. AND THEN, OF COURSE, I JUST REFLECTED BACK ON THE MOU ABOUT THE PARKING PROGRAM AND THE ACCOUNTABILITY AND WHERE THAT MONEY IS GOING. IT GOES RIGHT IN DIRECTLY INTO A PARKING LINE ITEM THAT WE HAVE. SO THAT'S WHERE ALL THAT FUNDING GOES TO. AND WE CAN COME BACK TO THIS SLIDE. BUT I DID WANT TO LOOK AT I DIDN'T WANT TO SHOW YOU SOME OF THE OTHER FEES FROM SURROUNDING CITIES. SO BOISE'S PARKING RATES I KNOW IS SMALL. FOR THOSE WHO ARE READING THE SCREEN, ENFORCEMENT HOURS ARE HARD FOR ME. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 8 TO 8, IT LOOKS LIKE RATES ARE $2 FOR THE FIRST HOUR, $3 FOR THE SECOND HOUR, AND THAT'S IN ZONE ONE. SO THEY HAVE DIFFERENT ZONES. ZONE TWO THE RATES ARE $1.25 FOR THE FIRST HOUR, $2 FOR THE SECOND WITH A TWO HOUR MAX. SO THEY HAVE MAX TIMES ON THAT ZONE, THREE ENFORCEMENT HOURS. AND THEN THE RATES $0.50 FOR THE FIRST AND SECOND HOURS, $1 FOR THE THIRD AND FOURTH HOURS AND FOUR HOUR MAX. AND YOU SEE THE ZONES ARE IN THERE AS WELL. OF COURSE, THE LESS EXPENSIVE ZONES OR RATES ARE THOSE THAT ARE NOT THE PRIME PARKING SPOTS, SO THEY'VE CHANGED THEIRS DEPENDING ON THE ZONES. OGDEN PARKING RATES. AND THESE ARE ALL, ACCORDING TO THEIR WEBSITES. OGDEN PARKING RATES UP TO AN HOUR IS $1.50 TO $2 IN THE STREET. EACH ADDITIONAL HOUR IS $1.50 TO $2, AND DAILY MAX IS 8 TO 10. AND THEY HAVE DIFFERENT RATES FOR SPECIAL EVENT RATE. AND THAT
[00:40:07]
DEPENDS ON THE DEMAND. SALT LAKE CITY. THEY RECENTLY CHANGED THEIR. SO THIS IS DIRECTLY FROM THEIR WEBSITE. THE HOURLY RATE IS NOW $3.50 AT CITY PARKING METERS. AND IT WAS PREVIOUSLY $2.25. AND THEN WE CAN RETURN TO THOSE RATES IN JUST A MINUTE. BUT THE PARKING SIGNS, WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING DOING IS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP DURING THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING IS, ARE WE PUTTING IN METERS? ARE WE PUTTING IN MORE SIGNS? ARE WE CLUTTERING OUR STREETS? OUR SIDEWALKS KNOW AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE? NO, I I'M WITH YOU ON THAT. I'M SUPPORTIVE OF YOU ON THAT ONE. UPDATING THE EXISTING DOWNTOWN PARKING SIGNS. SO AT THE TOP IS WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT WE HAVE. AND THAT'S REFERRED TO BLOCK PARKING. WE WOULD HAVE TO ADD SIGNAGE TO THE MIDDLE OF THE CONSTITUTION WAY IF WE CHANGE THAT, BECAUSE THERE'S CURRENTLY NO POLLS, NO PLACE TO PUT SIGNAGE RIGHT NOW. AND THEN OF COURSE, I'VE ALREADY REMOVED THE OLD CLOTH SIGNS THAT WERE TATTERED AND PROPOSING PUTTING UP THE PAY THE PAY STATION SIGNS. SO THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF THE BOTTOM ONE IS AN EXAMPLE ONLY OF WHAT WE WOULD PUT UP IN THE PLACE OF THE CURRENT SIGNS. AND AGAIN FOR OUR IS IT IS ARE WE GOING WITH THE FOUR HOUR LIMIT. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING, BUT THAT'S OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. AND THEN IT'S A METERED PARKING 8 A.M. TO 6 P.M. AND THEN IT WOULD SHOW THREE WAYS TO PAY. NOW I WILL GO BACK TO THE RATES IF YOU ARE READY. GO AHEAD. I'M JUST CURIOUS. SO THE IDEA IS AFTER 6 P.M. YOU CAN PARK EVERYWHERE FOR FREE. OR IS IT JUST YOU'RE JUST GOING TO CHARGE DURING THE DAY, OR ARE WE GOING TO CHARGE ON STREET HOURS AFTER 6 P.M? YES, CURRENTLY THAT'S WHAT IT IS RIGHT NOW.YEAH, YEAH. AND ON WEEKENDS WE WON'T CHARGE IT ALL AT NO CHARGE. AND IT'S, AND WE, WE KIND OF WE WENT BACK AND FORTH. WHAT DO YOU PUT ON THE SIGNS. RIGHT. BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO CLUTTER THE SIGN WITH TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BUT YOU ALSO NEED JUST NEED TO CLARIFY SOMEWHERE.
SO IT'S WITHIN THE APP. WE'LL CLARIFY THE HOURS OF WHEN IT'S NEEDED OKAY. OKAY. AND THEN I WILL COME BACK TO THE RATES ONCE I GO THROUGH THE PUBLIC EDUCATION PIECES REAL QUICK HERE. SO WE DID GO THROUGH THE PUBLIC OUTREACH PLANNER WITH CITY STAFF. SO WE CAME UP WITH A TOP SCORE OF THREE. FOR THOSE THAT ARE FAMILIAR WITH WHAT A PUBLIC OUTREACH PLANNER TOOL IS, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THE CITY USES WHEN THEY'RE LOOKING AT LARGER PROJECTS THAT REQUIRE PUBLIC EDUCATION, AND IT HELPS THEM DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF PUBLIC EDUCATION AND RECOMMENDS TOOLS TO USE FOR THAT PUBLIC EDUCATION. SO THESE ARE SOME KEY MESSAGING THAT WE CAME UP WITH.
WE HAVE A COMMUNICATIONS PLAN. WE'RE STILL WORKING ON IT, BUT WE DO HAVE A DRAFT ONE OUT THERE INCLUDED THE KEY MESSAGING AS WELL AS SOME OF OUR COMMUNICATION CHANNELS THAT WE WOULD USE. DEDICATED IDK PARKING WEB PAGE. WE JUST WERE IN THE PROCESS OF REDOING DC'S WEBSITE THAT SHOULD GO LIVE HOPEFULLY IN THE NEXT MONTH. AND SO THAT WILL BE WHERE WE'LL HAVE A LANDING PAGE, MUCH LIKE WE DO WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION WHEN WE DO IT FOR THE CITY, FOR LARGE PROJECTS WHERE EVERYBODY CAN GO FOR ALL THE INFORMATION, FAQS, VIDEOS. THERE ARE THREE WAYS TO PARK. WE WILL ALSO HAVE A, OF COURSE, SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGNS. WE HAVE A DOWNTOWN NEWSLETTER THAT WE SEND OUT EVERY OTHER MONDAY. WE ALSO HAVE AN E-NEWSLETTER THAT WE SEND OUT JUST TO THE DOWNTOWN PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESSES. SO WE'LL HAVE MORE TARGETING, TARGETED MESSAGING FOR THEM. AND OF COURSE, TRADITIONAL MEDIA PRESS RELEASES, PSAS ON SITE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ON SITE PARKING AMBASSADORS SIMILAR TO JUAN. AND THEN OF COURSE, ME. AND THEN CURRENTLY WE DO NOT HAVE AN OPERATIONS MANAGER. THAT WAS THE POSITION I HELD BEFORE, BUT THAT INDIVIDUAL, WE DID OFFER SOMEBODY THE JOB AND THEY WILL START IN THE NEXT THREE WEEKS, 2 TO 3 WEEKS. SO WE WILL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL FULL TIME EMPLOYEE, TEMPORARY TEMPORARY SANDWICH BOARD, SIGNAGE THAT WOULD USE A PRIME INTERSECTIONS THAT WE WOULD HAVE OUT THERE DURING ROLLOUT OF THIS PROGRAM IF APPROVED. AND THOSE WOULD. WE'VE LOOKED AT OPTIONS OF HAVING QR CODES AVAILABLE ON THOSE. THEY WOULD BE AVAILABLE ON THE PARKING SIGNS THEMSELVES. BUT IN SOME OF THE TEMPORARY MESSAGING AND SOME OF THE OTHER PUBLIC OUTREACH THAT WE DO, INCLUDING QR CODES. CLEAR
[00:45:02]
PERMANENT SIGNAGE, WAYFINDING, POP UP INFORMATIONAL BOOTHS, THAT'S ALL DIFFERENT DEPENDING ON STAFFING LEVELS AND THEN ADDING PARK SMARTER AND PAY INFORMATION ON OUR PARKING ENFORCEMENT VEHICLE THAT'S MOVING AROUND DOWNTOWN AND VERY VISIBLE ALL DAY LONG. YOU KNOW, PUTTING INFORMATION ABOUT WHERE TO PAY FOR PARKING ON THAT VEHICLE SOMEWHERE IS ANOTHER IDEA. AND OF COURSE, HOW TO GUIDES FAQS. THE APP THAT WE HAVE DEDICATED. AND THAT I PUT IN SOME EVALUATION METRICS WITH OUR NEW WEBSITE THAT WE'LL HAVE ROLLED OUT SOON. WE'LL HAVE I'VE ASKED FOR ANALYTICS WITH THAT WEBSITE SO WE CAN MONITOR THAT A LOT CLOSER. AND THEN OF COURSE MEDIA COVERAGE AND. OTHER MONITORING TRAFFIC ON SOCIAL MEDIA. OKAY. AND THEN THESE ARE OUR WHAT'S OUR NEXT STEPS. SO AS FAR AS IF THIS IS PROPOSED OR ACCEPTED AND WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE TO ROLL THIS OUT WE WILL NEED ONE ADDITIONAL PARKING. AMBASSADOR. WE'RE LOOKING AT THE TIMES A DAY RIGHT NOW. OF COURSE BRAND AND CLOTHING, THEY'LL NEED EQUIPMENT. AND NOW EQUIPMENT IS ACTUALLY COME SO FAR THAT IT'S NO LONGER A HANDHELD DEVICE THAT ONE IS CURRENTLY USING. IT'S A CELL PHONE THAT TIES IN WITH BLUETOOTH TO A PRINTER, SO IT'S SIMPLY GETTING ANOTHER CELL PHONE, A PRINTER TO PRINT OUT THE CITATIONS, SOME MORE SOFTWARE LICENSES, OR DECIDING ON THE VEHICLE AND THE BIKE. AND THEN, OF COURSE, MARKETING AND OUTREACH IS WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THE CITY MAYOR AND COUNCIL'S HELP TODAY IS TO SUPPORT AND MOVE FORWARD WITH ON STREET PAY TO PARK PROGRAM, APP AND PHASED APPROACH SCIENCE AND INSTALLATION. I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH BRIAN CARDIN ON THIS, HE SAID. 115 REPLACEMENT SIGNS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $15,000. ACTUAL COST AND QUANTITY SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON WHEN WE ROLL THIS OUT. AND THEN HE SAID APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS FOR INSTALLATION, DEPENDING ON PUBLIC WORKS WORKLOAD AT THE TIME. AND THEN WE NEED ASSISTANCE WITH UPDATING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING ORDINANCE AND THE MOU UPDATING THE FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH IS COMING UP QUICKLY. I BELIEVE WE HAVE TO HAVE THAT TURNED IN BY WEDNESDAY, CORRECT FOR THE FEE SCHEDULE AND THEN ACCESS TO CITY COMMUNICATIONS TEAM. I WILL BE MEETING WITH THE COMMUNICATIONS TEAM AND THE PIOS AND PLATFORMS FOR INFORMATION SHARING AND PUBLIC EDUCATION. SO WITH THAT, THAT'S ALL I HAVE AND I CAN I'M GOING TO FLIP THIS BACK TO. THE RATES AND THE FEES FOR AND OPEN UP FOR DISCUSSIONS AND QUESTIONS. HOPEFULLY I HAVE ANSWERS FOR YOU, COUNCILMAN FREEMAN, YOU HAD THE OGDEN ONE UP THERE, AND I LIKE THE FACT THAT THEY HAD THEY CHARGED MORE FOR THE STREET PARKING THAN THE LOT PARKING. YEAH. IS THAT SOMETHING YOU YOU'RE THINKING YOU WOULD DO OR. THAT'S ONE THING, BECAUSE WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR PARKING LOTS, WE'RE DOING THAT NEXT YEAR. BUT YEAH, THE PRIME PART PARKING IF YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE, YOU KNOW, A, B, C OR ONE, TWO, THREE IF YOU WILL, IN THE ZONES. RIGHT. THE PRIME SPOTS ARE ON STREET AND THOSE SHOULD BE MORE EXPENSIVE. AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THEN WE INCREASE THEM GOING OUT INTO THE PARKING LOTS AND THEN HAVE THE FREE PARKING ON THE OUTSKIRTS AS WELL. SO GOOD. AND I HAVE ANOTHER JUST ANOTHER COMMENT ABOUT I LIKE THE IDEA OF A FLAT RATE, BUT THAT EACH HOUR YOU KNOW THAT YOU JUST PAY HOUR BY HOUR BY HOUR BY HOUR. AND IT'S AND IT'S A FLAT RATE. AND THEN YOU MENTIONED HAVING A FOUR HOUR MAXIMUM. THAT KIND OF KEEPS THE PEOPLE WHO WORK DOWNTOWN OR EIGHT HOUR SHIFTS. AT LEAST YOU KNOW THAT. THINK OF OTHER OPTIONS I GUESS THEY SAY THAT, OKAY, THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO IF I MOVE MY CAR TWO HOURS, OR DO I PAY FOR MY THIRD AND FOURTH HOUR, OR DO I GET TO START OVER AT TWO? IT'S ACCORDING TO ZONES, SO IT'LL TRACK YOU. SO YEAH, IF YOU'VE BEEN IN WE ASK THAT QUESTION TO IF WE GO, YOU KNOW, A DOLLAR PER HOUR, THE FIRST HOUR, IT KEEPS THEM FROM JUST MOVING AND PAYING A DOLLAR FOR THE FIRST HOUR OF MOVING AGAIN. I ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE FEES WITH EVERY TIME, EVERY TIME THERE'S A TRANSACTION. SO THERE'S A DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM DOING THAT TOO. SO YEAH. SO THE SYSTEM KNOWS WHERE YOU ARE IN THE ZONE. SO KIND OF RANDOM QUESTION I WAS LOOKING AT DIFFERENT CITY HALLS AT ALL THESE OTHER LOCATIONS. YOU KNOW, COUNCIL MEMBERS DON'T ALWAYS GET I MEAN, OUR CITY HALL HAS ALMOST NO PARKING LAW. HOW MANY PARKING SPOTS DOES IT HAVE? ANY IDEA? 75, 80, 75, 80, POTENTIALLY IN FRONT OF CITY HALL, LIKE IN FRONT OF CITY HALL? LIKE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT JUST IN OUR LOT RIGHT HERE. OH TEN 1212 1212 SO LIKE IF DIRECTOR ALEXANDER IS INVITING[00:50:08]
THE CEO TO COME DOWN OR CATHERINE OR COUNCILMEMBERS COMING TO A MEETING, THEY HAVE TO PAY TO PARK. THIS LOT IS FULL. IT'S KIND OF A MEETING. OKAY. BECAUSE THERE'S NOT REALLY OTHER OPTIONS. THERE'S OTHER OPTIONS WITH THE FREE AND CROSS YELLOWSTONE, OBVIOUSLY IT'S NOT IDEAL, BUT I KNOW, I KNOW THAT THE AIRPORT IS ABOUT READY TO ISSUE A PARTICULAR QR CODE THAT YOU CAN SCAN, AND IT RECOGNIZES AND WILL WAIVE A FEE. AND SO IT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW IF WE CAN ISSUE TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS, THE OPTION TO HAVE A FEE WAIVED IF LIKE A VALIDATION LIKE SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. YEAH. SO WE ASKED THAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE THE PAY STATIONS. WE'RE ABLE TO VALIDATE THE APP. THEY ARE ADVANCING THAT. THEY DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE IT AVAILABLE FOR VALIDATION. BUT THAT'S HOW IT WOULD WORK. YOU WOULD BE GIVEN A CODE AND THAT'S WHAT YOU WOULD PUT IN. SO WE ARE CONTINUING TO FOLLOW UP WITH THAT OKAY. YES. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE COUNCIL NOT TO HAVE SOME SORT OF GOVERNMENTAL FREE PARKING OPTION FOR THE STREET PARKING. THE STREET PARKING IS A PUBLIC TRUST AND IT NEEDS TO OUGHT TO BE MANAGED IN A WAY THAT IS UNIFORM, AND THE SAME FOR EVERYONE THAT'S GOING TO UTILIZE IT. SO IF YOU IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AREAS THAT YOU CAN GUARANTEE THAT VISITORS THAT ARE COMING TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL HAVE ACCESS TO PARKING THAT THE CITY PROVIDES FOR FREE. CITY HAS TWO PARKING LOTS THAT ARE LOCATED ON THIS BLOCK THAT THE CITY COULD REGULATE DIFFERENTLY, BUT I WOULDN'T RECOMMEND HAVING SOME SORT OF QR CODE THAT A COUNCIL MEMBER COULD GIVE SOMEONE TO GET OUT OF A TICKET. THANK YOU. I THINK THAT THERE'S A LOT OF WISDOM THERE, AND I THINK THE BOTTOM LINE IS COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT WHATEVER WE GO THROUGH, WHATEVER GOES THROUGH, I THINK THERE NEED NOT BE A WORRY ABOUT IT COSTING YOU MONEY TO BE ABLE TO SERVE AS A COUNCIL MEMBER. WE THERE ARE WAYS WE CAN ADDRESS THAT. WE'LL FIGURE IT OUT IN WAYS THAT ARE EQUITABLE AND NOT PRONE TO ANY ABUSE. SO LET'S LET'S NOT LET THAT BE A CONCERN. ALTHOUGH I APPRECIATE YOU RAISING THE POINT BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO VET ALL OF IT. THANK YOU. I WILL JUST WEIGH IN THAT I THINK I'M CONFUSED RIGHT NOW. FIRST, OUR SECOND OR THIRD HOUR. IT COULD BE I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MEANS. FIRST HOUR, 1 TO $2. IS IT THAT YOU'RE STILL JUST TRYING TO DECIDE WILL IT COST ONE OR WILL IT COST FOR DISCUSSION? YEAH. BECAUSE YOU LOOK AT THOSE FEES, RIGHT.WHETHER IT'S $1 OR $2, THOSE FEES ARE GOING TO BE TACKED ON. SO YOU'VE GOT TO BE ABLE TO PAY FOR THE PROGRAM ITSELF CONSIDERING THE FEES TOO. OKAY. AND SO BY THE TIME YOU GET TO YOUR FOURTH HOUR, YOU WILL ALREADY HAVE $6 PLUS SOME FEES THAT YOU'VE EARNED. AND SO THE SIXTH HOUR COULD THEN BE 11 PLUS FEES OR EVEN HIGHER BECAUSE THAT WOULD. SO WE WEREN'T GOING.
FOURTH HOUR WAS $5, SIXTH HOUR WAS FIFTH HOUR WAS SOMETHING, SEVENTH HOUR WAS SOMETHING HIGHER. IT WAS JUST THE FOURTH HOUR. IT WAS GOING TO BE THIS LAST NUMBER. YEAH. WE WERE GOING TO GO UP. YEAH. OKAY. MY OWN PERSONAL THOUGHT AND IT'S GOING TO COME BACK TO BITE ME IN THE BACKSIDE AT SOME POINT WHEN I'M, YOU KNOW, SHAKING MY FIST IN THE AIR AS TO WHY I HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH. BUT I WOULD ENCOURAGE US TO GO WITH, WITH A HIGHER NUMBER THERE JUST TO, TO DO, TO ACHIEVE THAT TURNOVER. I KNOW THAT THE WHETHER IT'S HIGH OR MEDIUM OR LOW, WE'RE STILL GOING TO GET PEOPLE WHO ARE UPSET FOR THE FIRST INITIAL SHOCK PERIOD. AND THEN AFTER THAT, AFTER THINGS CALMED DOWN A BIT, I THINK WE'RE BETTER OFF WITH LETTING MONEY MOTIVATE PEOPLE'S ACTIONS THAN WISHES AND HOPING THAT THEY'LL THAT THEY'LL, YOU KNOW, NOT THINK THAT IT'S CHEAPER TO WORTH THEIR TIME TO ONLY PAY $11 AND BE DONE WITH THEIR DAY. SO I, I WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT. I AM A BIG BELIEVER IN LETTING EXCUSE ME, WE MAKE OUR DECISIONS BASED ON ON COST, THAT THAT IS THE BIGGEST MOTIVATOR. MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE. THE DOLLARS ARE. AND THE OTHER THING THAT'S THAT'S IMPORTANT IS THAT WE DO GO THROUGH THIS EXPERIENCE OF TEACHING EVERYONE INVOLVED IN SHOPPING DOWNTOWN, THAT REAL ESTATE IS NOT FREE, AND THIS IS A WAY TO TEACH THAT LESSON. AND IF IT GETS US TO THAT NEXT PHASE, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, EVEN MORE LOTS OR FANCY COVERED LOTS OR WHATEVER, MORE OF THOSE WILL AT LEAST UNDERSTAND THAT PARKING HAS INCREDIBLE VALUE. SO I'M I'M EXCITED TO SEE WHAT HAPPENS. MICHELLE, YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT THOUGHT. GARY, DID YOU DID YOU HAVE ANY FEEDBACK FROM ANY OF THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES THAT YOU SPOKE TO THAT WERE CONCERNED
[00:55:03]
THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE A CLIENT THAT WAS WITH THEM FOR FOUR HOURS OR MORE? I HAVE PARKING COMMITTEE BE ABLE TO SPEAK MORE ABOUT THIS. BUT YEAH, WE THEY BEFORE I EVEN STARTED, I DON'T KNOW, JAKE, DO YOU WANT TO YOU WANT TO BRING ANY MEMBERS OF PARKING FORWARD? YOU CERTAINLY CAN. JACOB. JAKE IS OUR. JAKE IS OUR PARKING COMMITTEE CHAIR. A COUPLE OF THINGS. A COUPLE OF THINGS I'D RECOMMEND IN TERMS OF THE FEE THAT YOU JUST THINK ABOUT IT THOUGHTFULLY. AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS IF IT'S CHEAPER TO GET A TICKET THAN TO TACK ON EXTRA HOURS, JUST HOWEVER YOU DECIDE TO DO THAT, IT SHOULD BE STRATEGIC. IT SHOULD. WE ALWAYS WANT THE PARKING TO BE CHEAPER THAN THE TICKET. WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE THIS CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE RATHER THAN A SLAP ON THE WRIST. I IN THE FEEDBACK THAT I GOT IN TERMS OF HOW LONG PEOPLE WANT TO BE DOWNTOWN, THE MOVIE THEATER GAVE A LOT OF FEEDBACK. WHAT HE SAID WAS THAT, YOU KNOW, MOVIES ARE LONGER THAN TWO HOURS NOW, SO TWO HOURS DOESN'T REALLY WORK. SOMETIMES PEOPLE WANT TO GO TO DINNER AND A MOVIE. AND SO THAT'S LOTS OF TIMES ABOUT A THREE HOUR, MAYBE A LITTLE OVER A THREE HOUR, BUT USUALLY ABOUT A THREE HOUR EXPERIENCE. THE OTHER ONE IS SALONS. LOTS OF TIMES, YOU SEE, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT BEFORE. THERE'S TIN FOIL PEOPLE WALKING ALL OVER THE PLACE. AND SO I THINK LOTS OF THOSE APPOINTMENTS ARE ABOUT THREE HOURS. AND SO I ACTUALLY THINK THREE HOURS IS KIND OF A SWEET SPOT BASED ON THE FEEDBACK THAT I GOT OR I RECEIVED. IF YOU GO FOUR HOURS, I ACTUALLY LIKE IT BECAUSE IT BUILDS IN A LITTLE BIT OF FLEXIBILITY. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AS A MAXIMUM, CORRECT? YEAH. OKAY. OTHER INPUT COUNCIL MEMBERS, I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WHEN I'M IN CITIES AND THEY HAVE PARKING, I ALWAYS ASK YOU ABOUT BUSINESSES. WHAT'S THE CONCEPT OF OUR BUSINESS IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO PAY FOR PARKING. THEY HAVE WE CURRENTLY HAVE VALIDATION AT OUR PAY STATIONS AND THE APP. THEY'RE LOOKING INTO OFFERING THAT AND DEVELOPING IT, BUT IT'S CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE FROM WITHIN THE APP. AND JAKE, CAN YOU SPEAK MORE ON VALIDATIONS? IT GOES BACK TO THE PUBLIC PIECE THAT MIKE WAS TALKING ABOUT. I IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, WE DID NOT VALIDATE BECAUSE OF THE YOU KNOW, IT'S A PUBLIC FACING SERVICE AND IT NEEDS TO BE EQUITABLE FOR EVERYBODY. I THINK THAT'S WHY WE DECIDED NOT TO VALIDATE. BUT AM I WRONG? THAT'S AN EXPECTATION. LIKE I ALWAYS ASK, I CAN I THINK LOTS OF PEOPLE ASK. IT'S JUST NOT A SERVICE THAT IS OFFERED FOR PART OF THAT. I THINK MOST OF THE VALIDATION YOU SEE IN OTHER PLACES ARE PRIVATE LOTS. BUT THEY'RE BUT THEY BUILD. THAT'S WITHOUT DOING A TON OF RESEARCH INTO THAT. I THINK THAT'S TRUE.I THINK THE ONLY EQUITABLE WAY TO DO VALIDATION WOULD BE FOR THE BUSINESS THEN TO PAY THE FEE. I AGREE, I THOUGHT THAT'S WHAT THEY DID. I ASSUMED, ARE THEY GOING TO HAVE THAT OPTION? IS THAT YOU THINK THAT COULD BE SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE? IF A BUSINESS LOVES HAVING PEOPLE COME IN AND OUT AND THEY WANT TO VALIDATE, CAN THEY PAY THERE? ACCORDING TO IPS, THAT THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING INTO DEVELOPING. BUT I DON'T KNOW WHEN OR FOR SURE IF THEY'RE GOING TO. COUNCILOR FREEMAN, IT SEEMS A LITTLE COUNTERINTUITIVE TO ME THAT THIS ONE WHERE IT GETS MORE EXPENSIVE THE LONGER YOU STAY, YOU KNOW, MOST THINGS GET CHEAPER THE LONGER YOU DO THEM. AND YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT. I MEAN, IT'S TO ENCOURAGE TURNOVER. YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT I MEAN, I JUST KIND OF LIKE THE FLAT RATE IDEA. IT JUST SEEMS TO ME THAT, YOU KNOW, THEN PEOPLE AREN'T CONFUSED ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THEY JUST KNOW THAT IT'S THAT MUCH EVERY HOUR. RIGHT. SO IT SEEMS TO MAKE MORE SENSE TO ME. BUT ANOTHER REASON THAT YOU SEE THAT ESCALATE IS TO DISCOURAGE EMPLOYEE PARKING. LOTS OF THE FOLKS THAT ARE STAYING LONGER THAN FOUR HOURS ARE EMPLOYEES AND NOT NECESSARILY CUSTOMERS. AND SO I THINK THE IDEA IS TO MAINTAIN IT FOR CUSTOMERS AND PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SHOP AND BE PART OF THOSE SERVICES, RATHER THAN FOLKS THAT ARE WORKING. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO YOUR BOARD NEEDS TO MAKE ITS DECISION ABOUT THE FEES TO CHARGE AND GET THEM COMMUNICATED TO THE CITY THIS WEDNESDAY IN TIME FOR IT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FEE RESOLUTION. CAN YOU, AFTER WE GO TO COUNCILOR LARSEN'S QUESTION, WILL YOU THEN MAYBE BY WAY OF WRAP UP, SORT OF GET US TO THE TIMELINE THAT YOU'VE GOT GOING HERE? SURE. AND WHAT WHAT ELSE IS NEEDED BESIDES THE DECISION ON THE FEE? SURE. OKAY. I GUESS I HAVE A PROCESS QUESTION. SO I ROLL UP AND I'M NOT SURE HOW LONG I'M GOING TO BE HERE, AND I
[01:00:08]
GET CHARGED EACH TIME I DO A TRANSACTION. SO DO I ACTION FEE OR DO I SAY I'M GOING TO BE HERE THREE HOURS? I GET ONE TRANSACTION FEE AND I PAY WHATEVER THREE HOURS IS? HOW DOES THE PROCESS WORK? YEAH. SO THE PROCESS IS YOU SELECT HOW MUCH TIME YOU THINK YOU'RE GOING TO BE THERE WHEN YOU GET THERE, AND THEN THE APP WILL SEND YOU A NOTIFICATION, A PUSH NOTIFICATION WHEN THAT'S ABOUT TO EXPIRE. AND THEN YOU CAN CHOOSE TO ADD MORE TO THE APP FROM YOUR PHONE. OR YOU CAN START WITH THREE HOURS INITIALLY AND THEN AND THEN YEAH. SO IT'S CHARGED PER TRANSACTION. AND WHEN YOU DO MAKE THAT CHANGE AND ADD MORE TO YOUR ON YOUR APP METER, YOU GET A SECOND TRANSACTION OKAY. CORRECT. OKAY. PAY UP FOR THREE HOURS AND ONLY STAY TWO. IF YOU GET A ONE HOUR CREDIT FOR THE NEXT TIME. YEAH, IT'LL FIGURE IT OUT. OKAY. I'M SURE THERE ARE OTHERS THAT WILL. DO THAT. ONE, IT SAYS THAT THE PROCESSING FEE DROPS A NICKEL IF IT'S A SMALL FEE, WHAT'S A SMALL FEE? SMALL FEE IS WHAT THEY TOLD ME. SO WHEN YOU HIT THAT THRESHOLD OF ABOUT 10 TO $15. SO IT'S UNDER $10. UNDER TEN, UNDER $10 IS WHEN YOU GET THOSE SMALL TRANSACTION FEES FROM THE CREDIT CARD. ALL RIGHT. SO TELL US WHAT THE TIMELINE IS. WHAT'S WHAT'S THE FEES ARE. OR ONCE YOU HAVE CONSENSUS ON THE FEES THEN WHAT. ROLLING IT OUT. SO I WOULD LIKE TO SPEND ALL OF AUGUST AND PERHAPS SEPTEMBER DOING PUBLIC EDUCATION AND POSSIBLY STARTING.I WOULD BE MORE COMFORTABLE WITH STARTING OCTOBER 1ST, BECAUSE I HAVE A FULL TIME EMPLOYEE IN PLACE BY THEN AND TRAINED. I WOULD ALSO NEED TO HIRE ANOTHER PARKING AMBASSADOR, PROBABLY PART TIME TO BEGIN WITH. GET THE EQUIPMENT THAT TAKES ABOUT SIX WEEKS TO GET HERE. I'M TOLD SOMETIMES IT'S FASTER, SO IDEALLY STARTING OCTOBER 1ST, FOCUSING ON AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER ON PUBLIC EDUCATION HEAVY HEAVILY. THAT FITS WITH OUR FEE SCHEDULE TO. AND OF COURSE, IT'S ALL DETERMINED ON THE IF WE CAN GET THOSE FEES IN BY WEDNESDAY. WHAT DO THE MERCHANTS THINK? OH, YOU'RE NOT KIDDING. BRING JAKE BACK UP. THEY'RE SAYING IT BACK, AND I BRING THEM UP BECAUSE THEY'VE HAD MORE CONVERSATIONS THAN I HAD A CHANCE TO HAVE PARKING OR CONVERSATIONS ABOUT IT. SO, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE HAD THE CONVERSATION, MOST MERCHANTS. UNDERSTAND AND KIND OF SEE THE BIG PICTURE. THERE'S DEFINITELY MERCHANTS THAT HAVE HAD CONCERNS. CONCERNS THAT I HEARD WERE NOBODY'S GOING TO COME TO MY SHOP ANYMORE. I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT IT'S GOING TO DO TO BUSINESS. WE'VE HEARD CONCERNS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, EMPLOYEE PARKING, HAVING ENOUGH SPACE FOR EMPLOYEES. AND I THINK LOTS OF THE CONCERNS ARE REALLY AROUND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE CHANGING THINGS. AND WHEN YOU CHANGE THINGS, PEOPLE HAVE TO KIND OF FIGURE OUT A DIFFERENT WAY OF DOING THINGS. THOSE ARE MOST OF THE CONCERNS THAT THAT I HEARD. OKAY. THANK YOU. AND ARE WE AT I REMEMBER THAT SOME OF THE MERCHANTS WERE CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE STOPPING, POPPING IN, POPPING OUT, GETTING SOMETHING AND NOT REALLY THERE. PEOPLE WILL PROBABLY JUST TAKE THE RISK AND NOT SIGN UP, AND THEY GET BACK OUT BEFORE THE TICKET. OR, YOU KNOW, I THINK MOST OF THOSE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WITH THE WITH THE THERE'S A LITTLE TEMPORARY PARKING SPOTS.
AND THERE'S ALSO LIKE THERE'S WAYS TO FIGURE IT OUT, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WANT TO GO TO GREAT HARVEST, THERE'S THE OFF STREET PARKING. THERE'S A FEW SPOTS THERE WHERE PEOPLE CAN GET THINGS. IF YOU LOOK AT, YOU KNOW, THE COFFEE SHOPS OR MOST, YOU KNOW, ARE MOST OF THE CONCERNS COFFEE SHOPS, GREAT HARVEST THOSE PICK UP AND DROP OFF TYPE OF PLACES, MOST OF THEM EITHER. THE OTHER THING IS, IS IT'S, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE GOING TO GET A $6 CUP OF COFFEE. ARE YOU WILLING TO PAY $2 FOR PARKING? IS IT PROHIBITIVE? BASED ON WHAT WE'VE SEEN, IT'S NOT BASED ON WHAT WE'VE HEARD FROM OTHER OTHER PEOPLE DOING THIS. IT'S NOT. BUT COULD IT BE? OF COURSE IT'S A RISK. YEAH, YEAH. NO, I WAS MORE THINKING ABOUT PEOPLE RUNNING IN AND GRABBING A BASKET OR SOMETHING AND GREAT HARVESTING PRE-PAINTED AND EVERYTHING, AND THEN JUST IN AND OUT AND THERE'S ACTUALLY LOADING AND UNLOADING ZONE RIGHT THERE, RIGHT NEXT TO GREAT HARVEST. SO THAT'S PART OF THE EDUCATION. THAT'S NOT JUST FOR UPS OR WHATEVER. THAT'S FOR ANYBODY LOADING IN ON I DON'T THINK EVERYBODY REALIZES THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR. OKAY. AND THE
[01:05:04]
EDUCATION CAN ALSO OBVIOUSLY INCLUDE FREE OPTIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BOUND TO DETERMINED TO SAVE EVERY, YOU KNOW, EVERY DOLLAR. AND THERE'S JUST A BIT OF WALKING INVOLVED. BUT I DO REMEMBER THAT WHEN WE DID THE OVERLAY OF A TYPICAL LARGE DISCOUNT VARIETY STORE, LIKE A WALMART OR A TARGET, YOU DO THE OVERLAY OF THEIR PARKING LOT ON TOP OF DOWNTOWN, AND YOU END UP REALIZING THAT HOLIDAY SHOPPING AT WALMART INVOLVES A BIT OF A WALK. USUALLY IT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN WALKING FROM YELLOWSTONE. ACROSS YELLOWSTONE, YOU KNOW, OVER TO. THE VILLA. I MEAN, IT'S DOABLE. AND IT'S NOT THAT THAT IT'S NOT AS PAINFUL WHEN PEOPLE SEE THAT. COME ON, IT'S JUST BEAT. IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, YARDS. IT'S NOT THAT BIG. CHANGING THE PERCEPTION IS THE HARDEST PART. BUT FOR THOSE WHO REALLY LIKE THE CONVENIENCE, THAT'S HOW THAT'S HOW FREE ENTERPRISE WORKS. YOU PAY MORE FOR CONVENIENCE, RIGHT? SO IT WILL WORK. I JUST THINK IT'S GOING TO BE WE'RE GOING TO BE NERVOUS AT FIRST BECAUSE NO ONE SMILES WHEN THEY HAVE TO REACH INTO THEIR POCKET THE FIRST FEW TIMES. SO WHEN WILL WE SEE ON THE AGENDA? WELL, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS INVOLVED IN THE MOU AND SORRY ORDINANCE CHANGE THAT'S NEEDED. AND SO UPDATING THE CITY'S, THE MOU AND THE ORDINANCE, WHEN DOES THAT NEED TO HAPPEN AND WHAT'S INVOLVED IN THAT IS THAT BEFORE OCTOBER 1ST KIND OF A THING. SO THE MOU. WE PROBABLY NEED TO HAVE THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORP PITCH US WHAT COSTS ARE GOING TO INCREASE AS THEY'LL NEED TO SEE THE CITY CONTRIBUTE. THAT'S GOING TO BE THE MAIN PART OF IT, THAT OTHERWISE THE MOU ALREADY EMPOWERS THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORP TO EXERCISE THE CITY'S ORDINANCE. THE CITY'S ORDINANCE DOESN'T ALLOW FOR METERED PARKING IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA CURRENTLY, SO WE WILL NEED TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE THAT THAT WOULD PERMIT METERED PARKING. WE DO HAVE A DRAFT ORDINANCE THAT WE'VE HAD IN FRONT OF COUNCIL ONCE OR TWICE, THAT IS MORE OR LESS READY TO GO. I RECOMMEND PROBABLY HAVING ONE MORE WORK SESSION WHERE COUNCIL TAKES A LOOK, MAYBE A FINAL LOOK AT THAT ORDINANCE, BUT THE ORDINANCE, AS WRITTEN, WOULD PERMIT THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN PROPOSED TODAY.ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL MAKE A NOTE THAT IT IS FOR CATHERINE TO DRIVE THAT AND GETTING IT ON THE AGENDA. THERE ARE TWO COUNCIL MEETINGS IN EACH MONTH. AND SO WE'VE GOT FOUR AHEAD OF US BEFORE OCTOBER 1ST FOR THAT, ALL OF THAT TO TAKE PLACE. AND I'LL LEAVE IT FOR IF TO BE WORKING WITH MUNICIPAL SERVICES FINANCE TEAM TO GET THOSE FEES REPORTED. BUT SO IT'LL BE SOMETIME IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS THAT WE'LL HAVE COUNCIL ADDRESS THE MOU AND THE ORDINANCE. BUT WE ALSO NEED TO MAKE SURE IS DO WE KNOW IF THE DOLLARS LET'S SEE THE $94,000, IS THAT CURRENTLY IN THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY, OR IS THAT A NEW NUMBER? TWO 9292 IS THE EXISTING NUMBER THE EXISTING? AND DO YOU NEED ARE YOU ARE YOU PROPOSING THAT YOU WOULD RECEIVE MORE THIS COMING YEAR? NO CHANGES TO THAT, NO CHANGES TO THAT. THAT'S HELPFUL. SO THERE ARE NO BUDGETARY IMPACTS FOR THE CITY RIGHT NOW. MOST OF IT'S JUST WORDING MAKING SURE THE WORDING IS CORRECT. AND THAT'S HOUSED IN CVS'S BUDGET CURRENTLY. SO JUST SO YOU'RE AWARE OKAY OKAY. AND THAT MAY BE AN ACTUAL FUNCTIONAL CHANGE THAT CAN HAPPEN IN A FUTURE YEAR. BUT ANYTHING ELSE. YEAH. CAREFULLY WORD THIS QUESTION. BUT I THINK THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO BUSINESSES THAT WERE QUITE VOCAL ABOUT CONCERN ABOUT THIS. CAN YOU SAY WHETHER THERE'S BEEN ANY CONVERSATION WITH THEM TO HELP ADDRESS THEIR CONCERN, OR HAVE THEY COME AROUND IN ANY RESPECT? I BELIEVE THE TWO YOU'RE REFERENCING, I JUST TALKED TO JAKE LAST WEEK ABOUT THAT, AND HE DID SAY IT WAS A SIT DOWN CONVERSATION. AND WE WHEN HE LEFT, THERE WAS GREATER UNDERSTANDING, WHICH IS MOSTLY THE CASE. WE'LL BRING IN AND HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THEM AND EXPLAIN THE WHY, AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO DO THAT.
RIGHT. I THINK THOSE CONVERSATIONS ARE HUGELY IMPORTANT. THANK YOU. YES I AGREE. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE, COUNCILOR FREEMAN? YES, THANKS. SORRY, I JUST GOT TO TELL YOU HOW GLAD I AM NOT TO. YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN ENVISIONING THESE METAL METERS ON THE SIDEWALK OR, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE FIRST STARTED TALKING ABOUT THIS, AND I WAS, LIKE, AGHAST AT IT. YOU KNOW, I'M SO GLAD. AND I WANTED TO GIVE YOU GUYS KUDOS ABOUT THE FLOWERS DOWNTOWN BECAUSE THEY'RE REALLY GREAT. AND, YOU KNOW, IT MAKES ME PROUD TO LIVE HERE AND BE PROUD OF OUR DOWNTOWN. IT'S REALLY, REALLY PRETTY. AND I HEAR PEOPLE COMMENT ABOUT THEM ALL THE TIME. SO YES, THANK YOU.
[01:10:02]
AND THAT'S FOUR SEASONS THAT DOES THAT WITH THE PARKS AND REC TOO OKAY. THAT'S A TEAM EFFORT.THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY LAST WORDS. YES. JUST A QUESTION ABOUT TIME. SO IS THIS GOING TO BE JUST LIKE IT IS NOW. LIKE ARE NIGHTS GOING TO BE. HOW'S THAT WORKING THE TIME. OH THE TIME.
SO IT'LL BE CURRENTLY IT'S 8 A.M. TO 6 P.M. FOR THE TWO HOUR. AND THAT'S WHAT IT'S GOING TO BE TO. IT'LL REMAIN THAT WAY. SO THE NIGHT SCENE, THIS WON'T BE NIGHTS AND WEEKENDS WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW. THERE MAY COME A DAY BUT NOT FIND A SPOT. YEAH. YEAH. WE SATURDAYS ARE GETTING NOW WITH THE FARMER'S MARKET IN THE SUMMERTIME, IT'S HARD TO FIND A PLACE TO PARK ANYWHERE NEAR MEMORIAL. AND I GET TOLD THAT THE FARMER'S MARKET IS VERY POPULAR. IT'S BECOME ONE OF IT IS PRETTY POPULAR. HIGHLY POPULATED IN THE STATE OF IDAHO. SO YEAH, THEY'VE DONE A GOOD JOB WITH IT. ANYTHING ELSE? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS VERY EXCITING. WE'RE THANKFUL FOR IT, FOR ALL THAT IT DOES. THE VIBRANT DOWNTOWN IS A SECRET WEAPON WHEN IT COMES TO HELPING COMMUNITY MEMBERS FEEL LIKE THEY HAVE A GATHERING PLACE, AND IT BUILDS A SENSE OF COMMUNITY. AND IFDC IS JUST A FANTASTIC ORGANIZATION THAT MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE FOR EVERYBODY ELSE.
AND WE'RE LUCKY TO HAVE ALL OF ALL OF THE MERCHANTS AND LANDOWNERS AND BUSINESS OWNERS AND OPERATORS AND NONPROFITS THAT ARE A PART OF DOWNTOWN. MAKES A BIG THANK YOU. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU MORE IN YOUR NEW ROLE. AND, JAKE, TO YOU AND YOUR COMMITTEE.
WONDERFUL THAT YOU WERE ABLE TO DO SUCH A GOOD STUDY AND GET IT. WE'RE NEAR THE FINISH LINE, COUNSELOR URGES ME, DIRECTOR, CENTER AND CAITLIN, DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS OR CLOSING CLOSING WORDS OR DIRECTIONS? NO, CAITLIN. OKAY. WE'D ALSO LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE CAITLIN IN HER ROLE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. SHE HAS BEEN A LIAISON TO THE IPDC BOARD. AND AS CATHERINE TRANSITIONS INTO TAKING OVER MORE OF THAT RESPONSIBILITY, CAITLIN MAY NOT HAVE THAT SAME. DIRECT, I GUESS, TITLE, BUT ALL OF THAT EXPERTISE THAT SHE WALKS AROUND WITH IN HER HEAD WILL STILL BE THERE, AND SHE MAY STILL BE TAPPED EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE FOR THAT. AND SO WE THANK YOU FOR ALL THE EFFORT AND TIME YOU'VE PUT IN THUS FAR OVER THE LAST YEAR OR YEAR OR SO. SO THANK YOU. ANYTHING ELSE? ONE MORE. PLEASE DO A GREAT JOB OF EXPLAINING. THANKS. THANK YOU. YOUR DEMEANOR AND YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS. GOOD JOB. THANKS. THAT'S WHY HE'S COMMITTEE CHAIR. THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME. AND I ENCOURAGE EVERYBODY WHO HAS A COPY OF THIS PACKET VIRTUALLY OR IN PAPER TO SAVE IT, BECAUSE IT'S GOOD HISTORY THERE. THANK YOU FOR THE WORK YOU DID IN PUTTING THAT TOGETHER. HAVE A GREAT AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. THANK YOU. THANKS FOR COMING. YEAH, A LOT OF YOU SHOWED UP. THANKS, BRETT. COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE'RE GOOD. 20 MINUTES BEHIND OUR LITTLE DESIRED SCHEDULE. AND SO I'M GOING TO KEEP GOING. AND WE HAVE FOR OUR NEXT ITEM WE HAVE IFBC COMING FORWARD. EXCUSE ME. NO CDS COMING FORWARD WITH SOME INFORMATION FOR US WITH RESPECT TO CDBG. SO. OH NO SORRY. WE'RE DOING IMPACT FEES OKAY. SORRY.
[Legal, Municipal Services, Mayor's Office]
YEAH. ALL RIGHT. WHERE I THOUGHT I WAS IN THE AGENDA. YEAH, I WAS ALSO. SO. YEAH. OKAY I'LL PASS IT AROUND HERE. A HARD COPY OF THE IMPACT. THE UPDATES. SO WE MET AT THE BEGINNING OF THE.MONTH ABOUT. SOME CHANGES THAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR IN THE IMPACT THE. EMILY ASKED IF I HAD ANYTHING FOR THE SCREEN, BUT I KNOW I ONLY HAVE THIS DRAFT. AND SO WE MET AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MONTH. YOU MIGHT RECALL WE'VE DISCUSSING DIFFERENT WAYS OF CHANGING THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, PRIMARILY FOR THE RECOMMENDATION HAS BEEN TO MOVE TO A RESIDENTIAL SQUARE, FOOTAGE IMPACT FEE. IT'S THE TASK OF DEFINING WHAT THAT MEANS. EXACTLY. WHAT IS SQUARE FOOTAGE.
SO WE HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THAT AND TALKING ABOUT BASEMENTS AND BEDROOMS AND WHAT COULD COUNT AND WHAT NOT TO COUNT. AND THE CONSENSUS THAT I TOOK AWAY FROM THAT CONVERSATION IS THAT COUNCIL WANTED TO SEE IF A RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE DEFINITION OF FOCUSED ON KIND OF A MORE TRADITIONAL WAY THAT IS MORE COMMON ACROSS THE COUNTRY, THAT'S FOCUSED OFF OF FOLKS
[01:15:05]
LIVING SPACES AND SPACES THAT ARE LIKELY TO BECOME LIVING SPACES, TO GET RID OF THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE IMPACT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED BY EXEMPTING UNFINISHED SPACES WITHIN THE HOME. SO AS PARTICULARLY INFINITE FINISHED BASEMENT. SO IF YOU GO TO PAGE SIX OF 15, ON THE BOTTOM OF THAT PAGE IS WHAT I DRAFTED AND WHAT THE DEFINITION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OR IS PROPOSED TO BE. IS DEVELOPMENT OF A STRUCTURE PROVIDING COMPLETE, INDEPENDENT AND SELF-CONTAINED LIVING FACILITIES FOR ONE OR MORE PERSONS, INCLUDING PERMANENT PROVISIONS FOR LIVING, SLEEPING, EATING, COOKING AND SANITATION. THE CALCULATION OF A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CLIMATE CONTROL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE STRUCTURE. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE WHAT HOW WE ARRIVE AT THAT. THEN THERE'S AN EXCEPTION, PROVIDED THAT AUTOMOBILE GARAGES AND ACCESSORY STORAGE STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. SQUARE FOOTAGE. THIS GOES BACK TO THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION NOT TO INCLUDE GARAGE SPACES, AND SOME OF THE CONVERSATIONS THAT COUNCIL WAS HAVING ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE NOT COUNTING PEOPLE'S SHEDS WHERE THEIR LAWN MOWER IS AS PART OF THEIR SQUARE FOOTAGE AS THEIR IMPACT FEE. SO WITH THAT, THAT'S WHERE THAT DEFINITION WORK IS MORE OR LESS RIGHT NOW. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO FINE TUNE IT SOME MORE TO SEE IF YOU YOU'VE HAD A CHANGE OF OPINION, WANT TO GO BACK. IF WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT I UNDERSTAND. COLUMN IS OF THE IS ONLINE WITH US TODAY. AND SO IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR COLIN ABOUT THIS DEFINITION TO HE'S HE STANDS READY TO ANSWER. IF NOT THEN MAYBE YOU CAN MAKE UP SOME PERSONAL TIME. I JUST HOW DOES THE WORDING CLIMATE CONTROL SQUARE FOOTAGE COVER EVERY FLOOR? IN THE HOME IN OUR BUILDING CODE, THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE HOMES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE CLIMATE CONTROL IN ALL PARTS OF THE HOME TO PREVENT FREEZING IN THE WATER PIPES. SO THAT WILL THAT WAS WHY THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED TO LEAVE OUT FINISHED BASEMENTS IS BECAUSE UNDER THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE, EVERY BASEMENT THAT'S CONSTRUCTED IN THE IDAHO FALLS, WHETHER IT'S FINISHED OR UNFINISHED, REQUIRES A HEATING SYSTEM. AND THAT BETTER THAN SAYING ALL LIVING OR POTENTIAL LIVING SPACE. IT'S NOT BETTER.IT'S JUST ONE WAY OF DOING IT. AND IF WE DESCRIBED IT AS LIVING OR POTENTIAL LIVING SPACES, THEN WE REALLY NEED TO DEFINE WHAT A LIVING SPACE IS. AND THIS AVOIDS THAT QUESTION BECAUSE INSTEAD WE'RE LOOKING AT AREAS THAT ARE GOING TO BE AFFECTED BY A THERMOSTAT. IS THERE A PARTICULAR CATEGORY OF SOMETHING THAT YOU THINK IT LEAVES OUT? OR. I GUESS I'M THINKING ABOUT MY OWN HOUSE. WHEN I MOVED IN, IT DIDN'T HAVE A THERMOSTAT IN THE BASEMENT. SURE, AND MINE DIDN'T EITHER. AND SO SOME OF THE OLDER HOMES PROBABLY WON'T FIT THIS DEFINITION.
FORTUNATELY, IMPACT FEES ONLY LOOK AT NEW CONSTRUCTION, AND THAT'S REQUIRED. YOU LOOK AT WHAT'S GOING TO BE REQUIRED UNDER THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE. OKAY, CAN I FINISH THE THOUGHT.
AND THAT LINKS BACK TO THE IBC, WHICH IS KIND OF A STANDARDIZED ACCEPTED CODE. IT SEEMS TO ME THERE'S A LOT OF LOGIC IN THAT. AND EXPLAINING TO SOMEONE HOW WE GOT FROM POINT A TO B TO C, AND THERE ARE A LOT OF CHANGES IN THE WAY THAT HOMES ARE BUILT THROUGH THE YEARS. AND SO IF YOU'RE IN AN OLDER NEIGHBORHOOD, LIKE THE ONE THAT JIM AND I LIVE IN, THERE MIGHT BE SOME PARTS OF IT THAT WOULDN'T TIE IN NICELY WITH THIS. BUT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, I'M PRETTY SURE THAT WE COVER ALL OF THIS. THANK YOU. I GOT A WHAT IF. YEAH. GOOD. OKAY, SO YOU DECIDE TO BUILD A GARAGE NEXT TO YOUR HOUSE THAT'S NOT ATTACHED, BUT YOU PUT A COUPLE OF BEDROOMS IN THE TOP FLOOR OF IT AND THOSE ARE HEATED. DID THEY COUNT AS YOUR SQUARE FOOTAGE? THOSE WOULD COUNT BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T BE AN AUTOMOBILE. GARAGE WOULD BE A SPACE ABOVE THE GARAGE ATTACHED TO THE REST OF THE HOUSE WITH KITCHEN AND ALL THAT OTHER STUFF. BUT I'M JUST. OKAY, SO YOU'RE SAYING A TOTALLY SEPARATE STRUCTURE. I THINK UNDER THIS IT WOULD COUNT AS WELL. ONE OF THE THINGS WE CONSIDERED WHEN WE DRAFTED THIS LANGUAGE WAS ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, WHICH IS WHY WE CLARIFY THAT ACCESSORY STORAGE STRUCTURES DON'T PROMPT A FEE, BUT AN ACCESSORY
[01:20:07]
STRUCTURE THAT HAD A DWELLING UNIT IN IT, LIKE WHAT YOU'RE DESCRIBING THAT WOULD THAT WOULD TRIGGER THE FEE BECAUSE IT'S A BE A CLIMATE CONTROLLED LIVING SPACE. OKAY. IT WOULD NEED TO HAVE INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITIES IN IT, BUT THAT'D BE THE OTHER THING TO LOOK AT. SO I GUESS IF WE WERE REALLY GOING TO HAVE A FIGHT OVER IT, TWO TWO BEDROOMS THAT ARE ABOVE A GARAGE WITH TWO BEDROOMS IN A MATH. YEAH, LIKE IN BOY MEETS WORLD, MAYBE THAT WOULDN'T MEET THE DEFINITION OF A COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY. YEAH. MY QUESTION IS JUST BACK TO WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE. NOW, I DON'T THINK HE WAS HERE THAT THEY WERE TALKING. NO HE WASN'T. SO MY QUESTION WAS, I THINK, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO FIND A LINE SOMEWHERE. MY CONCERN WAS JUST FROM A LEGAL CHALLENGE STANDPOINT, THERE'S NO IMPACT TO THE CITY IF NO ONE MOVES INTO THAT BASEMENT. BUT THE CONCERN FROM THE COUNCIL WAS, WELL, NO ONE ACTUALLY. WE DON'T HAVE A GREAT PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WHEN THEY GO TO FIX THEIR GET THEIR BASEMENT COMPLETED.THEY DON'T GET THEY DON'T PULL PERMITS BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE THE CLEANEST WAY WOULD BE TO HAVE THE PERMIT, THEN CHARGE AN IMPACT FEE FOR THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE, BECAUSE THEN YOU'RE HAVING AN IMPACT BECAUSE THEY'RE ABOUT TO BUILD IT AND SOMEONE'S GOING TO LIVE DOWN THERE. AND I JUST WONDERED IF TO ME, MIKE MADE ME FEEL BETTER BECAUSE I AND I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY CHALLENGES OF THAT. BUT JUST IN MY LOGIC, THAT MAKES SOME SENSE, THAT THERE'S NO IMPACT IF NO ONE'S LIVING IN THE BASEMENT AND A CEMENT FLOOR. NO, YOU KNOW, PLUMBED IN BATHROOMS. AND I THINK THERE COULD BE AN ARGUMENT MADE THAT, HEY, WHY ARE YOU CHARGING AN IMPACT FEE? SO I JUST WONDERED IF YOU'D SEEN THAT ACROSS THE COUNTRY OR. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. YEAH, I ACTUALLY DON'T HAVE THE DEFINITION RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, BUT BUT THEORETICALLY, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, ANY LIVABLE SPACE, YOU KNOW, LARGER THE HOME, MORE LIVABLE SPACE, MORE PEOPLE ON AVERAGE IN THOSE UNITS. YOU KNOW, THEORETICALLY, YOU KNOW, MAYBE YOU DON'T HAVE YOUR LIVING ROOM ON YOUR, YOU KNOW, GROUND LEVEL, YOU'RE LIVING IN THE BASEMENT AND ALL THE BEDROOMS ON THE GROUND LEVEL. SO YOU'RE OCCUPYING MY SPACE, JUST SORT OF BEING ORIENTED. YOU KNOW, HOW THAT SPACE IS USED. AND SO THAT'S WHERE LIKE CLIMATE CONTROL DEFINITION COMES FROM, BECAUSE THAT'S USABLE, LIVABLE SPACE. IF THAT'S A BEDROOM OR A REC ROOM, YOU KNOW, THAT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, BELOW GRADE NOT NOT ON YOUR SECOND FLOOR. AND THEN THE OTHER QUESTION WAS, BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE, THE RISK ISN'T HIGH FOR US TO BE SUED OVER THAT. SO THAT'S WHAT MADE ME MOST COMFORTABLE. THE OTHER QUESTION IS HOW MANY CITIES ARE DOING WHICH WAY IN IDAHO THAT YOU'VE HELPED? ARE WE SEEING BASEMENTS? YOU KNOW, IN DIFFERENT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, I THINK I FOUND LIKE FIVE. SANDPOINT, I BELIEVE COEUR D'ALENE. I THINK THERE WAS ANOTHER ONE NORTH IDAHO. AND HAILEY AND I BELIEVE KETCHUM WAS DOING IT VICE VERSA. BOISE DOING IT BY SQUARE FOOTAGE. BUT WE ARE SEEING IT MORE COMMON IN THE VICTORIAN, DRIGGS AND TETON COUNTY. IN YOUR NECK OF THE WOODS IS, I THINK, WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER RADFORD WAS ASKING IS HOW MANY OF THESE CITIES THAT ARE DOING IT BY SQUARE FOOTAGE, EXEMPT UNFINISHED BASEMENTS FROM THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, AND THEN AND THEN WE WOULD STILL WANT TO CHARGE IT WHEN THEY PERMIT, RIGHT? YEAH. DO YOU SEE ANY EXEMPTIONS FOR UNFINISHED BASEMENTS ACROSS THE STATE? NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE, NO. YEAH. THIS THIS WOULD BE A AND THAT'S MY THAT'S MY OPINION AS WELL, IS THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT EXEMPT UNFINISHED BASEMENTS. THANK YOU.
SO AND JUST TO FOLLOW UP, JUST TO FOLLOW UP TO I MEAN SORT OF SORT OF THE DISCUSSION WE HAD IS, IS THAT IF YOU EXEMPT THE UNFINISHED BASEMENT NOW FIVE YEARS LATER, BECAUSE WE'RE THINKING ABOUT THE LIFE OF THAT HOUSE, FIVE YEARS GO DOWN THE LINE, THAT NEW FAMILY THAT FINISHES THAT BASEMENT BEDROOM AND A BATHROOM DOWN THERE. NOW, THEY'VE THEORETICALLY INCREASED THE DEMAND OF THAT HOME. YOU SHOULD YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY THROUGH THIS PROCESS TO CHARGE AND IMPACT BEYOND THAT. NOW FINISHED NET NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE. AND YOU WOULD BE MISSING THAT IF YOU DIDN'T PUT THAT POLICY. SO I WOULD JUST SHARE A THOUGHT, A COUPLE THOUGHTS WITH THE COUNCIL. ONE IS THAT WHENEVER YOU ENACT AN ORDINANCE THAT YOU KNOW IS GOING
[01:25:04]
TO BE DIFFICULT TO ENFORCE, THEN YOU YOU'RE YOU'RE CREATING YOUR OWN PROBLEM WITH LACK OF ENFORCEMENT OR INABILITY TO ENFORCE OR IN THIS CASE, INABILITY TO COLLECT FEES FOR SOMETHING THAT FOR PROJECTS THAT HAPPEN LATER BECAUSE THERE'S IGNORANCE AND THERE'S SOMETIMES JUST SOMEBODY WANTING TO AVOID THE FEE ALTOGETHER, THEY WON'T THEY WON'T DO THAT. SO I THINK WE CREATE OUR OWN INCOME GAP. THE IDEA IS THAT HOMES OF A CERTAIN SIZE HAVE A KIND OF IMPACT. COUNCILOR RADFORD, I WOULD SAY THERE'S NOTHING IN THE LAW THAT GUARANTEES THAT THERE IS PERFECT ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THE SIZE OF YOUR FAMILY AND THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE YOU BUY. AND SO I DON'T THINK THERE'S GROUNDS FOR A LAWSUIT WHERE YOU SAY, I'M NOT BEING CHARGED SOMETHING THAT'S EQUITABLE BECAUSE THIS IS DESIGNED, ON AVERAGE, TO GATHER A CERTAIN KIND OF INCOME BASED ON OUR BEST EFFORT AT TRYING TO BE EQUITABLE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE, PRETTY DARN EQUITABLE. AND SO I DON'T THINK THAT THERE'S MUCH GROUNDS FOR THAT KIND OF A LAWSUIT WHERE PEOPLE COULD SUE BASED ON FEELING PERSECUTED THERE, AND TO BUILD OFF OF KIND OF THE MAYOR'S THOUGHTS THERE, THAT THAT IS WHAT ACTUALLY MAKES DEFEAT EQUITABLE. IS THAT WHERE THE IDAHO'S IMPACT FEE LEGISLATION DOES NOT REQUIRE YOU TO HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL TO SEE HOW EACH STRUCTURE IS BEING USED? EXACTLY. IT DOESN'T ASK FOR THAT KIND OF CORRECTNESS. INSTEAD, WHAT IT REQUIRES CITIES AND COMMUNITIES TO DO IS TO IDENTIFY GENERALLY APPLICABLE ASSUMPTIONS ON HOW PROPERTY IS USED. SO IT IS TRUE THAT EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, A SINGLE PERSON WILL BUY A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT HOME, PLANNING TO LIVE IN IT BY THEMSELVES, BECAUSE THAT WAS THEIR DREAM WHEN THEY WERE SIX YEARS OLD, AND THEY TOLD THEIR MOTHER THEY WEREN'T GOING TO PLAY IN THE ROOM, RIGHT? BUT THAT DOESN'T USUALLY HAPPEN. AND WHAT THE IMPACT FEES REQUIRE TO DO IS TO LOOK AT WHAT USUALLY HAPPENS. THAT'S WHY THEY CALL IT A GENERALLY APPLICABLE LAND USE ASSUMPTION. I JUST HAVE ONE MORE THOUGHT. WOULD IT BE AT ALL HELPFUL TO INCLUDE SOMETHING ABOUT THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE? CLIMATE CONTROL IN THE DEFINITIONS. SO BECAUSE AS YOU SAID, IT'S A REFERENCE TO A BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENT, OKAY. JUST ADDING IT TO DEFINITIONS. WHICH DEFINITIONS. WELL I WOULD JUST CALL IT I MEAN WHERE IS THIS. THIS IS ON. SO ON PAGE SIX IT IS IN THE DEFINITION SECTION OF THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE. OH IT ALREADY IS. WERE YOU LOOKING FOR IT TO BE ADDED A DIFFERENT DEFINITION SECTION. NO, I WAS LOOKING FOR IT UNDER THE DEFINITIONS AT THE BEGINNING LIKE ON PAGE FOUR AND FIVE. YES IT IS. IT CONTINUES ON TO PAGE SIX. SO THERE ARE QUITE A FEW SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS THAT ARE IN THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE. SO THAT'S PART OF THE DEFINITION.YES. SO THIS LANGUAGE THAT APPEARS IN STRIKEOUT FORM ON PAGE SIX THAT THAT IS PART OF THE DEFINITION SECTION. IT IS DEFINING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. YES. SO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE QUESTION ACTUALLY ISN'T IN. IT DOESN'T APPEAR LATER IN THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE. YEAH.
SO IT'S RIGHT HERE. THAT'S WHAT THAT IS WHAT IT'S GOING TO ESTABLISH WHAT SQUARE FOOTAGE IS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE. BUT IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR THE DEFINITION OF THE CLIMATE CONTROL THAT IS IN THE CODE, AND IF THIS REFERENCES THE CODE THAT I, THAT I, I MEAN, WE COULD ADD SOME LANGUAGE HERE THAT SAYS THE CALCULATION OF RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEE SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CLIMATE CONTROL AS REQUIRED BY THE BUILDING CODE. I MEAN, THAT'D BE SOMETHING YOU COULD THROW IN. THAT WOULD BE A REFERENCE THAT MIGHT HELP PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T KNOW WHAT. OKAY. IF THAT'S SOMETHING COUNCIL WANTS TO SEE, WE CAN HAVE THAT. SO WITH THAT, WHEN THE CODE CHANGED, WOULD THAT AUTOMATICALLY CHANGE THAT. SO IF THE CODE IF THE CODE CHANGED TALKING ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING. YEAH, I THINK IF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE CHANGED IN A WAY WHERE YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO CLIMATE CONTROL THE ENTIRE HOUSE, THEN WE WOULD PROBABLY WANT TO COME BACK AND THINK ABOUT THIS. THIS ORDINANCE. BUT IF IT JUST AFFECTED THE VALUE OF THE INSULATION OR THE CLIMATE, THAT WON'T CHANGE. SO LET'S SAY THAT IN A FUTURE EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, THE CODE PROHIBITED NATURAL GAS FURNACES. RIGHT? BUT WOULD IT REQUIRE THAT THERE BE HEATING SOMEHOW IN THE HOME THEN THIS DEFINITION WOULDN'T THAT WOULDN'T AFFECT ANYTHING HERE. OR, YOU KNOW, ONE THING THAT THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE DOES NOT REQUIRE IS AIR CONDITIONING. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE THAT'S WHY
[01:30:08]
IN SOME EXAMPLES, IF YOU LOOK THROUGH THE COUNTRY, USE THE TERM HEATED SPACES. I USE CLIMATE CONTROL BECAUSE I THOUGHT IT THOUGHT IT MADE MORE SENSE. BUT IT DOESN'T NEED TO SAY CLIMATE CONTROL. IT COULD SAY HE DID. THAT WOULD BE A MORE TYPICAL DEFINITION YOU'D SEE IN OTHER EXAMPLES ACROSS THE COUNTRY. BUT, WELL, THE HEAT IS CONSISTENT WITH FREEZING PIPES AND SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS MENTIONED IN OUR IN OUR AREA HEATING SYSTEM IS REQUIRED IN EVERY NEW STRUCTURE, AND IT HAS TO HEAT THE ENTIRE HOME WHETHER OR NOT IT'S FINISHED SPACE OR NOT. OKAY. SO IS THERE A GENERAL SATISFACTION WITH THAT DIRECTION? I THINK THAT THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WILL BE DISAPPOINTED IN THE ONE HALF OF IT AND PLEASED WITH THE OTHER HALF. SO MAYBE IT WOULD BE A COMPROMISE THAT'S YOU END UP IN A SITUATION LIKE THAT. SO HOPEFULLY THERE WON'T BE ANY GNASHING OF TEETH AND WRINGING OF HANDS AND, YOU KNOW, THAT KIND OF THING. I THINK THAT COUNCIL, YOU MADE A VERY REASONED, YOU'VE TAKEN A VERY REASONABLE PATH TO GET TO WHERE WE ARE, ARE. SO THIS WILL THEN BE PART OF OUR IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE. IS THERE OTHER LANGUAGE THAT YOU WANTED TO CALL TO OUR ATTENTION? THERE ARE SOME CHANGES THROUGHOUT THAT. WE'VE MADE. THE SECOND MAJOR CHANGE THAT IS IN THIS PROPOSED ORDINANCE APPEARS ON PAGE 12. THIS WILL STRIP OUT THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXEMPTION THAT'S IN THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS BEEN VERY CONCERNED ABOUT IS ENSURING FAIRNESS WITH THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. EXEMPTIONS THAT ARE MADE. ONE OF THE QUIRKS ABOUT THE IMPACT FEE. LAW THAT THE LEGISLATURE HAS ADOPTED IS THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU EXEMPT A AFFORDABLE HOME FROM HAVING TO PAY THE IMPACT FEE DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE IMPACT FEE FUND DOESN'T GET THE MONEY. IN OTHER WORDS, COUNCIL MUST FUND THOSE IMPACT FEES ANOTHER WAY, EITHER FROM AN ACCOUNT THAT THE COUNCIL MAKES UP FROM GENERAL FUNDS OR FROM GRANTS FROM THIRD PARTIES. BUT THOSE IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID INTO THE IMPACT FEE FUNDS, WHETHER THEY ARE CHARGED TO THE DEVELOPER OR NOT. THAT, AS COUNCIL IS AWARE OF, HAS BEEN DIFFICULT TO COME BY EXTRA MONEY TO GRANT THOSE AND WE HAVEN'T GRANTED ANY AFFORDABLE IMPACT FEE WAIVERS. WHAT WE'VE HAD IN THE PROGRAM IN PLACE. SO ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS, AS WE WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CONCERNS AND LOOKING AT IT, THEY JUST FELT THAT IT WAS NOT FAIR TO LEAD DEVELOPERS ON THAT. THEY MIGHT GET A AFFORDABLE IMPACT FEE WAIVER OR EXEMPTION. BUT WHERE THE COUNCIL HADN'T FUNDED ONE AND THERE REALLY ISN'T AN AVENUE TO DIRECT THIRD PARTY FUNDS TO PAY FOR THE IMPACT FEE, SO IS THERE A RECOMMENDATION TO REMOVE IT? WE'VE DISCUSSED IT A LITTLE BIT IN COUNCIL, WHICH IS WHY IT'S IN YOUR DRAFT ORDINANCE TODAY AS BEING JUST STRIPPED OUT. BUT THAT'S THE SECOND MAJOR CHANGE TO THE ORDINANCE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE GOT QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT OR NOT, BUT THAT THAT'S THE OTHER MAJOR CHANGE HERE. IT SEEMS LIKE WE DID IT TWICE. WE HAD TWO HEARINGS, BUT NEITHER ONE OF THEM WAS GRANTED, IS MY RECOLLECTION. MAYBE HANS GOT A BETTER FEATHER. BLACK FEATHER. WE GOT A SMALL AMOUNT FOR THEM. MAYBE. MAYBE I'M NOT RECALLING CORRECTLY OR SOMETHING. THERE WERE TWO. YEAH, COUNCILOR FRANCIS, WE'VE HAD A TOTAL OF TWO AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARDS, IF YOU WILL, BY CITY COUNCIL. WE HAVE NOT HAD ANY THIS PAST YEAR.RIGHT? RIGHT. BUT THERE WAS ONLY THERE'S ONLY BEEN TWO LIMITED FUNDS TO BOTH OF THOSE SO THEY COULD GET SOME ACCESS TO HUD MONEY, I THOUGHT. YEAH, IT WAS ACTUALLY THEY WERE REQUESTING IT WHEN THEY WERE SUBMITTING THEIR HUD APPLICATION. AND IN ORDER FOR THEM TO SCORE MORE POINTS, IF YOU WILL, THERE WAS SOME BENEFIT TO HAVING SOME KIND OF PARTICIPATION BY THE MUNICIPALITY. IT WAS THERE. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK BECAUSE I DON'T WANT US TO BE IN A SITUATION WHERE WE'RE ALWAYS GOING TO BE DISADVANTAGED, HUD SCORING IN THIS COMMUNITY IS THEIR HOOK UP. IS THERE OTHER WAYS THAT WE CAN? YES. SO ONE THING THAT CATHERINE SMITH AND OR I SHOULD SAY SMITH BEFORE ONE THING THAT CATHERINE AND I ARE WORKING ON IS CREATING
[01:35:04]
A AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM THAT WILL BE SIMILAR TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM THAT WE'VE GOT IN CITY CODE ALREADY, WHERE THERE'LL BE WAIVERS AND ACCELERATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS. SO THERE ARE THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO INCENTIVIZE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITY AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AFFORDABLE IMPACT FEE THAT WE FIND IN OTHER WAYS, APART FROM THE IMPACT FEE TO DO THAT. AND THOSE WOULD SATISFY HUD, BUT THEY WOULDN'T CARRY WITH IT THE STATUTE, THE STATE LEGISLATIVE MANDATE THAT THOSE FEES BE PAID FOR IN SOME OTHER SOURCE. RIGHT. IF I MAY, I NEED TO I'M SO SORRY. I NEED TO CORRECT MYSELF. THERE WAS ACTUALLY THREE. THERE'S ACTUALLY THREE OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, BUT A TOTAL OF THREE. PARDON ME. WELL, I'M GLAD PLANS HERE BECAUSE I HAD FORGOTTEN ABOUT THOSE. MY NEXT QUESTION IS THE GOVERNOR. THIS LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION PUT TOGETHER SOME NUMBER OF MILLIONS TO HELP WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND I WONDERED IF WE COULD STILL USE THAT FOR THIS INCENTIVE PACKAGE WITHOUT IT BEING IN OUR ORDINANCE. BECAUSE WHAT I FORESEE IS WE COULD ASK FOR 500,000 AS A SEED FUND FOR SO THAT WE COULD SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. IT WOULDN'T PREVENT US FROM DOING THAT STILL, AND I DON'T THINK IT WOULD PROHIBIT US FROM PARTICIPATING WITH THE GOVERNOR'S PROGRAM AT ALL. I SHOULD TELL YOU THAT CATHERINE IS MONITORING THAT PRETTY CLOSELY. THE OTHER THING I'LL TELL YOU, AND I WAS GOING TO BRING IT UP MORE WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT CDBG NEXT. BUT I WILL JUST BRIEFLY REFERENCE IT HERE. AND THAT IS THAT TOMORROW THE BANKING COMMITTEE IS PLANNING TO MARK UP THE RECENTLY RELEASED. SO THIS IS A FEDERAL ROAD ROAD ROAD TO HOUSING ACT AND THE. SORRY SENATOR CRAPO'S OFFICE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF WE HAVE ANY FEEDBACK ON A PROVISION THAT THEY'RE CONSIDERING WHICH WOULD CREATE A PILOT TO CHANGE THE WAY. AND I WILL LINK IT. I PROMISE TO CHANGE THE WAY CDBG MONEYS ARE ALLOCATED. SO WHAT DOES WHAT DOES CDBG HAVE TO DO WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE AT SUBSIDIES HERE THAT WAIVERS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. IT WOULD BE THAT THE NEW FORMULA WOULD GIVE CITIES THAT ARE INCREASING THEIR PERCENTAGE OF HOUSING SUPPLY, INCREASING THEIR PERCENTAGE. THEY WOULD GET BONUS CDBG FUNDS.SO IF WE COULD SOMEHOW TIE THAT, THAT THIS PROGRAM LIKE THIS CREATES SOMEWHERE ELSE, WE COULD POSSIBLY QUALIFY FOR BONUS CDBG FUNDS, CITIES WHICH HAVE GROWTH RATES BELOW THE MEDIAN OF ALL ELIGIBLE CITIES IN THEIR CATEGORY, WOULD BE GIVEN 10% LESS IN CDBG FUNDING. IT WOULD ONLY AFFECT CITIES IN IDAHO THAT HAVE A POPULATION OVER 500,000. SO THAT COULD BE A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF MONEY. FIVE 50,000 CORRECT. A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF MONEY TO FUND THIS AS WE SEEK TO EXTRICATE IT FROM HERE. SO THERE ARE PERHAPS OTHER AVENUES, AS WE WERE SAYING, AND I THINK IT WILL BE CATHERINE WHO CAN BRING SOME OF THAT FORWARD. BUT IN THE MEANTIME, IS THERE CONSENSUS THAT STRIPPING IT OUT OF HERE, WITH ITS UNIQUE PROVISIONS AND THE FACT THAT IT WAS SORT OF DANGLING SOMETHING THAT WE NEVER REALLY DID A GOOD JOB OF PROVIDING CONSENSUS THAT IT SHOULD COME OUT OF OUT OF THE IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE WITH THE EXPRESS UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'RE PLANNING TO PUT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE. AND CATHERINE WOULD HAVE BEEN HERE TODAY TO PRESENT MORE ON THAT, BUT SHE JUST HAPPENS TO HAVE PLANNED A FAMILY VACATION THIS WEEK. SO I THINK THAT SHE IS PLANNING TO COME AS SOON AS THERE'S A LITTLE MORE CLARITY ON WHAT BOTH THE FEDERAL AND WHAT THE LEGISLATIVE ACTION IS GOING TO BE. SHE IS MONITORING ALL OF THAT, SO SHE'LL COME WHEN THERE'S SOMETHING TO REPORT. APART FROM THOSE TWO MAJOR CHANGES, THERE ARE SMALL MINOR CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE ORDINANCE THAT ADDRESS THE CHANGE FROM A HOUSING UNIT AS BEING THE BASIS FOR THE FEE TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, AND SO YOU'LL SEE SMALL STRIKEOUTS THROUGHOUT. BUT THAT'S WHAT THOSE SMALL STRIKEOUTS ARE FOR, IS TO CLARIFY THAT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT A HOUSING UNIT BE ANYMORE WITH THAT. THOSE ARE THE CHANGES, AND I'D STAND FOR ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS THAT YOU HAVE. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO BRING FORWARD? WE MAY BE GETTING TO THE POINT WHERE WE'RE NEAR THE END OF OUR IMPACT FEE DISCUSSION. AND PAM AND MIKE, DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ABOUT THEM, WHAT OUR NEXT STEPS MIGHT BE? YEAH. GO AHEAD PAM. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. JUST TO GIVE YOU A PUT MY GLASSES AWAY OKAY. SO ON AUGUST 11TH WE'LL HAVE A WORK SESSION. AND THAT IS WHERE MIKE AND CATHERINE WILL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAM THAT HE MENTIONED EARLIER. AND
[01:40:03]
THEN ON SEPTEMBER 2ND, THIS IS A TENTATIVE DATE WE PLAN TO POTENTIALLY TENTATIVELY GO TO PNC, GO TO THE COMMISSION MEETING. OUR DIRECTOR, SANDER WILL BE HEADING THAT OUT. SO THAT IS SOMETHING TO LOOK FORWARD TO. AND THEN ALSO ON SEPTEMBER 25TH, WE WILL LOOK AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, POTENTIALLY TO BE DISCUSSED. WE'LL HAVE TO DO THE ADVANCE NOTICE AND ALL THAT THROUGH THE PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS. BUT ON SEPTEMBER 25TH, WE'RE LOOKING AT POSSIBLY DOING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE NEW UPDATED IMPACT FEE, NEW UPDATE, UPDATED IMPACT FEE STUDY, AS WELL AS THE FEES ASSOCIATED, WHICH GIVES US THEN OCTOBER, NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER TO PHASE THIS IN OR NOT PHASE IT IN, BUT TO IMPLEMENT IT SO THAT IT IS READY FOR JANUARY 1ST. ROLLBACK.OKAY, SO THAT'S THE SCHEDULE THAT WE'RE ON. AND TRYING TO THINK IF THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE ANYBODY WANTS TO BRING UP ON THIS. IS COLIN STILL WITH US? COLIN I JUST WANTED TO ASK HOW THE BABY'S DOING. FATHERHOOD. WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. YEAH. THANKS, MAYOR. THANK YOU. YEAH.
THREE WEEKS OLD, HAPPY AND HEALTHY. AND THE MOM AND DAD. WE KIND OF HIT A WALL AROUND THIS TIME OF THE DAY, SO THANK YOU. VERY. GIVES ME A LITTLE SLEEP DEPRIVED. ARE YOU? WELL? THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING WITH US THIS THUS FAR, AND FOR THE KNOWLEDGE THAT YOU'VE BROUGHT TO THE STUDY. WELL, WE'LL SEE YOU SOON. BUT IN THE MEANTIME, TAKE CARE AND ENJOY THE BABY. YEAH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. I THINK WE'RE AT THE END OF THAT
[Community Development Services, CDBG]
CONVERSATION, AND WE'RE READY TO MOVE ON NOW TO THE CDBG PIECE. AND WHILE LISA'S COMING UP, I'LL JUST SAY THAT WHAT I WAS READING TO YOU WAS IN AN EMAIL SENT TO ME TODAY FROM SENATOR CRAPO'S OFFICE. AND SO I JUST WONDERED, COUNCIL MEMBERS NOT WONDERED, BUT WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS AN I WILL HAVE THIS CONVERSATION WITH LISA SEPARATELY JUST TO GET ANY INFORMATION THAT WE WANT TO SEND BACK TO SENATOR CRAPO STAFF. BUT IF THERE'S ANYTHING YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT WHEN IT COMES TO THIS IDEA OF GETTING BONUS DOLLARS, IF WE ARE INCREASING OUR HOUSING SUPPLY AND GETTING FEWER DOLLARS IF WE ARE NOT INCREASING OUR HOUSING SUPPLY, THAT'S A WHOLE NEW SORT OF LAYER OF REQUIREMENTS, I GUESS, OR REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE ON TOP OF THAT COULD BE BECOME A NEW PART OF CDBG. ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT? WHICH IS REALLY CHALLENGING? UNLESS YOU'RE A MUNICIPALITY WHO WANTS TO OWN A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. WELL, THAT'S WHAT I INITIALLY SAID WAS THAT IT'S GOING TO DEPEND ON HOW YOU DEFINE INCREASED HOUSING, INCREASED WORKING TO INCREASE HOUSING SUPPLY. IF AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM QUALIFIES, THEN THAT COULD BE FINE. BUT IF IT'S NOT, THEN IT WOULDN'T BE. SO ANYWAY, WE. YEAH, I KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO TELL ME WE'RE OFF TOPIC, BUT I WAS GOING TO THAT COULD ALSO BRING THIS UP UNDER NEW CONCERNS LATER AT THE END OF THE MEETING. SO RUMINATE ON IT AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT AT THE END OF THE MEETING. WITH THAT, WE'RE READY TO GO WITH TURNING IT OVER TO WADE AND LISA FOR OUR CONVERSATION ABOUT ALLOCATION. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I'M JUST HERE TO INTRODUCE THIS TOPIC AS WELL, BUT THIS IS FOR THE 2025 CDBG ACTION PLAN. AND JUST FOR THE RECOMMENDED PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES THAT LISA DOES A GREAT JOB OF RATING. AND SHE'LL GO THROUGH EACH OF THOSE. AND THEN WE'LL PRESENT THESE AGAIN TO OUR REGULAR OR THIS THURSDAY. YEAH. THIS THURSDAY. YEAH THAT WILL BE PRESENTED. SO. GO AHEAD. THANK YOU MAYOR AND COUNCIL I CAN'T BELIEVE WE'RE STILL AT THIS POINT NOW THAT WE'RE MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS AND MOVING FORWARD. AND IT'S BEEN A LITTLE DIFFERENT THIS YEAR. USUALLY WE LIKE TO GET THESE OUT BEFORE COUNCIL WORK SESSION, BUT OUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD DIDN'T END UNTIL SATURDAY. SO WE HAVE TO SHOW THAT FULL 30 DAYS OF PUBLIC COMMENT IN YOUR PACKET. I'D GIVE YOU COPIES OF. ONE OF OUR LETTERS OF SUPPORT THAT WE RECEIVED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP INCORPORATED FOR THE PROJECT. SO THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET. AND THEN ALSO DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, WE HAD TWO ANONYMOUS DONATIONS, ONE FOR PROJECT FOR IDAHO FALLS RESCUE MISSION, THE HAVEN TO FINISH THE TEN UNITS, AND THE OTHER ONE WAS FOR A PORTION OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PROGRAM FOR THE DDE PROGRAM. AND SO BOTH THOSE APPLICANTS, THE FIRST ONE, IDAHO FALLS RESCUE MISSION, ASKED TO REMOVE THEIR APPLICATION. AND THEN THE SECOND ONE FOR. THE GED PROGRAM. THEY[01:45:03]
ASKED TO REDUCE THAT AMOUNT. AND THAT'S REFLECTED ON THE TABLES FOR BOTH OPTIONS AND TO. THOSE ARE ALL THE COMMENTS THAT WE DID RECEIVE DURING THAT TIME PERIOD. SO WHAT I WHAT I'D LIKE TO DO IS GO OVER, I HAVE OPTION ONE AND OPTION TWO. THERE'S NOT THAT BIG OF A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO.WHAT I MOSTLY WANTED TO FOCUS ON IN YOUR PACKET IS THE FORMULA AND THE EXPLANATION AS TO HOW WE GOT THERE. SO AS YOU'RE AWARE, FOR 2025, WE'RE GOING TO BE RECEIVING 412,342. AND SO WHEN WE BREAK THOSE CATEGORIES UP INTO ALLOWABLE CATEGORIES, THE MAX ALLOWED FOR ADMINISTRATION IS 20%. SO WE DEDUCT THAT FROM THE TOP. THE MAX ALLOWED FOR OUR PUBLIC SERVICE CATEGORIES 15% AND THE MAX ALLOWED FOR SLUM AND BLIGHT IS 30%. KEEPING IN MIND WE HAVE TO MEET A MINIMUM OF DIRECT LMI BENEFIT OF 70% OR MORE. SO IF YOU USE THAT FORMULA OF SUBTRACTING YOUR ADMIN, THAT GIVES YOU THE 329 EIGHT, 7360. FROM THAT, WE CALCULATE OUR 70% AND FOR OUR MINIMUM 70%, WE HAVE TO HAVE AT LEAST 230,911 52. THAT'S THE MINIMUM. IF YOU SUBTRACT THAT FROM THE 329 873 60, THAT REALLY ONLY LEAVES US 98,960 208 FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AND SLUM BLIGHT, AND WITH APPLICATIONS TOTALING OVER 745, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THOSE CUTS HAVE TO BE MADE. SO I'LL GO THROUGH OPTION ONE. AND COMPARE THAT TO OPTION TWO. AND THEN WE CAN WE CAN TALK MORE ABOUT IT.
SO OPTION ONE I IN YOUR PACKET THERE'S ALSO THE PRIORITIES. SO I ASSIGN THEM EITHER ONE THROUGH SEVEN AND HOW THEY RATED IN THEIR PRIORITIES. SO FOR LEGAL AIDS VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THEY FALL INTO TWO CATEGORIES. SO. WE'RE RECOMMENDING FUNDING FOR 12,962 EIGHT. AND THEN FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CRISIS CENTER OF EAST IDAHO. THEY FELL INTO THE CATEGORY OF HOUSING NEEDS. AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING 18,000 FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER. EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A PRIORITY, IT WASN'T AS HIGH IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHER PROJECTS. AND GIVEN THE FACT THAT WE DID HAVE A $5,000 DONATION THAT HELPED ALLEVIATE SOME OF THE OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES THAT WE FELT WE NEEDED TO FUND IT. UNITED WAY ALICE CHILD CARE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM IS DEFINITELY AN ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY, AND SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING 6000 FOR THAT PROJECT. THE SALVATION ARMY WITH HOUSING NEEDS AND SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING, ESPECIALLY FOR RENT, WAS A HIGH PRIORITY. SO WE'RE REQUESTING $8,000 TO GO TOWARDS UTILITY AND RENT PROMISE RIDGE FAMILY EMERGENCY SHELTER. THIS IS HOUSING PLUS SPECIAL NEEDS.
THIS IS FOR FAMILIES. AND THIS IS DEFINITELY A NEED THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED OVER THE YEARS. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING $8,000 FOR PROJECT THE NEXT PREGNANCY CARE CENTER IS DEFINITELY A SPECIAL NEED FOR PRENATAL CARE FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME INDIVIDUALS. AND BEING A NEW PROJECT TO THE SCENE, WE'RE REQUESTING $6,000 FOR THIS GO ROUND. THEN THE COMMUNITY FOOD BASKET OF IDAHO FALLS. AGAIN, THERE'S DEFINITELY A NEED, BUT IT WASN'T AS HIGH ON THE PRIORITY LIST FOR A PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION FOR THE CANOPY TO COVER THE FAMILY RAMP AT THE EMERGENCY FOOD DISTRIBUTION CENTER, THEN FOR DDC, IT'S A DIFFERENT CATEGORY. WE SLUM AND BLIGHT MY AREA. IT REALLY COVERS THREE DIFFERENT AREAS WITHIN SLUM AND BLIGHT AS FAR AS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, JOB CREATION AND PUBLIC FACILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING AN OPTION ONE $40,000 TOWARDS THE PROJECT. THEN FOR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. AGAIN, THAT NEEDS TWO CATEGORIES OF. SPECIAL NEEDS PLUS PUBLIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO LOW MODERATE INCOME NEIGHBORHOODS. IT ALSO HELPS US MEET THAT 70% DIRECT LMI BENEFIT. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THE FULL AMOUNT OF 195,000 FOR THE YMCA. IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. AND FOR THIS YEAR, WE'RE NOT RECOMMENDING FUNDING DUE TO PROJECT THAT'S NOT FINISHED IN 2023, AND THERE'S STILL SOME SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF FUNDS LEFT TO COMPLETE THAT PROJECT. SAME FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. RUSH OF KINDNESS FOR THEIR MINOR EXTERIOR REPAIR PROJECT, THEIR
[01:50:03]
2024 PROJECTS NOT YET STARTED, SO IT DIDN'T SEEM TO BE AS BIG A PRIORITY AS SOME OF THE OTHER PROJECTS. AND OF COURSE, IDAHO FALLS RESCUE MISSION WAS REMOVED DUE TO A ANONYMOUS DONATION THAT PAID FOR THEIR PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED. DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP INCORPORATED. WE RECOMMENDED FOR SPECIAL NEEDS THE 28,731 22 FOR THEIR EXTERNAL RENOVATION PROJECT, AND THEN THE IDAHO FALLS SENIOR CENTER DEFINITELY HAS A SPECIFIC NEED. WE RECOMMENDED THE FULL AMOUNT OF 7180 30 TO REPLACE THE FIVE OVENS AND THEIR FIVE VENTS THAT DELIVER THE MEALS ON THOSE PROGRAMS FOR THE SENIOR CENTER, AND OF COURSE, THE FULL AMOUNT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE PROGRAM FOR 82,468, 40 FOUR. OPTION TWO. THE ONLY REAL DIFFERENCE THERE IS UP OR DOWN $5,000 FROM THE FDC, REDUCING THAT AND GIVING THAT 5000 TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP INCORPORATED PROJECT TO GIVE THEM JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE FUNDS TO COMPLETE THEIR PROJECT.THAT WAS THE ONLY DIFFERENCE REALLY, BETWEEN OPTION ONE AND OPTION TWO. I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE, OR I KIND OF ASSUME THAT THERE'S BEEN SOME COMMUNICATION THAT THAT WOULD BE THE DIFFERENCE MAKER. YES. YEAH. OKAY. YOU MEAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP, THE EXTRA FIVE K WOULD IT BE. THAT'S WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE. THAT'S WHAT I'M READING. YEAH.
YEAH, YEAH. THAT'S THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THERE IS THE 5000 REDUCED IN THE SLUM AND BLIGHT IDC TO THE 5000 DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP PROJECT. NO. IF I'M UNDERSTANDING CORRECTLY, THAT'S THE NECESSARY TO REALLY MAKE THEM BE ABLE TO DO IT. YEAH. YES. OKAY. LISA, DO YOU THINK THAT IMPACTS YOUR PROGRAM SIGNIFICANTLY? I'M SORRY. YOU THINK THE $5,000 REDUCTION IMPACTS THE PROGRAM SIGNIFICANTLY? I DON'T THEY HAVE SOME FUNDING THAT'S GOING TO BE USED TOWARDS THE SUN SHADE PROJECT, WHICH WILL TAKE UP MOST OF IT, IF NOT ALL OF IT, WHICH LEAVES THEM WITH NO FUNDING FOR OTHER PROJECTS. 5000, GIVE OR TAKE, MIGHT NOT MAKE THAT BIG OF A DIFFERENCE. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING. YEAH, YEAH, I'M SUPPORTIVE OF OPTION TO ME TO SUPPORT OPTION TWO AS WELL. I KNOW THAT OFTENTIMES MISS FERRIS'S LOGIC IS PERSUASIVE AND WE ARE DONE. I KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN THERE'S BEEN A TIME OR TWO WHEN YOU'VE ALSO HAD OTHER THOUGHTS ABOUT THE ALLOCATION. ARE THERE ANY OF YOU WHO ARE PREPARED TO SUGGEST ANY ADJUSTMENTS? WELL, THE ONE THING THAT STRIKES ME IS THE ADA RAMP AT THE YMCA. THEY DON'T HAVE ADA ACCESS. IS THAT ONLY ONE ENTRY? DOESN'T THE IT'S THE WEST ENTRANCE. IT'S A TOTALLY DIFFERENT ENTRANCE THAN THE ONE THAT WE HAD PROJECT FUNDS ON THE EAST. THERE'S A RAILING THAT HAS NOT YET TO BE INSTALLED, AND THERE'S ALSO A SUNSHADE PROJECT IN THE BACK THAT IS NOT GOING TO INCLUDE FOR 2024 FUNDS. WHAT DID YOU EXCUSE? WELL, I'M JUST ASKING ABOUT THE YMCA ASKING FOR AN ADA RAMP, WHICH IS WE HAVE THE ADA PROGRAM IN THE CITY. SO YEAH, BUT THEY ALSO HAVE 23,000 FROM 2023 FUNDS. SO THEY HAVE MONEY THEY HAVEN'T SPENT. OKAY OKAY. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT OUR 2025 ALLOCATION IS THE LAST FOR THIS FIVE YEAR PLAN. SO WE'LL BE STARTING THAT PROCESS OVER FOR A NEW FIVE YEAR PLAN. AND IT'S TIME TO RAMP UP ALL OF THESE PROJECTS NICELY FOR THE FIVE YEAR PLAN PERIOD. CAN I ASK? THERE'S A COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT REQUIRED FOR THE NEW FIVE YEAR PLAN. YES. AND DO YOU DO THAT OR DO WE PAY A CONSULTANT? HOW DO YOU HOW HAVE YOU APPROACHED THAT? WE'LL BE GOING THROUGH CONSULTANTS. WE'LL GO OUT FOR AN RFP FOR A CONSULTANT. AND THOSE DOLLARS COME FROM WHERE? YEAH, THOSE WERE THOSE WERE ALREADY WE HAD TALKED TO MUNICIPAL SERVICES ABOUT THAT. THAT WOULD BE IN THE BUDGET THIS YEAR. WE DIDN'T HAVE TO ASK FOR IT. BUT YEAH, THE 60,000 IS ONE. THEY SAID WE WOULD FIND IT IN THE BUDGET. SO OKAY. AND WE DON'T KNOW YET. AS PER THE EARLIER CONVERSATION ABOUT SENATOR CRAPO'S REQUEST, THE CDBG PROGRAM MAY BE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT NEXT YEAR, MAY HAVE SOME OTHER ASPECTS TO IT.
SO ANYTHING THEN IF EVERYBODY IS FEELING COMFORTABLE WITH OPTION TWO, THEN AND IF THAT IS THE
[01:55:11]
WILL OF THE COUNCIL OR THE CONSENSUS HERE, THAT'S WHAT WILL THEN BE INSERTED INTO THE PACKET FOR THE THURSDAY NIGHT MEETING. ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THAT? ANY OBJECTIONS TO THAT? THEN WITHOUT TAKING A FORMAL VOTE, WE'LL JUST ASSUME THAT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO. AND I, AS USUAL, MISS FARRIS, FEEL VERY GOOD ABOUT THE LOGIC AND THE REASONING AND THE RATIONALE THAT YOU PUT INTO THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT YOU MADE. AND I THANK YOU FOR PAYING ATTENTION TO THE NEEDS OF THIS MANY ORGANIZATIONS AND TRYING TO IT'S ALMOST LIKE SOLOMON'S SPLITTING THE BABY.THIS IS HARD WORK TO TRY TO DECIDE WHICH NEEDY, YOU KNOW, ENTITY IS NEEDY OR WHICH IS TRICKY. SO I APPRECIATE ALL THE SUPPORT FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IT REALLY HELPS THIS PROGRAM SURVIVE. LET'S CROSS OUR FINGERS THAT IT WILL WILL CONTINUE TO BE FUNDED, AND THAT IT WILL BE RECOGNIZABLE SO THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO HELP SOME OF THESE ORGANIZATIONS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. THANKS. WELL, WE HAVE ACTUALLY MADE UP ALMOST ALL OF OUR TIME. AND SO
[Community Development Services]
THE NEXT ITEM IS THE PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF REVISIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE. WADE IS ABOUT TO HIT US WITH 4 OR 5 CHANGES THAT ARE ALL TO THE SAME PART OF OUR CODE, BUT THEY'RE ALL A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, AND YET THEY'RE ALL RELATED IN SOME WAY. SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU AND YOU CAN START. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND CASS, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, WE TYPICALLY BRING CODE REVISIONS OF OUR ZONING CODE TO YOU AT THE END OF THE YEAR. A COUPLE OF THESE HAVE BECAUSE STATE STATUTE HAS CHANGED. SO WE WANTED TO GET ON TOP OF THAT IN REGARDS TO DAYCARE USES. AND THEN SOME OF THE OTHER CODE CHANGES ARE ACTUALLY FROM CONVERSATIONS THAT WE'VE HAD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. AS YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE AWARE, I'VE BEEN OUT TALKING TO A NUMBER OF PEOPLE, CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS, AND SOME OF THESE WERE PROPOSALS THAT THEY GAVE TO US, AND WE JUST FELT LIKE IT WOULD BE A GOOD TIME TO MAYBE COME IN MID-YEAR AND, AND LOOK AT SOME OF THESE CODE CHANGES. SO I'LL START WITH THE YEAH, I'LL START WITH THE FIRST ONE. THE FIRST ONE IS IN REGARDS TO DAYCARE USES AS YOU AS YOU KNOW, THE STATE STATUTE IN IDAHO HAS CHANGED IN REGARDS TO DAYCARES, ESPECIALLY IN REGARDS TO LICENSING, THAT THAT NOW IS MORE OF A STATE RESPONSIBILITY. AND SO THESE CODE CHANGES JUST REFLECT THAT. SO WE'RE IN REGARDS TO DAYCARES AND COMMERCIAL USES. WE'RE BASICALLY SCRAPPING THAT SECTION OF OUR CODE OR STRIKING IT IN ESSENCE SO THAT IT REFLECTS THE LANGUAGE OF THE STATE STATUTE. WE ALSO LOOKED AT HOME OCCUPATIONS, HOME OCCUPATIONS FOR DAYCARES. THIS LANGUAGE, AGAIN, MOST OF IT WAS OKAY, BUT WE HAD TO STRIKE SOME OF IT IN REGARDS TO THE EMPLOYEE PROVIDING THEREIN FOR A HOME OCCUPATION AND THE NUMBER THAT MORE THAN 12 CHILDREN, BECAUSE THAT IS NOW REGULATED BY THE STATE. AND THEN WE ALSO WENT THROUGH OUR DEFINITIONS. AGAIN, THESE REFLECT OURS WERE SLIGHTLY OFF FROM THE STATE STATUTE. SO WE HAVE CHANGED THE DEFINITIONS ON THIS ONE. ALL THIS IS JUST TO REFLECT WHAT THE STATE HAS DONE. THIS JUST SHOWS YOU THE USE TABLE FOR ZONING. YOU'LL NOTE THAT WITH LET ME GO. WE DO ALLOW FOR DAYCARE USES IN THE R-1 UP IN OUR RESIDENTIAL ZONES. HOWEVER, WE TRADITIONALLY HAVE NEVER HAD THEM IN THE RI OR RP.THESE ARE THE LARGER LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. WE HAVE NOT ALLOWED THEM IN THERE AND THESE ARE ALL ALLOWED BY CONDITIONAL USE. JUST SO YOU KNOW, WE COULD LOOK AT CHANGING THAT IF YOU WOULD CHOOSE TO. WE ARE NOT LOOKING TO CHANGE THAT AT THIS TIME. SO THAT IS THE THAT IS THE FIRST CHANGE I'M LOOKING AT BASICALLY DAYCARE PROVISIONS TO REFLECT WHAT'S GOING ON ON THE STATE LEVEL. THE SECOND IS ANY QUESTION ON THAT ONE. PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. BUT ANY ANY REASON WHY THE RI IT SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE MORE SPACE, NOT LESS. YEAH. THAT'S JUST TRADITIONALLY WHAT WE'VE WE JUST HAVE NOT ALLOWED. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A HISTORY ON THAT OF IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE TABLE. SO WHAT IS REALLY BEING SHOWN IN THE TABLE IS THE, IT'S THE DAYCARE CENTER THAT'S NOT ALLOWED IN THE RI, THE RP, WHICH WOULD BE YOUR COMMERCIAL LEVEL DAYCARE FACILITY. THE RI CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE MORE SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE PARKING AND OTHER THINGS. SO I
[02:00:05]
JUST THINK IT WAS SOMETHING WHEN WE DEVELOPED THE RI, WE DIDN'T EXTEND THAT. BUT WHETHER YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMMERCIAL DAYCARE CENTER IN THE RI, I THINK WOULD BE UP TO YOU, BUT IT DOESN'T AFFECT HOME DAYCARE, CORRECT? CORRECT. I THINK, I MEAN, I JUST THINK ONE THING THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS HAVE LESS CAR TRIPS. AND SO THIS IS ONE WAY TO ALLOW THEM. AND RESIDENTS COULD WALK THEIR CHILDREN DOWN THAT WAY. YOU KNOW, I'M IT'S NOT TOO STRONGLY OF THAT. I JUST IT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULDN'T BE A BIG CHANGE. AND WE ONLY HAVE A FEW OF THOSE. RI.RIGHT. VERY, VERY LIMITED. AND THE CONDITIONAL USE WOULD STILL REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING AND NEIGHBORHOOD NOTICE AND INVOLVEMENT TOO. SO I'M SORT OF DOING I DON'T THINK THERE'S ENOUGH OF US THAT SAY YES, THEN I WOULD BE INTERESTED. IN EQUITY THING. I'M SORRY, HE SAID. IT'S AN EQUITY THING. YEAH, YEAH. BUT I DO THINK IT SHOULD BE A CONDITIONAL USE SITUATION. OKAY, OKAY. THE NEXT ONE IS IN REGARDS TO THIS CAME OUT OF OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN TERMS OF STREET WIDTHS. SO I'LL SHOW YOU THIS CHART. AND THEN REALLY THE CODE CHANGE IS DOWN HERE IN BLUE. YOU'LL SEE THE LANGUAGE IS A LITTLE VAGUE. AND I'LL EXPLAIN THAT. SO WHEN IT COMES TO STANDARDS FOR DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS FOR TWO WAY IS 24FT. HOWEVER, IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WHEN SOMETHING IS DESIGNATED AS A FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD, THEN THE STANDARD OF THE RECENTLY ADOPTED FIRE CODE IS 26FT. SO IF YOU REMEMBER, WE CAME WITH A CHIEF NELSON ABOUT THIS VERY TOPIC AND THE NEED FOR SOME STANDARD OF THAT DRIVE AISLE APPARATUS, ROAD AND SO THAT'S WHERE THIS COMES OUT. WE JUST ADDED IT VERY VAGUELY IN THE ZONING CODE TO SPECIFICALLY, SAY, REQUIRED BY THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE IN CASE IN THE FUTURE, IF THAT EVER CHANGED, WE WOULD INTERPRET IT AT 26FT IN WIDTH. BUT IF THE FIRE CODE WERE TO CHANGE, MAYBE AT 28 OR 20 OR WHATEVER, THEN WE DON'T HAVE TO GO BACK IN AND COMPLETELY CHANGE OUR CODE. SO THAT WAS THE WHOLE THING ON THERE. IT'S JUST TO ADJUST THAT 26 FOOT WIDTH THAT WAS REQUESTED AS A PART. CAN YOU SPEAK TO THE PROCESS OF BEING DESIGNATED AS A FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD? BECAUSE IF THAT'S JUST UP TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR JUST UP TO THE DEVELOPER, THAT WOULD BE INTERESTING AND IT WOULD BE A DESIGNATION THAT WOULD COME FROM FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. SO THEY, THE DEVELOPER, KNOW THAT THEY WOULD DO THAT AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN REVIEW. THEY WOULD KNOW IT AT THAT TIME. SO I'M NOT SURE WHY THOSE DON'T CHANGE FROM 24 TO 26, BECAUSE 24 IS. SO THINK OF IT. THE BEST EXAMPLE TO USE HERE IS IN REGARDS TO LIKE A PARKING LOT. SO THAT DRIVE AISLE WE WOULD KEEP IT TO 24 UNLESS THE FIRE MARSHAL WERE TO SAY THAT'S A FIRE APPARATUS ROAD, WE NEED TO INCREASE THAT BY TWO FEET SO THAT WE WOULD KEEP THAT STANDARD OF 24 UNLESS THE FIRE CODE SAYS OTHERWISE. TO BE MORE FLEXIBLE TO WHAT FATE IS OUT HERE, DON'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT PARKING EITHER. THAT'S. I'M CURIOUS. I'M KIND OF CURIOUS ABOUT IF YOU HAVE A 24 FOOT ROAD AND YOU ALLOW PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET, THEN BASICALLY IT BECOMES A ONE WAY, ONE LANE ROAD. SO I MEAN, I'M JUST THROWING DARTS AT IT. YEAH.
NO, NO THAT'S GOOD, THAT'S GOOD, THAT'S GOOD. AND IF I REMEMBER RIGHT THE FIRE CODE ALREADY DESIGNATES THE 26 THAT IT WOULD JUST BE ONE SIGN. RIGHT. SO THIS IS A WOULD BE A DRIVE AISLE WITHIN A PARKING LOT ON A PUBLIC ROAD OR A PRIVATE ROAD. OKAY. SO THERE WOULD BE NO PARKING ON THIS ROAD. CORRECT? 24FT IS THE MINIMUM. IN ORDER TO HAVE TWO WAY TRAFFIC WITHIN A PARKING AISLE. AND ONE WAY TO THINK OF IT TOO IS IF YOU THINK OF A LARGE PARKING LOT LIKE A OF A SHOPPING CENTER, NOT EVERY DRIVE AISLE IN THAT PARKING LOT IS A FIRE APPARATUS, OR EVEN THE ONES UP NEXT TO THE BUILDING FOR SURE WOULD BE, AND THOSE ROADS WOULD NEED TO BE 26FT. BUT WE DIDN'T CHANGE THE 24 BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE EVERY SINGLE DRIVE AISLE IN THE PARKING LOT AN ADDITIONAL TWO FEET WIDE, OR IF IT'S REALLY JUST NEEDED FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. OKAY, YOU CAN
[02:05:01]
GET ANOTHER LINE OF CARS, PROBABLY. RIGHT? RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT I MIGHT ADD. HOW MANY TREES? OKAY. THE NEXT. SO WE HAVE FIVE CODE CHANGES. WE'VE DONE TWO. THE NEXT THREE. JUST SO YOU'RE AWARE THESE ARE COMING DIRECTLY OUT OF CONVERSATIONS WE'VE HAD WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. IT ALSO IS NOT JUST THAT, BUT AS IS PRESCRIBED IN IMAGINEFX TO LOOK AT HOUSING TYPES. THIS IS TO TRY TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT HAD THE PRIORITY THAT YOU'VE TASKED WITH ADDRESSING HOUSING IN THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. SO THAT'S JUST THINK OF THAT. SO THIS HAS BEEN IN COLLABORATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS AS WELL, AND HOW WE CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THESE ISSUES. THE FIRST IS IN REGARDS TO CORNER LOTS. CURRENTLY OUR CODE READS THERE'S A YOU CAN SEE THE LARGE SECTION THERE IN TEN 1-5 OF THAT. WHEN WE WOULD LOOK AT A CORNER LOT A CORNER LOT HAS TWO FRONTAGES. RIGHT. IT'S ON THE CORNER WITH THE CORNER. YOU TYPICALLY NEED MORE LAND IN REGARDS TO UTILITIES AND THINGS THAT NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS YOU COME UP BOTH FRONTAGES. SO HOW WE USED TO CALCULATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THAT LOT IS WE ACTUALLY USED TO TAKE AN AVERAGE OF THE STREETS ALONG THE BLOCK. IT EXEMPTED WEDGE SHAPED LOTS.SO IT WAS BASICALLY IS THIS OR IS THIS NOT A WEDGE SHAPED LOT. IT WAS A LITTLE AMBIGUOUS. AND IF WE COULDN'T GET ENOUGH TO GET AN AVERAGE, WE COULD USE THE ADJACENT SUBDIVISION TO DETERMINE WHAT THAT SQUARE FOOTAGE WAS. AS YOU CAN TELL, IT WAS VERY INTERPRETIVE AND VERY CONVOLUTED. SO AND JUST IN TALKING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AND AS WE INTERNALLY TALKED ABOUT IT AS STAFF, WE& JUST SAID, WHY NOT TAKE WHAT THE OUR WHATEVER THE ZONING DISTRICT IS, THAT THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE AND JUST ADD A 10% TO THAT. SO FOR EXAMPLE, AN R-1, THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE, THERE'S 7000FTā S. SO YOU WOULD HAVE A 7700 SQUARE FOOT CORNER LOT. SO IT JUST TAKES WE WERE GETTING SOME QUESTIONS BECAUSE DEVELOPERS WOULD SUBMIT TO US AND WE WOULD LOOK AT THE AVERAGES. USUALLY WE HAD TALKED THROUGH THIS, BUT WE WOULD COME BACK AND THERE'D BE A MISINTERPRETATION OF WHAT THE AVERAGE ACTUALLY WAS. AND THIS JUST KEEPS IT VERY STANDARD AND MAKES IT VERY EASY FOR THEIR DESIGNERS TO DESIGN. SO THAT'S THE WHOLE PREMISE OF THIS, JUST TAKING WHAT THE MINIMUM IS AND TAKE THE PERCENTAGE AT 10%. I'M CURIOUS ABOUT CORNER LOTS, RIGHT. BECAUSE EVERY HOUSE ON THAT CUL DE SAC IS KIND OF LIKE A CORNER LOT ALMOST, OR. YEAH, I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW, THAT WHOLE THING'S A CORNER. IT'S A BIG CORNER. SO WE WOULD PRIMARILY BE LOOKING AT THAT CORNER RIGHT HERE. YEAH. AND OBTUSE CORNERS OF A CUBE. SO YOU CAN SEE THE SUBDIVISIONS, HOW THEY GET DESIGNED. THEY'RE NEEDED TO JUST BE JUST A VERY EASY STANDARD TO HELP THE DEVELOPER MOVE FORWARD AND NOT BE PUT INTO SOME EQUATION. LOTS ARE WILDLY DIFFERENT IN THAT PICTURE. RIGHT? N SQUARE FOOTAGE. YEAH.
HENCE THE DIFFICULTY OF CALCULATING WHAT THAT AVERAGE WOULD BE. YEAH. SO JUST STANDARDIZE IT MAKES IT MUCH MORE EASIER FOR INTERPRETATION. THE NEXT ONE IS IN REGARDS TO THE R2 STANDARD. WE HAVE CAPPED DWELLING UNITS ON THE R2 STANDARD R2 ZONE AT FOUR DWELLING UNITS. THIS CAME BACK TO. WE HAVE SOME LOTS THAT ACTUALLY BECAUSE OF SIZE AND THE FIRE CODE ACTUALLY COULD ALLOW FOR MORE DWELLING UNITS ON THE LOT EVEN THOUGH IT'S AN R2. SO WE WENT BACK AND LOOKED AT THIS, THIS ONE I BELIEVE IT DEVELOPER I CAN'T REMEMBER ON THIS ONE WHO BROUGHT IT UP TO US, BUT BASICALLY WHAT WE LOOKED AT IS ELIMINATING THAT FOUR DWELLING UNIT CAP AND BASICALLY LEAVE IT TO THE FIRE CODE. SO IF THE FIRE CODE ALLOWS FOR MORE, THEN WE COULD ALLOW FOR MORE IN TERMS OF FIRE HOSE LENGTH AROUND THE BUILDING. OR THERE'S OTHER FACTORS THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT LOOKS AT. LOOKS AT. WHAT WE'VE SEEN IS IN SOME SITUATIONS WE CAN ACTUALLY GET TO SIX DWELLING UNITS ON SOME LOTS, NOT ON ALL OF THEM. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT THE R2 ZONE. I'LL JUST SHOW YOU THIS MAP HERE. WE'RE LOOKING AT A VERY LIMITED ZONE THROUGHOUT THE CITY. BUT WHAT THIS DOES IS IT GIVES MORE FLEXIBILITY TO THE DEVELOPER AND GIVES THEM THE ABILITY TO POTENTIALLY GET MORE ON THE LOT THAT WOULD BE PERMITTED. SO WE WOULD NOT BE CAPPING IT. IT WOULD BE CAPPED ACCORDING TO THE FIRE CODE. SO JUST SO YOU'RE AWARE THAT'S THAT
[02:10:03]
COULD CHANGE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT. AGAIN WE'RE TRYING TO GET TO THAT INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND NOT SPREADING OUT AND SPRAWLING OUT INTO OUR OUR FARM. THE LAST ONE IS IN REGARDS TO SETBACKS. THIS IS A THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE ALREADY DO IN THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE. WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS PULL THIS INTO THE OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS. SO CURRENTLY YOU CAN SEE THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, THE FRONT SETBACK RIGHT HERE FOR THE VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS. TN IS 15, R2 IS 20, R1 IS 25. SO WE'RE TRYING TO PROVIDE SOME FLEXIBILITY IN THE ZONING CODE IN THIS INSTANCE. SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS WE'RE LOOKING AT DECREASING THE FRONT SETBACK IN THE R1 AND R2 ZONES TO 15FT, WITH THE CAVEAT THAT WHEN VEHICULAR ACCESS IS COMING FROM THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROVISION IS TO BASICALLY SHIFT THE. SO YOU WOULD HAVE A REAR LOADED PRODUCT. SO MOST R1 IN PARTICULAR IS FRONT LOADED. SO WE WOULD BE ABLE TO PUSH GIVE THE DEVELOPER, I SHOULD SAY, THE ABILITY TO PUSH THE HOUSE CLOSER TO THE STREET IN DISCUSSION WITH THE OTHER DEPARTMENTS. R1 IS A GOOD EXAMPLE. IT'S 25FT. THEY HAD REQUESTED THAT WE ABSOLUTELY CAP IT AT 15, JUST BECAUSE SOMETIMES THERE ARE UTILITIES IN THE FRONT OF THE LOT. BUT THE THINKING HERE IS THAT THE UTILITIES WOULD BE IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY WOULD HAVE AN ALLEYWAY, AND THE ALLEYWAY STANDARD IS 20FT ANYWAYS, SO THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO PUSH THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT CLOSER TO THE STREET. WITH THAT, WE WOULD LOOK AT THE REAR YARD SETBACK, THEN BEING REDUCED TO THREE FEET. MIND YOU, WE HAVE THE 20FT ALREADY FOR THE ALLEYWAY, SO IT WOULD JUST GIVE A GREATER FLEXIBILITY TO THE DEVELOPER. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE R1 ZONE, THAT THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO PRIMARILY DO A FRONT LOADED PRODUCT. IT ALSO ALLOWS THEM FLEXIBILITY ON THE LOT TO SHIFT THE HOUSE FORWARD AND CREATE A LITTLE MORE DENSITY OR ACCESS ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PROPERTY. SO THAT'S THE THINKING THERE. MY QUESTION ON THAT ONE IS COORDINATING WITH PUBLIC WORKS, BECAUSE IF WE'RE NOT GOING TO MAINTAIN ALLEYS. WE'RE WORKING AGAINST OURSELVES. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YEAH. LIKE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO MAINTAIN THE ALLEY SO YOU CAN GET INTO YOUR GARAGE OR WHATEVER. CORRECT. BUT THE CITY'S NOT DOING IT ANYMORE. SO WE ACTUALLY CLARIFIED THAT A LITTLE MORE IN OUR DEFINITIONS. YES. SO THAT YOU WERE YOU WERE A STEP AHEAD OF THE GAME THERE. COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCIS. SO YES. SO NOW WE DELINEATE BEFORE WE JUST HAD ALLEY AND NOW WE HAVE DELINEATED BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ALLEYWAYS. SO THAT'S THE THINKING THERE TO CLARIFY THAT. SO YOU COULD HAVE FOR EXAMPLE PRIVATE ALLEYWAYS WHICH WOULD BE MAINTAINED BY AN HOA OR SOME OTHER ENTITY. SO. AND I, I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU WANTED TO LOOK AT ANY EXAMPLES, BUT I CAN STOP THERE JUST IN THE INTEREST OF TIME. BUT THOSE ARE THE THOSE ARE WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT FOR THE ZONING CODE. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THIS IS COMING TO YOU ON THURSDAY, BUT WE JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A HEADS UP OF WHAT THESE CODE CHANGES WERE DOING AND THE THINKING BEHIND IT. AGAIN, THIS IS JUST BEEN FROM WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO FOCUS ON HOUSING CHOICE THAT'S PRESCRIBED IN IMAGINEFX. AND WE'RE ALSO LOOKING AT INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND TRYING TO GET MORE INFILL. SO WE'RE NOT SPRAWLING OUT INTO OUR POTATO AND BARLEY FIELDS. SO ALSO JUST IN OUR LIAISON MEETINGS WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS, BUT I JUST THINK IT'S ALSO BUILDING TRUST IN OUR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY THAT YOU'VE LISTENED, THAT YOU'VE BEEN MEETING WITH THEM, THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO FIND THESE COMMON PLACES. SO YES. THANK YOU. YEAH, IT IS FROM CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM, WE'RE TRYING TO GET TO A MIDDLE GROUND WITH THEM AND FOR SURE, FOR SURE. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WELL WE'LL JUST GO AND RAPID FIRE ON THURSDAY. AND UNLESS YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF OKAY OKAY. THANK YOU COUNCIL MEMBERS. BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY THINGS ON THE AGENDA. I HAVE BEEN THINKING THAT AS LONG AS WE HAVE FOUR PEOPLE IN THE ROOM, WE CAN CONTINUE. SO IF ANYBODY NEEDS TO STEP OUT FOR ANY REASON, WE CAN STILL KEEP THE MEETING GOING, IF THAT'S OKAY. BUT IF YOU WOULD LIKE, WE CANNOT DO THAT. WE CAN STOP AND HAVE A FORMAL BREAK. THAT'S GOOD. KEEP KEEP THE[Police, Human Resources]
ROLLING GOING. OKAY. WELL THEN WE'LL KEEP MOVING ON THEN. AND THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS[02:15:05]
THE CHANGES TO THE PERSONNEL MANUAL. AND WE HAVE WITH US OUR POLICE CHIEF AND OUR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE CHANGES. ONCE THEY GET IT EXPLAINED, IT REALLY MAKES SENSE AND IT GOES QUICKLY. BUT WE NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO GET THE SETUP THAT WILL TURN IT OVER TO THE TWO OF YOU. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU COUNCIL. SO IN THE CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL, I BELIEVE THE FIRST OF THE YEAR, THERE WAS A CHANGE TO THE INJURY ON DUTY CITY POLICY. AND I HAD TALKED A COUPLE OF TIMES WITH THE DIRECTOR ABOUT SOME OF THE NUANCES OF THAT AND, AND SOME OF THE WORRIES I HAD. HE WAS VERY RECEPTIVE AND LISTENED TO ME. WE THEN WORKED THROUGH A COUPLE OF REAL LIFE CASES, THE PD, AND THEY DIDN'T GO PERFECTLY SMOOTHLY. AND SO HE CALLED AND SAID, HEY, WHY DON'T WE LOOK AT JUST DOING AN INJURY ON DUTY POLICY THAT APPLIES TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PUTTING THE POLICE PERSONNEL MANUAL? SO SPECIFICALLY, ONE OF THE REASONS THAT THE POLICE OFFICERS WERE WORRIED ABOUT THIS IS EVEN THOUGH I THINK IT IS VERY UNLIKELY IT WOULD EVER HAPPEN, THE RULES IN THE CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR A POLICE OFFICER TO ENGAGE IN SOME SORT OF HEROIC ACTIVITY, GET INJURED ON DUTY AND THEN GO INTO AN UNPAID STATUS AND NOT BE PAID FOR SEVERAL DAYS? I THINK IT'S UNLIKELY. AND I TOLD THEM THAT I DIDN'T THINK IT WOULD HAPPEN, AND I TOLD THEM THAT PROBABLY IN MOST CASES, I WOULD HAVE ANOTHER WAY OF COVERING THAT. BUT AS A, AS AN EMPLOYEE GROUP, THEY'RE KIND OF LIKE, WELL, THE RULES SAY IT CAN HAPPEN. AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR ASSURANCES AND YOUR YOUR WINK AND YOUR NOD AT US. BUT BLACK AND WHITE IS BLACK AND WHITE. SO IT CAUSED SOME SOME CONCERN THERE. AND SO WE JUST LOOKED AT WORKING THROUGH SOME OF THE, SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. CAN WE ADD, NO THANK YOU. OKAY. SO WHAT WE SAY HERE IS WE'RE JUST GOING TO ADD A SECTION TO THE END OF THE MANUAL. AND WE WORKED ON THIS LANGUAGE TOGETHER. AND THEN OUR CITY ATTORNEY WEIGHED IN AND ON IT AS WELL. SO BASICALLY THE IDAHO FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL FOLLOW ALL THE PERSONNEL RULES EXCEPT FOR A COUPLE OF THINGS. SO FOR THE FOR POLICE OFFICERS, ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS AND ORDINANCE OFFICERS, WHO ARE THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, INJURY ON DUTY FOR THEM WOULD START WHEN THEY GET WHEN THEY GET INJURED. SO THE FIRST DAY IS ALWAYS COUNT AS A WORK DAY. AND THEN THEY WOULD GO INTO INJURY ON DUTY, STARTS HAVING A FIVE DAY WAITING PERIOD. THEN WE DEFINE WHAT SHIFT THAT WE PUT ON AND HOW THEY'LL BE ASSIGNED LIGHT DUTY OR MODIFIED DUTY STATUSES. WE DEFINE A SHIFT. IF THEY'RE INJURED AND THEY'RE UNABLE TO COME BACK TO WORK, WE DEFINE WHAT THEIR SHIFT WILL BE ON DAY SHIFT, EVEN THOUGH THEY WON'T BE WORKING DURING THAT TIME. WE OFTEN HAVE OUR EMPLOYEES THAT ARE SUBPOENAED TO COURT, AND THE COURT REALLY DOESN'T CARE THAT MUCH ABOUT WHAT OUR INJURY ON DUTY POLICY SAYS. THEY HAVE A SUBPOENA. WE PROBABLY KIND OF WORK THROUGH THAT, BUT WE CAN'T CONTROL THE COURT. SO IF WE DON'T CHANGE THE SCHEDULE, WE END UP PAYING OVERTIME FOR THEM TO GO TO COURT WHEN THEY WHEN THEY CAN'T WORK. AND THAT DIDN'T SEEM TO BE A PRUDENT THING TO DO AS A CITY. SO THAT'S WHY THOSE SCHEDULES GET DEFINED. AND THEN IF THEY CAN COME BACK TO WORK AND THEY ARE ON SOME SORT OF MODIFIED DUTY, AGAIN, WE DEFINE THAT THEY'LL BE PUT ON A 410 SCHEDULE THAT MEETS THE NEEDS OF THE DEPARTMENT, AND THEN IT TALKS ABOUT IN OTHER PLACES IN THE MANUAL. IF WE CHANGE THEIR SCHEDULE AND WE DON'T GIVE THEM NOTICE AT LEAST 14 DAYS NOTICE, THERE'S AN OVERTIME COMPONENT TO THAT. WE WORK 24 HOURS A DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. AND IF YOU'RE CONSTANTLY MOVING PEOPLE'S SCHEDULES AROUND, IT CAN BE VERY HARD ON THE EMPLOYEES TO BOTH PROTECT THE EMPLOYEE, BUT ALSO TO ENCOURAGE ME AND MY COMMAND STAFF TO PROPERLY PLAN BEFOREHAND. AND THEN IF WE GET TO THAT MOMENT TO MAKE A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF WHETHER IT'S WORTH IT TO MOVE THAT PERSON'S SCHEDULE WITH INJURY ON DUTY, WE'RE WE'RE SAYING WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE PAYING YOU OVERTIME FOR CHANGING YOUR SCHEDULE. MOST FOLKS CAN'T GIVE 14 DAYS NOTICE AND THEN GET HURT. AND SO WE EXEMPT THAT OUT OF THERE. AND THEN THE LAST PARAGRAPH TALKS ABOUT HOW UNDER STATE LAW AND THE LAST PARAGRAPH WOULD ONLY APPLY TO SWORN POLICE OFFICERS UNDER STATE LAW. THAT 58 CAP ON ON WORKMAN'S COMP, THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO POLICE OFFICERS. SO IT JUST MAKES IT CLEAR THAT WE'RE FOLLOWING THE STATE LAW ON THAT.ON THAT 50 DAY CAP ON IT. AND THAT'S THE CHANGE IN A NUTSHELL. SO THIS WOULD BE, I'M SORRY, A
[02:20:04]
CHANGE TO THE CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL, NOT THE POLICE PERSONNEL MANUAL. POLICE PERSONNEL MANUAL.THIS THIS IS GOING TO THE POLICE PERSONNEL MANUAL. SO THE THINGS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO THIS WOULD GOVERN THE PEOPLE THAT IT DIRECTS. SO POLICE OFFICERS, ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS, ORDINANCE OFFICERS AND EVERYTHING ELSE. BECAUSE THIS DOESN'T SPEAK TO EVERYTHING ABOUT INJURY ON DUTY. THIS HAS SPECIFIC CARVEOUTS FOR THOSE SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES DUE TO THE NATURE OF THEIR JOBS AND EVERYTHING ELSE, THEY WOULD FOLLOW THE CITY PERSONNEL MANUAL, WHICH IS FOR 40. AND PROCEDURALLY, IT COMES HERE FOR FEEDBACK AND GUIDANCE. AND THEN IT WOULD GO TO ALL OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR 30 DAY REVIEW AND COMMENT PERIOD, AND THEN COME BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. SO THE EARLIEST THIS WOULD BE CHANGING WOULD BE THEN PROBABLY MORE TOWARD THE END OF GIVEN THE 30 DAY PIECE AND HOW LATE WE ARE RIGHT NOW AND WHEN MEETINGS ARE SCHEDULED. IT WOULD BE THE FIRST MEETING IN SEPTEMBER, WOULD BE THE FIRST TIME THAT WE WOULD GET A CHANCE TO GET TO THIS, I THINK THAT'S THE EIGHTH, NINTH, 11TH OF SEPTEMBER. YES. I JUST HAVE A QUICK QUESTION, JUST MORE CLARITY, BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY THOUGHT ABOUT THIS MORE THAN I HAVE, BUT WHY DID YOU LIMIT THE FOUR SHIFTS TEN HOUR SCHEDULE TO MONDAY THROUGH THURSDAY? THERE'S NO NEED FOR ANY OTHER DAYS. I MEAN, SO THAT'S WITH THE WHEN THEY CAN'T COME BACK TO WORK. SO THEY'RE ACTUALLY NOT WORKING. OH, OKAY. IT'S JUST WE'RE WE'RE DEFINING WHAT THEIR SCHEDULE WOULD BE THAT WAY IF THEY HAVE SUBPOENAS AND HAVE TO GO TO COURT, THAT WOULD BE THEIR REGULAR DUTY TIME AND IT WOULDN'T BE OVERTIME OTHERWISE. LIKE IF THEY'RE A GRAVEYARD EMPLOYEE. WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T DEFINE WHAT THEIR SCHEDULE WOULD BE WHEN THEY HAD A SUBPOENA GO TO COURT OR THEY WOULD BE UNABLE TO WORK AND WON'T BE WORKING. BUT WE WENT TO COURT. THEY WOULD GET OVERTIME. SO THAT THAT PROTECTS THE CITY A LITTLE BIT FROM SOME SOME LIABILITY THERE.
YEAH, I MISUNDERSTOOD THAT. OKAY. SO THEY ACTUALLY AREN'T WORKING DURING THAT TIME. IT'LL GO DOWN AS ACCIDENT DUTY. IF THEY HAVE TO GO TO COURT OR SOMETHING ELSE, THEN THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED JUST WORKING. OKAY. OTHER INPUTS OR THOUGHTS OR CONCERNS. GOOD, GOOD. I THINK THIS IS JUST A SIMPLE MATTER OF CLARIFYING. AND SO IT REALLY DOESN'T NEED TO BE A BIG CONTROVERSY. AND I'M GLAD THAT IT'S NOT. SO WE'LL WE'LL TALK ABOUT THIS PROBABLY IN THE WORK SESSION ON SEPTEMBER 8TH AND THEN SEE IT AGAIN JUST AS A FOLLOW UP. COME BACK AND TELL US WHETHER OR NOT YOU HAD ANY FEEDBACK AND IF THERE ARE GOING TO BE ANY MODIFICATIONS. AND IF NOT, THEN WE'LL PROBABLY SEE THIS LANGUAGE. BUT I DON'T ANTICIPATE ANTICIPATE THERE BEING A LOT OF FEEDBACK ON THIS. FEEDBACK THAT ALREADY GAVE WAS THAT WE NEED TO DO THIS. SO THEY'RE THEY'RE THEY'RE VERY SUPPORTIVE OF THIS CHANGE. GOOD. IT'S GOOD TO BE RESPONSIVE WHEN THERE'S NO REASON NOT TO BE. SO THANK YOU CHIEF. APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS HERE. THANK YOU DIRECTOR. THANKS. ALL RIGHT. SO DIRECTOR JONES IS REMAINING AT THE TABLE BECAUSE THE NEXT BIT
[Human Resources, Legal]
OF CONVERSATION, WE NEED TO GET SOME. WE'LL HAVE SOME CLARITY. THAT'S A LEGAL CLARITY. AND THAT'S WHY MY MICHAEL IS COMING FORWARD. BUT. THE STATE STATUTE IN IDAHO IS VERY SPECIFIC AS TO WHEN ELECTED OFFICIALS AT THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL CAN HAVE OR MAKE CHANGES TO COMPENSATION, AND THE PHILOSOPHIES ON COMPENSATION VARY ALL ACROSS THE BOARD. SOME FOLKS WILL THINK THAT PUBLIC SERVICE SHOULD BE FREELY GIVEN. OTHER FOLKS WILL THINK THAT WE PAY JUST FOR EXPENSES. OTHER FOLKS MIGHT ARGUE THAT IT'S WISE TO PAY FOR PAY TOP DOLLAR BECAUSE YOU WANT TOP TALENT.JUST LIKE WHEN YOU'RE HIRING IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND YOU HAVE EVERY VARIATION IN BETWEEN. AND SO THE. TOPIC, INTERESTINGLY, IS ONLY ALLOWED TO BE RAISED DURING THE ELECTION YEARS. AND IT WOULDN'T. AND THEN NOTHING WE DO WOULD BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL JANUARY 1ST AFTER THE ELECTION. SO IT WOULD BE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT COUNCIL THAT WOULD BENEFIT FROM ANY CHANGES YOU MIGHT DECIDE TO MAKE IN THIS SMALL WINDOW OF TIME THAT WE HAVE TO CONSIDER. CONSIDER THIS. BUT IT'S DESIGNED TO, I THINK BY PUTTING IT IN A MUNICIPAL ELECTION YEAR, IT'S DESIGNED TO HAVE AN IMPACT ON PRUDENCE, PERHAPS BECAUSE YOU DON'T GO HOG WILD AND THEN STAND FOR ELECTION THREE, YOU KNOW, A MONTH LATER. SO THERE IS SOME BUILT IN RESTRAINT THAT COMES TO IT. I THINK THAT WHATEVER IS HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST WHEN WE'VE HAD THIS BYLAW, HAS BEEN VERY CAREFUL AND THOUGHTFUL CONVERSATION, AND THAT SEEMS TO SATISFY VOTERS. I'VE NEVER HEARD THIS THROWN IN ANYBODY'S FACE OVER THE LAST DOZEN YEARS THAT I'VE BEEN WATCHING. IT'S JUST IMPORTANT THAT WE BE ABLE TO TALK ABOUT THIS REASONABLY. AND SO AS A PART OF THAT, DIRECTOR JONES HAS SAID ABOUT GATHERING
[02:25:08]
LOTS OF DATA, HE AND HIS STAFF MEMBERS HAVE COLLECTED GOOD INFORMATION. AND SO I'M GOING TO TURN IT TO THEM TO PRESENT THE INFORMATION AND THEN LEAD YOU IN A CONVERSATION ABOUT WHERE YOU MIGHT WANT TO GO WITH THIS, WITH THIS TOPIC. DIRECTOR. YEAH. THANK YOU. ONE OF THE SHEETS THAT I HANDED OUT WAS A SPREADSHEET, WHICH IF WE WANTED TO GO INTO MORE DETAIL, WE COULD PULL IT UP ON THE SCREEN. IT BASICALLY COMPARES THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS WITH OTHER IDAHO AND SOME UTAH CITIES IN TERMS OF POPULATION, BUDGET, EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 24, BECAUSE THAT'S DATA THAT I COULD FIND READILY AVAILABLE. THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT, THE COMPENSATION FOR THE MAYOR, THE BENEFITS FOR THE MAYOR, THE COMPENSATION FOR COUNCIL. AND THE BENEFITS FOR COUNCIL. THE POINT BEING JUST TO TRY TO GIVE SOME COMPARABLES FOR CITY COUNCIL TO COMPARE WHAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING FOR THEIR CITY COUNCIL AND FOR THE MAYOR. WE ALSO HANDED OUT THE ORDINANCE TO CURRENT CITY OF IDAHO FALLS ORDINANCE FOR THE COMPENSATION OF CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR. AND THERE'S A WORD DOCUMENT THAT WAS HANDED OUT THAT IS A SUMMARY OF SOME OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CITIES, THE IDAHO CITIES THAT WE LOOKED AT IN TERMS OF THE COMPLEXITY AND WHAT THEY DO AND DON'T OFFER AS A CITY. SO TOGETHER WE WERE GOING TO KIND OF TIME FRAMES AND GUIDELINES AND ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BENCHMARKING DATA, IF YOU HAVE ANY. AND IF YOU'D LIKE THAT SPREADSHEET ABOUT THE SCREEN, I THINK WE'RE PREPARED TO KNOW IT. IS THERE OTHER SCREEN NOW SO WE CAN ZOOM IN ON IT IF THERE'S CERTAIN FIELDS? YEAH. WE'LL JUST HAVE TO TELL ME WHERE TO ZOOM IF YOU NEED TO ZOOM. IT WAS A DIFFICULT ONE TO PRINT BECAUSE IT GOES QUITE A WAYS OVER TO THE TO THE RIGHT AND HAS A LOT OF THE DATA THAT'S ON THIS WORD DOCUMENT AS WELL ON THE SPREADSHEET. SO WHERE WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO WITH THE CONVERSATION? I JUST HAVE A QUESTION THAT JUST POPPED INTO MY HEAD RIGHT NOW. I WAS UNAWARE OF THIS, THAT I SEE THAT YOU'VE GOT COUNCIL RECEIVES PERCY COMPENSATION. YES. YEAH, WE ALL HAVE. OH WELL I DON'T WELL YOU PROBABLY YOU HAVE A PREVIOUS PERSON. YEAH. I'M NOT ADDING TO MY PERCY I KNOW I DON'T, I DON'T IT'S INTERESTING YOU THAT'S AN INTERESTING THING PROBABLY FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE HIGHEST YEARS. I THINK YOU'RE ALREADY I MEAN, YEAH, I CAN'T, I CAN'T ADD OR COLLECT PERCY FROM THIS JOB BECAUSE IT WOULD AFFECT MY PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT. INTERESTING. I HAVEN'T LOOKED AT THAT SPECIFICALLY IN THAT SITUATION, BUT THAT IS AN INTERESTING I MEAN, IT JUST OCCURRED TO ME SO. OH, OKAY. WELL, I'LL RAISE ONE ISSUE. I MAY BE WRONG, BUT IT SEEMS LIKE OUR JOB HAS GROWN. WHETHER IT'S MORE BOARD MEETINGS, LIKE ADDING AIRPORT BOARD MEETING AND THE TIME FRAMES AND EVEN BUDGETING IN JULY, IT SEEMS LIKE THE HOURS ARE MORE AND THERE'S MORE TO READ. AND I COULD BE WRONG. I COULD JUST BE A SLOWER READER. BUT NO, YOU'RE NOT. YOU'RE RIGHT. IT'S A. FOR ME, IT'S BEEN ENOUGH THAT I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH FREE TIME. IF I NEED TO GO SEEK SOMETHING ELSE. THIS PRETTY MUCH TAKES ALL OF THE TIME, RIGHT? AND SO THAT'S CERTAINLY TRUE.AND I'LL JUST SAY THAT THE COMPLEXITY OF WHAT WE DO, I THINK I'M GRATEFUL FOR YOU TO KIND OF ADD SOME OF THE THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT. BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S IT'S HARD TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WE DO. I THINK WE'RE THE ONLY MUNICIPALITY IN THE STATE THAT HAS A, YOU KNOW, BILLION DOLLAR KIND OF UTILITY THAT WE MANAGE AND IN TERMS OF ITS VALUE, AND THEN PROBABLY 80 TO $100 MILLION OF ITS REVENUE, AND THEN THE SLICE PRODUCT THAT WE'VE KIND OF KNOWLEDGE WE'VE HAD TO GAIN, I MEAN, ALL OF US THAT HAVE COME ON THE COUNCIL, IT WAS HOW MANY HOURS AND HOURS AND HOURS TO LEARN WHAT ELECTRIC REALLY DID, WHICH IS UNIQUELY PLACED IN IDAHO FALLS, BECAUSE I THINK THERE'S A FEW OTHER CITIES THAT DO ELECTRIC, BUT THEY GENERALLY DON'T CREATE ELECTRICITY. YEAH, THEY DON'T GENERATE THEIR GENERATE. AND THEN ANYWAY, SO AND THEN YOU'RE RIGHT ABOUT AIRPORT, I THINK THAT'S ADDED DEFINITELY INTO THE BOARD MEETING THERE. WE DO HAVE A BOARD MEETING WITH PUBLIC WORKS, BUT WE HAVEN'T REALLY DELVED INTO THAT AT THE SAME LEVEL. THAT'S ONCE A YEAR. YEAH. YEAH I, I JUST KNOW TO THE OTHER THING IS IF WE DON'T DEAL WITH IT I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A. THERE'S NOT A MECHANISM THAT MAKES IT HAPPEN. AND I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A MECHANISM OR ELSE YOU CAN GO 20 YEARS WITHOUT IT BEING CHANGED, WHICH I DON'T
[02:30:02]
KNOW IF IT'S EVER 20, BUT IT'S WHEN A DECADE, I'M PRETTY SURE. BUT I THINK IT CHANGED. AND TO BE HONEST, I THINK THE MAYOR'S RIGHT. I'M NOT SURE THAT I WOULD SEEK REELECTION IF SOMETHING DOESN'T CHANGE JUST BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH TIME, AND I COULD SEEK COMPENSATION IN OTHER WAYS, THAT WOULD BE MORE BENEFICIAL, FOR SURE. NOT THAT YOU I MEAN, GOVERNMENT SERVICE IS SERVICE, SO YOU DON'T EVER THINK YOU'RE GOING TO GET COMPENSATED FULLY FOR WHAT YOU GIVE. BUT AT SOME POINT YOU HAVE TO MAKE CHOICES ABOUT TIME AND EFFORT. DID ONE QUESTION I WAS WONDERING WAS AMOUNT OF TIME ESTIMATES? DID WE EVER HAVE WE EVER SURVEYED EACH OF US TO KNOW HOW MUCH? BECAUSE I THINK IT IS AN INTERESTING THING ABOUT HOW MUCH TIME THEY ARE GIVING TO THE READINGS, TO THE PACKETS, TO THOSE THINGS. I'M NOT SURE WE KNOW THAT NUMBER. I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU WOULD KNOW IT ACCURATELY EITHER. YOU'VE NEVER SOUGHT A MEASURE. I THINK TO DO THAT, WE'D HAVE TO ASK EVERYBODY TO LIKE, KEEP SOME BILLABLE HOURS. WE'D HAVE TO PICK CERTAIN TIMES OF THE YEAR TO ACCOUNT FOR SEASONALITY AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. AND I THINK THE BEST WE CAN DO IS JUST ESTIMATE THAT FOR EVERY, YOU KNOW, HOUR IN A MEETING, THERE'S PROBABLY AN HOUR'S WORTH OF.READING AND, AND OR PREPARATION THAT GOES INTO THOSE MEETINGS, IF NOT MORE. AND WE'VE TRIED TO ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF LIAISON MEETINGS THAT MIGHT BE HELD AND THAT KIND OF THING. BUT WHAT WERE THE PROXIES IN THE IN THE SPREADSHEET THAT WERE DESIGNED TO CAPTURE COMPLEXITY? BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I'VE ARGUED IS THAT THE CITY IS ONE OF THE MOST COMPLEX. AND COUNCILOR RADFORD'S COMMENTS ABOUT AIRPORT AND POWER MAKING US A LITTLE UNIQUE AMONGST THE LARGER CITIES IN IDAHO. HOW ARE WE TRYING TO CAPTURE THIS SO THAT WE CAN COMPARE THE NARRATIVE DOCUMENT, AND IT'S ON THE SPREADSHEET AS WELL. WE PULL IT UP AND KIND OF PUT MORE INTO IT. IT'S CHALLENGING TO CAPTURE, RIGHT? JUST LIKE WE LOOK AROUND THIS ROOM AND THINK, HOW MANY HOURS DOES THIS GROUP SPEND PER WEEK, PER MONTH, PER YEAR? AND THEN TO GO TO CAPTURE THAT FROM THE CITY COUNCILS OF ALL THESE OTHER CITIES WOULD JUST, WOULD BE JUST AS NUANCED. SO THE DATA IS ONLY GOING TO TAKE US SO FAR THE BENCHMARKING INFORMATION WILL ONLY TAKE US SO FAR. AND IT GIVES KIND OF ENOUGH INFORMATION TO HAVE A RELATIVELY GOOD SENSE OF WHAT THE OTHER CITIES ARE DOING. AND THEN FROM THERE, WE JUST HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION ON, YOU KNOW, THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS IS GOING TO DO CAN THEY SPEAK TO NAMPA? 29 DEPARTMENT? ARE THEY BREAKING THINGS UP LIKE THAT SEEMS OVERWHELMING. THERE'S A LOT OF HARD. YEAH, I DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE ANY ANY MORE INFORMATION ON IT BECAUSE WE HAVE MORE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. BUT YEAH. YEAH, THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. WELL, IN THE, YOU KNOW, THE ANNUAL EXPENDITURES KIND OF CAPTURES THAT A LITTLE BIT, JOHN, AS FAR AS THE COMPLEXITY BECAUSE THAT ADDS POWER, RIGHT? I MEAN, THERE'S $80 MILLION THAT'S ADDED, RIGHT? YEAH. AND THAT CHANGES US FROM, FROM LIKE SIDE CITIES DOUBLE OUR SIZE AND POPULATION, BUT DOESN'T SPEND AS MUCH AS OUR BUDGET. RIGHT. MAYBE THEY DON'T DO THE STREETS EITHER. THEY'RE ADA COUNTY. YES. PLOWING. THEY DON'T HAVE ANY UTILITY. THEY DON'T HAVE THEIR NO PUBLIC POWER. THE POCATELLO IS THE ONE I THINK IS FASCINATING IS THAT WE'RE DOUBLE THEIR THEIR BUDGET. ALMOST THE SAME DAY. YEAH. I'M ALSO INTERESTED THAT THEY HAVE 23.
THEY HAVE TRANSPORTATION. I THINK THAT THEY I KNOW THEY HAVE THE BUS SYSTEM GATHERING THIS INFORMATION IS AN INTERESTING EXERCISE BECAUSE THERE'S SOME DATA THAT LIKE THE ANNUAL EXPENDITURES IN 24, I COULD GO PULL THAT OFF THE IDAHO PUBLIC WEBSITE IN A MATTER OF A COUPLE OF HOURS. SOME OF THE DATA, IT'S A IT'S DIGGING THROUGH OTHER CITIES WEBSITES. IT'S MAKING PHONE CALLS, IT'S DOING PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS. AND EVEN WHEN YOU GET IT BACK TO INTERPRET THAT AND COMPARE AND CONTRAST IT WITH WHAT WE DO IS DIFFICULT. SO THAT'S WHERE IT'S THE BENCHMARK IS ONLY GOING TO GET US SO FAR. IT GIVES US A GENERAL SENSE OF AN IDEA OF WHAT THE OTHER CITIES ARE DOING, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AN EXACT ARITHMETIC IN THIS PICTURE. SO DIDN'T THE LAST TIME WE TALKED ABOUT THIS AND WE VOTED ON IT AND WE GOT A RAISE THAT WE TALKED ABOUT INDEXING IT OR AUTOMATICALLY INCREASING IT EVERY COUPLE YEARS OR SOMETHING THAT IS IN THE CODE RIGHT NOW.
IT'S NOT VERY SEXY IN TERMS OF THE DOLLAR AMOUNT. WE DID TALK ABOUT INDEXING IT. THE TROUBLE WITH INDEXING IT IS THAT THE LAW REQUIRES THAT YOU HAVE A DOLLAR AMOUNT CERTAIN, SO YOU CAN'T TIE IT TO, LET'S SAY CPI IS AUTOMATICALLY INCREASES IT BECAUSE YOU NEED TO KNOW EXACTLY THE DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT THE PUBLIC IS GOING TO PAY EVERY YEAR, SO THAT THE WHEN. THE
[02:35:02]
COUNCIL LOOKED AT THIS LAST, YOU DID PROVIDE YOURSELVES A MODEST ANNUAL INCREASE. IT'S I THINK, 2.5%, WHICH WAS THE AVERAGE OVER THE AVERAGE OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WE WENT BACK A WAYS AND IT SEEMS LIKE. YEAH. SO THAT SO THOSE AUTOMATIC INCREASES END JANUARY 1ST, 2029. THAT'LL BE THE LAST TIME THE LAW AUTOMATICALLY INCREASES COUNCIL'S SALARY.OKAY. BUT THOSE TAKE EFFECT EVERY YEAR THAT FIRST DAY OF THE YEAR. SO LEGALLY IT HAS TO BE DONE BEFORE THE ELECTION. THAT'S CORRECT. SO THE LAW REQUIRES THAT COUNCIL CHANGED ITS COMPENSATION BEFORE A GENERAL ELECTION, AND THAT IT CANNOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL AFTER THE GENERAL ELECTION, JANUARY 1ST, BUT IT COULD TAKE EFFECT. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE LIKE IF WE DID IT THIS YEAR. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE JANUARY 1ST, 2026. IT'LL BE JANUARY 21ST, SURE OF 27. YES IT COULD. AND I'LL EXPLAIN WHY I RAISED THAT ISSUE, BECAUSE WE HAVE SO TIGHT ON THIS BUDGET AND THE TIMING OF ANY FTE EXCEPT FOR THE GIS PERSON. THAT'S ONLY 13,000. IT LOOKS IT WOULD LOOK AWKWARD TO ME TO GIVE OURSELVES THAT RAISE AT THE VERY TIME. I KNOW WE GAVE A PACKAGE FOR A COMPENSATION, BUT WE ALSO SAID WE DON'T HAVE ANY ONGOING MONEY. WELL, THE SYSTEM HAS BUILT INTO IT. WHAT, 2.1 THAT'S ALREADY ON THE BOOKS? THAT IS THREE. BUT TO YOUR POINT, I, I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT EXACTLY. GIVEN THE BUDGET SITUATION THIS YEAR. BUT I DO CHANGING THAT. IF I'M BACK TO MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT, I THINK THE JOB HAS BECOME MORE COMPLEX FOR COUNCIL AND THAT DESERVES MORE COMPENSATION. SO ONE, IF YOU DO DECIDE TO DO THAT, THAT'S AN INTERESTING IDEA. YOU WILL NEED TO DO THAT IF EVEN IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE IT EFFECTIVE 27, YOU WILL NEED TO MAKE THAT DECISION BEFORE AUGUST 14TH, WHICH IS YOUR LAST, YOUR LAST SCHEDULED MEETING BEFORE THE DEADLINE, AUGUST 21ST IS THE ABSOLUTE DROP DEAD DEADLINE. TO DO THAT, YOU WILL NEED TO CALL A SPECIAL MEETING. SO I THINK IT HAS TO BE PUBLISHED BY THE 21ST.
SO THAT MEANS EVEN IF YOU DID IT ON THE 21ST, YOU WOULDN'T BE PUBLISHED IN TIME. SO YOU'D HAVE TO. THE 14TH IS REALLY OUR. SO 14TH IS REALLY YOUR LAST DAY TO GET IT DONE. YOU COULD MAKE IT EFFECTIVE. YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT EFFECTIVE ANY EARLIER THAN JANUARY 1ST 26, BUT YOU COULD MAKE IT EFFECTIVE LATER THAN THAT. IF YOU WAIT, THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION. THREE YEARS FROM NOW, YOU'RE. YOU GO AHEAD, COUNCILOR FREEMAN. SO THE 2% RAISE OR WHATEVER IT WAS WE WROTE INTO THE THING LAST TIME IS STILL IN EFFECT. IF YOU DO NOTHING, YOU'RE AT A MAYOR'S SALARY, AND COUNCIL MEMBER SALARIES WILL INCREASE NEXT YEAR BY 2 TO 2. IT'S ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE HANDOUT THAT YOU GOT. SO IT WILL RIGHT NOW THE COUNCIL RECEIVES A BIWEEKLY SALARY OF $589.62. STARTING AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR 26.
THAT WILL INCREASE TO $602.59. AND THEN THEREAFTER IT'S ABOUT DOLLARS. IT'S ABOUT. WHAT IS IT EXACTLY? IT'S 2.15% INCREASE EACH YEAR ON THAT DATE THROUGH JANUARY 1ST. I'M FINE WITH THAT.
29TH. I THINK I'M FINE WITH LEAVING IT THE WAY IT IS. I JUST THINK WE'VE GOT TO RIGHTSIZE SOMEWHAT TO BE CLOSER TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE OTHER CITIES. I'M GOING TO JUST POINT OUT THAT, I MEAN, TO YOUR POINT, JOHN, COUNCILORS RECEIVE JUST A IF YOU CUT YOURS IN HALF, THEY'RE STILL GETTING A LITTLE MORE THAN HALF. AND THINK ABOUT THE SIZE OF THEIR CITY, THE NUMBER OF DEPARTMENTS AND THE NUMBER OF SERVICES THEY I'M GUESSING THAT YOU WORK MORE THAN TWICE WHAT THEY DO. THEN TAKE A LOOK AT CITY OF BOISE. THEY'RE MAKING LITTLE UNDER TWICE WHAT YOU MAKE, AND THEY HAVE STAFF DEDICATED TO COUNCIL IN ADDITION TO THEIR DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. AND THEN THOSE FOLKS HOLD FULL TIME JOBS. SO THEY JUST AS SOME OF YOU DO. SO IT'S INTERESTING THAT THEY GET A CELL PHONE AND A PREMIUM EACH MONTH, TOO. THERE WAS A COUPLE OF INTERESTING THINGS THAT I HAD FOUND ABOUT UTILITY BOARD MEMBERS. I DID VERIFY ALL OF THIS. I CAN GIVE I CAN GIVE YOU NAMES. YOU KNOW, THE AVERAGE IS THE AVERAGE SALARY ON THE
[02:40:03]
SALARIES WEBSITE IS ABOUT A LITTLE UNDER $4,000 PER BOARD MEMBER. DOES VARY PRETTY GREATLY. LIKE THE CITY OF BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS, THEIR UTILITY BOARD MEMBERS, THEY MAKE $3,250 A YEAR. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER ONE THAT WAS KIND OF INTERESTING. SO BAINBRIDGE, INDIANA, WHICH IS A CIVIL TOWN. SO IT'S LIKE, YOU KNOW, PAY THEY MAKE ABOUT $1,500 A YEAR, BUT THEIR HIGHEST REPORTED BOARD SALARY, THEY TOOK A PAY CUT AT ONE POINT IN TIME. I THINK IT WAS ABOUT $2,000. SO AIRPORT BOARDS, MANY OF THEM THAT I FOUND WERE FREE FOR SOME. FOR SOME REASON I DON'T. THIS IS LIKE A STATE LAW THING, BUT INDIANA, I FOUND AT LEAST TWO AIRPORT BOARDS THAT DO PAY THEIR WORKERS, THE HIGH END BEING $800, THE LOW END BEING LIKE $500 A YEAR. SO YEAH, IT'S JUST KIND OF INTERESTING THAT THERE ARE SOME MUNICIPALITIES AND AIRPORTS THAT DO PAY MORE MEMBERS FOR THEIR SERVICE. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THAT WE HAVE FIVE UTILITIES PLUS THE AIRPORT AND THOSE UTILITIES ALL NEED A SPECIALIZED UNDERSTANDING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE REGULATED AND THEY'RE ALL OVER THE PLACE. FIBER, YOU'VE GOT POWER AND THEN YOU'VE GOT WATER, WASTEWATER AND SANITATION AND THEN AIRPORT EXPERTISE. I DO THINK THERE'S A CASE TO BE MADE THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS SHOULD BE PAID. YOU COULD DOUBLE YOUR PAY AND STILL JUSTIFY IT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN DOUBLE IT POLITICALLY AND STILL SURVIVE SCRUTINY FROM PEOPLE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW HOW MUCH WORK, HOW MUCH YOU WORK, AND HOW LITTLE YOU'RE REALLY COMPENSATED WHEN YOU BREAK IT TO AN HOURLY RATE. BUT I GUESS AND YOU'RE NOT COMPENSATED FOR GASOLINE NECESSARILY, THAT YOU SPEND GOING TO AND FROM CITY HALL MEETINGS ALL THE TIME. SO THERE'S SOME PERSONAL COST, BUT PERHAPS YOU MIGHT WANT TO CONSIDER, AT A MINIMUM, GOING FROM 2.15 TO 2 OR TO 3% INCREASE ANNUALLY. BUT YOU MIGHT WANT TO DO SOMETHING A LITTLE MORE. COUNCILOR FRANCIS'S IDEA IS INTRIGUING, AND THAT IS YOU SHOW. YOU SHOW SENSITIVITY TO THE FACT THAT THERE'S VERY LITTLE RECURRING MONEY AVAILABLE THIS YEAR. AND BUT MAKE WE MAKE SURE THAT THESE WHATEVER INCREASE YOU MIGHT BE THINKING IS APPROPRIATE CAN BE BAKED INTO NEXT YEAR'S ONGOING FUNDING BEFORE IT EVEN GETS TO THE BUDGET PHASE. I WOULD ALSO. I THINK THE 3% MAKES A CERTAIN SENSE, BUT IT STRIKES ME THERE'S TWO ELEMENTS HERE. ONE IS THE ANNUAL INCREASE, THE OTHER IS THE BASE. PART OF WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING IS THAT THE BASE IS TOO SMALL. YES. NOW, DO I THINK WE OUGHT TO CHANGE THAT THIS YEAR? NO, I DON'T FOR THE REASONS ALREADY CITED. BUT IF YOU'RE REALLY GOING. TO ADDRESS THAT PART OF THE QUESTION THAT THEN IT NEEDS TO BE TALKED ABOUT THAT OKAY. WHAT'S A REASONABLE BASE GIVEN WHAT OTHER PLACES PAY AND WHAT OTHER WHAT OUR RESPONSIBILITIES ARE? I MEAN, THERE ARE A LOT OF ELEMENTS THAT GO INTO THAT. BUT BUT DECIDING BETWEEN 2.1 AND 3, THAT'S JUST AN ANNUAL PIECE. THAT'S THAT'S A DIFFERENT PART OF THE QUESTION I GUESS IS WHAT I'M THINKING ABOUT IT. I'M THINKING ABOUT INCREASING THE BASE. AND WE HAVEN'T TALKED ABOUT THE WHICH I THINK I AGREE WITH. I AGREE WITH THAT TOO. I THINK MAYOR SALARY IS THE COMPLEXITY OF THE CITY.BUT FOR THE SAME REASON, FRANCIS, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SUGGEST INCREASING THEIR SALARY EITHER UNTIL 27. I MEAN, IT'S JUST I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE THE MONEY WOULD COME FROM. WELL, THAT'S WHEN WE SAY WE DON'T HAVE. WE DON'T HAVE, WE DON'T HAVE. WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A CERTIFIED VALUATION YET. RIGHT. NOT THE COUNCIL SEAT. SO YEAH, WE DON'T KNOW. WE. WELL, WELL DIDN'T WE NOT ALLOCATE A FEW HUNDRED THOUSAND ALREADY. THE OTHER THING IS I MEAN THERE'S MONEY AND OUR COUNCIL, OUR COUNCIL BUDGET EVERY DOLLAR WE AREN'T SPENDING WHAT WE SPEND.
LIKE I ALWAYS THINK ABOUT OUR TRAVEL YOU KNOW, THERE'S PROBABLY ROOM IN OUR COUNCIL BUDGET TO FIND THE SAVINGS TO PAY THE EXCESS. WELL, IT'S A REALLY INTERESTING POINT YOU BRING UP BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, TRAVEL HAS VARIED YEAR TO YEAR. I'M SURE YOU COULD ARGUE THAT THERE'S BEEN YEARS WHERE MORE COUNSELORS HAVE DONE MORE THINGS. SO WHERE ARE THE SAVINGS IN THAT? GO STRAIGHT BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND. SURE. YEAH. BUT IT'S I MEAN, IT'S THE SAME ARGUMENT THAT THAT IT'S JUST A PRIORITIZATION. YEAH. YOU COULD FUND SOME OF YOU COULD FUND SOMETHING THIS COMING YEAR IN PART FROM TRAVEL AND SAVING. RIGHT. THAT'S WHAT I THINK. AND I THINK I THINK WE NEED TO DO IT TO GET THE BASE RATE. YOU'RE YOU'RE RIGHT. I'M ACTUALLY SUPPORTIVE OF TYING OUR INCREASES, NOT TO A NUMBER, BUT TO WHAT WE GIVE TO THE EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES THE YEAR BEFORE, SO THAT WE'RE ALWAYS IN LINE WITH WHAT, THE EMPLOYEES. SO YOU'RE
[02:45:06]
TALKING ABOUT THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT. WE DON'T HAVE ONE OF THOSE, RIGHT? YEAH. SO I'LL JUST TELL YOU THAT YOU YOU WILL HAVE TO COME UP WITH ANOTHER REVENUE. YOU CAN'T TIE IT TO SOMETHING OUTSIDE OF THE ORDINANCE. IT MUST BE THE ORDINANCE ITSELF. CAN WE CHANGES ORDINANCE ANNUALLY? NO, IT'S JUST EVERY TWO YEARS. RIGHT. YOU CAN ONLY CHANGE IT EVERY TIME THERE'S AN ELECTION. SO EVERY TWO YEARS. YEAH. CAN YOU SAY, CAN YOU SAY SOMETHING LIKE 5% OR THE OR THE LESSER OF WHAT. THE EMPLOYEES. YOU CAN SAY 5%. YOU'VE GOT TO SAY A DOLLAR AMOUNT. SO THE TWO THE REASON WHY I'M HAVING SUCH TROUBLE WITH THE PERCENTAGE IS BECAUSE IT ISN'T WRITTEN IN THE ORDINANCE AS A PERCENTAGE. EVERY, EVERY YEAR IT INCREASES BY THE 2.15%. AND YOU'RE SAYING THAT'S BASED ON THE STATE LAW AND THAT'S THE STATE CODE MAKES IT CLEAR IT'S GOT TO BE IN DOLLARS AND CENTS. IT CAN'T BE ON ANYTHING EXTERNAL FOR TRANSPARENCY OR TRANSPARENCY. I MEAN, ANY PERCENTAGE CAN BE FIGURED OUT AS WELL. AND THAT'S KIND OF THE CHALLENGE, RIGHT? BECAUSE LET'S SAY WE AGREED IN THE ELECTION YEAR, LIKE THIS YEAR, OKAY, THE PAST TWO YEARS, WE'VE GIVEN X AMOUNT OF INCREASES TO THE CITY STAFF, LET'S SAY IN TWO YEARS THAT ENDS UP BEING 5.5% OR SOMETHING. RIGHT? SO THEN YOU PASS AND THIS IN 2025 A 5.5% AND THEN LET'S SAY 2027, LET'S SAY THE COMBINATION IS NOW 7% OR 8%. NOW YOU'RE PASSING AN 8% INCREASE.IS THERE GOING TO BE POLITICAL WILL TO DO THAT? YEAH. NO. ALL OF A SUDDEN THAT DOESN'T SOUND AS ATTRACTIVE. RIGHT. BUT WHILE WE'RE GETTING I THINK ULTIMATELY MAYOR, I DON'T WANNA PUT WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH. BUT ULTIMATELY I THINK PERHAPS THE CONVERSATION HAS BEEN BROUGHT FORWARD BECAUSE OF ONE RECRUITMENT. RIGHT? JUST GETTING INDIVIDUALS TO RUN AND MAKING IT SOMETHING THAT IS, YOU KNOW, DOABLE IN THEIR LIVES. I KNOW OTHERWISE YOU HAVE TO BE INDEPENDENTLY WEALTHY AND RETIRED. I KNOW OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO PROBABLY MADE SOME CALCULUS IN THAT. I MEAN, I KNOW THERE'S RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION, JUST LIKE WITH THE REST OF YOUR EMPLOYEES. THOSE ARE TWO HUGE CONSIDERATIONS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THIS JOB DOES ACTUALLY COST SOMETHING. JUST JUST ASK ME HOW MANY MEETINGS I'VE GONE TO AT LUNCHES AND HOW MUCH GAS WE SPEND EVERY MONTH.
AND, AND HOW MANY EVENTS YOU'RE EXPECTED TO DO. AND NO GUARANTEE WE WON'T BE PAYING FOR FUTURE PARKING. I MEAN, THOSE ARE ALL VERY REAL COSTS. SO WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? AND MAYBE THAT'S JUST PART OF WHAT WE ACCEPT. BUT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A HARDER AND HARDER TIME GETTING PEOPLE TO BE INTERESTED IN REPRESENTING THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR COMMUNITY IF IT'S GOING TO COST THEM SOMETHING. BUT MAYBE, PERHAPS WE ONLY WANT THE RICH AND ELITE TO RUN. WELL, NO, THAT THAT IS A BIG CONSIDERATION AS THEY TALK ABOUT RETIREES AND DILETTANTES. AND I HAD TO LOOK UP DILETTANTE WHEN I FIRST HEARD THAT, BECAUSE IT'S NOT A COMMON WORD, BUT THE IDEA BEING, YEAH, THOSE WHO ARE INDEPENDENTLY WEALTHY AND THAT THAT SPEAKS TO PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE FREE TIME AND NOT ALL RETIREES ARE GOING TO BE OF A WEALTHY. HOW THE WEALTHY BACKGROUND. BUT DO YOU WANT YOUR POLICY THAT GOVERNS YOUR COMMUNITY TO BE MADE BY PEOPLE WHO MAY NOT HAVE STRUGGLED ON, ON A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK, OR PEOPLE WHO MAY NOT HAVE HAD TO BALANCE A BUDGET SO TIGHTLY THAT THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT LIFE EXPERIENCE TO BRING. AND SO PART OF THE ARGUMENT IN THE POLITICAL SCIENCE LITERATURE SAYS THAT YOU WANT TO PAY AT A RATE THAT BRINGS IN A VARIETY OF PEOPLE, SO THAT YOU HAVE A VARIETY OF LIFE EXPERIENCES AROUND THE TABLE. WHEN YOU'RE HAVING DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC. AND SO THESE ARE VERY IMPORTANT POINTS TO BRING UP. WELL, JUST REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, IF YOU'RE A MEDIAN INCOME IS 57,000, BUT YOU CAN ONLY RECRUIT PEOPLE TO BE ELECTED OFFICIALS THAT MAKE THAT HAVE HAD. SIX. YEAH. SIX FIGURE POSITION. YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST AN INTERESTING CONVERSATION. AND I CONSIDER I ALSO SAY THAT LIKE EVEN NOW THE MAKEUP OF OUR COUNCIL DOESN'T HAVE A BIG FAMILY COMPONENT. LIKE YOU'RE PROBABLY THE ONLY ONE. I'M THE I'M THE ONLY PERSON THAT'S EVER HAD SMALL CHILDREN AT HOME, WHICH IS A PARKS AND RECREATION QUESTION. YOU DON'T GET THE SAME KIND OF I MEAN, LISA HAD ONE HIGH SCHOOLER, YOU HAD A HIGH SCHOOLER. I WAS ELECTED, MY DAUGHTER WAS 12. YEAH, YEAH. SO MY SON WAS FOUR. SO I DO THINK IT'S VERY DIFFERENT. I JUST THINK REALLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS, WE'RE CLEARLY SHOULD BE CLOSER TO 20 THAN 15 AS A BASE. AND THEN THE INCREASES I DON'T THINK. I DON'T HAVE A HUGE. SO HOW HAVE WE BEEN DOING IT NOW SINCE WE DID THE TWO? LIKE HOW HAVE YOU APPROACHED THAT THE 2.15% EVERY YEAR IN JANUARY, THE PAY RATE FOR THE COUNCIL GOES UP AT A 2.15% AND THE MAYOR'S IS THE SAME THING GOES UP BY 2.15. BUT IT'S ONLY AS STIPULATED HERE. AND THIS WAS ONLY ENACTED THIS
[02:50:04]
LAST JANUARY WAS MY FIRST TIME AROUND THE CALENDAR. SO YOU ALL GOT A NOTICE FROM MARCH. SO WE'RE GOING TO FIX THAT GOING BACK TO JANUARY. YEAH I WILL SAY THAT BEFORE COUNCIL ADOPTED THIS COUNCIL HAD NOT INCREASED COUNCIL SALARIES OR MAYORAL SALARIES. THE FIRST TIME, THE LAST TIME WE DID IT BEFORE 23 WAS IN 2017. YEAH. SO BUT THAT WAS ENACTED IN 2015 AND IT TRIGGERED CHANGES IN 16 AND 17. YES. SO COUNCIL HAS BEEN PRETTY CONSERVATIVE WITH ITSELF. IT HASN'T TAKEN PAY RAISES OR CHANGED MAYORAL SALARIES FOR A LONG TIME. REALLY THE REASON IT CAME UP FOR DISCUSSION AGAIN WAS BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN ALMOST SIX YEARS, AND IT HAD BEEN ALMOST EIGHT YEARS SINCE COUNCIL HAD HAD THAT CONVERSATION. SO THAT'S WHY YOU HAD THE CONVERSATION LAST TIME. AND I DON'T THINK IT WAS A BAD IDEA TO HAVE THE CONVERSATION MORE REGULARLY. BUT ONE OF THE REASONS WHY MY, MY RECOLLECTION IS THAT COUNCIL PUT IN THE AUTOMATIC INCREASES FOR THE NEXT SIX YEARS WAS OUT OF CONCERN THAT YOU WOULDN'T READDRESS IT SOON. AND SO IT TAKES POLITICAL WILL. I THINK THE IDEA WAS IN 2015, THE REASON WHY THERE WAS ONLY TWO AUTOMATIC INCREASES WAS THAT, WELL, THIS WILL GET US THROUGH THE ELECTION AND THE NEXT ELECTION. THEN IT'LL BE TIME TO TALK ABOUT IT AGAIN. AND THEN COUNCIL DIDN'T TALK ABOUT IT AGAIN FOR SIX YEARS. I DON'T KNOW WHY THAT WAS. YOU'D HAVE TO ASK YOURSELVES. BUT SO TO ME IT'S IF WE WENT FROM 15 TO 21 WOULD BE $6,000 PER ONE OF US, AND THAT WOULD BE $36,000 TOTAL TO THE BUDGET. SO IF WE CAN'T FIND THREE QUARTERS OF A YEAR. YEAH. BECAUSE JANUARY 1ST. THAT'S RIGHT. AND SO, I MEAN, I THINK WE COULD FIND THAT IN OUR TRAVEL SAVINGS. I DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR TOTAL TRAVEL IS, TO BE HONEST, AS A COUNCIL, BUT I BET IT'S 100,000. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY SET ASIDE. TAKE A LOOK AT IT POINTS OUT THAT THERE COULD BE SOMETHING LIKE INCIDENTAL AND INCIDENTAL STIPEND AND CELL PHONES STIPEND OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT'S JUST POINTING THAT OUT, THAT INCREASING THE BASE IS PART OF IT. BUT THERE'S ALSO THE WAYS TO HELP OFFSET SOME OF THE COSTS THAT YOU INCUR WITH THAT. AND I THINK I'M JUST GOING TO SAY I DON'T THINK THOSE NUMBERS ARE OUTRAGEOUS EITHER. BUT I THINK WE SHOULD PROBABLY INCORPORATE WHAT THE MAYOR'S SALARY IS INTO THAT AS WELL. YEAH, EXACTLY. LET ME ASK YOU THIS. DOES THE. ORDINANCE DOES THE ORDINANCE, DOES IT NEED TO COVER ANY OTHER COMPENSATION LIKE A STIPEND, OR DOES IT ONLY COVER THE ACTUAL WAGE IT NEEDS TO LIST OUT THE OTHER BENEFITS THAT COUNCILS CAN RECEIVE. SO YOU NEED THE WAGE IN THERE. AND OUR ORDINANCE DOES SAY THAT IN ADDITION TO THE WAGE, THE COUNCIL IS GOING TO RECEIVE ANY OTHER BENEFIT THAT'S AVAILABLE TO FULL TIME EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING PERCY AND HEALTH INSURANCE AND TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT. SO IF THERE IS AN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT THAT IS OFFERED TO THE EMPLOYEES WITH LARGE THAT YOU WANTED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF, YOU COULD. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS WOULD BE. I'M SURE YOU'RE TAKING CARE OF TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEM ALREADY. NOT SICK LEAVE OR YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, IF YOU IF YOU NEED TO TAKE IT BY THE HOUR BECAUSE YOU'RE SICK, YOU TAKE IT OFF THE CHECK. COME. YOU NEED TO SCHEDULE A VACATION. GO ON VACATION. THE CHECK WILL COME ANYWAY. WELL, I THINK THIS CELL PHONE IS THE ONE, BUT I DON'T THINK ANY OF US REALLY WANT ANOTHER CELL PHONE. IT WOULD BE A STIPEND, LIKE $50 A MONTH TOWARDS YOUR CELL PHONE. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. THAT'S AN EXISTING BENEFIT FOR EMPLOYEES WHO ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A CELL PHONE. SO THAT'S YEAH, I WOULD I WAS GOING TO SAY THE EXACT SAME THING. THAT'S ALREADY AN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT THAT UNDER THE ORDINANCE YOU COULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF. THAT SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD MAKE $300 A YEAR. YEAH. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT'S A MATTER OF JUST I PERSONALLY DON'T HAVE ANY DESIRE TO CHANGE ANYTHING. HONESTLY, I REALLY DON'T. IF YOU NEED A CELL PHONE STIPEND, I SUBMIT THAT THERE'S A FORM THE CITY HAS SUBMITTED UP TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, AND I IMAGINE THAT YOU'LL BE APPROVED FOR IT. SO, COUNCILOR FRIEDMAN, I WOULD I WOULD SAY, HOWEVER, THAT AS WE'RE MAKING THESE THIS HAVING THIS DISCUSSION, IT'S NOT ABOUT OUR INDIVIDUAL SITUATION. THIS IS ABOUT WHAT'S THE RIGHT AMOUNT TO PAY FOR THE POSITION, THE WORK, AND WHO MAY BE ELECTED IN THE FUTURE, ATTRACTING THE PEOPLE THAT ARE NEEDED. IT'S WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS THIS IS NOT ABOUT REWARDING EACH OTHER. WE WOULD STILL BE WOEFULLY UNDERPAID. IT'S ABOUT PER HOUR. NO, NO ONE'S FEEDING THEIR[02:55:02]
FAMILY OFF THE SALARY TO HAVE GOOD POLICY AND GOOD LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATED INDIVIDUALS STEPPING UP TO SACRIFICE THEIR TIME TO LEND THEIR BRAINS AND THEIR SKILLS TO THE WORK OF RUNNING THE CITY. SO IT'S PUT THAT PUT THAT AS THE OBJECTIVE, BECAUSE IT'S NOT ABOUT VOTING FOR MORE MONEY FOR JOE, YOU KNOW? AND I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S VERY MUCH MORE MONEY. LIKE I SAID, IT'S $36,000 IN THIS. IF YOU JUST DID THE CONSERVATIVE IF YOU WENT TO 21. SO YOU'RE STILL IN A BOISE. BUT IF WE KIND OF COMPENSATE OURSELVES AS THE SECOND HIGHEST BUDGET IN THE STATE, WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE, I THINK THE BENCHMARK DATA CERTAINLY SUPPORTS WHAT YOU'RE SUGGESTING IN TERMS OF INCREASES. WELL, WITHIN SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE.DEFENSIBLE. IF YOU LOOK AT THE BENCHMARK IT'S DEMONSTRATING AT LEAST. WELL, IT'S BEEN IT'S BEEN JUST POINT OUT JUST FOR THOSE WHO ARE WATCHING FOR THE FIRST TIME, THE ADA COUNTY HIGHWAY DISTRICT COVERS ALL OF ADA COUNTY CITIES. SO THOSE CITIES DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE ANY LEVY FOR THEIR STREETS. THEY DON'T HAVE TO THINK ABOUT SNOW REMOVAL. THEY DON'T HAVE TO THINK ABOUT, SIDEWALKS AND THOSE THINGS. THEY ALSO, BY AND LARGE, ALL CONTRACT OUT SANITATION. AND SO TAXPAYERS ARE NOT PAYING IN FOR THAT. AND THERE IS NO CITY DIVISION FOR THAT AND NO NEEDED EXPERTISE.
AND SO THERE'S A LOT LESS THAT A ADA COUNTY CITY, WHICH THAT'S WHERE THE TOP FIVE IN POPULATION, TOP FOUR ARE AHEAD OF US. THEY JUST DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT AS MUCH. SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT COMPLEXITY, WE'RE NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT, OH, WE HAVE A POWER UTILITY AND A FIBER UTILITY. WE ALL AND OH, WE, WE RUN THE SECOND BUSIEST AIRPORT IN THE STATE. IT'S ALSO THAT WE DO MORE QUITE LITERALLY, BECAUSE THERE ARE THINGS THEY JUST FLAT OUT DON'T DO. SO THIS IS A HARDER JOB. AND SO COMPARING IT'S HARD TO CAN'T DO IT RIGHT. WE CAN'T COMPARE PAY PER DIVISION OR PAY PER DEPARTMENT PAY. WE HAVE TO FEEL OUR WAY. BUT I WILL ARGUE EVERY CHANCE I GET, WHICH I HAVE, YOU'RE PROBABLY SICK OF HEARING ME SAY IT. WE ARE A COMPLEX CITY. DID DID COUNCIL PRESIDENT BURTENSHAW LEAVE BEHIND ANY COMMENTS, MAYOR, FOR YOU TO PASS ON? NOT WITH ME. I KNOW THAT SHE HAD BEEN TRYING TO WATCH THE LIVESTREAM. SHE SHE COULDN'T COULDN'T GET IN ON QUITE A WHILE AGO. YEAH, YEAH, I TALKED TO HER ABOUT IT. I MEAN, I'M NOT GOING TO SPEAK FOR WHAT SHE SAID, BUT I MEAN, I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE. I THINK SHE AGREES THE COMPLEXITY ISSUE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT SHE WOULD SAY ABOUT WHAT SHE WANTS TO DO BECAUSE OF IT, BUT I THINK I THINK IT'S REALLY JUST CURIOUS IF YOU PASS ON ANYTHING. SOMETIMES WHEN I LEAVE, I'LL SAY SOMETHING TO SOMEBODY. YEAH, SO YOU CAN MAKE A DECISION NOW, OR WE CAN PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA FOR THE 11TH OF AUGUST TO HAVE A SECOND FOLLOW UP DISCUSSION OR HAVE A FOLLOW UP DISCUSSION DURING WHICH A DECISION WOULD BE MADE. IT WOULD REQUIRE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE THAT'S BEEN PASSED OUT TO YOU. AND THAT'S THE WAY WE CAN WRAP THIS CONVERSATION. BUT I ALSO DON'T WANT TO CUT IT OFF BECAUSE THERE ARE THINGS THAT YOU HAVEN'T SAID. WELL, I'LL SAY ANOTHER THING ON THE MERITS OF. LOOK AT LIKE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, ETC. YES, IT'S WAY LOW FOR WHAT'S EXPECTED OF A MAYOR OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS. I CERTAINLY KNOW IF YOU IT CERTAINLY WAS A DETERRENT FOR ME TO EVER WATCH. I MEAN, IT JUST ISN'T COMPENSATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE DEMANDS OF THE. AND SO THAT'S FOR SURE, I WOULD SAY, AND I KNOW THIS IS NOT ANYTHING THAT ANYBODY REALLY WANTS TO FIGURE FACTOR IN. BUT NOT HAVING A SECOND INCOME FROM A SPOUSE AT HOME AND NOT HAVING A SPOUSE AT HOME. I FIND THAT THINGS LIKE SHOVELING MY DRIVEWAY, MOWING THE LAWNS, TRIMMING ANNUAL MAINTENANCE, AND THOSE THINGS I EITHER HAVE TO NOT DO DO MYSELF AT THE EXPENSE OF SLEEP OR QUALITY OF WORK AT THE CITY, OR PAY FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO DO. AND I PERSONALLY HAVE HAD A HARD TIME JUGGLING ALL OF THAT, AND I HAVE SOME DEFERRED MAINTENANCE THAT I AM GOING TO LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING ANOTHER JOB TO PAY FOR WHEN I'M DONE BEING MAYOR, BECAUSE I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET IT DONE WHILE I'VE BEEN MAYOR, GIVEN THE LACK OF DOLLARS. AND SO IF YOU END UP WITH A MAYOR WHO HAS A SPOUSE WHO TAKES CARE OF THOSE THINGS, THEN IT'S NOT AN ISSUE. BUT IN MY CASE, IT HAS BEEN A LITTLE BIT OF A OF A DIFFICULTY.
AGAIN, WE DON'T MAKE THESE DECISIONS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL SITUATION OF ANYBODY.
[03:00:04]
BUT DO YOU WANT TO PRECLUDE SINGLE PEOPLE FROM RUNNING? AND SO THAT I KNOW THAT SOUNDS STUPID, BUT IT IS SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT. WELL, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALSO IT'S A COMPENSATION IS A RESPECT THING IN OUR SOCIETY. AND WHEN YOU'RE WELL PAID AS A CITY MAYOR, IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE. I'D LIKE TO PUT OUT AGAIN, JUST FOR THOUGHT, NOT FOR NECESSARILY DISCUSSION AT THIS TIME, BUT SPECIFICALLY WITH THE MAYOR AND MAYBE SOME KIND OF A STEP INCREMENT OVER, YOU KNOW, TWO OR 3 OR 4 YEARS OF THE BASE. YEAH, I AGREE. SO WE GET IT OUT TO A NUMBER THAT AND I HAVEN'T THOUGHT ABOUT IT ENOUGH TO KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER IS. BUT AGAIN, GIVEN THE BUDGET SITUATION, BUT IF YOU CAN INCREMENTALLY DO THAT BASE OVER SOME PERIOD OF TIME, THE MAYOR'S SALARY IS REALLY INTERESTING BECAUSE. THE $100,000 IS NOT IT'S NOT AN ATTRACTIVE NUMBER AT THIS POINT.I MEAN, IN MY SPHERE OF PEOPLE, CEO IN THE NONPROFIT WORLD, WE WOULDN'T EVEN LOOK AT THAT NUMBER BECAUSE IT'S JUST THE COMPLEXITY AND THEN HOW MUCH PEOPLE ARE BEING PAID TO PEOPLE UNDER, WE CAN'T ATTRACT PEOPLE FOR 80 OR 100 TO DIRECT OUR PROGRAMS. SO YOU CAN'T JUST THEN SO THERE HAS TO BE SOME DIFFERENTIAL TO. AND THEN THAT'S PROBLEMATIC BECAUSE SOME OF OUR DIRECTORS ARE MAKING HUGE NUMBERS, SALARIES, WHICH I DON'T THINK OUR MAYOR WILL GET THERE BECAUSE THERE'S REASONS FOR THAT IN TERMS OF STUDIES. RIGHT. BUT I WAS KIND OF ALWAYS INTERESTED IN TAKING A LIKE AN AVERAGE OF WHAT THE DIRECTORS WERE MAKING TO SEE IF YOU COULD AT LEAST BE IN THAT RANGE, MAYBE TAKING OUT THE TOP ONE. BUT I JUST THINK YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE 150 TO 170 AT SOME POINT IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, OR ELSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SAY, WELL, I KNOW WHEN IT WAS AT 80. OR 800 EMPLOYEES AND A $300 MILLION BUDGET. I MEAN, IF YOU WERE DOING THAT IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND WE'RE NOT. SO I'M NOT SAYING THAT'S WHAT IT WOULD BE, BUT YOU WOULD BE IN THE 400 TO $500,000 CEO. SO, WELL, LET ME POINT OUT, TOO, THAT THE ONLY REQUIREMENT FOR RUNNING IS THAT YOU'D BE OVER THE AGE OF 8 OR 18 AND THAT YOU'D BE A CITY RESIDENT. AND SO YOU NEVER KNOW ABOUT THE VAGARIES OF THE POPULACE. RIGHT? THEY COULD THEORETICALLY ELECT SOMEBODY WHO'S DOESN'T HAVE A HIGH CAPACITY. MAYBE THEY'VE ONLY GRADUATED FROM HIGH SCHOOL AND THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, 21 YEARS OLD. IT'S POSSIBLE. AND SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T HAVE THEN A LOT OF EXPERIENCE AND THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO BRING A LOT OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION BECAUSE THEY JUST HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO GAIN THAT IN THEIR LIFE. YOU THEN MIGHT HAVE A SCENARIO WHERE YOU WOULD HAVE TO RELY VERY, VERY HEAVILY ON ANOTHER KIND OF EMPLOYEE. AND SO WE DON'T WANT TO BUILD THIS AROUND ASSUMING THAT EVERYONE WHO'S ELECTED IS GOING TO BE CEO. QUALITY, BECAUSE TALK ABOUT IMPOSTER SYNDROME. I DON'T HAVE CEO, YOU KNOW, CREDENTIALS. AND THIS HAS BEEN A STRUGGLE TO LEARN THAT. BUT I GUESS MY POINT IS YOU JUST NEVER KNOW WHO'S GOING TO GET ELECTED UNLESS WE HAD SOME REQUIREMENTS FOR A SUPERINTENDENT. THERE'S SOME REQUIREMENTS INVOLVED. ALL OF THOSE AREN'T SUBJECT TO ELECTION. SO THERE'S SOMETHING TO CONSIDER THERE. AND WE'VE ALSO HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE SPAN OF OR SPAN OF CONTROL THAT THE MAYOR HAS AND HOW IF WE HAD A SITUATION WHERE WE COULD CREATE A POSITION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND OR ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR, THEN YOU COULD TURN A LOT OF THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTION OVER AND FREE YOURSELVES UP TO LET THE POPULACE ELECT WHO THEY WANT AND NOT HAVE THE WHOLE CITY STRUGGLING, BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A CEO WHO'S GOTTEN ELECTED.
SO THERE'S SOMETHING TO CONSIDER THERE. AND MAYBE WE DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE MAYOR'S SALARY TOO HIGH BEFORE YOU HAVE THAT OTHER MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION. WELL, THAT'S THE OTHER QUESTION IS, IF YOU GO AWAY FROM A STRONG MAYOR SYSTEM AND I, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU SAW SOME, BUT MY SENSE OF BEING A CITY MANAGER, YOU'RE IN THE 200,000 RANGE FOR ANYTHING THAT CITY, CITY OR AT LEAST WHAT'S INTERESTING BECAUSE I'VE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT MYSELF. IF YOU LOOK ON HERE, HOW MANY LARGER CITIES HAVE A CITY MANAGER? PRETTY SKINNY. THE SMALLEST CITIES DO WELL, IN OUR CASE. YEAH, WELL, AN ADMINISTRATOR IS DIFFERENT. I MEAN, IF YOU SAY MANAGER, YOU ARE SAYING THEN THAT YOU HAVE A. DIFFERENT SYSTEM, A WEAK MAYOR, RIGHT? EXACTLY. AND THAT WOULD
[03:05:02]
REQUIRE A VOTE OF THE OF THE PEOPLE. BUT IF YOU HAVE THE CITY, A CITY ADMINISTRATOR, THEN YOU CAN BRING IN THAT PROFESSIONAL EXPERTISE TO SUPPLEMENT WHATEVER YOUR MAYOR AND COUNCIL DO. I GOTCHA. SO I'VE TALKED TO CITY MANAGER. YEAH. MICHELLE, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. IT WAS AN UNDERSTANDING EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE SAYING EARLIER. YOU'RE SUGGESTING GO AHEAD AND DO IT IN 2026 AND NOT WAIT UNTIL 27. I'M NOT I'M NOT REALLY SUGGESTING ANYTHING, OKAY? I'M JUST SAYING THAT I DON'T I DON'T LIKE I DON'T THINK THERE'S AN ARGUMENT TO BE MADE THAT WE CAN'T FIND THE MONEY. 2026 OKAY, SO THAT'S ALL. IF IT'S ALL ABOUT MONEY, I THINK I THINK THAT THERE'S BUDGET CAPACITY. NOW, DO WE REALLY KNOW THAT TILL WE GET OUR VALUATION. NO WE DON'T. AND I DON'T THINK WE DON'T. YOU ALSO AGREE THAT DELAYING IT JUST MEANS COST MORE LATER WITHOUT A DOUBT. AND THAT'S WHAT THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I WAS SAYING ABOUT LIKE THE STACKING. RIGHT. IF YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING NOW AND YOU BARE MINIMUM, THINK, OKAY, WELL, COUNCILMEMBER SHOULD RECEIVE A PAY INCREASE THAT'S ON PAR WITH, YOU KNOW, A WAGE ADJUSTMENT, A MARKET OR, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER WE WANT, WHATEVER MARKET KPI YOU WANT TO THROW OUT AT THAT. BUT, YOU KNOW, THEN YOU'RE STACKING THEM, RIGHT. BECAUSE EMPLOYEES, LET'S SAY THEY GOT 3% ONE YEAR AND 2.5% NOW IN 2027. NOW IT'S 5.5%. AND SO IF YOU DON'T THINK THAT 3% IS EXCITING RIGHT NOW, I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE APPETITE IS GOING TO BE FOR 6%. AND NOW YOU'RE JUST BEHIND. AND WE'RE AND I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY AN ARGUMENT THAT WE'RE ALREADY BEHIND. I JUST THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE A BITTER PILL TO SWALLOW THAN TO RIGHTSIZE IT AS SOON AS WE CAN. AND THEN LOOK AT THAT IN A COUPLE OF YEARS AND THEN KEEP DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING. YEAH, THEN KEEP IT UP FROM NOW. BUT THE ONLY WAY YOU'RE GOING TO GET THAT MARKET ADJUSTMENT, QUOTE UNQUOTE, IS BY LOOKING AT LIKELY THE FIVE, 5 TO 6% INCREASES EVERY TWO TO YEARS. ON TOP OF RIGHTSIZING THE BASE.RIGHT. I HAVE A QUESTION I'M KIND OF CURIOUS ABOUT. HOW DOES CALDWELL AND NAMPA HAVE 33 AND 29 DEPARTMENTS? NO IDEA. THEY JUST DEFINE THEM MORE CLEARLY. THEY HAVE BEEN THAT IN LIEU OF BEING ABLE TO FIND THAT ON THE WEBSITE, THEY JUST COUNTED EVERY FUNCTION. I WAS JUST LOOKING AT IT AND I'M TRYING TO FIGURE IT OUT. BUT WE COULD WE COULD GET TO IT TOO, IF WE DID. PLANNING AND ZONING SEPARATELY. IF WE DID, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOME OF THE NUANCED DATA LIKE THAT IS NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD. YOU'RE ALL REALLY FAMILIAR WITH IT, SPENT A LOT OF TIME GATHERING THIS DATA, BUT IT REALLY WAS LIKE GOING OUT TO WEBSITES AND SEARCHING THROUGH WHAT THEY HAD, AND THEY LISTED IT IN SOME WAY THAT WE MISUNDERSTOOD IT. THE SOLID NUMBERS ARE WHAT THEY'RE PAYING AND WHAT THEIR BUDGETS WERE. SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS ABOUT THE DEPARTMENTS AND THE DESCRIPTIONS, YOU KNOW, SOMEBODY FROM ANOTHER CITY MIGHT LOOK AT THESE WRITE UPS AND THINK, WAIT A MINUTE, WE THAT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE WE DID THE BEST WE COULD TO TRY TO GATHER THAT DATA. AND IT'S GOOD. I WOULD SAY IT'S REASONABLY GOOD, BUT IT'S NOT PERFECT. AND THE THING THAT I ASKED FOR WAS THE BUDGETS. JUST SO THAT, YOU KNOW, OUR SPENDING AND OUR BUDGET DOES THAT SHOWS THE COMPLEXITY OF WHAT WE'RE DOING. IT'S SOMETHING I'M PROUD OF IN THE CITY THAT WE COLLECT, WHAT, $40 MILLION IN PROPERTY TAXES. AND YET CITIZENS GET A LOT MORE FOR THEIR MONEY IN SOME WAYS. NOW THEY'RE PAYING ENTERPRISE FEES, AND IT'S NOT LIKE THEY'RE GETTING IT FOR FREE. BUT THE ONE THING I PICKED UP, I KIND OF WENT THROUGH THE EXERCISE HERE, DESCRIBING AND RESEARCHING. BUT THE OTHER THING I LEARNED IS, YOU KNOW, LAST YEAR'S BUDGET HAD HOW MUCH IN IT IN CAPACITY FOR THE AIRPORT THAT NEVER GOT UTILIZED. YEAH. OR HOW MANY YEARS DID WE CARRIED THE CAPACITY FOR A NEW FIRE STATION THAT IT NEVER GOT SPENT BECAUSE WE ONLY SPENT IT ONCE, BUT IT WAS IN THERE FOR LIKE THREE YEARS. WHAT I'M SAYING IS THAT THAT DISTORTS THE BUDGET NUMBERS. I DON'T KNOW, BECAUSE OTHER CITIES HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING. SO WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE DOING. AND THE OTHER THING I WOULD SAY IS WE MANAGE $190 MILLION IN ASSETS THAT WE INVEST, AND THAT'S NEVER BEEN COUNTED IN OUR BUDGETS UNTIL THIS YEAR. AND THAT'S I CAN SEE THAT, BECAUSE YOU CAN PUT A VALUE ON THE POWER COMPANY ON THE AIRPORT. THAT'S WHY I TOOK THE NUMBERS THAT WERE OF THE NUMBERS THAT WERE AVAILABLE. I TOOK THE EXPENDITURES BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT WAS SPENT IN A GIVEN YEAR, EVEN THOUGH IT'S A YEAR AND A HALF OLD AT THIS POINT, IT'S NUMBERS THAT WERE SPENT IN MANY YEARS. SO, YOU KNOW, IN ANY GIVEN YEAR, CAPITAL PROJECT COULD PUSH SOME OF THESE BUDGET UP 50 MILLION OR MORE. BUT THIS IS MONEY THAT WAS SPENT IN THAT YEAR. AND THAT I AGREE WITH. LIKE I SAID, IT COULD BE THE YEAR THAT THEY BUILT A NEW FIRE STATION DURING A POLICE STATION AND SPENT $20 MILLION. WELL, I GUESS MAYBE TO TRY TO WRAP UP THIS MEETING AND GO FORWARD WITH THE LOOK AT WHAT WE TENTATIVELY AGREED TO ADJUST THE BASE BOTH FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL. AND WE'LL LEAVE A SPECIFIC NUMBER FOR ANOTHER MEETING
[03:10:03]
BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE IT IN MY HEAD. WELL, I THINK WE COULD KIND OF LOOK AT THE 20 HALFWAY BETWEEN IS ONE THING, BECAUSE I WAS THINKING WHEN I WANTED TO LOOK AT THIS, I THOUGHT THAT THE ENTERPRISE FUNCTIONS COULD PAY US 15 AND THE CITY COULD PAY US 15. BUT THESE GUYS HELPED ME SEE THAT WE SHOULD LOOK MORE AT AT THESE KIND OF DATA POINTS. AND IN LOOKING AT THAT BEING 28, BEING BOISE AND US BEING THE SECOND, AND THEN WE'RE AT 15 NOW, IF WE ADDED SIX, IT WOULD BE 21. AND THEN FOR THE MAYOR'S SALARY, KIND OF BE IN THAT SAME KIND OF PERCENTAGE RANGE OF GETTING RIGHT BELOW WHAT THE CITY OF BOISE IS OR, YOU KNOW, 10,000 BELOW IT TO BE. YES.THAT'S MY SENSE OF HOW YOU GET TO THE RIGHT SIZE, BECAUSE WE ARE THE MOST COMPLEX CITY, WE ARE DOING THE MOST. AND THE ELECTRICAL ASK IS REALLY BIG, RIGHT? LIKE, YOU, I KNOW ALL OF YOU, BUT, YOU KNOW, HUNDREDS OF HOURS INTO LEARNING ELECTRIC AND GOING TO CONFERENCES AND GOING TO IOWA AND GOING TO ALL THOSE THINGS, AND THERE'S OPPORTUNITY COSTS TO WHAT WE CAN EARN IF WE WERE DOING SOMETHING. SO THAT'S MY SENSE OF WHERE WE COULD GO. RIGHT NOW. YOU'RE THINKING MORE LIKE THE 2500, HALFWAY TO 20,000. WELL, WHAT I'M SAYING IS THEY HAVE TO GIVE US A NUMBER BECAUSE HE CAN'T DO A PERCENTAGE. RIGHT. YOU COULD SAY DARREN AND MIKE GO RIGHT AS AN ORDINANCE THAT GIVES US A 15% BASE INCREASE IN A 3% RAISE EVERY YEAR FOR FIVE YEARS. WHAT WE BRING YOU BACK IS SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE THIS, THAT'S GOT A DOLLAR VALUE. SO IF THAT'S THE NUMBER YOU'RE THINKING OF, I MEAN, WE CAN TAKE INSTRUCTIONS AND WRITE WHATEVER YOU'D LIKE.
AND THEN I WOULD LIKE TO PAY FOR IT OUT OF OUR BUDGET. I AGREE THAT IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD TO DO IT IN A YEAR WHERE IT'S ROUGH, BUT I THINK THERE'S ENOUGH SAVINGS IN THE COUNCIL BUDGET.
IT'S 1,000,001 RIGHT NOW. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW THAT, BUT MY GUT TELLS ME THAT THERE'S SOME SAVINGS THERE FOR 36,000 A YEAR. I THINK THAT PART WOULD BE EASIER TO ACCOMPLISH AND CAN BE DONE QUICKER. WE HAVE TIME TO DO IT BEFORE THE FINAL BUDGET IS APPROVED, BUT AND IT WON'T IMPACT THE HEARING THAT YOU HAVE TO HAVE ON YOUR TENTATIVE BUDGET. BUT WE DO NEED TO.
IDENTIFY A DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT YOU'RE AIMING FOR, AND THEN THE MATH CAN BE DONE TO CREATE THE PAY SCHEDULE. IF WE HAVE A DOLLAR AMOUNT, OR IF YOU HAVE A PERCENTAGE, A KIND OF FORMULA THAT YOU'RE AIMING FOR. AND SO IF THERE, WE COULD PICK THAT NOW OR A COUPLE OF YOU COULD THROW SOME SCENARIOS AND SOME SCENARIOS TO THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE REALLY INTERESTED IN THIS, TO DARREN. AND BEFORE OUR NEXT MEETING ON AUGUST 11TH BY, LET'S SAY, BY EARLY NEXT WEEK, SO THAT THEY HAVE A WEEK TO PUT IT TOGETHER, THEN THAT MIGHT GET US WHERE WE NEED TO GO. SO, JOHN, YOU CAN TAKE YOUR DOLLAR AMOUNT IDEA AND WRITE IT DOWN AND OPERATIONALIZE IT. AND OTHERS OF YOU WHO MIGHT HAVE A DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT. DOES THAT SOUND OKAY. GREAT. OKAY. SO PROPOSALS THEN NEED TO HAPPEN TO DAIRY BY NEXT MONDAY A WEEK FROM TODAY. I GUESS THE QUESTION THAT I WOULD HAVE IS WHICH ONES, WHO'S SENDING THE PROPOSAL? AND WHAT IF I GET TWO DIFFERENT NUMBERS FROM TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE THEN YOU WOULD. I HOPE YOU GET SIX SO THAT YOU WOULD JUST BREAK OUT THE MATH IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS, AND THEN EVERYBODY HERE WOULD, AREN'T WE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE YOU READY TO KIND OF JUST MAKE THOSE CHANGES, MAYBE ON THE ORDINANCE? YEAH. I MEAN, I'LL JUST TELL YOU THAT THIS ISN'T THAT COMPLEX OF AN ORDINANCE, RIGHT? IT'S LITERALLY PUT AN INNOCENT NUMBERS. SO EVEN IF, EVEN IF YOU DECIDED TO REWRITE THE WHOLE THING TONIGHT OF WE'VE WRITTEN SOME THINGS IN THE DEAD OF NIGHT BEFORE I COULD DO IT FOR YOU AGAIN. YEAH, ESPECIALLY BEFORE YOU GOT HERE. IT'S JUST THAT THEY'RE NOT IN A POSITION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. RIGHT.
THIS IS REALLY ON US TO TELL YOU THAT. CAN I ASK, DIRECTOR, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE AT THIS POINT? I'LL SAY, I THINK I AGREE WITH WHAT'S BEING SAID. WHEN I LOOK AT THE DATA AND I LOOK AT THE COMPLEXITY, I DON'T, I DON'T I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERN FROM A PURELY COMPENSATION STANDPOINT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE KINDS OF NUMBERS THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT TO BRING THOSE UP. IT MAKES SENSE TO ME TO DO THAT FROM A COMPENSATION STANDPOINT.
THERE'S A BUDGET DISCUSSION THAT'S SEPARATE. THERE'S OTHER THINGS THAT MIGHT BE SEPARATE, BUT PURELY, PURELY FROM A BENCHMARKING COMPENSATION PERSPECTIVE, I HAVE NO CONCERN WHATSOEVER WITH INCREASING BOTH THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR'S SALARY BASED ON THIS INFORMATION. AND I WOULD SAY ONE THING I'VE HAD TO DO IS LOOK AT THE MAYOR'S SALARY INSTEAD OF OURS, BECAUSE WHEN IT'S YOURS, YOU'RE KIND OF BIASED, FOR SURE. BUT WHEN I WATCHED WHAT THE MAYOR'S PROPOSAL WAS FOR ALL THOSE YEARS IN THAT 86, 88, IT WAS ALWAYS TOO LITTLE. YEAH, IT
[03:15:04]
JUST IN 95 FOR EIGHT YEARS. AND THAT WAS. THAT WAS TOUGH. YEAH. TOWARD THE END. ANYWAY, EARLY ON IT WAS GREAT. OKAY. THEN WE'RE READY TO MOVE TO THE NEXT FEW ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. THANK YOU.[Mayor and City Council]
SORRY. THE NEXT ITEM IS A. WE NEED TO RECEIVE THE MINUTES FROM THE PMC. IS THAT A MOTION? THAT COUNSELOR, IS THAT YOU MAY I CAN DO IT OKAY I MOVE CITY CLERK IS READY TO I MOVE COUNCIL RECEIVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE JULY 1ST, 2025 MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL LAND USE PLANNING ACT. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION. WE HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILOR LARSON. AND SO WITH THAT CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CALL THE ROLL ON THAT MOTION? FREEMAN. YES. BRADFORD. AYE. I'LL NOTE THAT BURTENSHAW IS STILL NOT ACTIVE ONLINE.DINGMAN. YES. FRANCIS. HI. LARSON. YES. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. SO, COUNCIL MEMBERS, I'LL JUST SHARE A COUPLE THINGS, A COUPLE THINGS THAT I HAVE WITH YOU. SPEAKING OF BEING BUSY AND HAVING A LOT TO DO, YOU SEE THAT AUGUST IS HAS A LOT OF DATES ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THE WARBONNET RODEO KICKS OFF, AND IN FACT, THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE GOING TO BE GOING, IS EVERYBODY IN THE ROOM GOING TO BE THERE ON FRIDAY NIGHT? NO. OH, DON'T HAVE MICHELLE FRIDAY NIGHT OKAY. SO OH WOW. FIRST TIME EVER. WHO'S GONNA MISS A SELFIE ON THE BACK OF THE TRUCK? YOU'LL HAVE TO SHOUT ME IN. WE DON'T HAVE ANY BELT BUCKLES FOR YOU. I KNOW. ALL RIGHT, SO FRIDAY NIGHT WE'RE ON IT. BUT IT STARTS WEDNESDAY WITH THE FREE EVENT. AND THAT'S A BIG FUN DAY FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO. THEY CAN DO A LOT WITH RODEO ON WEDNESDAY. THURSDAY IS THE KICKOFF NIGHT TRIBUTE TO IS IT VETERANS? OH, I LOST TRACK. NO IT'S THE TRIBUTE TO VETERANS IS ON SATURDAY SO I FORGOT WHAT THE TRIBUTE IS ON THURSDAY. FIRST RESPONDERS I HAVE IT RIGHT HERE. AND THEN WEAR PURPLE I BELIEVE IS ON FRIDAY AND THAT'S THAT'S BREAST CANCER AWARENESS.
AND THEN SATURDAY THE TRIBUTE TO THE VETERANS. SO WHAT ELSE OKAY. ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IS NEXT WEEK. WE ALSO HAVE THE COMING UP THE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FAIR WHICH YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GO TO. BUT IF YOU DO THEY USUALLY HAVE BREAKFAST GOODIES THERE. AND IT'S EARLY EARLY TO MID-MORNING. THE 14TH DOE IS HOLDING AN INFORMATIONAL MEETING THAT YOU'VE ALL BEEN INVITED TO. IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIGH BURN UP OF FUEL THAT'S COMING FOR TO INTO IDAHO TO BE CHARACTERIZED MEANING STUDIED BY DOE, THEN YOU WOULD WANT TO GO TO THAT. BUT IF YOU ARE NOT TERRIBLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE RESEARCH, YOU KNOW FUEL THAT'S BROUGHT INTO THE STATE FOR STUDY, THEN YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY TOO MUCH ABOUT IT. ALSO, A THING THAT YOU'VE BEEN INVITED TO IS THE. ON THE 21ST HAS A WHAT THEY'RE CALLING A SPECIAL EVENT, AND THEY SAY IT'LL BE WORTH GOING TO. BUT THEY DIDN'T TELL US WHAT. THAT'S THE NOON HOUR ON THE 21ST. SO WE'RE WAITING TO HEAR MORE. THE 22ND. I BELIEVE IDAHO FALLS POWER IS STILL WORKING ON PUTTING TOGETHER A TOUR OF THE PLANT IN POCATELLO. AND WE'LL ASK. I WON'T ASK ANYBODY TO COMMIT TO ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES. RIGHT NOW. THERE'S A RIBBON CUTTING AT HERITAGE PARK FOR A HERITAGE TYPE DISPLAY THAT IDAHO FALLS POWER IS BEHIND, AND THAT WILL BE HAPPENING ON THE 28TH, I SKIPPED OVER. I HAVE DETERMINED THAT I'LL BE GOING TO, MOSTLY BECAUSE I WANT TO ASK IN PERSON SOME QUESTIONS ALONG THE LINES OF. OUR NEW OUR SEARCH FOR NEW DIRECTOR TO REPLACE THEIR GENERAL MANAGER TO REPLACE BEAR PRAIRIE. THERE'S ALSO IN THE 19TH, A WATER COLLEGE TOUR.
I THINK I'VE GIVEN YOU SOME INFORMATION ABOUT THAT IN AN EMAIL. IN AN EMAIL, AND MORE WILL COME SOON. IN TERMS OF ARE THEY FEEDING EVERYBODY LUNCH OR, YOU KNOW, THE EXACT TIMES AND SUCH. SO AND THEN OUR ENTIRE BUDGET HAS TO BE ADDRESSED. SO IT IS A VERY BUSY MONTH. THE IDA TENANT PICNIC IS ALSO HAPPENING. FREE HOT DOG OR MAYBE A HAMBURGER. IF YOU GO DOWN TO THAT. IT'S ACTUALLY USUALLY BEEN A REALLY GOOD THEY. YEAH, THEY'VE GOT REALLY GOOD MEAT.
YEAH. ANYWAY IN AUGUST THERE'S ALSO TWO HIGH POWERED CHAMBER LUNCHEONS THAT ARE SCHEDULED NEXT TUESDAY AS CONGRESSMAN SIMPSON. AND THEN A WEEK LATER IS THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR. I
[03:20:01]
DON'T HAVE AS MUCH KNOWLEDGE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT CONGRESSMAN SIMPSON'S VISIT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED OR NOT, BUT I SAW THAT THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN BOISE LAST WEEK, HE KNEW HE WAS COMING HERE ON THE ON THE 12TH. I SIGNED UP FOR THAT ALREADY. SO VERY GOOD. SO THAT'S THAT'S SORT OF A LOT THAT'S GOING ON. THERE ARE A BUNCH OF DATES ARE THERE FOR YOU WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT I SAW IN THE AIC MAILING TODAY THAT THE BILL MCGRANE AND PROBABLY KELLY PACKER ARE GETTING TOGETHER TO TALK ABOUT THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS. I THINK THIS MAY BE MORE SUITED FOR STAFF, BUT IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE DETAILS AND THE NITTY GRITTY, THAT WEBINAR ONE HOUR WEBINAR MAY BE MAY PROVIDE SOME USEFUL INFO. OR IF YOU ARE RUNNING A CAMPAIGN OR KNOW SOMEONE WHO IS RUNNING A CAMPAIGN AND THEY FEEL YOU FEEL THEY NEED TO BRUSH UP OR BE AWARE SO THAT THE CAMPAIGN CAN BE ORGANIZED WELL, THEY MIGHT WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THAT. I ALSO DID ATTEND THE MEMORIAL SERVICE FOR BRUCE AND BARBARA TURNER, AND IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT PROGRAM I HAVE, I PICKED UP A COUPLE EXTRA COPIES. THEY HAVE LOTS, LOTS. IT WAS A VERY SWEET CEREMONY WITH SOME. I LOVE IT WHEN PEOPLE TELL STORIES AT A FUNERAL OR MEMORIAL THAT CAUSE EVERYBODY TO LAUGH, BUT IT'S A SWEET KIND OF LAUGHTER WHERE EVERYBODY IS SHARING A FOND MEMORY. AND THAT SERVICE DEFINITELY HAD THOSE KINDS OF MOMENTS. I ALSO WANTED TO THEN JUST CIRCLE BACK TO THE EMAIL THAT CAME FROM. CONGRESSMAN CRAPO'S OFFICE, AND THEY WANTED TO KNOW IF WE HAD ANY COMMENTS TO SHARE, AND THEY WOULD HAPPILY CONVEY THOSE TO DC STAFF BEFORE THE MORNING. IF I JUST GOT BACK TO THEM AFTER THIS MEETING TODAY. AND SO IF A CPG WERE TO CHANGE A LITTLE BIT AND BE USED AS SOMETHING TO INCENTIVIZE CITIES TO TAKE TO BE MORE PROACTIVE IN TERMS OF BUILDING THEIR HOUSING STOCK, WOULD HOW DO WE FEEL ABOUT THAT? AND I THINK MICHELLE SUMMED IT UP, AND THAT IS SHE SUMMED UP MY THINKING, WHICH IS IT WILL IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU DEFINE WHAT THOSE ACTIVITIES ARE. IT WOULD BE REALLY UNFORTUNATE IF WE SAW A DEFINITION THAT CAUSED US TO LOSE 10%, BECAUSE WE AREN'T SET UP TO BE PROACTIVE, BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE A HOUSING DEPARTMENT, AND NOR DO WE HAVE A STREAM OF INCOME THAT COMES TO US THAT IS TIED TO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, OTHER THAN OUR GENERAL FUND, AND OUR GENERAL FUND TENDS TO GO TOWARD, YOU KNOW, OTHER OTHER USES. AND SO I THINK THAT'S THE TRICKY THING. AND I DID POINT THAT OUT TO THEIR OFFICE, BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT FAMILIAR WITH MUNICIPAL BUDGETING, THEY MAY NOT HAVE REALLY UNDERSTOOD WHAT I WAS SAYING. AND SO IF THERE ARE OTHER WAYS TO SAY THIS, HELP ME TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO CONVEY, I WOULD JUST SAY THAT I AGREE COMPLETELY WITH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. BUT IF THEY'RE WILLING TO GIVE US 10% MORE MONEY WITHOUT TAKING ANY AWAY, IF WE'RE THROWING A 10% RATE, THEN I THINK WE'RE ALL IN. AS LONG AS WE DON'T HAVE TO FUND IT. IF THEY'RE DOING CDBG DOLLARS. SO IF WE GOT 422,000 THIS YEAR, THAT WOULD. IT'S JUST A MATTER OF HOW HOW THEY'RE DEFINING GROWING YOUR BASE.YEAH. OKAY. BECAUSE IT COULD SYSTEMATICALLY DISADVANTAGE IDAHO CITIES WHERE WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING THAT OUR THE WHOLE DILLON'S RULE ARGUMENT, WE CAN'T DO THINGS THAT OUR STATE DOESN'T ALLOW. WHEREAS A HOME RULE CITY IN ANOTHER STATE COULD CREATE A HOUSING PROGRAM JUST TO QUALIFY FOR ADDITIONAL CDBG. RIGHT. AND SO THAT THAT CHANGES THE EQUITY QUITE, QUITE A BIT. AND THAT'S WHERE I WORRY IF THE STATE OR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS BASING IT ON CITIES BEING PROACTIVE, OUR HANDS ARE TIED WHEN IT COMES TO HOW PROACTIVE WE CAN BE. SO I'LL TRY TO CONVEY THAT. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER THOUGHTS? GET THEM TO ME BEFORE SAY, 7:00 TONIGHT, BECAUSE THAT'S WHEN I'LL BE REACHING OUT TO THEIR OFFICE. IS THERE? NO. SO WITH THAT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND WE'LL GO AROUND THE ROOM AND SEE IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING ELSE THEY WANT TO SHARE OR HIGHLIGHT. AND SO WE'LL START WITH MICHELLE. I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANYTHING THAT I LIKE. OKAY. HOW ABOUT JOHN? JUST ONE THING. THERE HAS BEEN WORKING AFFORDABLE HOUSING GROUP IN THE STATE. AND BE AWARE THAT THAT'S BEEN HAPPENING. AND THOSE MINUTES ARE OUT. AND THERE IS ONE MORE CHANCE TO MAKE COMMENTS. FROM OUR STANDPOINT, I THINK, OR FOR ME, I'M TALKING ABOUT THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOUSING, DIVERSITY AND HOUSING STOCK THAT IS MEETS THE NEEDS OF OUR OF OUR NEW EVOLVING DEMOGRAPHICS. YOU KNOW, WHERE PEOPLE LIVE ALONE OR THEY LIVE WITH ONE OTHER PERSON. SO
[03:25:04]
JUST BE AWARE OF THAT'S HAPPENING. I'M GRATEFUL FOR WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH WITH SOME ORDINANCE CHANGES. I THINK WE'VE ALL TALKED ABOUT LIBRARY. AND SO OTHER THAN THAT, I IS THAT WHEN YOU SAY FROM THE STATE, IS THAT THE LEGISLATIVE INTERIM COMMITTEE? OKAY. AND AS I SAID EARLIER, CATHERINE IS TIED INTO SOME THINGS. THAT IS DEFINITELY ONE OF THE EFFORTS SHE'S SHE'S WATCHING. THEY ACTUALLY HAD A MEETING THAT I HAVE TO ATTEND. AND AARON JOHNSON SPOKE. AND SO IT'S INTERESTING IF YOU WANT TO GO WATCH IT, IT'S RECORDED AND YOU CAN SEE ALL THEIR MEETINGS. SO YEAH. AND CATHERINE HELPED TO WITH THAT. SOME OF THE EFFORTS OF ORGANIZING THEM. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'LL GO TO COUNSELOR FREEMAN. JUST A COUPLE THINGS FROM THE POLICE. YOU HAD A COUPLE OF THEM ON HERE WITH THE NATIONAL NIGHT OUT, BUT THEY'RE ALSO DOING PIZZA WITH POLICE ON SEPTEMBER 3RD AT LUCY'S PIZZA ON MEMORIAL TO JUST GET OUT AND MEET PEOPLE. AND THEN BAGELS WITH THE BLUE AT TETON BAGELS AND FOOD TRUCK AT 681ST STREET, SEPTEMBER 6TH. AND THEN THERE'S COFFEE WITH A COP COMING UP OCTOBER 1ST AT DIXIE'S DINER. I CAN ASK CARLA TO GET THOSE ON EVERYBODY'S CALENDARS. SHE PUT THEM ON MINE, AND I'LL ASK HER TO PUT THE NOTES. WE DID GET THEM. OKAY? OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? THAT'S IT. ALL RIGHT. WHERE'S EXECUTIVE COUNSELOR? FRANCIS? JUST ONE THING FOR TONIGHT. I TOOK A TOUR WITH DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON OF VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS. STREETS, MICRO SURFACING. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THAT AND CHIP SEAL. VERY INTERESTING AND INFORMATIVE. AND PROJECT COMING FORWARD. THEY'RE STARTING TO THINK ABOUT THE DESIGN FOR THE PATHWAY ALONG RURAL AND THAT WHICH DOES LINK TO ZOO LONG TERM PLANNING. AND ALSO BECAUSE OF THE FACT HOW THINGS GO THERE. THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS IN THE WORK RELATED, OBVIOUSLY, ALWAYS A LOT OF THINGS FOR PUBLIC WORKS, BUT IT WAS INTERESTING TO SEE THEM UP CLOSE AND TALK ABOUT THINGS WE'RE ANTICIPATING, LIKE THE WALKWAY ALONG ROLLING DOWN WELL. AND THERE IS A SPEAKING OF INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ALTERNATIVE USES, A LOOKS LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE DEDICATED BIKE PATH ALONG KEN IS GOING IN RIGHT NOW JUST ON THE WEST WEST OF BALLARD AS IT CURVES AROUND TO OLD YOU. THERE'S RIGHT. YEAH, WE SAW THAT THAT'S BEING PULLED UP AND THE PATHWAY ALONG SKYLINE HIGH SCHOOL. THAT WAS ALSO THAT WAS VERY NEEDED. YEAH, YEAH. GREAT. GREAT COUNSELOR. WATCHING YOU ARE LAST BUT NOT LEAST, KIND OF ON THE SAME VEIN. BUT BEFORE I GO THERE, THE SWEARING IN ON THE 31ST, IF YOU'RE INTERESTED, AT 1700 HOURS WHEN YOU'RE TALKING TO LEADERSHIP TO THAT 1700 HOURS, SO ALSO KNOWN AS 5 P.M.THE OTHER THING IS WE'VE TALKED WE TALKED WITH SOME FREQUENCY AND RIGHTFULLY SO, ABOUT THE QUALITY OF THE DIRECTOR AS A PROFESSIONAL QUALITY OF OUR DIRECTORS. BUT WHEN YOU SEE WHEN YOU SPEND SOME TIME WITH THE DIRECTORS AND YOU SEE THEM HAVE GREAT PASSION FOR WHAT IT IS THEY DO, I DON'T CARE WHETHER IT'S TAKING CARE OF SEWAGE OR TAKING CARE OF STREETS OR TAKING CARE OF THE AIRPORT OR WHATEVER IT IS. THEY REALLY DO WANT TO DO IT WELL, AND THEY WANT TO BE A BENEFIT TO THE TAXPAYERS AS WELL. THAT MOST DEFINITELY IS A HALLMARK OF OUR LEADERS. I DON'T KNOW IF WE IF EVERY CITY HAS IS AS FORTUNATE AS WE ARE, BUT YOU'RE RIGHT. INTERESTING COMMENT SELLING BOOKS. THIS WEEKEND SOMEONE CAME UP AND SAID THAT THEY'RE AN UBER DRIVER. IF YOU EVER WANT TO SEE THE CITY AND KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE THERE OR WHAT'S GOING GREAT. UBER DRIVER FOR A FEW WEEKENDS, HE OFFERED TO LET ME RIDE WITH HIM, SO I GUESS I COULD ADD. I'M GOING TO SPEAK TO ROTARY ON THE 27TH OF AUGUST ABOUT LAND USE DECISIONS. OKAY, BECAUSE I STILL CONSIDER THAT THE TOUGHEST THING TO WHAT WAS THE TOPIC, WHAT'S THE TOPIC? THEY USUALLY HAVE A I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE TOPIC IS. AMANDA ASKED ME TO SPEAK. THAT'S AWESOME. ANYTHING ELSE FOR THE DISCUSSION OR BENEFIT OF THE WHOLE. ALL RIGHT. SO HOMEWORK IS GET TO ME BY SEVEN IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO BE TO PASS ON TO SENATOR CRAPO'S OFFICE, GET TO DARREN BY NEXT MONDAY. IF YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR KIND OF PROPOSAL THAT YOU'D LIKE TO PUT FORWARD, THAT YOU FEEL YOU CAN SELL YOUR COLLEAGUES ON WHEN IT COMES TO COMPENSATION. AND BEYOND THAT, I THINK WE'RE JUST GOING TO GO AND WORK REALLY HARD TO GET SOME THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT TODAY INTO THE AGENDA FOR THURSDAY NIGHT, AND I THINK WE'RE READY TO POST. WE'LL BE POSTING THAT TOMORROW AS WE'RE SUPPOSED TO. SO WITH THAT, I THINK WE ARE DONE. WE'RE ADJOURNED FOR 30 MINUTES. OVER.
GREAT. COMPARED TO WHAT
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.