[Call to Order and Roll Call]
[00:00:07]
ALL RIGHT, WE HEARD THE POP. WE'RE LIVE. AND HOPEFULLY STREAMING RIGHT NOW. SO WELCOME TO THE MEETING. THE BUDGET MEETING. WE'RE GOING TO CALL OUR FIRST BUDGET TUESDAY SESSION TO ORDER AND INVITE OUR CITY CLERK TO CALL THE ROLL. COUNCIL. PRESIDENT BURTENSHAW HERE, COUNCILOR BRADFORD. I KNOW HE HAD SIGNED IN VIRTUALLY. HE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO TUNE IN CONSISTENTLY. OKAY. COUNCILOR DINGMAN HERE. COUNCILOR FREEMAN HERE. COUNCILOR FRANCIS HERE.
[Mayor]
COUNCILOR LARSON HERE. MAYOR, YOU HAVE A QUORUM. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO MAY BE WATCHING, THIS IS CALLED, WHAT, A BUDGET SESSION. ONE OF THE PRIMARY DUTIES OF OUR CITY COUNCIL IS TO SET THE BUDGET. IT'S SORT OF THE TIME HONORED TRADITION IN THE UNITED STATES.LEGISLATIVE BODIES HAVE THE PURSE STRINGS, AND A LOT GOES INTO THAT. BUT ANYWAY, THAT MAKES THIS A FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING. AND WE DO HAVE FIVE OF OUR SIX COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT.
PRESENT. COUNCILOR RADFORD HAS A WORK OBLIGATION. AND SO HE'S SORT OF INTERMITTENTLY TUNING IN BETWEEN HIS WORK OBLIGATION AND HIS ABILITY TO BE IN HIS COMPUTER. AND THAT TO HIM, AS FAR AS ANNOUNCEMENTS GO, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING FORMAL RIGHT NOW. BY THE END OF THE DAY, WE MAY HAVE SOME ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR THE AT THE END OF THE MEETING, BUT I DO WANT TO TURN A LITTLE BIT OF TIME OVER TO MARGARET TO INTRODUCE A COUPLE OF EMPLOYEES, ONE NEW ONE NOT AS NEW, BUT MAYBE NEW TO SOME OF YOU. SO YES, I WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY INTRODUCE KIMBERLY FELKER, WHO IS THE CITY'S NEW PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, AND THEN ALSO KAYLEE EGBERT, WHO HAS JUST JOINED THE CITY TEAM AS A COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST. SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO HAVE THEM BOTH MOVE INTO THESE NEW POSITIONS AND GET OUT INTO THE COMMUNITY AND TELL OUR CITY'S STORY. SO WELCOME. GREAT. WELCOME, KAYLEE, TO THE TO THE WHOLE CITY FAMILY AND A PUBLIC CONGRATULATIONS TO KIMBERLY. I WILL TELL YOU THAT MARGARET SAID THEY'RE THEY'RE TASKED WITH TELLING THE STORY AND THEY CAN'T TELL THE STORY IF THEY DON'T KNOW THE STORY. RIGHT. AND SO BEING IN MEETINGS LIKE THIS, WHERE SOME WOULD SAY THE SAUSAGE IS MADE RIGHT, WHERE THE ACTUAL HARD DECISIONS ARE MADE AND DISCUSSIONS ARE HAD, IS REALLY INSTRUCTIVE WHEN IT COMES TO INFORMING YOU ABOUT NOT JUST THE OUTCOMES, BUT SOME OF THE PROCESSES AND THOUGHT PROCESSES THAT LED TO THOSE. I'M SURE YOU'RE GOING TO FIND, AS I DO, THAT EVERYBODY HERE DOES GOOD WORK AND EVERYBODY HERE HAS THE RIGHT INTENTIONS, THE BEST INTENTIONS FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
PROBLEM IS, IS THAT WE DON'T HAVE UNLIMITED DOLLARS, SO WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH A HUGE PROCESS TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THOSE DOLLARS DO GO. ALL RIGHT. SO I AM SLATED TO MAKE JUST A FEW ANNOUNCEMENTS OR REMARKS. AND I JUST WANTED TO, I GUESS, SHARE A COUPLE THOUGHTS. ONE IS THAT THIS YEAR I FEEL LIKE IS A YEAR WHERE WE HAVE A LOT OF FIRSTS. THIS IS THE FIRST YEAR WE'VE HAD A MORE COMPLETE STRATEGIC PLAN. WE THIS KIND OF EMBODIES WHAT'S CONTAINED IN IT, AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET THIS UP ON THE WALL EVENTUALLY AND YOU'LL BE ABLE TO REFERENCE IT.
BUT BEING ABLE TO HAVE THIS IS SIGNIFICANT, RIGHT? BECAUSE IT GIVES US MORE DIRECTION AND MORE REFINED AND FOCUSED DIRECTION TO THE DECISIONS THAT WE MAKE. IT'S THE FIRST YEAR THAT WE HAVE ACCUMULATED PRIORITIES. WE'RE WORKING ON NOT JUST THIS YEAR'S PRIORITIES, BUT LAST YEAR'S AND KIND OF JUGGLING LOTS OF DIFFERENT GOALS IN THE AIR AT ONCE. IT'S ALSO THE FIRST YEAR THAT WE'VE BEGUN A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF EACH DEPARTMENT'S PROGRAMMATIC OFFERINGS, AND WE'VE DONE THAT THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. IT'S A PROCESS OR THING WE'VE DUBBED YEAR ROUND BUDGETING, WHERE WE DON'T JUST LOOK AT IT VERY SPECIFIC BUDGET MEETINGS, BUT YEAR ROUND WE'RE THINKING ABOUT HOW FUNDS ARE BEING SPENT, AND WE FOCUS ON ONE DEPARTMENT PER MONTH. IN DOING THAT. WE ALSO HAD THIS PAST NOVEMBER, AND I THINK IT WILL GET BETTER EACH NOVEMBER. BUT WHEN WE HAVE OUR QUARTERLY QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REVIEW, THE ONE IN NOVEMBER IS THE ONE WHERE WE GET THE CLOSEOUT FROM THE PRIOR FISCAL YEAR. AND THIS PAST NOVEMBER, I THINK OUR TROOP CONVERSATION WAS THE FIRST TIME WE HAD A REAL EMPHASIS ON TRYING TO HAVE A TRUE CONVERSATION, AND AT THAT PROVIDES A SENSE OF CLOSURE FROM THE PREVIOUS YEAR, EVEN THOUGH IN SOME WAYS THIS
[00:05:03]
THIS PARTICULAR PHASE OF THE BUDGET IS FEELS LIKE A MARATHON OR A SPRINT, IT FEELS LIKE A SPRINT AND YOU'RE TIRED AFTERWARD, AND YOU DON'T WANT TO THINK ABOUT THE BUDGET FOR SEVERAL MONTHS. BUT WE KIND OF INTRODUCED SOME NEW DISCIPLINE SO THAT THINKING ABOUT IT ALL YEAR ROUND MAKES A DIFFERENCE. AND HAVING THAT TRUE UP CONVERSATION IN NOVEMBER IS, I THINK, GOING TO BECOME MORE AND MORE MEANINGFUL. WE ALSO, AS EVERYBODY KNOWS, BUT MAYBE FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY, WE PUT AN AWFUL LOT OF TIME INTO THE BUDGETS. AND OVER THE YEARS WE'VE HAD A PROCESS AND THE PROCESS HAS FELT MAYBE FAMILIAR. BUT IN FACT, EVERY YEAR IT'S A COMBINATION OF OLD AND NEW. THE RHYTHM THAT WE'VE ESTABLISHED RIGHT NOW GOES SOMETHING LIKE THIS. WE HAVE COUNCIL MEETING IN FEBRUARY. WE CALL THAT THE COUNCIL BUDGET RETREAT, AND THAT'S WHERE COUNCIL ESTABLISHES THEIR PRIORITIES. I THINK WE'RE GOING TO FIND WITH TIME THAT A CERTAIN KIND OF RESTRAINT IS NEEDED ON THE PART OF THE COUNCIL TO NOT HAVE EVERYTHING AS A PRIORITY. AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT AS A CRITICISM. WE DIDN'T HAVE EVERYTHING AS A PRIORITY, BUT IT'S AN EASY WAY TO LABEL GETTING, GETTING, HAVING TOO MANY PRIORITIES RIGHT, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TOO MANY THINGS TO FOCUS ON. YOU ARE SO DIVIDED THAT NOTHING IS ALLOWED TO THEN BE A REAL PRIORITY AND TAKE THE BULK OF YOUR FOCUS OF TIME. SO I THINK WE'RE GOING TO GET BETTER AT THAT. THEN IN MARCH WE HAVE A DIRECTOR'S MEETING. REMEMBER, WE USED TO START WITH JUST A DIRECTOR'S MEDIUM, BUT IT WAS FRESH THINKING. AND NEW COUNCIL COUNCIL MEMBERS AND NEW COUNCIL LEADERSHIP THAT KIND OF SAID NO, WE SHOULD START WITH THE COUNCIL. THAT'S OUR DUTY. AND SO WE SHOULD START WITH THE COUNCIL SO THAT THAT WE ADDED THAT FEBRUARY MEETING JUST LAST YEAR. SO ANYWAY, THE DIRECTOR'S MEETING NOW HAS A DIFFERENT FOCUS. IT'S NOT JUST THE DIRECTORS GETTING TOGETHER, DECIDING HOW TO CUT THE PIE, BUT IT'S THE DIRECTORS GETTING TOGETHER WITH A WITH AN IDEA OF WHAT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE WANTING TO SEE TO CHERRY PIE OR APPLE PIE THIS YEAR. RIGHT. SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN JUST DIVIDING THE PIE. NEVERTHELESS, THE DIRECTORS START ROLLING UP THEIR SLEEVES IN MARCH. THEN WE GET ALL CITY LEADERS TOGETHER, ELECTED AND APPOINTED, AND COME TOGETHER WITH OUR FINANCE TEAM IN APRIL. WE CALL THAT THE BUDGET WORKSHOP, AND THAT IS A MEETING WHERE WE TRY TO BE AS COMPREHENSIVE AS POSSIBLE. WE WOULD MAKE SO MUCH PROGRESS IN THAT MEETING IF WE HAD FINAL NUMBERS. BUT EVERYTHING IS CONJECTURE IN MARCH OR IN APRIL, AND WE REALLY CAN'T GO TOO FAST. WE DON'T HAVE FINAL NUMBERS FROM NEGOTIATIONS, WE DON'T HAVE FINAL NUMBERS FROM THE COUNTY, WE DON'T HAVE FINAL NUMBERS ON HEALTH INSURANCE. WE JUST CAN'T MAKE A LOT OF PROGRESS. BUT WE MAKE A LOT OF PLANS AND WE SET OUR INTENTIONS. MAY BUDGETS ARE WORKED ON IN THE DEPARTMENTS. THEY'RE BUSY. JUNE, WE HAVE SOME MEETINGS WITH FINANCE TEAM, WITH MYSELF, MY OFFICE, WITH DIRECTORS AT EACH DEPARTMENT. AND WE TRY TO FIGURE OUT, YOU KNOW, HOW DO WE HOW DO WE MAKE THIS STUFF, THIS ALL AS MUCH AS WE CAN INTO THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE HAVE OR WE THINK WE HAVE. AND FINALLY, THAT RESULTS IN A BUDGET THAT IS SENT TO THE COUNCIL. IT USED TO BE A BOOK THAT YOU GOT A PHYSICAL BOOK. WE NOW ARE PRETTY MUCH PUSHING A BUTTON AND YOU WANT TO GO IRONICALLY, AND THERE'S A LOT LESS PAPER AT THE TABLE TODAY, EVEN THOUGH IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S LITTERED WITH PAPER. BUT THAT BOOK, WHETHER IT'S VIRTUAL OR REAL, REPRESENTS ALL THAT WORK FROM ALL THOSE MONTHS. AND THEN WE SPEND ALL THIS MONTH REVIEWING IT, FIGURING IT OUT. BY THE END OF THIS MONTH, THE COUNCIL HAS ADOPTS A TENTATIVE BUDGET. AUGUST. WE'VE GOT THE FORMAL BUDGET SEPTEMBER. IT'S FORMALLY SUBMITTED TO THE STATE, EVEN AS THE FINANCE TEAM IS CLOSING OUT THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR. AND THAT'S A BIG JOB. THEN WE HIT OCTOBER, WE GET A FISCAL YEAR, AND THE RHYTHM FOR OCTOBER TO DECEMBER IS PREP FOR AUDIT.AND THEN THE AUDIT OFFICIALLY BEGINS WHEN THE AUDIT TEAM ARRIVES IN JANUARY, EVEN AS DEPARTMENTS ARE THINKING, WHAT DO I WANT FOR THE COMING YEAR? AND THEN THEY TALK TO COUNCIL AND THEN IT STARTS AGAIN. SO WE REALLY DO HAVE A YEAR ROUND BUDGET CYCLE. THERE'S ALWAYS A FOCUS ON MONEY. THE QUESTION IS WHAT'S THE FOCUS FOR ANY GIVEN YEAR? I GO THROUGH ALL THAT BECAUSE I THINK THAT EVEN IF NO, NOT EVEN IF WHEN NEW LEADERSHIP COMES IN WITH FRESH EYES, FRESH IDEAS, I HOPE THAT SOME OF THE RHYTHM WILL STILL BE MEANINGFUL AND THAT YOU'LL BE ABLE TO ADDRESS EVERYTHING. BUT CHANGE IS CONSTANT WITH THIS PROCESS, SO I HOPE THAT WHATEVER CHANGES WE'VE INTRODUCED, AND I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT. I HOPE THAT. IT WILL JUST ALWAYS CONTINUE TO GET BETTER. SO ANYWAY, TODAY WE'RE GOING TO SPEND SOME TIME
[00:10:03]
LOGICALLY REVIEWING THE YEAR THAT WE'RE IN. WE'RE ALSO GOING TO SPEND SOME TIME THEN TAKING A LOOK AT THE YEAR THAT WE'RE PLANNING FOR. THEN WE'LL TAKE MORE TIME ON THE AGENDA THAN TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT OUR PEOPLE. WE ALWAYS, IT SEEMS, THE FIRST, BEST AND LAST PART OF THE CITY AND THE CITY'S BUDGET ARE THE PEOPLE THAT WE FUND, THAT DO THE WORK AND CARRY OUT THE DREAMS AND THE GOALS. SO WE'LL HEAR FROM HR AS WE HEAR ABOUT OUR WHERE WE ARE WITH EMPLOYEES AND OUR COMMITMENTS TO THEM AND OUR EVEN OUR DESIRES FOR NEW EMPLOYEES, BECAUSE WE CAN'T SERVE MORE CITIZENS WITH FEWER EMPLOYEES EVERY YEAR. BOY, WE CAN'T AFFORD MORE EMPLOYEES EVERY YEAR. IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S A TRICKY NUT TO CRACK. AND THEN WE WILL ALSO HAVE SOMETHING THAT WE'VE NEVER HAD BEFORE THAT I'M EXCITED ABOUT, AND THAT IS FINANCING AND HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE WITH US TRENDS THAT THEY SEE IN THE DATA, THAT THEY CRUNCH, THE NUMBERS THAT THEY WORK WITH EVERY DAY IN AND DAY OUT, MONTH IN AND MONTH OUT, WHAT THEY SEE, AND WE'LL HAVE A CHANCE TO DISCUSS SOME OF THOSE. SO IT'S A BUSY DAY NEXT MONTH OR THE NEXT TWO WEEKS WILL ALSO BE BUSY DAYS. AND WE JUST APPRECIATE EVERYBODY FOR BEING HERE. WE HAVE LOTS OF SEATS AT THE TABLE. IF ANYBODY REALLY FEELS THEY WANT TO BE MORE CLOSE TO THE DISCUSSION OR PART OF IT, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COME DOWN. IF YOU WANT TO STAY IN THE COMFY SEATS,[Finance Team, Mayor's Office Council, Departments]
YOU CAN STAY THERE TOO. AND WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TURN IT OVER TO PAM, WHO IS LEADING FINANCE TEAM. AND WE'LL JUST KIND OF VOLLEY BACK AND FORTH WHEN WE HAVE THINGS TO ADD HERE. GREAT. THANK YOU SO MUCH, MAYOR. AND THANK YOU, COUNCIL FOR SPENDING PART OF THE DAY WITH US. THANK YOU, MAYOR, ALSO FOR GOING OVER THE PROCESS BECAUSE REALLY, TRULY IS A YEAR ROUND PROCESS. WE JUST CAME OFF OF AN AUDIT WHICH WAS A VERY POSITIVE AUDIT, A LOTS OF IMPROVEMENTS OVER THE LAST 12 MONTHS OR SO. AND THAT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH, YOU KNOW, OUR PROFESSION IN ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE OF BEING TRANSPARENT TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE PUBLIC DOLLARS THAT WE THAT WE USE TO PROVIDE CITY SERVICES. AND AS A GROWING COMMUNITY, YOU KNOW, THE WORK BECOMES MORE COMPLEX AND IT BECOMES MORE THERE'S MORE VOLUME TO KEEPING TRACK OF THOSE DOLLARS. SO ONE OF THE THINGS I WANT TO TALK ABOUT TODAY REALLY QUICKLY IS AN INTRODUCTION AS A COUPLE OF HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. FIRST OF ALL, AT YOUR PLACE FOR COUNCIL, AND I GOT A FEW EXTRA COPIES FOR OUR DIRECTORS, BUT YOU'LL HAVE THE COPY OF THE PRESENTATION FOR TODAY. YOU ALSO HAVE A LIST OF BUDGET, PROCESS, EXPECTATION, AND UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS THAT THE MAYOR REVIEWED, BASED, OR PROVIDED AN OVERVIEW OF A FEW MOMENTS AGO, BUT THIS IS JUST KIND OF A GUIDELINE OVER THE NEXT THREE BUDGET TUESDAYS THAT WE'LL HAVE. SO IF ANYTHING IN HERE THAT WE HAVEN'T ADDRESSED, JUST LET US KNOW. WE'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO INCORPORATE IT INTO A FUTURE BUDGET SESSION. AND THEN FINALLY, THERE'S A HANDOUT HERE FOR THE ONE TIME THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY HAVE APPROVED FOR THIS FISCAL YEAR THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO AN UPDATE ON IN THE PRESENTATION A LITTLE BIT LATER. SO THOSE ARE THE THREE ITEMS YOU HAVE. THE OTHER THING IS, IS WE DID SEND OUT A DRAFT BUDGET BOOK OVER THE WEEKEND. STAFF WAS WORKING ON IT A LITTLE WEEKEND AND THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME MORE CORRECTIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND WE'LL VERSION THAT UP LIKE WE DID LAST YEAR, WHERE WE HAVE EACH YEAR WE DO A DRAFT, WE'LL HAVE A VERSION ASSOCIATED TO IT. SO THERE'S COPY OUT THERE IN YOUR COUNCIL DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT, COUNCIL DRIVE.THERE'S ALSO ONE ON THE DIRECTOR DRIVE IN THE 2526 BUDGET FOLDER. AND THEN ALSO IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE A HARD COPY, JUST LET ME KNOW. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY IS INTERESTED IN THAT. THE MAYOR MENTIONED EARLIER WE'RE GOING PAPERLESS ON A LOT OF THINGS. BUT, YOU KNOW, FOR THE DRAFTS, OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, IF YOU WOULD LIKE SOMETHING, WE CAN CERTAINLY PRINT IT OUT FOR YOU.
WE DO HAVE AN OLD COPIER IN OUR FINANCE DIVISION. AND SO WE HAVE TO KIND OF RUB ITS BELLY EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE BECAUSE THEN IT GETS JAMMED. SO IF YOU WOULD LIKE A COPY, WE'RE MORE THAN HAPPY TO GIVE ONE TO YOU THAT'S FOUND. AND THEN ALSO WE HAVE ANYBODY THAT'S INTERESTED IN YOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT ARE INTERESTED IN A LAPTOP OR A DESKTOP. LAST YEAR I THINK WE HAD A DESKTOP IN THE CHIEF OF STAFF CONFERENCE ROOM. SO IF ANYBODY'S INTERESTED IN THAT, PLEASE LET US KNOW. IF YOU COULD LET MARGARET OR CHIEF OF STAFF KNOW. WE'LL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH IT TO GET THAT OVER TO YOU IF YOU WOULD LIKE. AND THEN FINALLY, BEFORE WE START THE ACTUAL PRESENTATION, YOU KNOW, MAYOR HAD MENTIONED SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT ABOUT, YOU KNOW, OUR FINANCE TEAM. AND TO BE REALLY HONEST, THEY WERE PRETTY MUCH YEAR ROUND. AND IT'S NOT BUDGET, IT'S AUDIT. AND WE HAVE SUCH A GREAT TEAM OF PROFESSIONALS THAT ARE DEDICATED NOT ONLY TO PUBLIC ACCOUNTING, BUT ALSO TO HELPING THE CITY DOING WHATEVER THEY CAN DO TO SUPPORT THEIR DEPARTMENTS.
SO WE WANT TO THANK OUR 11 DEPARTMENTS WORKING WITH OUR ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE TEAM.
[00:15:01]
THEY WORK REALLY HARD. THEY'RE A VERY TALENTED, VERY SMART GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS, AND THEY'RE LED BY OUR ASSISTANT FINANCE MANAGER AND ALSO OUR CITY TREASURER, MARK HAGEDORN. MARK, OVER THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF OR SO HAS BEEN KIND OF DOING LIKE AN UPLOAD, IF YOU WILL, OF HIS KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES OF NOT ONLY THE CITY BUDGET, BUT ANYTHING THAT HE'S LEARNED BY HIS LAST, I DON'T KNOW, 12 YEARS WORKING HERE AT THE CITY, HE'S BEEN TRYING TO KIND OF TRANSITION THAT OVER TO OUR ASSISTANT FINANCE MANAGER, BROOKS, BECAUSE HE'S ACTUALLY GOING TO SERVE AS A LEAD ON OUR ERP PROJECT THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE HAVING ROLLOUT NEXT. SUMMER OR FALL OF 2026. I'M LOOKING OVER AT MARK. I'M PRETTY SURE THAT'S STILL THE PLAN ON THAT.SO JUST REALLY WANT TO THANK THE TEAM. I KNOW SEVERAL OF THE TEAM MEMBERS WORKED OVER THE 4TH OF JULY HOLIDAY, BUT THEY ALSO KNOW THAT THE ACCOUNTING ROLE THAT THEY SERVE SOMETIMES DOES REQUIRE A LITTLE BIT OF EXTRA HOURS, BUT THEY DID REALLY PUT A LOT OF EFFORT INTO THIS PARTICULAR PRESENTATION FOR YOU TODAY. AND ALL THE SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION THAT YOU'LL SEE THAT WILL PROVIDE A HIGHLIGHT OF AND I THINK, OH, AND FINALLY, ONE OF THE THINGS WE TRY TO DO IN OUR 11 DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS WERE VERY KIND WITH US AS THE GENTLE REMINDER OF WHEN THEY WORK ON THEIR BUDGETS, TRYING TO KEEP THE FOCUS OF THE COUNCIL ASPIRATIONS IN MIND. AND THEN ALSO LAST YEAR, AS THE MAYOR MENTIONED, WE HAD PRIORITIES. AND ALSO BEING ABLE TO ARTICULATE A LITTLE BIT ABOUT ANY OF THOSE COUNCIL PRIORITIES THAT MAY EXTEND INTO THE 2526 BUDGET. SO WE'LL HAVE MORE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THAT AS WE AS WE GO FORWARD WITH A DIFFERENT BUDGET TUESDAYS. BUT WE REALLY WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE REALLY TALKED A LOT ABOUT AMONGST OUR COLLEAGUES HERE IS REALLY TRYING TO FOCUS ON THOSE ASPIRATIONS. SO WE PRODUCED WITH YOU A BUDGET THAT IS IN THE SPIRIT OF WHAT YOU'VE WHAT YOU'VE ASKED FOR. SO WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO HAND OVER THE MIC, SO TO SPEAK, TO BROOKS, OUR ASSISTANT FINANCE MANAGER. AS I MENTIONED, SHE HAS BEEN SPENDING A LOT OF TIME ON THIS. SHE HAS BEEN BASICALLY THE ONE NEEDING ALL THE JOE FOR OUR SOURDOUGH LOAF THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TODAY. SO WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO PASS IT OVER TO YOU, BROOKS. OH PARDON ME. IT'S MARK FIRST AND. PRESENTATION. OKAY. YES. GREAT. OKAY. GREAT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS LOVE THIS TIME OF YEAR. IT'S THE BEST TIME OF YEAR TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE. IN ORDER TO TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE AND OUR FUTURE PLANS. YOU GUYS TALKED ABOUT THE PAST A LITTLE BIT AND WHERE WE ARE. AND SO. I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT WHERE WHERE WE ARE THIS YEAR OR THE YEAR 2025. AND THEN BROOKS IS GOING TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF OUR BUDGET GOING INTO THE BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS. AND SO THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN YOU WOULD SEE ON A QUARTERLY FINANCE REPORT, EXCEPT THAT IT'S NOT BY THE QUARTER. WE'RE DOING IT AS OF MAY. MAY IS OUR OUR LAST CLOSED PERIOD USUALLY TAKES US ABOUT 30 DAYS TO CLOSE A PERIOD 2020 TO 30 DAYS TO CLOSE A PERIOD. SO WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF NOW CLOSING JUNE. AND SO YOU'LL HAVE A QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT ON JUNE IN THE COMING AND THE COMING MONTH. AND SO THIS IS AS OF MAY. AND WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH KIND OF THE CITY AS A WHOLE AND THE GENERAL FUND. AND THEN WE'LL ALSO KIND OF GO OVER SOME KEY INDICATORS.
SO FOR FISCAL YEAR 25 THROUGH THE MONTH OF MAY, WE HAVE 184 MILLION OF OUR BUDGET HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. THAT IS 59%. TYPICALLY, IF YOU WERE TO ANNUALIZE WHERE WE SHOULD BE RIGHT NOW, IT WOULD BE ABOUT 67%. AND SO YOU IT APPEARS TO BE A LITTLE BIT LOW. BUT THAT'S JUST IF WE WERE ANALYZING BY MONTH, THE CITY IS NOT EQUAL FOR EACH MONTH. AND SO WE'RE PRETTY ON TRACK TO OUR NEXT LARGE TAX DEPOSIT WOULD BE IN THE MONTH OF JULY. AND THEN WE WILL BE ABOVE THAT 75% AT THE END OF JUNE. SO FOR THIS YEAR, WE ARE PRETTY MUCH ON TARGET WHERE WE EXPECT TO BE CITY AS A WHOLE. SOME THINGS TO POINT OUT. SINCE
[00:20:08]
IMPACT FEES, IMPACT FEES ARE SLIGHTLY NUANCED IN THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT'S EASILY PREDICTABLE. SO WE CAME UP WITH CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES BASED ON HISTORICAL INFORMATION ON BUILDING PERMITS, AND MADE A BEST GUESS ON ON THAT. AND SO OUR CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE, WE'VE OUTPACED THAT SO FAR FOR THIS YEAR. THE OTHER THING THAT WE ARE WHAT WE FEEL GOOD ABOUT IS.ENTERPRISE COST. COST IS SLIGHTLY ABOVE AS FAR AS THE REVENUES. SO THAT'S THAT. THAT'S IN A GOOD SPOT. THINGS TO BE. TO BE CONSIDER IS THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE. IS SEEMS WELL A LOT OF THAT HAS TO DO WITH SOME BONDING TIMING OF BONDING AS WELL AS SOME TIMING ON GRANTS. BUT OUR OPERATIONAL REOCCURRING INTERGOVERNMENTAL SEEMS TO BE ON TARGET. AND MAYBE IN THE FUTURE, THAT'S ONE CATEGORY WE CAN SPLIT INTO CATEGORIES OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE. BECAUSE FOR GASB STANDARDS, THEY THEY GROUP THEM ALL TOGETHER AS GASB IS THE ACCOUNTING BOARD OF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING BOARD. THEY SAY ALL GOVERNMENTAL GOES TOGETHER, BUT ALL GOVERNMENTAL REVENUE IS NOT THE SAME. THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE ONE TIME, THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE CONTINGENT AND SOME THAT ARE OPERATIONAL. AND SO THIS IS AN AREA WE COULD PROBABLY IMPROVE ON TO GIVE SOME CLARITY OF WHY, THE NUANCES OF WHY SOME YEARS ARE HIGH AND WHY SOME YEARS ARE LOW. ANOTHER LOW ONE YOU WOULD SEE IS CONTRIBUTIONS. AND THESE AGAIN IS ANOTHER ESTIMATE CONSERVATIVE BASED ON HISTORICAL TRENDS. IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I CAN GO OUT AND SAY, OKAY, WHO'S GOING TO GIVE US MONEY THIS YEAR? THAT USUALLY IS SPONTANEOUS. AND SO WE JUST USE AN AVERAGE OVER MULTIPLE YEARS TO KIND OF GIVE AN ESTIMATE ON CONTRIBUTIONS.
AND THEN YOUR OTHER FINANCING SOURCES DOWN HERE. SO THIS IS WHERE THE ENTERPRISE BOND COMES IN. THIS IS THE POWER PEAKING PLAN DRAWDOWNS. SO WHAT THAT IS. ANY QUESTIONS ON CITYWIDE REVENUE. WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE. TO JUST OR I MEAN ADVISABLE OR TELL ME WHY IT'S NOT ADVISABLE.
THIS IS WHAT JUST HAVE CONTRIBUTIONS BE ZERO SO THAT EVERY GIFT IS A SURPRISE. SOME ARE SOME ARE KNOWN. AND SO WE TRY TO DO THE KNOWN ONES. I MEAN, WE TRY TO TREAT IT LIKE GRANTS. IF WE KNOW IT'S COMING, IT'S REASONABLE AND ESTIMABLE. AND WE LOOK AT THE HISTORICAL, WE'LL PUT THAT IN THERE LIKE THE FRONTIER CENTER. AND THE OTHER REASON IS, IS WE WANT TO HAVE THOSE BUILT IN IF WE KNOW IT'S A POSSIBILITY. THAT WAY WE HAVE IT IN AS PART OF OUR CAPACITY BUDGET, BECAUSE IF WE DON'T HAVE IT INCLUDED IN THE CAPACITY, IT'S GOING TO BE REALLY DIFFICULT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO SPEND IT OPENING THE BUDGET DEPARTMENTS WHO PUT DOWN CONTRIBUTIONS. WE ASK THEM TO TIE IT TO AN EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, LIKE WHAT IS IT OFFSETTING? OKAY, CITYWIDE EXPENSES. SO USING THE 67% AS KIND OF THE MEDIAN POINT OF WHAT WE EXPECT PEOPLE TO OPPOSE ANNUALIZED WAGES IS ONE OF THOSE THAT FITS CLOSELY TO THAT.
OUTSIDE OF THAT, WE DO 26 PAY PERIODS INSTEAD OF 24. SO AT SOME TIME DURING THE YEAR, THOSE TWO EXTRA PAY PERIODS DO HAVE AN INFLUENCE. AT THIS POINT IT DOES NOT. AND SO WE ARE A LITTLE BIT BELOW WHAT OUR EXPECTATIONS ARE ON WAGES, PARTLY TO DO WITH TURNOVER. EVEN IF YOU INDICATE THE SEASONALITY OF THINGS OR JUST SLIGHTLY LOWER. BUT WE EXPECT THAT THAT WILL PROBABLY PICK UP AND BE OFFSET BY SEASONAL. WE SEE THAT WHEN THERE IS. A THE NUMBER OF VACANCIES IS SOMEWHAT CONNECTED TO THE NUMBER OF SEASONALS. AND SO IT'S NOT ALWAYS A 1 TO 1 RELATIONSHIP.
BUT THERE IS A CONTEXTUAL ASSOCIATION THERE. AND THEN WITHIN THAT WE ALSO HAVE OUR BENEFITS, WHICH IS FOR THE MOST CASE A PERCENTAGE OF WAGES. ONE THING THAT WE HAVE ON HERE IS OUR OPERATIONAL EXPENSE. THIS. RIGHT HERE. WHY IS IT. IT SEEMS A LITTLE ON THE LOW SIDE. THAT'S
[00:25:07]
JUST TIMING. AND WE ARE WE SPEND LIKE ON THE OPERATIONAL SIDE. THE LAST QUARTER OF THE YEAR IS BECAUSE OF GOOD WEATHER. I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS YOU CAN DO WITH GOOD WEATHER. THERE'S NOT AS MANY THINGS YOU CAN DO WHEN IT'S NEGATIVE TO AN OUTSIDE. AND SO WE DO SPEND MORE DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS. THE SAME GOES WITH CAPITAL. CAPITAL IS ALSO TIME, TIME TO TIME OF YEAR. DEBT SERVICE. THIS IS ONE THAT WE'RE IMPROVING ON. IT USED TO BE THAT THIS IS JUST WHERE WE PUT THE BOND PAYMENTS. NOW WE'RE STARTING TO PUT LEASE PAYMENTS IN HERE. AND SO IT'LL BE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT COMING IN THE LAST PART OF THIS YEAR TO MOVE FOR THE LEASES WERE RECORDED OR WERE GOING TO BE RECORDED IN THE OPERATIONAL SIDE, MOVE DOWN THE DEBT SERVICE. WE JUST DIDN'T FEEL LIKE IT WAS NECESSARY TO MAKE THAT BUDGET ADJUSTMENT UNTIL THAT WAS MADE, HAS COME IN. SO THAT ONE WOULD EXPECT TO GO UP BEFORE SEPTEMBER 30TH. THAT'S CORRECT. YEP. AND THEN COST ALLOCATION THIS. SO WE HAVE DELIBERATELY SEGREGATED A COST ALLOCATION VERSUS A TRANSFER. A TRANSFER IS AN EXCHANGE OF SERVICES, WHICH MEANS IT'S LIKE BOUGHT ON THE OPEN MARKET. SO THAT IF POWER CAME IN AND DID SOME ELECTRICAL WORK TO BRING LINES TO A BUILDING OR FIX THE FIBER LINE, THAT DEPARTMENT PAYS FOR THAT ACTUAL COST. THAT'S WHERE THE TRANSFER IS TO WORK ORDER TRANSFER. IT MEANS THAT THEY ARE PAYING FOR THE COST. THE COST ALLOCATION IS THE ASSIGNMENT OF SHARE COSTS. AND IN THIS CASE IT'S AT 50%, YOU WOULD ASSUME. WOULD IT BE IN THE 60S? THE REASON WHY IT'S A LITTLE LOWER IS BECAUSE WITHIN THAT COST ALLOCATION WE HAVE BUILT IN THE ERP ALLOCATION, WHICH IS NOT FOLLOWING A AN AVERAGE USAGE OVER TIME BECAUSE IT'S JUST STARTING WHERE COST ALLOCATION FOR OTHER DEPARTMENTS IS, IS AS IT GOES EACH MONTH.AND SO IF YOU WERE TO REMOVE THE ERP PROJECT OUT OF THAT, IT WOULD BE CLOSER TO 61%, WHICH WHICH FOLLOWS THE GENERAL CONSUMPTION OF THE GENERAL FUND TRENDS. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON EXPENSES? I GO BACK AND ASK A QUESTION ON ON THE REVENUES. ABSOLUTELY. ON THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL, YOU SAID THAT IT WAS A TIMING ISSUE PRIMARILY IN BONDS AND GRANTS. SO I MIGHT HAVE TAKEN THAT, THAT THE NUMBERS ARE STILL PRETTY SOUND AS FAR AS THE TOTAL FOR THE YEAR. IT'S JUST THAT THEY'RE NOT LINEAR IN THE WAY THEY COME IN. AS FAR AS THE OPERATIONAL SIDE, INTERGOVERNMENTAL. YES. CAPITAL. THE CAPITAL REVENUE TIED TO CAPITAL PROJECTS. IT SOUNDED THE FACT THAT WE'LL DRAW THEM DOWN WHEN WE EXPEND THEM, WE JUST DON'T KNOW WHEN THAT'S GOING TO BE. WE FORECASTED THAT IT WOULD BE THIS YEAR. THE GOOD ONE WOULD BE THE AIRPORT. AIRPORT GETS FEDERAL FUNDS TO BUILD THINGS. WELL, THE THEIR EXPECTATION IS TO BUILD THOSE DURING THE YEAR, BUT THEY DON'T ALWAYS COME TO FRUITION. BUT WHEN THAT DOES HAPPEN, WE'LL BE ABLE TO DRAW DOWN FUNDS TO COVER THOSE COSTS. THANKS. PART OF THAT IS WHEN WE ESTIMATE GRANTS AND THE KNOWN GRANTS FOR CAPITAL, WE ARE PREDICTING THOSE 18 MONTHS IN AHEAD OF TIME. AND SO WE'RE BUDGETING NOW FOR NEXT YEAR. WELL, THINGS THERE'S A LOT OF TIME IN BETWEEN THAT THAT THAT CHANGES WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS. SO RIGHT NOW WE BUDGET FOR CAPACITY. OKAY. ON THE GENERAL FUND SIDE. ONLY ONE OTHER NOTATION HERE. SO WE'VE RECEIVED 184 MILLION. THAT'S WHAT I SAID EARLIER. THAT'S WHAT WE'VE COLLECTED. THIS IS WHAT WE EXPECTED 161. SO THERE'S ABOUT $23 MILLION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT WE BROUGHT IN VERSUS WHAT WE SPENT. ON THE GENERAL FUND SIDE. WE BROUGHT IN 76 MILLION OR 46 MILLION OF THE 72 MILLION THAT WE ARE FORECASTING. THIS.
ALL THESE ARE PRETTY CONSISTENT. YOU CAN SEE, FOR THE MOST PART, OUTSIDE OF THE OF THE GOVERNMENT CHARGE FOR SERVICES, WE'RE IN THE PERCENTAGE RANGE THAT WE WOULD EXPECT. TIMING WITH THE WITH THE JULY TAX PAYMENT WILL COME IN THIS NEXT MONTH OR THIS MONTH, SORRY. AND THEN INTERNATIONAL REVENUE. THIS IS MORE OPERATIONAL. WE'RE OTHER FUNDS. THERE'S MORE CAPITAL.
[00:30:03]
WE'RE RIGHT IN LINE WHERE WHERE WE EXPECT CHARGES FOR SERVICES ARE ALWAYS A LITTLE DOWN FOR THIS TIME OF YEAR. IT'S 39% BECAUSE A LOT OF OURS ARE OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES, RECREATION, ZOO, EVEN BUILDING PERMITS HAVE SOME. RELATIONSHIP TO WEATHER. SO JUST SO YOU KNOW, THAT THAT'S KIND OF HOW WE SEE THINGS RIGHT NOW. INTEREST REVENUE IS A LITTLE BIT LOW. THAN OUR EXPECTATION. THAT IS MAINLY DUE TO AN ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENT BASED ON THE VALUATION OF OUR INVESTMENTS THEY RECORDED AT MARKET LEVEL. SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE IN A PERIOD OF A WRITE DOWN BECAUSE OUR BECAUSE OF THE DECLINING INTEREST RATE. BUT IT'S KIND OF MISLEADING BECAUSE WE HOLD THOSE TWO MATURITIES. SO THAT WON'T BE NECESSARILY A LOSS. IT'S JUST THE WAY WE EVALUATE THEM FROM MONTH TO MONTH. THE ONLY WAY WE TAKE A LOSS ON AN INVESTMENT IS IF THE INVESTMENT OF THE ENTITY GOES DEFAULT. AND SO I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE. IF WE WERE TO BUY. A BANK, A CD FROM A BANK AND THAT THAT CD IS VALUED AT A MILLION IN THAT BANK GOES INTO DEFAULT, WE WOULD ONLY GET 250,000 OF A MILLION BACK UNLESS IT'S INSURED. AND SO WE TRY TO INSURE OURS TO AVOID THAT TYPE OF RISK. BUT BECAUSE OF THAT NARRATIVE THAT THERE'S THAT PRESUMPTION THAT COULD HAPPEN, OR THE MARKET DICTATES THAT WE, BASED ON THE INTEREST RATE, HOW THEY'RE VALUED. AND SO USUALLY THEY'RE VALUED LOWER THAN WHAT THE PAR VALUE IS. SO WE WOULD HAVE AN INVESTMENT THAT WE WOULD REDEEM AT MATURITY. BUT IT'S VALUED AT 960,000 BECAUSE OF THE MARKET DICTATES THAT. AND THAT DECREASE IN INTEREST INCOME. THAT'S WHY IT'S LOW. IT'S A LOT MORE DETAILS IF I WANTED. THAT'S SUPER EXCITING. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS ON GENERAL FUND REVENUE. I'M CURIOUS ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTIONS ONE. WAS TIMING OKAY. YEAH. TIMING TO THE. A LOT OF THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE CONTRIBUTIONS THAT WE HAVE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THAT ARE HAPPENING. OKAY. THIS ONE RIGHT HERE IS CAN BE A LITTLE NUANCED. OTHER FINANCING SOURCES. THIS TYPICALLY FOR THE GENERAL FUND IS NOT BONDING AS IT IS TRANSFERS THAT WE AGREE TO TRANSFER MONEY BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT FUNDS. AND IN THIS CASE INSTEAD OF A NEGATIVE MEANING TRANSFER OUT. THIS IS A TRANSFER IN. IT'S JUST IT'S WE DO THAT TO RECORD SOME OF OUR MURPHY MURPH ALLOCATION. AND SO THAT'S JUST MORE OF AN ACCOUNTING ENTRY TO RECOGNIZE SOME OF OUR CALCULATIONS. GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES. I WON'T POINT OUT AT THE BEGINNING. THE NUMBER HERE AT THE BOTTOM IS 44 MILLION. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE PREVIOUS SLIDE WE'RE AT 46. THAT MEANS WE BROUGHT IN MORE REVENUE THAN WE EXPENDED, WHICH IS GOOD. BUT IT'S A LITTLE BIT LOWER THAN WE USUALLY ARE. WE USUALLY HAVE A LITTLE MORE OF A BUFFER THIS TIME OF YEAR THAN WE DO NOW. SO I'M GOING TO EXPLAIN WHY THAT IS ON THIS SLIDE. AS I GO THROUGH EACH OF THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES. SO WAGES 63%. WE FEEL GOOD THERE GIVEN THE TIMING OF THE WAGES. AND THE REST OF THE YEAR, WE THINK WE'LL BE ABLE TO BE RIGHT THERE ABOUT 95 TO 99, 90 PERCENTILE AT THE END OF THE YEAR. OPERATING EXPENSES. THIS IS ONE THAT IS HIGHER THAN NORMAL THIS TIME OF YEAR. SO WE'RE AT 45% THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. WE'RE IN THE 41 TO 42 PERCENTILE. SO WE'RE ABOUT 3 TO 4% HIGHER THAN AVERAGE. THAT'S JUST A COMBINATION OF THINGS.PART OF THAT ALSO INCLUDES STARTING STARTING THE ERP PROJECT THAT HITS OPERATIONAL EXPENSES, WHICH HASN'T BEEN DRAWN BACK FROM THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS YET. WE'LL DO THAT AT THE END OF THE YEAR. CAPITAL IS ON TARGET. THOSE ARE COMING IN THE SUMMER MONTHS. MURPH. EXPENSE.
THIS IS THE ITEMS THAT WE BUY WITH OUR FUNDS. THOSE TYPICALLY HAPPEN AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR WHEN THE DEPARTMENT IS AUTHORIZED TO BUY MURPH THINGS. THEY USUALLY DO IT AS SOON AS THE YEAR STARTS. IT'S NOT USUALLY LADDERED THROUGHOUT THE MONTHS WHERE THE ALLOCATION,
[00:35:03]
WHICH IS THE MONEY PUTTING BACK INTO MURPH, IS ALLOCATED BY BY THE NUMBER OF MONTHS DEBT SERVICE. WE HAVE MADE THE FIRST DEBT PAYMENT ON THE POLICE FACILITY. WE HAVE ANOTHER ONE COMING IN SEPTEMBER. THAT ONE WILL BE PRORATED TO GO TO THE IMPACT FEE FUNDS BASED ON WHAT IS BUDGETED, AND THEN THE COST ALLOCATION. AGAIN, THIS IS A LITTLE SHOWS LOWER, BUT IT'S ABOUT WHERE WE EXPECT WHEN YOU REMOVE THE ERP ALLOCATION. SO OVERALL, THE REASON WHY WE WOULD TYPICALLY SEE ABOUT 4 MILLION IN EXCESS REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES VERSUS ABOUT 2 MILLION, THAT HAS TO DO WITH TIMING OF OPERATIONAL EXPENSES. IT HAS TO DO WITH THE TIMING OF.OF THE ERP REALLOCATION OF THE TRANSFER BACK THAT WE DO WITH THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS. WHEN WE'LL DO THAT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE THE TIMING OF THE DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT THAT WILL GO TO THE IMPACT BECOMES. BUT IT'S STILL A REASON THAT WE ARE WATCHING CERTAIN THINGS. AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING WE'LL TALK ABOUT LATER, WHAT YOU'RE WATCHING, TO MAKE SURE THAT WE STAY WITHIN OUR REVENUE. BECAUSE JUST BECAUSE WE PASS A BUDGET, UNLESS WE DICTATE SPECIFICALLY WHY WE WANT TO BE OVER REVENUE, WE TRY TO MATCH A REVENUE SO THAT WE'RE NOT LOSING OUR RESERVE. AND THIS YEAR WE HAVE TWO ITEMS THAT WE BUDGETED FOR IN EXCESS OF OUR REVENUES. ONE WAS THE ERP PROJECT, WHICH WILL END UP WITH DOING A LOAN ON, AND THEN WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. AND THEN THE SECOND ONE WAS A CONTRIBUTION TO THE FRONTIER CENTER WAS COMING OUT OF THOSE REFUNDS. WE HAD A ABOUT 4.5 MILLION INCHES RESERVES CAPITAL, WHICH WE'RE PULLING THOSE TWO FUNDS FROM. YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THE BUDGET, ON THE BUDGET SIDE, WHERE WE BUDGETED HERE, 76 MILLION IS THE BUDGET. AND ON THE ON THE REVENUE SIDE, IT'S 73 MILLION. THAT $3 MILLION DIFFERENCE HAS TO DO WITH THAT OVERAGE ON CAPITAL. SO LET'S DO CAPITAL ITEMS. ANY QUESTIONS ON GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES. ALL RIGHT. LET'S TALK ABOUT ECONOMIC INDICATORS. SO I GAVE YOU A TABLE. WE DECIDED NOT TO GO THROUGH A SERIES OF GRAPHS JUST BECAUSE WE JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU A HIGH LEVEL. JUST A QUICK OVERVIEW. THE GO. IN SUMMARY, THE ECONOMY IS SLIGHTLY IMPROVING. WITH THAT BEING SAID, THE ONE ITEM THAT'S NOT LISTED ON HERE THAT WOULD HAVE AN ECONOMIC IMPACT IS TARIFFS. SO THE REASON PART OF THE REASON WHY I MEAN, IF YOU READ THE NEWS, IF YOU'RE IN THE FINANCES, YOU'LL SEE THAT CHAIRMAN POWELL AND THE FED CHAIR HAS BEEN UNDER ATTACK BY THE PRESIDENT AND OTHERS BECAUSE THEY WANT THE THAT INTEREST RATE TO COME DOWN.
ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THEY'RE HOLDING THAT INTEREST RATE IS TO SEE THE EFFECT OF ON TARIFFS.
AND SO THAT WILL BE AN ONGOING BATTLE FOR THE REST OF THIS YEAR. THEY ARE IT IS SPLIT IN THE MIDDLE. THERE IS A THERE'S HALF THE PEOPLE THAT THINK THAT WE SHOULD DO TWO RATE CUTS THIS YEAR, DROPPING THE INTEREST RATE FROM 4.5% DOWN TO 4% OR LOWER 3.75. AND THERE'S HALF THAT SAY WE SHOULD LEAVE THEM WHERE THEY ARE. AND SO YOU CAN PICK YOUR YOUR PARTY TO DECIDE WHICH IS WHICH. UNFORTUNATELY, THAT'S KIND OF THE ENVIRONMENT THAT WE'RE IN. BUT THE OTHER INDICATORS ARE DOING WELL. MAY 2.4% INFLATION. IT'S SLIGHTLY UP FROM 2.1. AND IN MARCH AND APRIL OR APRIL, SO WENT FROM 2.4 TO 2.1 BACK TO 2.4. AGAIN. UNEMPLOYMENT IS AT 4.2%, BUT THEY ARE. THE JUNE NUMBERS JUST RECENTLY CAME OUT, AND I SAW THOSE THIS MORNING. THE UNEMPLOYMENT IS DOWN 4.1 4.1%. ONE THING THAT WE ARE WATCHING IS THE GDP. IT HAD A NEGATIVE.
GDP IN THE IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2025. THE THEORY BEHIND THAT IS THAT PEOPLE WERE ADVANCED BUYING BECAUSE THEY KNEW THE TARIFFS WERE COMING. AND SO THAT'S WHY THE GDP DROPPED. THE QUESTION IS IF PEOPLE'S THEORY WAS RIGHT, WE'LL KNOW THAT YOU'RE HERE IN A COUPLE IN A
[00:40:04]
COUPLE WEEKS. IF THAT THEORY IS RIGHT, GDP SHOULD BOUNCE BACK UP TO WHERE IT WAS. IF NOT, THEN IT WOULD HAVE TWO CONSECUTIVE QUARTERS OF NEGATIVE GDP, WHICH INDICATES THE START OF RECESSION. SO I'M BETTING ON THAT. IT'S TARIFFS THAT DROVE THAT DOWN. SO WE'LL SEE THAT BOUNCE UP. BECAUSE ALL OTHER YOU SEE IF THERE WAS A TARIFF RELATED YOU SEE UNEMPLOYMENT CONTINUE TO RISE AND INFLATION WOULD BE ALSO AFFECTED. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS ON ON ECONOMICS.OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE CURRENT YEAR'S ONE TIME REQUESTS AND THE STATUS OF THOSE. WE HAD AN UPDATE AT THE LAST QUARTERLY COUNCIL MEETING OR QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT.
SO THERE'S NOT MUCH THAT HAS CHANGED ON THOSE. IT WAS ABOUT 750,000 IN REQUESTS THAT WERE FUNDED BY THE GROWTH AND ANNEXATION MONEY LAST YEAR PRIMARILY. SO THE PARKING LOT EXPANSION OR PARKING LOTS AT STATION FOUR, WORK WAS CONTRACTED IN MAY. SO THAT CAME TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. SO THAT'S UNDERWAY. THE NEW FIRE RECORD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS COMPLETED IN FEBRUARY. SO THAT ONE HAS BEEN SPENT. AND IT CAME IN UNDER WHAT WAS PROJECTED. THE FACILITY REPAIR MAINTENANCES AT MUNICIPAL SERVICES WAS JUST KIND OF A PLACEHOLDER FOR THINGS THAT MIGHT COME UP, AND NOTHING HAS BEEN NEEDED YET. THE FISCAL YEAR IS NOT OVER YET, SO WE'LL SEE WHAT COMES OF THAT. PARKS AND RECREATION HAD SOME VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT. TWO OF THOSE HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ALREADY THIS YEAR, AND THEN ONE IS OUT FOR QUOTES. THAT'S THE SIDE BY SIDE HORTICULTURE. THEN POLICE HAD SOME FINGERPRINTING SOFTWARE. THEY PURCHASED THAT BACK IN FEBRUARY. AND THEN PARKS AND REC HAD TWO FURNACES AT THE PINE CREST CLUBHOUSE WAS COMPLETED LAST FALL. THE AQUATIC CENTER BOILER REPLACEMENT WENT OUT FOR BID AND WE GOT NO BIDS. RIGHT.
OKAY, SO PAM HAS AN UPDATE ON THAT ONE. WE DID A WALK THROUGH WITH A VENDOR. WE HAVE A QUOTE AND IT IS WITHIN BUDGET, AND WE EXPECT TO BRING THAT IN LATER THIS MONTH FOR COUNCIL AWARD.
BUT WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY BIDS WHEN WE WENT OUT. SO WE DID GET THE AUTHORIZATION TO BUY THE MARKET. SO YOU SHOULD BE SEEING THAT AT THE END OF THIS MONTH. THANK YOU. GOING TO BE GAS OR GAS OKAY. THE NETTING AND NEW POLES FOR THE DRIVING RANGE AT SAND CREEK WAS COMPLETED IN APRIL. AND THEN THE SHINGLES FOR THE ROOF AT THE SAGE LAKES GOLF SHOP AND CAFE GOT COMPLETED LAST FALL. SO WE HAVE BUDGETED FOR THE BOILER TO GO INTO NEXT YEAR JUST IN CASE. IT'S NOT COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 30TH. AND THEN I BELIEVE A COUPLE OF LITTLE PIECES ARE IF THEY DON'T FINISH NEXT YEAR, THEY'LL ROLL INTO NEXT YEAR, AND THEN THE FUNDING FOR THAT 750,000 IS NOT BEING REPURPOSED FOR ONE TIME REQUESTS. IT'S ROLLING INTO JUST OUR REGULAR BUDGET OPERATIONS FOR NEXT YEAR. ANY QUESTIONS ON THE STATUS OF THOSE ONE TIME REQUESTS? SAY THAT I'M TRYING TO. I WAS LISTENING TO YOU SAID IT'S GONNA IT'S NOT ROLLING INTO OPERATIONS NEXT YEAR. IT'S REMAINING. WE'VE GOT IT SET ASIDE. WE'VE GOT THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY THE 750. SO THIS INTO NOT INTO ONE TIME BUT JUST INTO GENERAL OPERATIONS AT THE TOP LINE OF THE BUDGET. CORRECT.
OKAY. THANK YOU. AND MARK MENTIONED I WAS GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE ITEMS WE'RE KIND OF KEEPING AN EYE ON OF THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR. ONE THING IS OUR ZOO AND FUNLAND. WE'VE JUST STARTED OPEN OR HAVE THE SEASON OPENING IN MAY. THEY'RE AT ABOUT 29% OF THE BUDGET FOR THE YEAR, SO WE'RE KEEPING AN EYE ON IT THROUGH JULY TO SEE IF THEY CAN GET TO HALF THEIR BUDGET, MAKING SURE THAT THEY ARE MEETING THEIR TARGETS. THEY'RE UP ABOUT 17 OR ABOUT 7% FROM LAST YEAR WHERE WE WERE LAST YEAR. SO THAT DOESN'T QUITE GET US TO THE REVENUE TARGETS, BUT WE'RE HOPING WE SEE GOOD ACTIVITY. BUT WE'LL KEEP AN EYE ON THAT ONE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ALL OF OUR PERMIT FEE REVENUES, THAT'S ANOTHER ONE TO KEEP AN EYE ON.
THOSE HAVE KIND OF STAGNATED. SO WE HAD A LOT OF ACTIVITY EARLY IN THE FISCAL YEAR. AND THEN OVER THE SUMMER IT HAS SEEMINGLY SLOWED A BIT. SO WE'RE JUST KEEPING AN EYE ON THAT AS WELL.
IT LOOKS LIKE WE'LL STILL HIT OUR PROJECTED REVENUE TARGET, BUT IF WE COME IN UNDER, THEN WE WANT TO ADJUST OUR CURRENT YEAR AS WELL. OR I MEAN OUR NEXT FISCAL YEAR BUDGET AS WELL.
PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL IS ANOTHER WORD WE'RE JUST KEEPING AN EYE ON OVERTIME. AND THEN JUST ALL THE PUBLIC SAFETY FUNDING FOR POSITIONS. WE HAVE THE NEW ARP POSITIONS IN FIRE.
SO JUST KEEPING AN EYE ON THOSE, MAKING SURE WE HAVE THAT CAPACITY, THE BUDGET FOR THOSE
[00:45:05]
POSITIONS, AND THEN JUST ALL OF OUR RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS, PARKS, PROGRAMS, MAKING SURE THAT WE SINCE THEY'RE SEASONAL, WE KEEP AN EYE ON THEM BECAUSE WE HAVE A LOT OF SPINNING RIGHT AT THE END OF THE YEAR. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE COVERING THOSE. I JUST WANT TO VERY BROOKS IS SAYING WE'RE WATCHING THE REVENUE. OUR PRACTICE IS IF SOMEONE FORECASTS FOR REVENUE, LIKE THEY'RE GOING TO BRING SO MUCH IN ADMISSIONS, IF THEY DON'T, IF WE DON'T SEE A TREND THAT THEY'LL HIT, THAT WE'LL ASK THEM TO CUT THEIR BUDGET TO OFFSET THAT SO THAT IT DOESN'T PUT A BURDEN ON THE REST OF THE BUDGET. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT CUTTING THE BUDGET FOR THIS THIS YEAR, THIS YEAR, NOT NOT YES. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. SO OUR EXPECTATIONS IS THAT THAT'S WHY WE WORK WITH THEM TO BUDGET CONSERVATIVELY BECAUSE IF THEY DON'T HIT THAT THEY HAVE TO MAKE IT UP IN A REDUCTION TO THEIR BUDGET. AND THAT DECISION IS MADE IN JULY. USUALLY THEY DON'T OPEN UNTIL MAY. YEAH. SO YEAH, WE WATCH IT PRETTY CLOSELY. WE GET WE'VE GIVEN THEM BROOKS TO WORK WITH THEM AND GIVE THEM SOME DATES. BUT WE DO THAT TO ALL THE FEE BASED REVENUES TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE AWARE OF THAT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ARE WE READY TO ROLL INTO BUDGET OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS OUR ONE OF OUR FINANCE SUPER BOWLS I KNOW IT'S NOT THAT EXCITING, BUT WE PUT IN A LOT OF WORK ON THE FINANCE TEAM. AND THE DEPARTMENTS HAVE DONE A LOT OF WORK AS WELL. SO I WANTED TO SAY JUST A BIG THANK YOU TO OUR TEAM, BUT ALSO ALL THE DEPARTMENTS. THEY'VE PUT IN A LOT OF DETAIL AND WORK TO THIS BUDGET. THAT MADE IT VERY EASY ON THE FINANCE END TO REVIEW BECAUSE ALL THE DETAILS WAS THERE. SO WE COULD ASK SPECIFIC TARGETED QUESTIONS. WHEN WE HAD QUESTIONS, AND IT MADE IT EASY TO CLEAN UP AND REVIEW, MAKING SURE THINGS WERE IN BALANCE. AND JUST A LOT OF TIME PUT IN ON EVERYBODY'S PART TO GET US TO THIS POINT. I WANTED TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON KIND OF THE PROCESS WE HAD TO GET TO THIS BALANCED BUDGET THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO YOU. SO THE DEPARTMENTS ALL THROUGHOUT MAY PREPARED THEIR BUDGETS AND PUT IN ALL THEIR NUMBERS AND ALL THEIR DETAILS. AND ONCE MAY WAS COMPLETED, WE LOCKED THEM OUT AND STARTED REVIEWING ALL THOSE DETAILS. WE MET WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS TO GO THROUGH AND MAKE SURE WE UNDERSTOOD WHAT WAS IN THE BUDGET, AND THEN CLEANED UP THINGS LIKE MAKING SURE THE GRANTS AND THE CONTRIBUTIONS BALANCED OUT. MERCH PURCHASES WERE THERE, THAT THERE WAS FUNDING THERE TO MAKE THOSE PURCHASES. WE DID SOME OF THOSE TYPE OF CLEANUP ITEMS, MAKING THINGS, MAKING SURE THINGS WERE IN THE RIGHT CATEGORIES SO THAT WE HAD A CLEAN NUMBER TO KIND OF PRESENT TO THE MAYOR. THEN ALL THE DEPARTMENTS MET WITH THE MAYOR TO TALK THROUGH THEIR BUDGETS. AND WHAT CHANGED, WHAT SIGNIFICANT THINGS WERE IN AND OUT OF THEIR BUDGETS. AND AFTER ACCUMULATING ALL OF THOSE DETAILS SPECIFICALLY IN THE GENERAL FUND, WE STILL WERE KIND OF SHORT. IF WE WERE LOOKING AT OUR REVENUES COMING IN. WE HAD ABOUT 2.5 MILLION THAT WE WERE STILL SHORT BECAUSE OF ALL THE REQUESTS THAT HAD COME IN. SO WE WORKED WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS TO CUT BACK. THE KIND OF TARGET WE WORKED ON WAS GETTING EVERYBODY TO ABOUT A 5% INCREASE INSTEAD OF VARIANCES THROUGHOUT THERE. SO WE KIND OF SYSTEMATICALLY WENT THROUGH DEPARTMENT BY DEPARTMENT WHAT THINGS COULD CHANGE, WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS TO CERTAIN THINGS LIKE THE SAFER GRANT FUNDING. GOING AWAY WAS A BIG IMPACT ON FIRES BUDGET. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO JUST SAY, ALL RIGHT, YOU GET TO CUT AN EXTRA 600,000 WHEN THERE'S NOT THAT CAPACITY. IT WOULD BE PEOPLE. SO THOSE ARE THE THINGS WE KIND OF MASSAGED AND LOOKED THROUGH AND WORKED WITH ALL THE DEPARTMENTS TO GET US TO A BALANCED BUDGET THAT YOU'RE SEEING TODAY. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON JUST THE PROCESS THAT WE TOOK TO GET TO THIS POINT BEFORE WE DIVE INTO SOME MORE OF THE ASSUMPTIONS AND DETAILS? YEAH, YEAH, I KNOW I MADE A COMMENT ABOUT THIS EARLIER, BUT, YOU KNOW, BROOKS DOES SUCH A GREAT JOB WITH THE SMOOTH TRANSITION.BUT BUT I WILL TELL YOU, THERE HAD TO BE SOME PRETTY DIFFICULT CHOICES MADE BY SOME OF OUR GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTS, AND IT WAS REALLY A COLLEGIATE TYPE OF SITUATION. IT'S NEVER A GOOD WHEN YOU GET A CALL FROM OUR FINANCE TEAM AND SAY, YOU KNOW, WE NEED YOU TO GO BACK AND LOOK AT YOUR BUDGET. SO JUST REALLY WANT TO, YOU KNOW, THANK THE ACCOUNTANTS FOR WORKING WITH THE DEPARTMENTS, BUT ALSO JUST TO LET THE COUNCIL KNOW THAT WE DID HAVE SOME DEPARTMENTS ON THE GENERAL FUND SIDE THAT MAKES SOME REALLY DIFFICULT CHOICES AND REPRIORITIZING THINGS THAT THEY HAD HAD PLANNED FOR, AND JUST WANT TO THANK THEM FOR WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH OUR ACCOUNTING TEAM, OUR FINANCE TEAM ON ON THE BUDGET. SO WE'RE ABLE TO PRESENT TO YOU TODAY WHAT BROOKS CALLS A BUDGET BALANCE, A BALANCED BUDGET, WHICH IS REALLY WAS A LOT OF WORK ON HER TEAM OVER THE LAST SEVERAL WEEKS. SO I JUST WANTED TO THANK OUR COLLEAGUES FOR WORKING WITH US. I WOULD ADD TO THAT SIMPLY THAT THE WE HAVE NOT THE FINANCE TEAM. AND I AM MARGARET. WE DON'T WE HAVE NOT APPLIED A PHILOSOPHY OF, OH, WE'RE SHORT. WHAT'S THE FAIREST
[00:50:03]
WAY TO DO THIS? EVERYBODY CUT X PERCENT, BECAUSE FLAT CUTS LIKE THAT ARE ACROSS THE BOARD. CUTS LIKE THAT JUST DON'T REALLY MAKE SENSE WITH PROGRAMS. AND SO IT'S THAT'S AN EASY BUTTON TO PUSH.BUT WE DON'T PUSH IT BECAUSE WE DO THE HARDER WORK, WHICH IS DEPARTMENT BY DEPARTMENT, CONVERSATION BY CONVERSATION. WE ARRIVE AT WHAT CAN BE MASSAGED. HOW CAN A PROGRAM CHANGE? HOW MUCH CAN YOU DEFER UNTIL NEXT YEAR. AND WE HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS INSTEAD BECAUSE JUST A STRAIGHT CUT, YOU COULD BE CUTTING OFF HEADS AT THE SAME TIME THAT YOU'RE CUTTING, YOU KNOW, TALL GRASS. YOU JUST NEVER KNOW. EXACTLY. AND I MIXED METAPHORS WEIRDLY IN THAT STATEMENT. BUT MY POINT IS, WE HAVEN'T DONE A STRAIGHT, STRAIGHT ACROSS CUT. AND I THINK IT'S NAIVE TO THINK THAT THAT'S AN EASY, A FAIR WAY TO DO THINGS, BECAUSE IT'S JUST IT DOESN'T WORK. AND I DO WANT TO THANK ALL THE DEPARTMENTS THAT I WORK WITH. IT WAS NOT FUN CALLS TO MAKE, AND I HAD TO START IT WITH, THIS IS NOT GREAT NEWS. SO THEY ALL CAME TO THE TABLE LITERALLY AND FIGURATIVELY, TO COME UP WITH WAYS TO MAKE THOSE REDUCTIONS THAT NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ASSUMPTIONS THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT HERE IN A MINUTE. OKAY. SO WE'LL TALK FIRST ABOUT OUR PROPERTY TAXES. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS IN OUR KICKOFF AND MEETINGS THAT HAVE FOLLOWED, BUT WANTED TO JUST REITERATE THE ASSUMPTIONS. WE'RE GOING INTO THIS BUDGET WITH THE 3% ALLOWABLE INCREASE. IT'S ABOUT A MILLION FOR IS INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET. ALSO, THE GROWTH AND ANNEXATION EXPECTED OF ABOUT 662,000. THAT'S A KNOWN NUMBER THAT WE DO NOT KNOW YET. WE'RE STILL EXPECTING DETAIL FROM THE COUNTY LATER THIS MONTH, AND THEN WE'RE ASSUMING AN INCREASE OR THE USING OF 1% FOR OPERATIONS. THAT'S ABOUT 504,000. AND THEN THERE'S 3% AVAILABLE AS ONE TIME FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS. THAT WOULD BE 1.5 MILLION. THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET. IT WOULD BE UP FOR DISCUSSION IF WE WANT TO USE THAT FOR THOSE ONE TIME CAPITAL REQUESTS. SO I WILL SAY WHEN THIS MAY COME AS A SURPRISE TO SOME, AND NOT AT ALL TO OTHERS, BUT FOREGONE IS NOT NECESSARILY A GIVEN. THIS IS ALWAYS A POLITICAL QUESTION, AND WE IN THE CITY ARE SOMETIMES SENSITIVE TO STATE LEGISLATIVE POLITICS. WE'RE SENSITIVE TO ELECTORAL POLITICS LIKE ANY ANY PLACE. AND UNTIL SOME OF THOSE DISCUSSIONS ARE HAD AND UNTIL THINGS ARE HASHED OUT, I KNOW THAT SOME COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE OF A MIND TO WORK TO FIND MONEY BEFORE YOU TAKE HERBACK. ON THE OTHER HAND, LOGICALLY IT MAKES SENSE TO TAKE FOREGONE, AND I HOPE THAT THE LEGISLATURE AND LEGISLATORS WHO CARE ABOUT REALITY AND NOT JUST THE PLATITUDE OF DON'T RAISE TAXES, I HOPE THEY WOULD DO, IS TAKE A SINCERE LOOK AT HOW WE BUDGET AND COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION THAT IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE FOR US TO TAKE FOR GRANTED THAT OUR BASE HAS TO GROW TO MAKE UP FOR PREVIOUS YEARS, YADDA YADDA YADDA. I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF EXPLAINING THERE, BUT I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME CROSSTALK ON THAT ONE BEFORE BEFORE A FINAL DECISION IS MADE.
AND THAT'S FAIR. IF WE CAN FILL OUR HOLE WITH NON FOREGONE MONEY, WE MAY ATTRACT. YES, NOT FOREGONE WOULD REQUIRE THE COUNCIL ACTION TO END RESOLUTION. I PROBABLY MISUNDERSTOOD, BUT WE CAN'T DO BOTH OF THOSE. YOU CAN'T TAKE THE 1% AND THE 3% IN ONE YEAR.
YOU CAN TAKE THE 3%. THAT'S WHAT YOU TOOK, RIGHT? YOU CAN. AS LONG AS YOU DON'T GO OVER THE 8% CAP, YOU COULD TAKE BOTH IN ONE YEAR. YEAH. THE DIFFERENCES IS THE 1% FOREGONE IS ONGOING AND WE DON'T HAVE TO GIVE IT BACK. WE'RE THE 3% IS FOR ONE TIME CAPITAL PROJECTS. ONCE THE CAPITAL PROJECTS COMPLETE, THE MONEY GOES AWAY. BUT AS LONG AS WE DON'T GO OVER THE 8% CAP, WE COULD, WE COULD. WE COULD DO BOTH. I'M SORRY. CAN I ASK FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE 8% CAP? IS THAT DOLLARS JUST PRIOR YEAR TO BUDGET YEAR? SO IT INCLUDES ANY FUNDS FROM ANNEXATIONS AND ALL THAT. SO ALL THAT GOES INTO THAT POT OF 8%. WE'VE NEVER REALLY PRACTICED THE MATH ON THIS ONE.
IT'S TO GET TO THE 8%. IT'S LAST YEAR'S LEVY TIMES 8%. THAT'S YOUR MAX. AND SO WHAT GOES INTO THE MAKING OF THAT IS YOUR 3% STATUTORILY 1% FOREGONE AND YOUR GROSS ANNEXATION. THERE'S ONLY BEEN A HANDFUL OF TIMES IN THE LAST 30 YEARS WHERE WE'VE HIT 8%. SO THE 3% CAPITAL PROJECTS
[00:55:01]
IS NOT PART OF THAT 8%. IT IS. SO ON THIS SCREEN, WE'RE SHOWING SEVEN OF THE 8%. RIGHT? OKAY.WELL ACTUALLY IT WOULD BE REALLY CLOSE TO 8% IF WE IF WE TAKE 3% STATUTORY, 3% CAPITAL, 1% FOREGONE, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO TAKE THE FULL GROWTH AND ANNEXATION. OKAY. YOU CAN TAKE LESS THAN 3% THOUGH. YOU CAN. YES. SO YEAH, ON THE DETAILS ON THE PROPERTY TAXES, THE THINGS INCLUDED ARE THE 3% ALLOWABLE INCREASE, THE GROWTH IN ANNEXATION AND THE 1% FOREGONE.
WE DID NOT INCLUDE ONE TIME FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, BUT THAT'S UP FOR DISCUSSION. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE AWARE OF THAT POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE. IS THERE AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT PERCENTAGE WE'RE AT WITH THOSE THREE? IT'S A LITTLE OVER SEVEN. OKAY. SO WE'RE ALREADY OKAY. 1% IS ABOUT HALF A MILLION OKAY. OKAY. CONTINUING ON OUR REVENUE EXPECTATIONS, THIS IS UPDATED NUMBERS FROM WHEN WE DID OUR KICKOFF. SO GENERAL FUND STATE SHARED REVENUES ARE DOWN AN ESTIMATED 168,000 FROM THE CURRENT YEAR. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT LESS OF AN AMOUNT AS WE WERE PREDICTED, ABOUT 400,000. WE WENT A LITTLE LESS CONSERVATIVE THAN OUR INITIAL ESTIMATIONS, JUST BASED ON WHAT'S BEEN COMING IN. SO WE BELIEVE WE'LL BE ON SOLID FOOTING TO ESTIMATE A LITTLE BIT BETTER THAN WE WERE ORIGINALLY PROJECTING. THE STREET SHARED REVENUE IS UP ABOUT 73,000 FROM THE CURRENT YEAR PROJECTIONS. THE OTHER BIG CHANGE IS ARE SWITCHING. WE'RE CHANGING TO DIRECTLY CHARGING FOR SERVICES TO OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS. THOSE ARE THE ITEMS, LIKE WASTEWATER, WILL BE PAYING DIRECTLY FOR. JUST STORMWATER. YES. THANK YOU. STORMWATER THAT PREVIOUSLY HAS BEEN PAID FOR BY STREETS OR BY PARKS. SANITATION IS TAKING ON THE STREETS SWEEPING FUNCTION, AND THEN POWER IS TAKING ON TRAFFIC LIGHTS AND STREET LIGHTS. THE OPERATIONAL SIDE, AS WELL AS THE CAPITAL SIDE OF THOSE FUNCTIONS, AS WELL AS PAYING DIRECTLY TO PARKS FOR MAINTENANCE OF THAT RIVER CORRIDOR. THINGS WITHIN THE RECREATION PLAN FOR POWER, SO THAT THAT PIECE OF IT IS ABOUT 3.1 MILLION. SO THAT'S A CHANGE AND A SHIFT IN THE WAY THAT WE'RE ALLOCATING THOSE COSTS.
SO, SO THE TIMING OF THE GENERAL FUND REVENUES, IF YOU REMEMBER EVERY MAY WE GET WHAT THEY CALL THE BLUE BOOK FROM AIC. AND THERE'S TABLES IN THERE THAT GIVE US THE ESTIMATES THAT WE USE TO PREPARE OUR BUDGET. THE FIRST DRAFT THAT CAME OUT FROM ASC HAD A LITTLE BIT OF A PROBLEMS ON SOME NUMBERS. IT SOUNDED LIKE THEY CARRIED OVER FROM LAST YEAR. SO WE ACTUALLY GOT A NEW BLUE BOOK POSTED. IT IS IN YOUR COUNCIL DRIVE IF YOU'D LIKE TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT.
BUT THAT'S THERE'S TABLES IN THAT THAT WE USE TO HELP DEVELOP OUR REVENUE SIDE. SO I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF TALK TO YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE TIMING OF WHY WE GET SOMETHING. AFTER WE HAD OUR WORKSHOP IN APRIL. CAN YOU TELL ME MAYBE PAM AND MARK EVEN MORE SO THAN BROOKS, BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN HERE LONGER. DOES THE AIC BLUE BOOK DO THOSE NUMBERS BEAR OUT MOST OF THE TIME, OR ARE THEY WILDLY? DO THEY FLUCTUATE WILDLY FROM WHAT WE'RE GIVEN? BECAUSE THE FACT THAT SOME THAT THERE WERE SOME ERRORS THIS YEAR COULD BE A JUST SIMPLE STAFF KIND OF, YOU KNOW, NEW STAFF GETTING MESSED UP ON JUST THE MECHANICS OF POSTING SOMETHING. BUT IN TERMS OF HOW THEY CRUNCH NUMBERS OR HOW THEY AGGREGATE THE NUMBERS, HAS THAT BEEN QUALITY WORK OVER THE YEARS? IT IS AFFECTED BY THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE. AND SO. SOME YEARS THEY'RE REALLY CLOSE. SOME YEARS THEY'VE BEEN WAY OFF LEADING INTO BEFORE COVID, WE WERE IN AN ECONOMIC BOOM. THE NUMBERS WERE LOW. WE WERE GETTING MORE THAN THEY WERE THAT WERE STATED POST COVID. THEY WERE HIGH. WE WERE GETTING LESS. IN FACT, ONE YEAR WE CUT OUR BUDGET BASED ON JUST $1 MILLION THAT THEY THAT THEY HAD OVERESTIMATED ON SALES TAX. AND SO IT REALLY DEPENDS ON THE ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT, BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO PREDICTING THOSE IN THE FUTURE BEFORE. AND SO WHAT WE WHAT WE DO IS WE TAKE THIS CURRENT YEAR BLUE BOOK THAT WE GET EVERYTHING BLUE BOOK, THE BUDGET BOOK FROM ASC AND COMPARE IT TO LAST YEAR. AND SO WE'LL SAY, OKAY, LAST YEAR THEY BUDGETED I'D SAY, YOU KNOW 7 MILLION FOR SALES TAX. BUT THIS YEAR IN THEIR NEW BOOK THEY'RE ONLY BUDGETING 6.5. WE TAKE NOTICE OF THOSE THINGS SO THAT WE CAN ADJUST. WE TAKE THAT VARIANCE AND APPLY IT TO THE CURRENT YEAR. SO WE DISCOUNT IT. SO WE FOLLOW THE TREND OF WHAT'S
[01:00:06]
ACTUALLY HAPPENING. THANK YOU. SO RATHER THAN JUST, YOU KNOW, PLACEHOLDER THE NUMBERS THAT COME RIGHT OUT OF THE BLUE BOOK, WE ACTUALLY DO. WE USE IT AS A TOOL AS MARK KIND OF DESCRIBED FROM MORE OF AN ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVE, BUT IT IS A TOOL THAT WE USE IN OUR TOOLBOX TO DEVELOP OUR REVENUE EXPECTATIONS. AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, I HAVE NOT EVER VERIFIED WHETHER THEY ARE. I DON'T THINK THEY'RE DOING THEIR OWN MATH. I THINK THEY'RE PUSHING, PASSING ALONG, THEY'RE AGGREGATING AND PASSING ALONG NUMBERS THAT COME FROM THE AGENCIES. YES, THEY'RE PASSING ALONG. THEY'RE NOT DOING THEM THEMSELVES. SOME CASES THEY HAVE IN SOME AREAS, BUT MOST OF THE TIME IT'S A PASS THROUGH. THANK YOU. DOES EVERYBODY KNOW WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? I MEAN COUNCIL MEMBERS, ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH FLIPPING THROUGH THAT BOOK AT SOME POINT? THANKS.OKAY. WANTED TO TALK A BIT ABOUT SOME OF THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO SOME OF OUR FEES THAT WILL BE PROPOSED FOR OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS ARE EXPECTING TO RAISE FEES BY 3%. MONTHLY SERVICE FEES GOING UP 5%. WASTEWATER, THE MAIN CONNECTION FEE GOING UP 5%, AND THEN SANITATION. MONTHLY FEES WENT UP 5%. FOR OUR POWER. IT'S GOT, DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF SERVICE, VARYING RANGES OF 2 TO 10%, THINGS FOR THEIR BASE CHARGES VERSUS THEIR DEMAND OR SERVICE CHARGES ANYWHERE FROM 2 TO 10%, MOST MORE LIKE FOUR AND SIX. BUT THERE'S A WIDE RANGE, SO YOU'LL SEE THOSE IN THE DETAILS. WHEN WE SHOW THE PROPOSED FEE CHANGES, THEN OUR FIBER RANGES SIMILARLY 3 TO 9% FOR THE VARIOUS MONTHLY CHARGES.
AIRPORT IS PROPOSING TO CHANGE THEIR CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE, RAISING IT FROM $4 TO $6. SO THAT'S FOR THE CAR RENTAL FEES THAT GET ADDED ON WHEN YOU RENT A CAR. THAT FEE IS EXPECTED TO GO UP. AND THEN JUST OTHER VARIOUS CHANGES THAT ARE CLEAN UP FOR THE MOST PART, OR SPLITTING OUT FEES IN DIFFERENT WAYS. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON THOSE FEE CHANGES? COUNCIL MEMBERS? BECAUSE I WAS NOT I DIDN'T COULDN'T ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE AUDIO OR I WAS IN THE AIR AND I MISSED THE BUDGET PRESENTATION. DID YOU IN THE AIRPORT BUDGET PRESENTATION TALK ABOUT THAT.
THAT 50% INCREASE, YOU'RE PRETTY COMFORTABLE WITH ALL OF THAT. GREAT. OKAY. THANK YOU WITH VERIFYING. OKAY. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR EXPENSE SIDE. WAIT WAIT WAIT. WILL YOU GO BACK THEN. YEAH. THE REVENUE EXPECTATIONS THE REVENUE SHOWS UP ON THE BUDGET AS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT LAST YEAR WAS. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE WAS ANOTHER. SO VARIOUS OTHERS IN CLEANUP. IS, IS THAT THE EXTRA FUND BALANCE THAT YOU TALK TO THAT IN A MINUTE. OKAY. LIKE THAT'S NOT MINOR. SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WASN'T VARIOUS OTHERS.
YES OKAY. SO I HAVE THAT ACTUALLY WAY LATER. BUT I CAN TALK BRIEFLY ABOUT THAT OKAY.
THAT'S OKAY. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WASN'T JUST YEAH. SO THAT'S THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGE THIS YEAR, WHAT WE'VE ADDED INTO THE BUDGET AND WE'VE HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT ALREADY. SO YOU'RE NOT ALONE IN THAT. WE HAVE ADDED IN AN ESTIMATED BEGINNING FUND BALANCE. SO THAT'S ASSUMING CURRENT YEAR'S BUDGET. IF WE STICK TO OUR BUDGET, WHAT SHOULD WE HAVE LEFT OVER FROM WHAT HAS ROLLED FORWARD FROM YEAR TO YEAR. SO OUR BEGINNING FUND BALANCE IS ESTIMATED IN THERE SO THAT IT'S THERE AS A RESOURCE AVAILABLE THAT'S FUNDING SOME OF OUR CURRENT OR OUR FUTURE YEAR EXPENDITURES. THEN ON THE EXPENSE SIDE, OUR RESERVES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED. SO YOU'LL SEE RESERVES FOR FUTURE CAPITAL RESERVES FOR RATE STABILIZATION IN POWER, THE FUTURE CAPITAL HAS OUR LIKE MURPH, ACCUMULATED RESOURCES AS WELL AS SET ASIDE FUNDING IN SOME OF OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS THAT ARE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS. THERE'S ALSO THE RESERVE FOR THE SELF-INSURANCE THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATING, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH SAVINGS FOR HEALTH INSURANCE. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE A RESERVE FOR DEBT SERVICE THAT'S REQUIRED FOR DEBT THAT WE'VE ISSUED. SO IT'S ABOUT A MILLION THAT HAS TO BE SAVED AND SET ASIDE SO THAT WE KNOW WE CAN MAKE OUR DEBT PAYMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR. SO ALL OF THOSE RESERVES HAVE BEEN PUT INTO THE BUDGET AT THE EXPENDITURE SIDE TO SHOW THAT CAPACITY THAT HAS BEEN HELD WITH A LOT OF OUR BEGINNING FUND BALANCE IS NOT AVAILABLE TO SPEND. IT'S BEING HELD FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES. SO IT'S TO SHOW THAT IN THE BUDGET SO WE CAN THAT'S A THAT'S A BIG CONVERSATION LATER THAT WE CAN DISCUSS WHETHER OR NOT WE WANT TO DO THAT OKAY OKAY. PERFECT.
AND THEN ALSO CONTINGENCY IS IN THERE WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY THE NET OF THOSE THE TO MAKE THE REST OF THE BUDGET BALANCE OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT BEFORE WE GO IN MORE DETAIL. NO.
[01:05:04]
WE'LL GO INTO MORE DETAIL ON THAT. THAT ONE HAS THAT ONE HAS MAJOR IMPLICATIONS THOUGH. SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WASN'T IN THE CLEANUP. BULLET OKAY. YEAH. THAT'S NOT THE CLEANUP OKAY. OKAY. SO ON OUR EXPENDITURE SIDE, OUR PERSONNEL COST ASSUMPTIONS, THESE HAVE NOT CHANGED MUCH FROM THE KICKOFF, BUT WANTED TO REITERATE WHAT WE HAVE ASSUMED IN THE BUDGET. SO WE'VE INCLUDED THE STEP AND GRADE WAGE INCREASES FOR OUR EMPLOYEES. THOSE ARE THE PERFORMANCE BASED INCREASES. THEN EMPLOYEE ADJUSTMENT FOR POWER AT 6%. AND THEN EVERYONE ELSE IS A 3% INCREASE. THAT WAS DECIDED BACK AT THE BUDGET KICKOFF. THEN OUR INSURANCE INCREASES. HEALTH INSURANCE IS AN INCREASE OF 9.9%. WE'RE ASSUMING THE SAME EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER SPLIT AS OUR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR. OUR DENTAL INSURANCE. WE HAVE ASSUMED 20% IN THE BUDGET. WE JUST GOT THE ACTUAL NUMBERS THAT IT'S ACTUALLY COMING IN AT 4%, WHICH, YES, WHICH IS GREAT, BUT IT ACTUALLY HELPS. WE HAD A LITTLE ERROR ON OUR SIDE IN FINANCE OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE SPLIT NOT GETTING IN THERE CORRECTLY. SO THOSE TWO THAT SAVINGS THERE KIND OF OFFSETS THE ERROR THAT WE MADE ON THAT EMPLOYER SPLIT. YEAH. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION ON THAT. YES. IF YOU LOOK ON PAGE IT'S THE SUMMARY PAGE 37 ON BENEFITS. AND THE BUDGET IN THE BUDGET BOOK. SORRY, THE NUMBER THAT IS SHOWN FOR BENEFITS FOR LAST YEAR IS 33,000,300, 386.BUT THE BUMP UP IS ONLY 200 EXTRA THOUSAND DOLLARS. SO I THINK IT SHOULD BE. LIKE IT SHOULD GO TO 36 EIGHT, 26 AT LEAST. I JUST THINK THAT THERE'S SOMETHING YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. YEAH, LOOK AT THAT ONE. BECAUSE I MEAN SALARIES AND WAGES. AND THEN IT JUST SAYS BENEFITS. AND IT JUMPED FROM 26 TO 33 BETWEEN 24 TO 25. BUT THEN FROM 25 TO 26 IT'S ONLY UP $200,000. AND THAT'S PART OF OUR PROOF READING. GOING BACK ON THE SECOND DRAFT. LET ME. SORRY. I MEAN, IT'S JUST IT'S JUST LIKE ONE OF THOSE COMMENTS TO MAKE IN THE, IN THE AND SOMETIMES WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THEY'RE GRAVITY. SOMETIMES IT WILL NOT PULL OUT. OH YEAH. DECIMAL POINTS. AND MARK'S GOING TO ADD A LITTLE BIT TO THAT TOO I WAS LOOKING AT. BUT IT'S LIKELY DUE TO THAT.
IT'S JUST IT'S JUST LIKE A SOMETHING TO NOTICE AS WE'RE GOING ON IT. IT'S UNDER THE BUDGET SUMMARY PAGE 37. I WILL POINT OUT SORRY. IT'S NOT IT'S YOU'RE PROBABLY RIGHT. IT'S SOMETHING WE WOULD DO AND SOMETHING THAT MIGHT NOT BE RIGHT. BUT I WILL JUST POINT OUT IT'S NOT MATHEMATICAL. IT'S NOT 9.9% HIGHER THAN LAST YEAR BECAUSE EMPLOYEES HAVE A IMPACT ON THE MIXTURE OF WHAT THAT IS. SO NOT ALL PLANS ARE THE SAME VALUE. OKAY. SO AS WE AND WE'RE COMING INTO WE PLAY THIS FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD GAME EVERY YEAR BECAUSE OPEN ENROLLMENT IS AFTER THE BUDGET IS DONE. AND SO OPEN ENROLLMENT DOES HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE BUDGET BECAUSE PEOPLE CHANGE PLANS. AND SO WE TRY TO ACCOUNT A LITTLE BIT FOR THAT. BUT. THAT'S ONE NUANCE IS IT'S NOT WE'RE NOT THE SAME. YEAH. IT'S JUST BIG ENOUGH TO CATCH MY EYE. YEAH. NO.
ABSOLUTELY. SO OKAY THAT WAS ALL JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT ONE IS DOUBLE CHECKED. YEP. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO VISION IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE 20% AND THEN NO PERCY RATE CHANGE EXPECTED FOR THIS YEAR. HAVE WE THOUGHT TO ON PERCY RATHER THAN TAKE A PUNCH IN THE FACE IN THE YEARS WHEN THEY DO HAVE AN INCREASE AND THEN BREATHE A SIGH OF RELIEF IN THE YEARS WHEN THEY DON'T HAVE, WE THOUGHT TO TAKE SORT OF A TEN YEAR LOOK AND KIND OF SET ASIDE A ROLLING AVERAGE AMOUNT THAT THAT WOULD HELP US TO BE READY WHEN THERE IS AN INCREASE SO THAT IT NEVER HURTS US. OR IS THAT TOO MUCH WORK FOR SOMETHING THAT WE'VE MANAGED TO SURVIVE ALL THESE YEARS? YOU'RE LIKE BASICALLY SAYING, ARE WE WORKING, PERCY? YEAH. WE'VE HAD THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT WE HAVE THAT KIND OF DISCUSSION ON, INCLUDING COMPENSATED ABSENCES FOR THE SAME IDEA, WHICH IS A MUCH HIGHER. YES. WE'VE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THAT IN THE PAST, BUT IT'S A LOW COST VERSUS THE A
[01:10:05]
BIGGER ONE WOULD BE COMPENSATED ABSENCES. AND BEFORE THAT ONE IS A BUILDING REPLACEMENT FUND.THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS WE NEED TO GET TO, BUT BOTH THE TWO BIG ONES ARE THE BUILDING BUILDINGS AND THEN COMPENSATED HOUSES. I COULDN'T AGREE MORE ON BUILDING, PARTICULARLY SINCE. THANKS.
OKAY. SOME OTHER ASSUMPTIONS ARE DEBT OBLIGATIONS ARE IN THE BUDGET. WE HAVE A DEBT PAYMENT FOR OUR POLICE COMPLEX. THAT'S 2 MILLION EVERY YEAR. OUR POWER REVENUE BONDS. WE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT SERIES OF DEBT THAT WE'VE ISSUED. 2021 WAS FOR TRANSMISSION, 2024 WAS FOR THIS PEAKING PLANT. SO THESE TWO DEBT ISSUANCES HAVE A MILLION AND A HALF IN 3.8 MILLION IN DEBT SERVICE. THEN OUR WASTEWATER LOAN FOR 1,000,001. AND THEN WE HAVE A NEW DEBT ISSUANCE EXPECTED FOR THE AIRPORT TERMINAL OF 17 MILLION. SO WE'RE EXPECTING LOADED IN SOME BUDGET DEBT SERVICE FOR THAT AS WELL. BUT WE. I'M SORRY, I'M MISSING SOMETHING ON THE POWER REVENUE BONDS BECAUSE WE'RE IMPLANTS A LOT MORE THAN 3.8 MILLION. THAT'S THE DEBT SERVICE, NOT THE OH JUST THE DEBT SERVICE, JUST THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYMENTS OR THOSE DEBT SERVICE.
EARLIER. SORRY FOR THE YEAR. FOR THE YEAR. SO WE'VE ALSO INCLUDED OUR LEASE OBLIGATIONS, OUR POLICE VEHICLES. WE HAVE ABOUT A MILLION AND A HALF BUDGETED FOR PAYMENTS ON OUR POLICE VEHICLE LEASES. THAT INCLUDES 15 NEW VEHICLES FOR THIS UPCOMING YEAR. AND THEN FIRE EQUIPMENT HAS ONE THAT HAS DROPPED OFF FOR FIRE EQUIPMENT. SO IT'S GONE DOWN TO JUST A LITTLE OVER 300,000 FOR THE YEAR. AND THOSE LEASE PAYMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN PRIOR YEAR'S DEBT SERVICE. RIGHT? RIGHT. THEY'VE JUST BEEN IN CURRENT OPERATING OR MURPH EXPENDITURES IN PREVIOUS YEARS.
WE'VE BEEN BREAKING THOSE OUT, PUTTING THEM IN DEBT. FOR OUR OTHER OPERATIONAL COSTS. KIND OF THE DISCUSSION WE HAD ABOUT TRYING TO GET WITHIN OUR BUDGET TO BE BALANCED, WE'RE TRYING TO HOLD STEADY ON OUR CURRENT OPERATING COSTS, OUR RISK ALLOCATION TO DEPARTMENTS INCREASED A BIT BECAUSE OF THE PREMIUM, INCREASING OUR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND FUEL COSTS CITYWIDE WENT UP 5%. ASSUMPTION UTILITIES FOR OUR POWER, WATER, SEWER, SANITATION BILLS, THOSE WE ASSUMED AN INCREASE OF ABOUT 5%. BASED ON THE RATES WE KNOW WE'RE PLANNING TO INCREASE. AND THEN JUST OTHER OPERATIONAL COSTS HAVE BEEN HIGHER TO FUEL THOSE TYPES OF THINGS. WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP THAT AT ABOUT 5% INCREASE. MURPH. WE CONTINUED TO HOLD STEADY ON MURPH FUNDING THOSE REPLACEMENTS THAT NEED TO BE FUNDED SO THAT WE HAVE MONEY WHEN THE TIME TO REPLACE COMES OUR INTERDEPARTMENTAL CHARGES AND COST ALLOCATED SERVICES.
AGAIN, TRYING TO HOLD STEADY, WE LEFT THE COST ALLOCATION PLAN AS IS. WE DID ADJUST THE AMOUNTS IN IT SO THAT IT REFLECTED THOSE CUTS WE MADE AND REDUCTIONS WE MADE TO BUDGET. SO IT WAS A LITTLE MORE IN ALIGNMENT WITH WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY BUDGETING FOR THOSE DEPARTMENTS INSTEAD OF PREVIOUSLY, WE'VE JUST DONE A 5% INCREASE OVER A 3% INCREASE OVER THE PRIOR YEAR'S BUDGET, BUT WE TRIED TO REALIGN IT WITH OUR ACTUAL BUDGETS THIS YEAR BECAUSE OF THOSE REDUCTIONS THAT WE'RE MAKING. INTERNAL OBLIGATIONS. WE PREVIOUSLY HAVE HAD THE FIRE STATION PAYBACK WHEN WE BUILT FIRE STATION ONE, THE PROPERTY TAXES WERE BEING ALLOCATED ABOUT 400,000 EVERY YEAR TO REPAY THAT TO THE GENERAL FUND. SO WE ARE THIS IS THE LAST YEAR OF IT. WE'RE ROLLING THAT BACK INTO THE GENERAL FUND. SO IT'S ABSORBED BY THE GENERAL FUND. AND THEN THOSE PROPERTY TAX FUNDS WILL STAY WITH THE GENERAL FUND. GOLF DID AN IRRIGATION PROJECT. SO THEY ARE REPLENISHING THE TURF THAT THEY USED ABOUT 300,000 EVERY YEAR. THEY HAVE ANOTHER FIVE AND A HALF YEARS OF REPAYMENT LEFT THERE. THEN FIBER RECEIVED A LOAN FROM POWER TO EXPAND OUR FIBER NETWORK. AND THEY'RE STARTING THAT REPAYMENT PLAN, PLANNING ON 1.25 MILLION NEXT YEAR. THAT LOAN IS A LITTLE OVER 19 MILLION PLUS INTEREST, SO RETAIN THAT OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT 10 TO 15, 20 YEARS.
WE FINALIZED ALL THE DETAILS OF THE REPAYMENT PLAN THAT. THERE WILL BE ONE MORE LOAN BEING PRESENTED IN THE COMING MONTHS WHEN WE FINALIZE THE ERP REPAYMENT PAYBACK. SO THAT ONE'S COMING. PROBABLY COMING TO THE END OF THIS YEAR. AND ALSO FOR THE FRONTIER CENTER. SO AS WE CONSTRUCT THE FRONTIER CENTER, THE FRONTIER BANK CONTRIBUTIONS WERE OVER THE COURSE OF FIVE YEARS. BUT WE'RE DOING THE PROJECT RIGHT NOW. SO THERE WILL BE DEPENDING ON HOW IT SHAKES OUT. I THINK IT'S ABOUT A MILLION AND A HALF. I BELIEVE IT'S PLANNED THAT WE'LL HAVE TO
[01:15:04]
BORROW UNTIL, IN ANTICIPATION OF THE REST OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS COMING IN OVER THOSE THE REST OF THE FIVE YEARS. SO I THINK WE HAD TWO YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION.AND THAT'S ALSO OUR PLEDGES AND DONATIONS. A LOT OF THE PLEDGES CAME IN WITH A FIVE YEAR OVER A PAYMENT OF OVER FIVE YEARS, OR A DONATION, IF YOU WILL, OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD. SO WE'VE GOT THAT INCORPORATED IN AS WELL. WILL WE, WILL WE CONSIDER OUR INTEREST THAT WE INCUR BY PAYING THOSE THINGS UPFRONT AND NOT RECEIVING THE MONEY YET AS OUR CONTRIBUTIONS? ALSO, IT DEPENDS ON WHAT SOURCE IT COMES FROM. OKAY, IF WE FUNDED OUT OF GENERAL FUND, WE WOULDN'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO DO THAT. IF WE FUND IT OUT OF AN ENTERPRISE FUND, WE WOULD HAVE TO DO THAT.
AND WE HAVE A POLICY ON THE ENTERPRISE SIDE OF HOW WE DO THAT. OKAY. ARE WE GOOD TO CONTINUE OR DO WE NEED TO BREAK ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. OH SO CONTINUE. ARE WE MOVING TO A DIFFERENT AGENDA. BUT IT BREAKS. I WAS THINKING THAT WHEN YOU WERE FINISHED HERE, WE WOULD TAKE A BREAK FOR DARREN CARTER. OKAY. WE STILL HAVE MORE. IS EVERYBODY OKAY WITH THAT? YEAH.
ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF THOSE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES. WE'LL BE GOING THROUGH DEPARTMENT BY DEPARTMENT ESSENTIALLY FOR WHAT THE DIFFERENT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET ARE. SO FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL'S BUDGET, THE DAYCARE LICENSES HAVE BEEN CHANGED AT THE STATE LEVEL. THE CITIES ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED TO PROCESS THOSE. SO THE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES EXPECTED FOR THOSE HAVE BEEN TAKEN OUT OF THE BUDGET GOING FORWARD. WE'VE ALSO BUDGETED FOR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF GIFT THAT IS FUNDING TOWARDS OR WE SEND MONEY TO TRIFIDA TO THEN SEND BACK TO US TO FUND OUR MATCH FOR THE GIFT PROGRAM. SO THIS YEAR WE SHOULD BE EXHAUSTING ALL OF THE CARES MONEY, THE ARPA FUNDING FOR CARES FUNDING FOR TRANSIT, AND WE'LL START MOVING INTO THE GRANTS THAT ACTUALLY REQUIRE MATCH. IT'S BEEN 100% FUNDED TO DATE, SO THE CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE PAST THAT WE HAVE MADE ARE ACCUMULATING SO THAT THEY HAVE GRANT MATCH AVAILABLE AND READY TO GO FOR THE UPCOMING GRANTS THAT WE HAVE. SO THAT 410 IS STILL CONTINUING SUPPORT OF TRANSIT. THAT'S WHAT THE EXPECTED AMOUNT ONGOING TO BE ABLE TO FUND THE MATCH REQUIRED TO KEEP OPERATING GIFT WAS THAT WAS THAT LAST YEAR'S AMOUNT TO CORRECT FOR TEN IS WHAT WE DID PREVIOUSLY IT WAS 160,000. BUT WE HAVE TO OKAY. NOW FOR TEN WAS THE SAME OKAY. YEAH. MUNICIPAL SERVICES THERE IS A REQUESTED NEW FTE FOR UTILITY BILLING. THAT'S A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE THAT WOULD BE FUNDED BY ALL OF THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS, THE UTILITY FUNDS. THE ERP IMPLEMENTATION IS A HUGE PROJECT UNDERTAKEN UNDER MUNICIPAL SERVICES. SO A LOT OF OUR IT AND FINANCE STAFF DEDICATED TO THAT. WE'VE ESTIMATED 3 MILLION IN THE BUDGET AND ABOUT 2.5 MILLION IN CARRYFORWARD, JUST NOT KNOWING EXACTLY HOW FAR WE'RE GOING TO GET BY SEPTEMBER 30TH IN BILLINGS, GIVING OURSELVES A CAPACITY THAT WOULD JUST ROLL FORWARD FROM THIS YEAR'S 3 MILLION EXPECTED. ALSO INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET IS A BIG CHANGE OF THE ANNUAL LICENSE AND MAINTENANCE OF WORKDAY AND SPRY POINT AT 618,000. THAT IS NEW IN THE BUDGET THIS YEAR FOR THAT SYSTEM. ALSO, WITH MUNICIPAL SERVICES, WE HAVE THE FRONTIER CENTER CONSTRUCTION GOING ON, THE CONTRACT UNDERWAY, AND YOU PROBABLY HAVE SEEN THE CONSTRUCTION GOING ON. IT'S PRETTY NEAT IN PROCESS THAT'S EXPECTED TO COMPLETE NEXT SPRING OR FEBRUARY OF NEXT YEAR. AND THAT IS PRIMARILY FUNDED BY DONATIONS. WE ALSO HAVE SOME ARPA FUNDING, AND THEN THE GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTION AS WELL. FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THEY ARE REQUESTING A NEW FTE AS A PLANNER. A LOT OF, I WILL SAY, A LOT OF OUR DEPARTMENTAL REQUESTS FOR NEW FTE, KNOWING IT'S A TIGHT BUDGET. MOST OF THEM KNOW THEY PROBABLY MAY NOT GET THE POSITION, BUT ALSO JUST WANTING TO DEMONSTRATE THE NEED THAT IS THERE SO THAT IT'S NOT THREE YEARS DOWN THE LINE AND YOU'VE NEVER HEARD ANY NEEDS. AND ALL OF A SUDDEN IT'S LIKE WE'RE IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION.
WE NEED THIS POSITION. SO A LOT OF THESE REQUESTS, IF THEY'RE NOT ALREADY FUNDED BY SOME SOURCE, ARE JUST MAKING SURE YOU'RE AWARE OF THE NEEDS. EVEN IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO FUND THOSE THREE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. ALSO IN THIS, THEY RUN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT, THE CDBG GRANT, AND THAT EVERY FIVE YEARS YOU HAVE TO UPDATE THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN. AND WITH THAT, THEY NEED TO DO A FIVE YEAR HOUSING STUDY. AND SO THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THEIR BUDGET TO FUND THAT STUDY. IT'S ABOUT $68,000. AND THEN WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT IT. BUT THEY'RE EXPECTING KIND OF STAGNANT REVENUES. SO WE'RE LEAVING THOSE RELATIVELY CONSERVATIVE SIMILAR TO THIS CURRENT YEAR. FOR POLICE. THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGE THERE IS
[01:20:06]
THEY'RE PAUSING THAT PLAN OF ADDING ADDITIONAL OFFICERS NOT APPLYING FOR THE COPS. GRANT, AGAIN, LOOKING AT THE HORIZON OF WE'RE IN A TIGHT BUDGET YEAR, THEY ARE PLANNING ON THE 15 VEHICLES IN A LEASE THIS YEAR, CONTINUING ON THEIR REPLACEMENT OF VEHICLES. AND THEN ALSO THEY'RE PUTTING IN THERE A NEW FTE REQUEST FOR A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER. THEY'RE APPROACHED BY ONE OF THE SCHOOLS TO THAT SCHOOL, THE TOURISTS. YES, ALL TOURISTS TO FUND A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER. THEY GENERALLY FUND 70% OF THE OFFICER. SO THAT WOULD BE PARTIALLY FUNDED. BUT IT'S AGAIN, IN THE REQUESTS FOR FUNDING OF A NEW EMPLOYEE. FOR OUR FIRE EMS TEAM. WE'VE GOT A NEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS GRANT FOR A LOT OF EQUIPMENT. CHIEF MAY BE ABLE TO TALK MORE ON THAT, BUT IT'S 2.3 MILLION OR 2.5 MILLION IN A GRANT. SO WE HAVE OFFSETTING GRANT REVENUES AND EXPENSES IN THE BUDGET. THEY'RE ALSO TAKING ON THE AIRPORT FIREFIGHTING SERVICE. THAT'S SIX FIREFIGHTERS IN THE BUDGET LAST YEAR, ESTIMATED AS A NEW HIRE AT THE END OF THE YEAR. AND SO THAT CONTRACT YOU'VE GIVEN NOTICE TO THE EXISTING PROVIDER OR SORRY, AIRPORT TO THE EXISTING PROVIDER, AND THAT'S INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET FOR AIRPORT FUNDING. THOSE POSITIONS. WE ALSO HAVE THE SAFER GRANT ENDING. THAT'S ABOUT 1.1 MILLION NOT FUNDING THOSE 12 FIREFIGHTERS THAT WERE HIRED THREE YEARS AGO. AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE A NEW REVENUE SOURCE EXPECTED FOR EMS. IT'S CALLED THE GROUND EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORT. IT'S THROUGH MEDICAID. WE HAVE ESTIMATED ABOUT 600,000. THE TIMING OF THIS, THE 600,000 WE'RE EXPECTING IS FROM 2023 ACTIVITY, IF I REMEMBER RIGHT. SO 2023 IS ACTIVITY OF MEDICAID SERVICES PROVIDED WE GET A CONTRACTED AMOUNT. SO THIS FUNDING IS HOPEFULLY TO FILL SOME OF THAT GAP WHERE WE GET LESS THAN WHAT IT COSTS TO OPERATE AND TRANSPORT PEOPLE UNDER MEDICAID. SO THIS IS SUPPOSED TO HELP BRIDGE THAT GAP. THIS FUNDING THAT'S EXPECTED SHOULD COME IN HOPEFULLY NEXT SPRING AT THE LATEST. SO WE IT'S KIND OF AN UNKNOWN, BUT HOPEFULLY IT IS FOR SURE. SO WE'VE PLANNED ON THAT 600,000 TO FUND SOME EQUIPMENT CARDIAC MONITORING OR MONITORS TO FUND THOSE PIECES OF EQUIPMENT. SO IF THE FUNDING DOESN'T COME IN, WE WON'T PURCHASE THOSE ITEMS. AND THEN BASED ON WHAT COMES IN THIS YEAR, WE'RE HOPING THAT WE SEE MORE OF IT FOR THE 24 ACTIVITY THAN THE 25 ACTIVITY. BUT THERE'S QUITE A LAG. I THINK IT'S ANYWHERE FROM 12 TO 18 MONTHS LAG ON THAT, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO COMPILE ALL OF THE ACTIVITY, SUBMIT IT, AND THEN GET REIMBURSEMENT UNDER THEIR TIMELINE, AND THAT'S FUNDING COMING THROUGH THE STATE FOR THE MEDICARE OR MEDICAID FUNDING.THEY'RE ALSO WORKING ON THE COMPLETION OF THE NORTH FIRE STATION SO THAT CONSTRUCTION IS UNDERWAY AS WELL, ESTIMATING TO BE COMPLETED NEXT SPRING, NEXT CALENDAR YEAR. ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT YET? OKAY, SO I DO HAVE ONE MORE. SO WHEN. THE 3% SALARY, THE STEP AND GRADE THE BENEFITS, THE 5% INCREASE TO FUEL, THE 5% INCREASE TO MAINTENANCE AND EQUIPMENT AND THE 5% INCREASE TO UTILITIES WITH SIGNIFICANT CHANGES, THOSE ARE ANYTHING IN ADDITION TO THOSE. ANY OTHER CHANGES HAVE ALREADY BEEN CAPTURED IN THE PREVIOUS SLIDES, RIGHT. PRETTY MUCH SIGNIFICANT ITEMS. YES. WELL, WHAT ABOUT JUST LIKE OTHER ITEMS. INSIGNIFICANT. YEAH. LIKE YEAH. LIKE WHAT WOULD WE CALL INSIGNIFICANT IF WE SAID THERE'S FUEL, THERE'S MAINTENANCE, THERE'S UTILITIES, THERE'S SALARY. LIKE WHAT WOULD BE INSIGNIFICANT? TYPICALLY WE DEFINE INSIGNIFICANT AS ANYTHING LESS THAN 75,000 BECAUSE THAT'S THE LEVEL IN WHICH IT COMES TO COUNCIL. SO THINGS LIKE TRAINING BUDGETS THAT WENT FROM 20,000 TO 20 5000 OR 60,000 TO 75,000.
WE'RE NOT DETAILING OUT ALL OF THAT, BUT IT IS IN THE DETAIL OF THE BUDGET BOOK. OKAY, OKAY.
OKAY. SO IT WOULD BE IN TRAINING, YOU COULD GIVE US A LIST OF SOME OF THOSE THAT ARE INSIGNIFICANT. JUST WOULDN'T GIVE YOU ALL THE DETAIL. YEAH, YEAH OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU.
YEAH. YOU'RE GOING TO BE GIVEN OR ARE THEY IN THE BUDGET BOOK IN, IN A CERTAIN WAY, THE BUDGET BOOK IS ALL IN SUMMARY OF THOSE MAJOR CATEGORIES. SO PERSONNEL BENEFITS, CURRENT OPERATING EXPENSES, DEBT. SO IF YOU WANT THE DETAIL WE COULD GIVE YOU THE LIGHT ON THE GL ACCOUNTS OR EVEN THE DETAIL WITHIN THAT WE HAVE BOTH LEVELS. BEYOND THAT, I'LL HAVE TO THINK THROUGH WHAT THAT IS BECAUSE I DON'T CARE ABOUT LIKE HOW MANY REAMS OF PAPERS AND WE DON'T LOOK AT THAT LITTLE DETAIL LIKE, OKAY, DO WE NOT HAVE COUNCIL HAVE ACCESS TO GRAVITY? WE DO, WE DO. SO YOU CAN GO IN AND JUST LOOK AT THE ITEMS ON THERE. SO YOU CLICK ON THEM, IT HAS THE DETAIL. THEN I
[01:25:08]
CAN SO 75,000 PER LINE ITEM BUDGET IS WHAT WOULD NOT COME TO COUNCIL AS A AS A LIST. THAT'S TYPICALLY INSIGNIFICANT. THAT'S KIND OF THE CUTOFF OKAY. I WOULD ALSO ARGUE THAT THAT IS MORE OF A RESPONSIBILITY OF LIAISONS TO BE AWARE OF YOUR DEPARTMENTS, HOW THEIR NEW REQUESTS BUILT UP, AND BE ABLE TO SHARE THOSE IN THE CONVERSATIONS THAT ARE HAD SHARED THERE. BECAUSE FOR ALL SIX OF YOU TO HAVE TO BECOME EXPERTS ON ALL EVERY DEPARTMENTS FIND REFINED ASKS IS, I THINK, NOT THE BEST USE OF YOUR OF YOUR TIME. AND SO WHEN YOU'RE DIGGING THROUGH GRAVITY, YOU MAY NOT WANT TO THE INFORMATION THERE, BUT TO DEFINE WHAT'S QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVELY. IF SOMETHING IS SIGNIFICANT, IT USUALLY AROUND THE 75,000 OR MORE. IF IT'S LESS THAN 75,000, WE DON'T FEEL LIKE IT'S QUANTITATIVE TO COME IN AND DISCLOSE THAT. THAT'S I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING. THERE'S A QUALITATIVE CONVERSATION THAT GOES ON DIRECTLY BETWEEN DIRECTORS AND LIAISONS. IT WAS JUST THE DEFINITION WHEN IT WAS LIKE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES. I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHAT WERE THE INSIGNIFICANT AND IF I COULD ADD THE PROCESS AS WELL. I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, THOUGH, THAT SEVERAL OF THE DEPARTMENTS HAD TO RUN THE GANTLET NOT ONLY THROUGH BROOKS AND HER TEAM WITH ACCOUNTANTS. THEY WERE VERY GRACIOUS, AND WE WANT TO THANK THEM FOR THAT BECAUSE THEY WERE ASKED THIS, THIS BUDGET LINE ITEM WENT UP BY, YOU KNOW, 5%.WHAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE SUPPORT TO ALLOW, YOU KNOW, TO BASICALLY JUSTIFY THAT INCREASE. AND THEN THEY WENT THROUGH THAT WITH BROOKS'S TEAM. AND THEN THEY ALSO MET WITH THE MAYOR. AND WE IDENTIFIED SOME OF THOSE AREAS AS WELL OF THE BUDGET LINE ITEMS THAT WENT UP. AND MY, MY DEPARTMENT INCLUDED, WHEN IT CAME TO, YOU KNOW, THE FUEL. AND SO THERE WAS, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF OPPORTUNITIES TO REALLY DIG IN AND MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S SUPPORT AND DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT THOSE INCREASES. ANYTHING ELSE. AND ALSO A LOT OF JUST ITEMS LISTED HERE ARE THOSE THINGS THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS. SO EVERY DEPARTMENT USUALLY HAS CERTAIN SOFTWARE SUPPLIES, THEY'VE GOT TRAINING AND THEY'VE GOT JUST MISCELLANEOUS PURCHASES THAT THEY MAKE THAT ARE PRETTY NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS. THESE ARE THOSE THINGS THAT ARE BEYOND THAT OR NEW AND DIFFERENT THIS YEAR. AND IT SPEAKS TO COMPARABILITY. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHY, WHY ONE THING IS DIFFERENT FROM ONE YEAR TO THE NEXT, YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE SIGNIFICANT ITEMS ARE. THAT WAY, YOU HAVE SOME MEASURE OF COMPARABILITY. AND BUT WE CAN LITERALLY PROVIDE IT AT THE LINE ITEM OR DETAIL WITHIN EACH. I'M JUST I JUST HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT BECAUSE ALL I HAVE TO THINK ABOUT, LIKE, YOU KNOW, DIFFERENT BUDGETS ARE GOING UP BY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BECAUSE THEY HAVE TEN INSIGNIFICANT ITEMS. YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST A MATTER OF WHAT AM I? WHAT AM I THINKING ABOUT AT THIS MOMENT IS HOW THERE IS BY LINE ITEM. AND THEN THERE'S IN TOTAL AND TOTAL. WE TRY TO KEEP IT TO 5%. OKAY.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. WE'LL MOVE ON TO PARKS AND RECREATION. THEY ARE REQUESTING A NEW EMPLOYEE FOR CEMETERY MAINTENANCE AND ALSO A NEW ZOOKEEPER RELATED TO SOME OF THE SAFETY ISSUES AT THE ZOO. AGAIN, THESE ARE ON THE DEPARTMENTAL REQUESTS. THOSE ARE NOT LOADED INTO THE BUDGET. THE PARKS AND REC SPECIFICALLY HAD A LOT OF PERSONAL SAVINGS FROM RETIREMENTS AND TURNOVER, SO THEY DIDN'T HAVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THEIR PERSONNEL COSTS. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S KIND OF UNIQUE IN THEIR DEPARTMENT. WE HAD TO REALLY LOOK AT THE DETAILS BECAUSE THEIR NUMBERS WERE GOING DOWN RELATIVELY FROM WHAT WE WERE EXPECTING, BUT IT WAS A LOT OF TURNOVER. IF YOU IF YOU HAVE SOMEBODY WITH A FULL FAMILY, THEY'RE MORE EXPENSIVE FROM THE HEALTH INSURANCE SIDE THAN SINGLE INSURANCE. SO THAT'S ABOUT $25,000 SAVINGS RIGHT THERE FOR EACH ONE. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION. SO THE RETIREMENT TURNOVER DON'T GENERATE A CHANGE IN FTE. JUST COSTS. CORRECT. THE NEWER EMPLOYEES DON'T COST AS MUCH AS OLDER EMPLOYEES GENERALLY. IS THAT IS THAT THE REASON? WE LIKE TO USE THE WORD EXPERIENCED? YES. OKAY. NEWER EMPLOYEES GET PAID LESS THAN MORE EXPERIENCED EMPLOYEES. YES.
AND THE OTHER THING WE'RE DOING TOO IS WE'RE CONTINUING TO REINFORCE POSITION CONTROL. THAT WAS SOME AFFECTIONATE COURSE THAT WE WENT ON A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO TO TRY TO MAINTAIN THOSE PERSONAL PERSONNEL BUDGETS. SO THAT'S STILL IN PLACE AS WELL. ANOTHER CHANGE IN GOLF IS WE'VE UPPED THEIR AND INVENTORY EXPENDITURE, AS WELL AS THEIR SALES REVENUE, TO MORE ALIGNED WITH WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING OVER HISTORICAL YEARS. THOSE HAVE BEEN A LITTLE OUT OF
[01:30:02]
WHACK, BUT THEY'VE OFFSET EACH OTHER. SO WE WANTED TO REALIGN THOSE SO THEY SHOULD REFLECT BETTER THE ACTUAL ACTIVITY. AND THE GOLF HAS BEEN PERFORMING WELL. SO THERE'S ACTUAL REVENUE COMING IN, WHICH IS GREAT. SO BEFORE WHEN IT WAS AN ACTUAL ACTIVITY, WHAT WAS IT? IT WAS ACTUALLY TWO, BUT OUR BUDGET WAS LOW ON BOTH ENDS. THEIR PROJECTIONS. THIS IS A HISTORICALLY FOR YOUTH GOLF CHANGED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO. THE GOLF PROS USED TO BUY AND SELL THEIR OWN EQUIPMENT, AND THEY WERE ALSO BUYING AND BUYING AND RENTING GOLF CARTS. RIGHT.AND THEY WERE IT WAS ON THEM. AND THEN THE CITY TOOK THAT OVER. AND SO IT HAS BEEN A REVENUE PRODUCER FOR US WITH THE GOLF CARTS AND WITH THE SALES IN THE PRO SHOP. THAT AND PAY THE GOLF PROFESSIONALS MORE NOW TO MAKE UP FOR THE DIFFERENCE. AND THEY ALSO GOT TO BE IN A CITY.
SO YEAH, IT WAS A BIG IT WAS A KIND OF A SEA CHANGE FOR, FOR GOLF OPERATIONS. WAS THAT EIGHT YEARS AGO IT. IN OUR LIBRARY THEY HAVE SHIFTED SOME OF THE FTE BUDGET TO THEIR SEASONALS TO JUST ALLOW FOR MORE FLEXIBILITY WITH THEIR OPERATIONS AND PROGRAMS. FOR OUR AIRPORT, WE'VE GOT THE BIG TERMINAL EXPANSION PROJECT AND OTHER CAPITAL PROJECTS. YOU'LL SEE A BIG INCREASE TO THEIR CAPITAL BUDGET, EXPECTED DEBT ISSUANCE OF ABOUT 17 MILLION TO FUND THAT TERMINAL EXPANSION. THE DEBT SERVICE FOR THAT WOULD BE FUNDED BY A TAX PRIMARILY ISSUED. WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THE CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE, THE EXPECTED INCREASE TO THAT FEE AND THEN JUST CONTINUED PASSENGER GROWTH. WE'RE SEEING GREAT GROWTH AT THE AIRPORT AND ADDED FLIGHTS AS WELL. FOR PUBLIC WORKS. WE'VE WE HAVE IN THE REQUEST A GIS TECHNICIAN.
THAT'S ANOTHER ONE THAT WOULD BE FUNDED BY DEPARTMENTS. SO AGAIN, ANY OF THE GOVERNMENTAL FUND FTE REQUESTS ARE NOT IN THE BUDGET NUMBERS. THEY'RE NOT IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET. THEY'RE ALL IN THE DEPARTMENT REQUEST LIST ENTERPRISE FUND FTE REQUESTS ARE IN THEIR BUDGET. SO THEY HAVE FEES TO SUPPORT THOSE POSITIONS. SO THE GIS TECHNICIAN IS NOT IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET, JUST ON THE DEPARTMENT REQUEST. THE WATER CIVIL ENGINEER IS INCLUDED IN THE WATER BUDGET. WE'VE GOT KIND OF GIFT SERVICE EXPANSION. WE'VE WE'RE PURCHASING FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES THAT SHOULD BE ABLE TO EXPAND SOME OF THE SERVICE. WE'VE ALSO GOT INTEREST FROM AMON FOR SERVICE. SO THAT'S ALL KIND OF IN THE WORKS. AND A FRESHLY NEWLY IN THE WORKS. BUT THAT'S ALL GRANT FUNDED WITH ALSO THE MATCH EXPECTED. WE ALSO HAVE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FOR STREET AND SANITATION, SHARED ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AS WELL AS WATER OFFICES, CONSTRUCTION. SO THOSE ARE BOTH BIG PROJECTS IN PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET. AND THEN WE ALREADY DISCUSSED THIS A LITTLE BIT, BUT THE STREET SWEEPING SERVICE TRANSITIONING TO SANITATION, AS WELL AS TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS TRANSITION TO POWER OUTAGE. STREETS BUDGET. SO I'M LOOKING AT I'M GOING TO LOOK AT DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON RIGHT NOW. BUT AS BROOKS MENTIONED, WE'VE GOT THOSE FOUR HYBRIDS COMING IN TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAM BECAUSE THE CITY OWNS THOSE. WE CAN ACTUALLY USE THE FUEL DISPENSERS OUT AT THE FUEL MAINTENANCE OR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY. SO WE'RE GOING TO SEE AN EVER SO SLIGHTLY JUST A SMALL INCREASE ON OUR FUEL BECAUSE OF THAT, BECAUSE WE HAVE A FEW MORE VEHICLES THAT WILL BE FILLING UP THERE. BUT IT'S REALLY BEEN A GREAT PLEASURE TO WORK WITH DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON AND ALSO KATE, THE TRANSIT COORDINATOR ON THIS. IT'S JUST BEEN REALLY FUN TO KIND OF WATCH THE PROGRAM GROW AND BEING ABLE TO SUPPORT THEM THROUGH THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITIES BEEN REALLY GREAT SUCCESS STORY, IF YOU WILL. OKAY. SOME SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FOR POWER AND FIBER. THEY'VE REQUESTED FOUR NEW FTES IN POWER FOR BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, ELECTRICAL ENGINEER AND A POWER SCHEDULER AND A DRAFTER. WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT THE RIVER CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE BEING PAID DIRECTLY TO PARKS FROM POWER UNDER THE RECREATION PLAN. ALSO, THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STREET LIGHTS THAT WE JUST TALKED ABOUT, PUBLIC WORKS. IT'S MOVING FROM STREETS INTO POWER. AND THEN ALSO THE NEW REPAYMENT OF THE LOAN POWER. SO THAT'S A CHANGE TO THEIR BUDGET AS WELL IN FIBER. OKAY. SO THIS IS WHERE I WAS GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE KIND OF PRESENTATION CHANGE OF SHOWING OUR BEGINNING ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE OR RESERVES AND CONTINGENCY. IF YOU LOOK AT LIKE CITY OF NAMPA, CITY OF BOISE, THEY'RE STARTING TO SHOW THIS SO THAT IT SHOWS A BALANCED BUDGET. IN PAST YEARS. YOU'LL SEE WE HAVE LIKE POWER BUDGET WOULD BE -52 MILLION. RIGHT. BECAUSE WE DON'T SHOW THE FUNDS ON HAND
[01:35:01]
THAT ROLL FORWARD FROM YEAR TO YEAR. SO THIS IS A WAY TO SHOW THAT IT BALANCES AND THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE THE FUNDS. BUT THAT IS A CHANGE IN HOW IT'S PRESENTED RIGHT NOW. I HAVE TO GO ALONG WITH THE GATSBY CHANGE, RIGHT. IN THE RESERVES. NO CHANGE. NOT YET. I'M GOING TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THAT BECAUSE I THINK THE PUBLIC IS EASILY MISLED BY THAT WORDING, BECAUSE MOST OF THAT MONEY IS GREAT. BULK OF IT IS NOT REALLY UNSPENT GENERAL FUNDS FROM LAST YEAR, FUNDS THAT ARE COMMITTED TO CERTAIN PROJECTS THAT ARE COMING UP AND NOT REALLY NOT REALLY READY. I MEAN, YEAH, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT REQUIRED THAT WE DO IT THIS WAY NOW. IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT OTHER MUNICIPALITIES HAVE GONE TOWARDS. THE STATE CODE DOES SAY WE SHOULD SHOW OUR FUND BALANCES. YES, BUT NOT NECESSARILY AS REVENUE. RIGHT. I MEAN, BECAUSE THAT'S I THINK THAT'S MY ISSUE IS THAT IT'S, IT'S HOW IT'S SHOWING UP. IT'S AS IF WE ARE GETTING NEW REVENUE AND, AND THAT'S THE IF YOU SEE THE TITLES, IT SHOULD SHOW UP AS A RESOURCE WHERE SOME OF THEM ARE REVENUES. AND THEN THOSE WOULD JUST BE RESOURCES. BUT THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD JUST SHOW DIFFERENTLY. SO IT'S A LITTLE CLEARER THAT THESE ARE NOT NEW. REVENUES COULD DO THAT IN BLUE. I THINK IT'D BE EASIER TO COMMUNICATE TO THE PUBLIC.AND PART OF THAT IS JUST THE TIMING OF TRYING TO GET THAT THROUGH WITH GRAVITY. WE DIDN'T HAVE TIME TO BREAK OUT A NEW SECTION TO PUT IT IN THERE, BUT THAT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE WANTED TO DO AS WELL. OKAY, SO IT SHOWS IN THIS CURRENT BUDGET, SO IT DOESN'T SHOW THAT THERE'S A REVENUE RIGHT OR A OKAY. YOUR TWO OPTIONS ARE CALL IT RESOURCING OR PUT IT UNDERNEATH REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND CALL IT USE OF FUND BALANCE. RIGHT. WE PERSONALLY DON'T LIKE THE WORD FUND BALANCE BECAUSE IT HAS. WE'RE TRYING TO USE THE WORD FUND IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS.
THAT'S A LITTLE CONFUSING, BUT THAT IS THE THAT'S THE TECHNICAL TERM. YES. OKAY. OKAY. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO GO INTO THE DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST. NOW THAT WOULD BE A GOOD BREAK POINT BECAUSE THAT'S A BIGGER DISCUSSION. AND IT'S ACTUALLY SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE THOUGHT THAT WE WOULD START OUR MEETING WITH NEXT TUESDAY. BUT IT FEELS LIKE WE JUST DID IT. AND SO HOW IS THE PRESENTATION OF REQUESTS GOING TO BE DIFFERENT FROM THE REVIEW THAT YOU JUST DID? SO THOSE WERE JUST SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THERE. THE ONLY PIECES THAT ARE IN THOSE DEPARTMENT REQUESTS WERE THOSE FTES. THAT'S THE ONLY ONES THAT ARE THAT WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT. EVERYTHING ELSE IS NEW THAT YOU HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT OTHER THAN THE FEES. WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO? I KIND OF FEEL LIKE WE SHOULD WE COULD JUST GO WITH WHAT WE HAVE, AND THEN WE CAN ASSESS AND DECIDE AFTER WE HEAR TODAY WHAT WE WANT TO HEAR LATER. MY, MY UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT WHEN WE GET INTO THE DEPARTMENT REQUEST, THAT'S WHEN THE DEPARTMENT COMES AND SAYS, LIKE, THIS IS WHY I NEED THIS PERSON AND THIS IS WHY I'M SHORT OR, YOU KNOW, THIS KIND OF LIKE WE DID LAST, I KNOW. AND SO THIS IS WHERE I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED. BUT IF WE GO WITH WHAT'S BEEN PREPARED, THEN COUNCIL MEMBERS CAN TAKE NOTES AND THEN WE CAN START OUR MEETING. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I. YES, THAT'S WHAT I MEANT. FOR THE NEXT TIME WITH THE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR WILL BE INFORMED AND WE MAY END UP DOING REVIEWING SOME OF IT TWICE, BUT YES. SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GO WITH IT. IT IS WHAT I'M GOING ON. 2:00. SO WE'VE BEEN AT IT FOR AN HOUR AND 45 MINUTES. DO YOU WANT TO TAKE A QUICK BREAK AND THEN COME BACK AND TRY TO HIT IT AT THE TOP OF THE HOUR? SO YEAH. GREAT. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL DO THAT. WE'RE IN RIGHT NOW. THERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE LIVE BACK FROM THAT. THAT FIVE MINUTE BREAK THAT TOOK 15. BUT HOPEFULLY EVERYBODY FEELS LIKE THEY GOT TO IT ONLY FELT LIKE FIVE. YEAH I KNOW IT FEELS LIKE THEY GOT I GOT A CONVERSATION
[Human Resources]
OUT OR TOOK CARE OF SOMETHING. WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON, BUT WE'RE NOT. EVEN THOUGH FINANCE HAS A LITTLE MORE TO PRESENT, I UNDERSTAND THAT WE'RE GOING TO INTERRUPT THEM AND INSERT DIRECTOR JONES AND SOME OF THE COMMENTS AND INFORMATION HE WANTS TO SHARE WITH US ABOUT OUR EMPLOYEES, AND THEN WE'LL GO BACK TO SOME THINGS THAT FINANCE IS GOING TO HEAR. WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH, MAYOR. YOU KNOW, WE WOULD BE REMISS IF WE DIDN'T SAY THAT THIS REALLY IS A TEAM PROCESS. AND I ACTUALLY ASKED DIRECTOR JONES TO SIT UP HERE WITH US. I WAS HOPING WE WOULD GET HIM A LITTLE BIT SOONER, BUT HE HAS BEEN SO PATIENT AND SO KIND WITH US AND GENEROUS WITH HIS TIME. HE'S GOING TO GO OVER SOME OF THE PERSONNEL COSTS, BUT JUST WANTED TO REITERATE TO COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR WHAT WHAT A PLEASURE IT IS TO WORK WITH DIRECTOR JONES AND HIS STAFF.THEY HAVE BEEN LOCKSTEP WITH US ON THIS THE WHOLE WAY, AND WE'RE REALLY EXCITED THAT WE'RE HAVING
[01:40:06]
HIM BE PART OF OUR TEAM PRESENTATION TODAY. SO WITH THAT, ON TO YOU. OKAY. THE TOPICS HERE ARE HAVE REALLY ALREADY BEEN COVERED IN TERMS OF THE INFORMATION. SO I'M HOPING WE CAN HAVE A DISCUSSION AND TALK ABOUT AND ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS. COME TO SOME DECISION ON ON SOME OF THE TOPICS THAT ARE LISTED. FOR EXAMPLE THE. JUST AS A QUICK RECAP. THE HEALTH INSURANCE, WHICH IS THE BIG TICKET BENEFITS ITEM, IS A 9.9% RENEWAL. OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS, THE AVERAGE ANNUAL RENEWAL HAS BEEN ABOUT 6%. THE LAST 3 OR 4 YEARS WERE ON ONE OF THE PEAKS. IT TENDS TO KIND OF WAVE AND GO UP AND DOWN, WHERE SOME YEARS WE'LL HAVE A FLAT INCREASE. VERY RARELY WE'LL HAVE A REDUCTION, BUT THE PAST 3 OR 4 YEARS WE'VE BEEN BEEN ON ONE OF THE PEAKS WHERE IT'S BEEN GOING UP PRETTY CONSISTENTLY. THE. DENTAL INSURANCE, WE HAVEN'T HAD AN INCREASE FOR A FEW YEARS. IT WENT UP BY 4% THIS YEAR. DIVISION INSURANCE ISN'T A VERY BIG PREMIUM, GO UP BY 20%, BUT IT'S NOT A HUGE DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR THE VISION. AT THE MEETING IN APRIL, THE COUNCIL VOTED TO APPROVE THE 3% INCREASE FOR THE ALMOST ALL OF THE CITY EMPLOYEES. SO IN TERMS OF SUSTAINABILITY, THAT'S ONE OF THE TOPICS I THINK WE CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT IN A GENERAL SENSE. ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN PUT IN A BUDGET AND FUND IT WITH ONGOING REVENUE IS GOING TO BE SUSTAINABLE OVER TIME. FUTURE CHANGES IN REVENUE OR OTHER CHANGES CAN BE ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME WHEN IT HAPPENS IN THE FUTURE. BUT AS LONG AS IT FITS IN THE EXISTING BUDGET, WITH REVENUE TO COVER IT, ONGOING REVENUE THAT WOULD COVER AN ONGOING EXPENSE, IT'S GOING TO BE SUSTAINABLE. THERE'S OTHER NUMBERS THAT WE LOOK AT. THEY TEND TO FLUCTUATE WILDLY WITH THE CITY BECAUSE IF YOU TOOK OPERATIONAL COSTS. AND COMPARED THEM WITH THE PERSONNEL COSTS, THEY MIGHT GO UP AND DOWN BY 10% IN ANY GIVEN YEAR. WHEN WE'RE BUILDING A BUILDING, THE OPERATIONAL SIDE OF THE BUDGET WILL GO WAY UP. AND THEN WHEN WE'RE NOT BUILDING A BUILDING OR HAVING MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS, THE OPERATIONAL SIDE COMES DOWN.AND SO IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'LL KEEP AN EYE ON. WE'LL CONTINUE TO LOOK FOR WAYS TO ACTUALLY MEASURE THAT STATISTICALLY, THAT 10% RANGE OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS HAS FLUCTUATED FROM, YOU KNOW, 76% TO 86% OF THE BUDGET, AND IT GOES UP AND DOWN PERSONNEL COSTS ON THE OVERALL BUDGET. SOME OF THE ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN SOME OF THE MUNICIPAL AND MUNICIPAL. THE GENERAL FUND BUDGETS ARE EVEN MORE THAN THAT. THEY'RE PRIMARILY 100% WERE REALLY CLOSE TO 1% PERSONNEL. SO IN TERMS OF THE QUESTION OF SUSTAINABILITY, I DON'T KNOW IF COUNCIL OR DIRECTORS OR ANYONE WANTS TO WEIGH IN ON THOUGHTS ABOUT WHAT CREATES SUSTAINABILITY. OBVIOUSLY, THE MORE POSITIONS WE ADD, THEN WE'VE GOT TO SUSTAIN THOSE OVER TIME. ANYTHING WE ADD TO WAGES, IT'S RELATIVELY EASY IN ANY GIVEN YEAR TO TAP THE BRAKES ON WAGES. YOU JUST REDUCE OR DON'T CREATE AN ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE FOR A YEAR OR TWO, AND YOU CAN KIND OF LET THAT CATCH UP WHEN YOU GOT WHEN PERSONNEL THAT THE FTE TAKE OVER. AND THAT BECOMES THE ISSUE. THAT'S NOT SUSTAINABLE REALLY. THE ONLY THE ONLY THING TO DO AT THAT POINT IS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF FTE. SO RIGHT NOW WITH WHAT'S, YOU KNOW, IN THE CURRENT YEAR WITH WHAT WE'RE FUNDING, WE CURRENTLY HAVE, I THINK IT'S 580 APPROVED POSITIONS IN THIS YEAR. GOT A SHEET HERE IN FRONT OF ME. I'VE JUST GOT TO FIND WHERE TO PUT IT. YEAH WE'VE GOT 802 FULL TIME FTE APPROVED. BUT WE'RE WE'RE AVERAGING CLOSE TO SEVEN 5760 FILLED. SO IN ANY GIVEN YEAR YOU'VE GOT A, YOU KNOW, ONGOING TURN WHERE THERE'S GOING TO BE VACANCIES THAT CREATE CHANGE.
BUT THE LARGER THAT FTE GETS, THEN THE LARGER THE BUDGET HAS TO BE TO SUSTAIN THOSE, ESPECIALLY IF IT'S PERCENT OF OPERATING BUDGET STARTS TO GET INCREASINGLY LIKE PERSONNEL COSTS GET INCREASINGLY HIGHER AS A PERCENT IN COMPARED TO OPERATING BUDGETS. SO I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY WHERE WE WANT TO TAKE THIS CONVERSATION, BUT IF ANYONE HAS SOME THOUGHTS OR QUESTIONS, WELL, I ASK THIS EVERY TIME YOU TALK MONEY, GIVE US, IF YOU CAN. WHAT ARE THE REALISTIC OPTIONS OF SELF-INSURANCE, OF WHAT WE DO WITH THAT SELF-INSURANCE FUND
[01:45:05]
GROWING FROM WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY 4 MILLION? IT'S SITTING THERE. BUT IF WE'RE NEVER GOING TO USE IT FOR SELF-INSURANCE, WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE US? SO IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I ACTUALLY PREFACE YOUR COMMENTS BY SAYING, I THINK THAT THIS IS A DEEP DIVE THAT WE NEED TO DO, AND IT WON'T BE DONE IN THIS IN THE BUDGET CYCLE. IT WILL PROBABLY BE DONE IN THE FALL, BECAUSE I THINK WE DO NEED TO MAKE SOME DECISIONS AND GET GET THROUGH MORE RESEARCH. THEN MAYBE YOU'LL BE ABLE TO GIVE US THE OVERVIEW NOW, BUT WE MAY HAVE DEEPER QUESTIONS AFTER YOU'RE DONE. SO SURE. YEAH. AS A AS A GENERAL OVERVIEW, WE'VE LOOKED AT THE WHETHER OR NOT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A WISE DECISION OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS TO BE SELF-FUNDED, AND IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN. I DON'T SEE THAT BECOMING A WISE DECISION IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE FOR OUR WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND. IT WAS A WISE DECISION BECAUSE WHEN YOU DID THE NUMBERS WITH THE WORKERS COMP, WE ACTUALLY COME OUT MUCH BETTER THAN YOU WOULD PAYING THE STATE REQUIRED PREMIUMS ON US BASED ON OUR CLAIMS RATIOS. OUR HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS RATIOS JUST HAVEN'T BEEN THERE, AND I DON'T SEE THEM GETTING THERE ANYTIME SOON. SO THE QUESTION OF WHAT DO WE DO WITH THOSE FUNDS? FOR ONE, IF WE REALLY DID WANT TO GO SELF-FUNDED, WE DON'T HAVE ANYWHERE NEAR ENOUGH ENOUGH FUNDING TO DO IT. SO WE'D HAVE TO START ALLOCATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO DO THAT. IF IT WAS LOOKING LIKE IT WOULD BE A WISE DECISION FINANCIALLY AND WE MIGHT WANT TO GO THERE, THEN I WOULD BE BRINGING TO THE TABLE. WE NEED TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF FUNDS WE'VE GOT SO THAT WE'LL BE PREPARED FOR THAT. BUT WHAT WE DO WITH THOSE EXISTING FUNDS, I THINK, IS, MAY BE THE TOPIC OF A FUTURE DISCUSSION. SO I ONLY I ONLY HAVE THE, THE SUMMARY CASH FUND BY YEAR. THE LAST ONE I PRINTED OUT WAS JANUARY OF THIS YEAR, AND IT WAS $6 MILLION IN THAT FUND. CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THAT UPDATED NUMBER IS RIGHT NOW? YEAH. I MEAN, LIKE FUND NUMBER 20. YOU KNOW, WE KNEW THAT COUNCIL PRESIDENT. YOU'RE OKAY. WELL, I WAS LOOKING AT IT.SHE CAN SLOW DOWN. SHE'S PROBABLY GOT IT RIGHT. ALMOST READY. BUT ONE OF THE THINGS I WANTED TO MENTION THAT DIRECTOR JONES HAD TALKED ABOUT, TOO, WAS THE IMPORTANCE OF POSITION CONTROL. YOU KNOW, WE WENT THROUGH THAT PAINFUL PROCESS ABOUT 3 OR 4 YEARS AGO, AND THAT HAS BEEN REALLY HELPFUL TO TRY TO MANAGE, YOU KNOW, OUR, OUR RESOURCES. BECAUSE IF YOU RECALL, THERE WERE A COUPLE OF PRESENTATIONS WHERE MARK WAS TALKING ABOUT HOW OUR OUR EXPENSES ON THE PERSONNEL SIDE WITHOUT POSITION CONTROL ARE OUTPACING THE REVENUE, PARTICULARLY WHEN YOU COME TO A LIMIT OF A CAP OF 8%, BUT POTENTIALLY EVEN LIMITING IT TO A 3% STATUTORY PROPERTY TAX FOR A GENERAL FUND POSITION. SO THAT'S WHY THE POSITION CONTROLS BEEN REALLY HELPFUL. AND WE REALLY APPRECIATE COUNCIL'S MAYOR AND COUNCIL'S APPROACH AND ENFORCING AND LIKE REINFORCING THE FINANCE TEAM TO BE ABLE TO HOLD THOSE POSITION CONTROL NUMBERS. AND THEN IF THERE'S ANY POSITIONS THAT ARE OVER AND ABOVE THAT, THEY COME TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OR THEY COME THROUGH APPROVAL THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS. SO THERE'S ACTUALLY A 404 FORMAL APPROVAL FOR ANYTHING THAT'S OVER AND ABOVE THIS STATED POSITION CONTROL. SO THAT'S REALLY SOMETHING WE WANT TO, YOU KNOW, THANK YOU FOR THE SUPPORT OF BEING ABLE TO DO THAT, BECAUSE THAT IS BEEN A PART OF OUR BUDGET ACCOUNTABILITY GOAL THAT WE'VE HAD TO HELP TO HELP, TO MANAGE THOSE EXPENDITURES JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE. AND I THINK BROOKS HAS THE NUMBER. SO THE HEALTH INSURANCE FUND, THE IT'S BROKEN INTO TWO PIECES, 2.1 MILLION IS THE HEALTH SAVINGS. SO THAT'S EVERY DEPARTMENT IS CHARGED PER PAY PERIOD AMOUNT PER EMPLOYEE THAT GOES INTO THIS FUND TO HELP SMOOTH OUT HEALTH INSURANCE. THAT WOULD BE WHAT WE COMMONLY REFER TO AS A SUSTAINABILITY FUND STABILIZATION. STABILIZATION.
YEAH. SO THAT THAT WOULD NEED TO BE RETAINED IF WERE DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING. RIGHT. OKAY. THEN WE HAVE THE SELF-INSURANCE, WHICH IS A LITTLE OVER 4.6 MILLION. AND THOSE BOTH MAKE UP FUND 20. CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. I GUESS WE'LL DISCUSS IT LATER. BUT I THINK IF FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A MISTAKE TO HAVE GONE THAT WAY, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN YOU WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN PREPARED WITH THE RESERVE. WE'D HAVE TO SEE FIVE YEARS BEFORE WE SAY, OH, YEAH, MAYBE WE COULD DO THIS RIGHT. WE COULDN'T JUST DO THAT. I WOULD WANT TO SEE A TREND OVER MULTIPLE YEARS BECAUSE YOU END UP WITH THIS, THIS FLUCTUATION. THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO IN THE MARKET OF PURCHASING INSURANCE, HEALTH INSURANCE THAT HELP KEEP COSTS DOWN. WHEN YOU'RE SELF-FUNDED. IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A COST FOR THE INSURERS CAN SOMETIMES SPREAD THE RISK OVER A HIGHER BOOK OF BUSINESS AND TAKE THE RISK ON LOSS OVER A COUPLE OF YEARS TO GET THE BUSINESS THAT WILL BE INEVITABLE IN FUTURE YEARS, WHERE WE'LL WE'LL HAVE
[01:50:01]
THE COST OF THAT. OKAY. AND SO IT'S PART OF IT IS THAT THAT FUND ISN'T BIG ENOUGH. THE OTHER PART IS THAT HAVE WE BEEN SELF-FUNDED OVER THE PAST? FIVE YEARS TO SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS MORE ON HEALTH INSURANCE THAN WE DID? YEAH. YOU KNOW, WHEN IT COMES TO SUSTAINABILITY, IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE IDENTIFY WHAT WE CAN AFFORD TO DO. AND YET THERE ARE OTHER WAYS OF VIEWING THIS. THERE IS WHAT DO THE DOLLARS ALLOW US TO DO? AND THEN WE ADJUST OUR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES ACCORDINGLY. THERE'S ALSO THAT I THINK WHAT OUR DIRECTORS, WHO ARE BEST PRACTICE ORIENTED DIRECTORS WILL LEAN TOWARD IS WHAT SHOULD WE BE DOING AND WHAT IS THE WORKFORCE NEEDED TO DO THAT, KNOWING THAT THERE ARE PRESSURES THAT GIVE US A REAL MINIMAL AND THAT'S HOW WE'VE BEEN OPERATING, IS IN WE WANT TO DO BEST PRACTICE, BUT WE KNOW WE CAN'T HIRE PEOPLE. SO HOW CAN WE BE? HOW CAN WE MAKE IT HAPPEN? OKAY, YES, YOU NEED TO ASK FOR ONE AND I'LL HOLD ON FOR FOUR MORE YEARS AND MAYBE ASK FOR ANOTHER ONE THEN. AND WE GET REALLY TIGHT, TIGHTLY AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED ASKS. RATHER IT'S NOT A CADILLAC, SORT OF. YOU KNOW, I'M GOING TO ASK FOR EVERYTHING. BEST PRACTICE EVERYWHERE. THERE'S STILL A LOT OF CONSTRAINT AND RESTRAINT THAT'S EXERCISED. BUT WHEN WE'RE COMMUNICATING HOW CITIES OPERATE, WHAT CITY NEEDS ARE TO LEGISLATORS WHO PUT US IN A BOX IN TERMS OF OUR OUR FINANCIAL PICTURE, I DO THINK THAT WE NEED TO BE AWARE OF BEST PRACTICE AND WHAT OUR NEEDS ARE. IF WE WERE OPERATING THE WAY THAT WE FEEL, WE NEED TO BE SERVING OUR, OUR, OUR CITIZENS. AND YET AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE'VE GOT TO BALANCE THE BUDGET SO WE HAVE TO REVERT FROM OUR MORE IDEAL OR OUR ASPIRATIONAL STANCE TO OUR REALITY STANCE. AND SO WE HAVE TO WE'RE BALANCING AND JUGGLING BETWEEN THE TWO. AND THIS IS HARD BECAUSE BY THE END OF THE MONTH, WE'VE GOT TO HAVE THE REALITY BASED DECISIONS MADE, BUT WE ALSO NEED TO CARRY THESE IN OUR MINDS THAT WHEN WE HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC AND PARTICULARLY WITH STATE LEADERS, BECAUSE THEY NEED TO KNOW THAT JUST BECAUSE WE MADE IT HAPPEN OVER HERE AT THE END OF THIS MONTH WITH THESE HARD DECISIONS, DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT'S THE RIGHT THING FOR OUR COMMUNITY. AND SO I JUST, I, I HAD TO SAY IT OUT LOUD THAT WAY. SO THANKS FOR LISTENING. WELL, IT'S THAT TENSION BETWEEN WE HAVE TO HAVE POSITION CONTROL FOR FINANCE. WELL, OUR CITY IS GROWING AND IMPACT FEES DO NOT PAY FOR POLICE OFFICERS OR FIREFIGHTERS. IT ONLY IS GOING TO BE THE GENERAL FUND. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO VOTE ON BALANCING THAT OUT SOMEHOW. SO AND I WONDERED, I MEAN, BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT THAT AS PART OF THE IMPACT FEE. IT'S LIKE GROWTH AND ANNEXATION IS WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE OPERATING COSTS.IF YOU THINK ABOUT THAT. I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT IT IS. YOU HAVE THE CAPITAL COST THAT IMPACTS FEES ARE PAYING FOR AND THEN GROWTH AND ANNEXATION. BUT THAT ISN'T REALLY NECESSARILY HOW WE'RE USING GROWTH AND ANNEXATION. LAST YEAR, I WAS HOPING WE WERE ON A PATH TO GET THAT 750,001 TIME MONEY, SO THAT THAT COULD BE THE MONEY THAT COUNCIL GAVE TO ALL OF THOSE NON ONGOING EXPENSES. BUT I MEAN REALLY THAT'S HOW THE SYSTEM IS SET UP IS SO THAT GROWTH AND ANNEXATION IS SUPPOSED TO COVER PERSONNEL, ANY NEW LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE MAINTAINING A LEVEL OF SERVICE, THEY DON'T REALLY ALLOW US TO INCREASE OUR LEVEL OF SERVICE. BUT AT LEAST FOR THOSE THREE DEPARTMENTS, THAT'S HOW THOSE IMPACT FEES ARE SET UP. BUT BUT OUR GROWTH AND ANNEXATION DOESN'T DOESN'T MATCH OUR 5% INFLATION. NOT EVEN CLOSE. SO WE ARE WE ARE CLEARLY ON A. YEAH. I MEAN IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT A 5 MILLION SUSTAINABILITY IS AN INTERESTING WORD RIGHT NOW. YEAH. AND I FIND IT FRUSTRATING. AND ACTUALLY OUR KELLY PACKER WAS ON A PODCAST A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO WITH OH, GARDNER. WHO WAS THE GARDNER WHO RAN FOR GOVERNOR A FEW YEARS BACK. TOMMY, TOMMY AHLQUIST. WHY DID I SAY GARDNER? BECAUSE HE USED TO WORK FOR GARDNER.
ANYWAY, SHE WAS ON A PODCAST WITH TOMMY AHLQUIST, AND SHE POINTED OUT THAT JUST BECAUSE CITIES MAKE IT WORK DOESN'T MEAN THAT, LIKE I SAID, IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO. AND THE VERY EXAMPLE THAT YOU GAVE. RIGHT. WE THE INFLATION THAT WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH AND THE CUTTING OR THE CUTTING BACK OR THE DEFERRING, WHATEVER IT IS THAT WE'RE DOING, AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE END UP LOOKING LIKE WE BALANCE OUR BUDGET, BUT WHAT THE IMPRESSION THAT A LEGISLATOR
[01:55:01]
SOME MIGHT TAKE IS, WELL, THEY MADE IT WORK. THEY MUST BE FINE AND THEN BE, OH, IF THEY WERE ABLE TO CUT THAT PROBABLY NEEDED TO BE CUT. AND SO THERE IS A TERRIBLE MESSAGE THAT WE SEND WHEN WE SUCCEED WITH OUR BUDGET EVERY YEAR, WHEN IT'S WHEN IT'S UP AGAINST THESE ODDS. AND SO WITH ALL OF THAT SAID, WHERE DOES IT PUT US IN TERMS OF HOW WE ACHIEVE OR WORK TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY WITH WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW? TODAY? SAM, DO YOU HAVE A THOUGHT? WELL, THE OTHER THOUGHT I HAD IS ONE OF THE ONE OF THE ALSO THE TOOLS IN THE TOOLBOX, MAYOR, THAT YOU HAVE BEEN USING OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS IS THE DIRECTOR'S BUDGET DISCUSSION. YOU KNOW, AFTER THEY HAVE THE COUNCIL WORKSHOP, THE DIRECTOR'S DISCUSSION, BECAUSE THAT GIVES THE COLLEAGUES, OUR COLLEAGUES, A CHANCE TO GO AROUND THE TABLE AND TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE AND REALLY TO TRY TO GARNER SUPPORT, BECAUSE WE'VE DONE THAT THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS, WHERE WE'VE ALL GOTTEN BEHIND A PARTICULAR DEPARTMENT THAT HAD SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT STAFFING NEEDS, AND WE WERE ABLE TO WORK TOGETHER AS COLLEAGUES TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. NOW, OBVIOUSLY WE CAN'T DO THAT ON THE ENTERPRISE SIDE, BUT, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE HAD SOME REALLY GOOD COLLABORATIONS, IF YOU WILL, ON THE GENERAL FUND SIDE OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS. AND SO I THINK WE STILL NEED TO KIND OF KEEP THAT GOING, BECAUSE WE'RE ONLY AS GOOD AS WHAT WE'RE AWARE OF WITH THE OTHER ONES DOING. AND SO I THINK THAT'S REALLY ANOTHER TOOL IN OUR TOOLBOX. IN ADDITION TO POSITION CONTROL, HAS HELPED. I THINK US BE MORE COLLABORATIVE WITH EACH OTHER ON OUR NEEDS AND THE PRIORITIES OF WHEN MAYBE WE COULD SHIFT IT OUT ONE YEAR OR SHIFT IT, YOU KNOW, BACK, LIKE DO A MID-YEAR INSTEAD OF A FULL TIME OR A FULL YEAR. SO THERE'S OPTIONS THAT WE HAVE THAT WE WORK TOGETHER WITH OUR OTHER COLLEAGUES IN OUR GENERAL FUND TYPE, A COUPLE OTHER THINGS TO DROWN OUT THE EMPLOYEES MIGHT BE LOOKING AT THEIR PERSONAL SUSTAINABILITY. AND I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK AT WHAT WE'VE DONE THIS YEAR WITH THE 3% ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE, WHERE THE MAY CPI NUMBER WAS 2.4 AND IT'S BEEN, YOU KNOW, IT WENT FROM 3 TO 2.6 TO 2.9 TO 2.5, 2.4. RIGHT. OVER THE COURSE OF THIS YEAR, EVEN WITH THE 9.9% HEALTH INSURANCE COST INCREASE, AND THE DENTAL AND VISION ARE COVERED BY THE CITY, IT'S JUST A CITY COST THERE. BUT THE OVER THE PAST SINCE JANUARY, WE TOOK ALL OF THE NEW HIRES, WHICH ARE USUALLY COMING IN AT NEAR THE ENTRY LEVEL PAY SCALE. THE AVERAGE PAY WAS 49,000 AND SOME CHANGE. SO ROUGHLY $50,000. AND IF YOU GIVE THAT $50,000, A 3% INCREASE, THAT'S $1,500 A YEAR. IF YOU TAKE THE 9.9% INCREASE TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM AND TAKE THE MOST EXPENSIVE PLAN, WHICH WOULD BE THE FAMILY PLAN ON THE PPO, THE COST WOULD BE ABOUT $450 A YEAR. SO IT EATS INTO PART OF ONE OF THE 1% OF THE COLA. SO THEY'RE STILL COMING OUT AHEAD IN THIS GIVEN YEAR. WE WON'T ALWAYS BE ABLE TO DO THAT. THERE'S GOING TO BE YEARS WHERE THE BUDGETS ARE TIGHTER. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GET STEP INCREASES THAT WILL KEEP PACE WITH WITH CPI AND HOPEFULLY STILL GIVE EMPLOYEES EVEN AT THE ENTRY LEVEL. YOU KNOW, MOST OF THAT TAKE HOME WITH THE ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE. ANOTHER POINT THAT I WANTED TO POINT OUT IS THAT WE WATCH ON A REGULAR BASIS AND ATTEND TRAININGS AND PARTICIPATE WITH OUR BROKERS FOR ANY POSSIBLE WAY TO CUT COSTS WITH OUR HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, THAT WE'RE IN A MARKET HERE WHERE THERE'S NOT A LOT OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE. AND SO THE MARKET HERE, COSTS OF CARE IS ROUGHLY 30% HIGHER THAN IT WOULD BE IN A LARGER MARKET LIKE THE BOISE AREA OR THE SALT LAKE AREA, SIMPLY BECAUSE THERE'S NOT COMPETITION. OR YOU CAN GO TO A DIFFERENT HOSPITAL IN OTHER PLACES. AND SO THAT BECOMES CHALLENGING FOR US IN THE EXISTING MARKET. THE THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE SHOW UP AT A TRAINING OR SOMETHING AND A VENDOR WILL GET UP AND SAY, IF YOU JUST LET US LOOK AT OUR NUMBERS, WE'LL SAVE YOU MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. AND I ALWAYS GO PULL THEM ASIDE AFTER AND HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH THEM. AND GENERALLY, YOU KNOW, THERE'S TH, THE FACTORS THAT ARE INVOLVED THERE ARE YOU EITHER DO PLAN DESIGN CHANGES WHICH RESTRICT WHAT THE EMPLOYEES BENEFITS ARE OR WHERE THEY CAN RECEIVE BENEFITS, OR YOU JUST GET LUCKY THAT YOU DON'T HAVE LARGE CLAIMANTS. AND THERE'S A POOL OF 750 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE LARGE CLAIMANTS ON ANY GIVEN YEAR THAT YOU HIT THOSE VALLEYS AS OFTEN AS YOU HIT THE PEAKS WITH THE CLAIMANTS, AND WE WANT TO BE THERE WITH THAT INSURANCE FOR OUR EMPLOYEES WHEN THEY'VE GOT THOSE CATASTROPHIC THINGS THAT COME UP IN THEIR LIVES. THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF INSURANCE. SO WE'RE WATCHING AND ANYTHING THAT LOOKS INTERESTING OR, OR LIKE A POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE COST FOR THE CITY. WE'RE EXPLORING IT IN DETAIL AND TRYING TO FIND WAYS TO REDUCE THOSE COSTS. I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS THAT, YOU KNOW, OVER MY CAREER SPAN IN HUMAN RESOURCES OVER THE PAST 25 YEARS, THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING AND CONSISTENT TOPIC THAT THE[02:00:01]
INFLATION RATE FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS HAS OUTPACED THE CPI, EVERYTHING ELSE, AND BECOMES A LARGER AND LARGER PERCENTAGE OF THE BUDGET. SO IN MY EARLY CAREER, IT WAS IT WASN'T UNCOMMON THAT YOU HAD HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS THAT WERE FULLY COVERED BY THE EMPLOYER, THAT WERE VERY RICH IN THE BENEFITS THAT WERE OFFERED. AND OVER TIME, THE PLAN DESIGN CHANGES HAVE WHITTLED THOSE DOWN AND PASSED ON COSTUMES. WELL, HE'S NOT JUST IN PREMIUMS, BUT ALSO IN CO-PAYS AND CO-INSURANCE. AND YOU KNOW HOW MUCH THEY HAVE TO PAY OUT OF POCKET BEFORE THEY STOP PAYING. AND SO THAT KIND OF THING. SO I JUST WANT TO PUT IT OUT THERE THAT WE ARE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN, EVERYTHING WE FIND, WE PURSUE IT. WE LOOK FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO REDUCE THOSE COSTS. BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S HAPPENING IN SELF-FUNDED GROUPS.IT'S SOMETHING THAT'S HAPPENING ACROSS THE NATION THAT THAT INFLATION RATE FOR MEDICAL CARE IS OUTPACING PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING ELSE. CAN I ASK A QUESTION THAT I MEAN, YOU CAN JUST SAY, THAT'S THE STUPIDEST IDEA YOU'VE EVER HEARD AND IT WILL NOT HURT MY FEELINGS. BUT YOU KNOW HOW IN GRAVITY IT SHOWS EVERY EMPLOYEE AND THEN IT SHOWS LIKE THIS IS THE TRUE COST OF THE EMPLOYEE. DO YOU FEEL LIKE THERE'S A SENSE OF THAT AMONGST EMPLOYEES? DO YOU THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE INSULTING TO GIVE THEM THAT, THAT LIKE HERE, HERE IS YOUR WHAT YOU ACTUALLY MAKE HERE'S. YEAH. LIKE YOU MIGHT THINK YOU'RE AT 68 BUT ACTUALLY YOU'RE AT 134 OF WHAT IT COST THE CITY, YOU KNOW, ACTUALLY HAVE THAT GREAT PIECE OF INFORMATION TO PUT IN THE HANDS OF EVERY EMPLOYEE. AND THE NEW ERP WORKDAY IS GOING TO HAVE THAT ON THEIR HOME SCREEN. IT WILL SHOW THEM THEIR VALUE OF THEIR SALARY, THEIR THEIR BENEFITS, AND ALL OF THAT INFORMATION WILL BE MUCH MORE READILY AVAILABLE. I MEAN, IT'S IN GRAVITY NOW, AND I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF IT WAS SOMETHING THAT IT WAS LIKE, AS WE'VE ADOPTED THIS BUDGET, LIKE WE'RE NOT TRYING TO SAY YOU'RE NOT VALUABLE. WE'RE WE'RE SAYING HERE IS THE VALUE AND IT'S ACTUALLY MUCH GREATER THAN YOUR TAKE HOME PAY. YOU'RE AWARE OF IT. YEAH. ONE OF THE THINGS WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT PRIOR TO DOCTOR JONES, STARTING WITH US AT THE ORGANIZATION, IS ACTUALLY GIVING THE EMPLOYEES, YOU KNOW, JUST AN AWARENESS. I MEAN, IT DOESN'T HURT TO GIVE THE EMPLOYEES AN AWARENESS. AND THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY WHEN THEY LOOK AT THEIR SIGNING UP FOR THEIR BENEFITS. AND THAT'S IN AUGUST NEXT MONTH. BUT AGAIN, I THINK PEOPLE REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH MONEY IT ACTUALLY COSTS FOR THE CITY TO INSURE EVERYONE THAT IS ELIGIBLE AT THE CITY. AND SO I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, IF WE COULD DO MORE OF AN EDUCATION CAMPAIGN OR SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES THAT JUST TO DEVELOP THE AWARENESS OF IT, I THINK WOULD BE HELPFUL.
AND I KNOW THAT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT, YOU KNOW, OUR HUMAN RESOURCES TEAM HAS BEEN TRYING TO DO AS WELL IS THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR THAT WHICH THEY'VE TAKEN BECAUSE, I MEAN, EVERY MONTH, YOU KNOW, IT'S LIKE, OH YEAH, THIS COMES OUT EVERY MONTH. BUT OVER THE COURSE OF A YEAR, I JUST DON'T KNOW IF THAT ENDS UP BEING INSULTING TO EMPLOYEES. LIKE, THEY'RE JUST TRYING. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF WE USED IT AS A BLUDGEON. IT PROBABLY WOULD BE. SO IT'S IMPORTANT TO GET IT IN FRONT OF THEM AND HELP THEM UNDERSTAND THE FULL VALUE OF WHAT THEY'RE GETTING FROM THEIR EMPLOYMENT WITH THE CITY. AND IT IS MUCH LARGER THAN, YOU KNOW, IT'S ROUGHLY 35% LARGER THAN WHAT THEIR SALARY IS. AND THE INTENT WITH WORKDAY AND HAVING IT OUT THERE IS IT'S THERE. AND THEY CAN LOOK AT IT AT ANY PARTICULAR POINT IN TIME AND SEE THAT IT'S I TO YOUR POINT, I THINK IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU USE IT, WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO WITH IT. BUT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR EACH EMPLOYEE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY IS INVESTING A LOT MORE THAN JUST THEIR SALARY AND EMPLOYING THEM IN THE CITY, AND THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO ANOTHER POSITION, YOU SORT OF WAY SOME OF THOSE THINGS OUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE THE WAGES COMPARED TO THE BENEFITS COMPARED TO THE LEAVE. AND, YOU KNOW, LEAVE IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT TENDS TO BE RELATIVELY GOOD WITH THE CITY, ESPECIALLY IF YOU'VE BEEN HERE A FEW YEARS. YOU KNOW, THE ENTRY LEVEL YEARS ARE PROBABLY MORE COMPARABLE THAN EMPLOYEES THAT HAVE BEEN HERE FOR A LONG TIME.
AND WE DO HAVE EMPLOYEES. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, DOCTOR JONES, WE DO HAVE EMPLOYEES THAT COME FROM OTHER AREAS THAT HAVE COMMENTED ON OUR OUR PLANS ARE ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, VERY NICE THAT THEY'RE JUST LIKE, THIS IS A REALLY GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM, TO THEM AND THEIR FAMILY TO BE WORKING FOR THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS BECAUSE OF THE BENEFIT PLANS THAT WE HAVE FOR EMPLOYEES THAT LIKE A PENSION, LIKE THE SECURITY OF A PENSION, YOU KNOW, THERE'S VERY FEW PLACES THAT OFFER PENSIONS ANYMORE. SO TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN PERSON IS A PRETTY BIG DEAL FOR THEM. SO THAT'S, I THINK, SOME GOOD NOTES THAT THEY'VE TAKEN ON THAT. BUT.
TO MOVE OFF OF BENEFITS FOR A MINUTE AND JUST BACK TO THE LARGER TOPIC OF SUSTAINABILITY FOR EMPLOYEES. ARE THERE IF YOU ARE ON AN UNSUSTAINABLE PATH AT SOME POINT. THERE'S A PROBLEM, A BIG PROBLEM, RIGHT? THAT HAPPENS IF SOMEBODY FALLS OFF, WHATEVER, WHATEVER IMAGE YOU WANT TO COME UP WITH. THE QUESTION IS, ARE WE ON AN UNSUSTAINABLE PATH? THIS IS THINK ABOUT FOR A SECOND.
[02:05:09]
EVER SINCE I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL, I WAS HEARING THAT SOCIAL SECURITY. THE THIRD RAIL OF POLITICS WAS ON AN UNSUSTAINABLE PATH. I'M GOING TO BE ELIGIBLE TO COLLECT SOCIAL SECURITY, AND IT'S STILL OUT THERE, ALTHOUGH NOW THEY'RE SAYING, OH, IT'S 2026, OH NO, IT'S 2029. OH, AND THEY KEEP PREDICTING. AND SO I DON'T KNOW, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE GOING TO LIKE SCOTTY, I'M USING SO MANY OLD TIME REFERENCES. BUT BUT SCOTTY IN THE IN THE ENGINE ROOM OF THE STARSHIP ENTERPRISE, WHY DON'T YOU JUST GET ONE MORE MOC WHATEVER OUT OF THE SHIP. MORE POWER. YEAH, YEAH. GET HIM OUT OF FROM NOTHING EXCEPT DUCT TAPE AND SO I'M JUST WONDERING, ARE WE ON THAT PATH WHERE WE'RE ABOUT READY, YOU KNOW, TO BLOW UP AND BE OVERTAKEN BY THE ENEMIES? OR ARE WE JUST SAYING FROM A COMFORTABLE STANDPOINT, I'M A LITTLE UNCOMFORTABLE. AND, YOU KNOW, 12 YEARS FROM NOW OR 15 OR 30 YEARS FROM NOW, YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO PAY FOR YOUR EMPLOYEES. I DON'T HAVE A SENSE OF HOW UNSUSTAINABLE WE ARE. SO OUR SUSTAINABILITY CONVERSATION IS KIND OF THEORETICAL RIGHT NOW. AND SO I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT WHAT DO WE NEED TO SOLVE RATHER THAN JUST CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT TOOLS IN OUR TOOLBOX, WHICH IS VALUABLE TO KNOW AND TALK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THINGS AWARENESSES AND SUCH. BUT WHAT DO WE HAVE? A PROBLEM SOLVED. THAT'S ONE YEAR, FIVE YEARS, TEN YEARS. I KNOW WE CAN'T PREDICT IT BECAUSE EVERYTHING CHANGES ALL THE TIME, BUT ANY THOUGHTS? SURE. I MEAN, I SHARE GOOD THOUGHTS AND BUT THAT'S KIND OF WHAT ANY ANY TIME THAT YOU WERE ABLE TO FUND ALL THE NEEDED OPERATIONS AND ALL OF THE NEEDED STAFF, WITH ONGOING REVENUE AND ONGOING FUNDS, THEN YOU'RE WHEN YOU START TO DO THINGS LIKE, LET'S CUT ALL TRAINING SO THAT WE CAN FUND STAFFING, LET'S CUT SOME OF THE VEHICLES THAT WE NEED AND THE OTHER EQUIPMENT THAT WE NEED. THOSE ARE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS THAT YOUR STAFFING IS TAKING OVER THE BUDGET IN A WAY THAT'S UNSUSTAINABLE. AND SO THERE MIGHT BE EARLY SIGNS THAT IF WE CONTINUE, YOU KNOW, WE ADD ANOTHER 10 OR 20 POSITIONS A YEAR, THAT THOSE THINGS WILL START TO GO IN THAT DIRECTION. HAVING BEEN IN ENVIRONMENTS THAT WERE MAKING THOSE DECISIONS IN THE PAST, I DON'T SEE THOSE HAPPENING HERE IN AN ALARMING WAY, BUT IT'S ALWAYS SOMETHING TO KEEP A REALLY CLOSE EYE ON AS YOU START TO SEE THE, YOU KNOW, THE INABILITY TO DO SOME OF THE THINGS YOU NEED TO DO TO MAINTAIN STAFFING BECAUSE PEOPLE TEND TO NOT WANT TO CUT THE STAFFING WHEN THEY MADE DECISIONS TO ADD THE STAFFING, THAT'S UNSUSTAINABLE. AND SO THEN THEY KEEP CUTTING EVERYTHING ELSE UNTIL YOU'RE REALLY DOING IT THAT WAY. THAT'S AN INTERESTING POINT, BECAUSE I THINK WHAT TENDS TO HAPPEN IS IT GRADUALLY WILL CUT TRAINING. WE CAN GET BY WITH A LITTLE LESS. IT WON'T BE AS QUALITY, BUT WE'LL DO A LITTLE LESS SO WE WON'T SEE IT ONE YEAR. OH, NO MORE TRAINING. WE'LL SEE. LIKE WHAT IS THE TREND THAT'S BEEN HAPPENING IN THE DEPARTMENTS IN TERMS OF TRAINING? IF IT'S ALREADY STARTING TO BE REDUCED IN SOME DEPARTMENTS, WHICH I THINK IT IS, THEN IT'S A TREND WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL OF RIGHT NOW. YEAH. WELL IT'S HARD FOR US TO SPOT. WHAT'S THAT? IT'S HARDER FOR US TO SPOT BECAUSE.YEAH, BECAUSE IF WE'RE GRADUAL. RIGHT. AND I'LL JUST I'LL MAKE AN ADDENDUM TO YOUR SPEECH, WHICH IS THAT I THINK THAT THE UNSUSTAINABLE CONVERSATION IS LOSING ITS IMPACT BECAUSE THIS IS MY 10TH YEAR ON COUNCIL. I WOULD SAY EIGHT OUT OF THOSE TEN YEARS, EVERY DIRECTOR HAS COME BEFORE US OR SERVICE DIRECTORS COME BEFORE US AND SAID THE SAME THING. AND COUNCIL DOESN'T REALLY HASN'T REACTED MUCH TO THAT. SO. SORT OF GETTING TO YOUR POINT IS, OKAY, WE'VE HEARD IT'S UNSUSTAINABLE. WHAT DOES THAT REALLY MEAN AT THIS POINT. AND I THINK WHAT YOU DID WITH THE SMALL EXAMPLES THAT YOU JUST GAVE ARE HELPFUL FOR PUTTING IN OUR MINDS THINGS THAT WE NEED TO BE LOOKING FOR AS SYMPTOMS OF AN UNHEALTHY ORGANIZATION. AND I KNOW YOU HAD SOME THOUGHTS, OVERALL THOUGHTS FOR YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO DODGE. SO I THINK THIS IS ALL GREAT. I JUST WANTED TO ADD TO IT. IN GOVERNMENT, YOU'RE ALWAYS GOING TO HAVE LIMITED RESOURCES. WE ALWAYS WILL. AND THAT WON'T BE AN ISSUE THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET AWAY FROM MOST LIKELY. SO A LOT OF IT IS JUST PRIORITIZING, RIGHT? IT'S WHAT DO YOU WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT? IS IT THE PEOPLE? IS IT THE EQUIPMENT? IS IT THE NEW SYSTEM WE WANT TO IMPLEMENT? IT'S ALWAYS HAVING TO SHUFFLE. WHAT PRIORITY IS THE MOST BENEFICIAL? I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF ADVANTAGES THAT WE CAN GAIN FOR TECHNOLOGY, THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO HIRE THREE NEW PEOPLE, BECAUSE TECHNOLOGY CAN MAKE IT DONE IN THE THREE. YOU ALREADY HAVE. A LOT OF OUR JOBS ARE NOT THAT WAY. THEY ARE ON THE STREET. THEY ARE OUT PUBLICLY. YOU CAN'T REPLACE THAT WITH A ROBOT. SO THAT'S SOMETHING TO WEIGH AS WELL. BUT I THINK THE MORE WE CAN COME UP WITH BENCHMARKS AND THINGS THAT ARE KIND OF WHAT ARE THOSE REPORT CARD ITEMS, ARE WE PERFORMING WELL? AND THOSE
[02:10:03]
BENCHMARKS OF WHAT IS OUR TARGET, OF HOW MUCH WE SHOULD BE REINVESTING INTO OUR CAPITAL VERSUS OUR PERSONNEL? WHAT IS OUR GROWTH PLAN? I'D LIKE TO WORK TOWARDS GETTING LONG TERM PLANS FOR OUR STAFFING. SO IF WE KNOW WE GROW AT 3%, HERE'S HOW MUCH STAFFING WE SHOULD BE.ADDING INTERNAL SERVICES IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF YOU CAN'T JUST HIRE A 10TH OF AN ACCOUNTANT OR A 10TH OF AN HR PERSON, RIGHT? BUT OVER THE COURSE OF FIVE YEARS YOU MIGHT NEED ONE. SO MAKING A PLAN FOR THAT SO THAT WE HAVE PLANS FOR THOSE GROWTH NEEDS. AND THEN AS WE GROW IN INFRASTRUCTURE WE HAVE CUSTOMER NEEDS. THOSE THINGS ARE A LITTLE BIT MORE DIGESTIBLE BECAUSE YOU HAVE METRICS THAT YOU CAN SAY, HEY, WE'VE ADDED 10,000 CUSTOMERS, WE'RE GOING TO NEED THIS MUCH MORE INFRASTRUCTURE, OR WE KNOW WHERE THE CITY HAS GROWN AND WHAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED FOR THOSE GROWTH. SO TO DATE, WE HAVE BEEN LIMITED IN OUR ABILITY TO HAVE DECISION MAKING LEVEL DATA FOR EVERYTHING BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN LIMITED IN OUR STAFFING ABILITY. HOW MANY PEOPLE WE CAN HIRE, WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY WHOSE TITLE IS BUDGET ANALYST YEAR ROUND, RIGHT? NOBODY HAS THAT TITLE. AND SOMETIMES WE SIT HERE DREAMING UP THINGS THAT WE'D LIKE TO KNOW THAT WOULD LOOK FOR THOSE PEOPLE, AND WE HAVE NONE OF THEM. BUT HOW MUCH OF MY QUESTION IS TO WHAT EXTENT DOES GRAVITY AND WILL WORKDAY HAVE THE ABILITY FOR AI TO CREATE TABLES AND CHARTS FOR US? BECAUSE ONE OF THE TABLES AND CHARTS, I WOULD LIKE TO JUST SPEAK INTO THE AIR AND HAVE BE CREATED WOULD BE ONE WHERE I COULD SEE THE GROWTH IN IN POSITIONS OF CHRIST. NOW I'VE FORGOTTEN IT. I HAD IT IN MY HEAD. BUT BUT IT WAS WHEN WE WERE TALKING AT THE BEGINNING ABOUT, OH, NEVER MIND, I'LL, I'LL REMEMBER AND THEN WRITE IT DOWN AND TELL YOU. BUT I GUESS IT WOULD JUST BE NICE TO KNOW BY DEPARTMENT HOW OUR, WHAT KIND OF FLUCTUATION WE'RE SEEING. IS IT WITHIN A NORM. HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO OTHER LIKE CITIES AND THEN. WE SAY TO OURSELVES, OKAY, WE'RE PERFORMING ON PAR OR WE'RE PERFORMING ON PAR, BUT WE COULD CUT THIS OR BUT WE HAVEN'T ADDED THAT AND IT WOULD JUST BE WE DON'T HAVE THAT DATA IS I BUILT INTO WORKDAY? THERE IS I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE DEPENDENT ON WHAT WE WHAT LEVEL WE BUILD, THE DATA WE'RE GOING TO COLLECT BECAUSE WE DON'T START COLLECTING IT. WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE IT AT THE END. RIGHT. SO I THINK THOSE ARE THOSE KEY METRICS OF WHAT DO WE WANT TO SEE AT THE END SO THAT WE BUILD THAT INTO HOW WE TRACK OUR DATA.
BECAUSE IF WE DON'T TRACK THAT DATA, SORRY, ARE WE GOING TO PUT HISTORICAL DATA INTO THAT SYSTEM? SOME. YES. SO I GUESS COUNCIL MEMBERS NOW IS PROBABLY THE PERFECT TIME TO BE THINKING OF SOME OF THE DATA YOU WANT THAT WE CAN'T CURRENTLY PRODUCE, BUT LET THEM KNOW SO THAT THEY CAN BE SURE THAT TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THEY'RE THERE UPLOADING THE RIGHT HISTORICAL DATA. AND I THINK, BROOKS, PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I BELIEVE IN THE ANNUAL ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT. THERE IS A CHART IN THERE THAT TALKS ABOUT THE STAFFING LEVELS BY DEPARTMENT. OVER THE LAST I THINK IT'S FIVE YEARS. IT'S TEN YEARS. PARDON ME, IT'S TEN YEARS. SO THAT IS IN THE AUDIT. AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE DO UPDATE EVERY YEAR AS PART OF OUR ANNUAL AUDIT. SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE COULD PUT INTO LIKE A DATA SET TYPE OF A THING. BUT BUT IT IS AVAILABLE AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE DO UPDATE REGULARLY. I THINK IT'D BE HARD FOR US TO COMPARE OURSELVES TO OTHER CITIES IN A WAY THOUGH, BECAUSE WE ARE MORE COMPLICATED, RIGHT? WE DO HAVE MORE DIVISIONS AND DEPARTMENTS AND WE DO THINGS THAT OTHER PEOPLE DON'T. IT WOULD ALMOST BE SERVICES THAT WE'D HAVE TO COMPARE. YEAH. SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S REALLY HARD FOR US TO SAY OUR EMPLOYEE COUNT IS LIKE TWO PER 1000 PEOPLE OR SOMETHING. YOU KNOW, I'M JUST SAYING, YOU KNOW, THROWING A NUMBER OUT THERE, BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN'T USE THAT METRIC. YOU CAN'T, BECAUSE WE DO SO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE AIRPORT THAT NOBODY ELSE HAS IN THE POWER COMPANY THAT NOBODY ELSE HAS. AND IT'S JUST WE'RE WE'RE NOT COMPARABLE. BUT, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES COMPARING WITH OURSELVES ACROSS TIME. YES.
COULD BE USEFUL. YES. AND SO THERE'S STILL VALUE IN HAVING DATA. WE JUST HAVE TO LIKE I AGREE WITH YOU FIND THE RIGHT COMPARABLES. AND I THINK COMING UP WITH THOSE BENCHMARKS THAT ARE VALUABLE TO EACH DEPARTMENT AND COMPARABLE ACROSS THE INDUSTRY. SO IF IT'S RESPONSE TIME FOR EMS OR IF IT'S LANE MILES PER, I DON'T KNOW, THERE'S DIFFERENT ONES FOR EVERY TYPE OF BUSINESS THAT WE ARE OPERATING. AND WHAT ARE THOSE ONES TO SHOW? ARE WE SHORT? ARE WE ABOVE.
WHERE DO WE NEED TO BE HITTING SO THAT WE CAN TARGET OUR BUDGETS TO MEET THOSE GOALS AND WHERE WE NEED TO FOCUS? OR MAYBE WE NEED TO RAISE A RATE HERE AND WE CAN'T DO IT HERE. SO FIGURING OUT WHAT ARE THOSE DIFFERENT FUNDING MECHANISMS FOR THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO. SO I THINK THOSE ARE SIGNS OF HEALTHINESS. WE HEARD SOME SIGNS OF UNHEALTHINESS, AND WE PROBABLY NEED TO BECOME EVEN SMARTER ABOUT UNHEALTHINESS SO THAT WE, AS LIAISONS CAN SPOT
[02:15:01]
IT. AND AS WE TAKE A LOOK, YOU KNOW, ACROSS THE PROGRAMS IN THE CITY THAT WE SEE, WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT TENDING TOWARD ADOPTING TOO MANY UNHEALTHY PRACTICES, ONE OF THE UNHEALTHY ONES FROM AFTER THE GREAT RECESSION WAS CUTTING MURPH TO FUND DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS. AND THAT THAT CAME BACK AROUND TO REALLY BITE US. RIGHT. AND WE HAD TO START SAVING OUR MURPH ACCOUNTS. AND SO WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO SPOT UNHEALTHY OR VERY SICKLY PRACTICES. SO THANK YOU FOR FRAMING IT THAT WAY. AND THE OTHER THINGS WE SHOULD TOUCH ON BEFORE WE LEAVE SUSTAINABILITY. COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, DIRECTORS, ANYTHING YOU WANT TO ADD IN WHILE YOU'RE SITTING HERE LISTENING TO? DARREN, YOU'RE WELCOME TO MOVE ON TO. I KNOW THERE WERE SOME OTHER SLIDES IN YOUR SECTION. THANK YOU. I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING. I THINK SUSTAINABILITY, I THINK WE'RE LOOKING AT IT AS AN OVERALL CITY ISSUE, WHICH I AGREE WITH, BUT I THINK YOU HIT ON EXACTLY WHAT IT IS. I THINK SUSTAINABILITY IN, IN EACH DEPARTMENT IS DIFFERENT. AND I THINK I THINK IT PROBABLY IS HAPPENING AT THE DEPARTMENT LEVEL ALREADY. YOU KNOW, I'VE LOST NINE PEOPLE IN TWO YEARS TO RESIGNATION. THAT NEVER HAPPENED. CAN I REPLACE THEM? YES, I CAN REPLACE THEM. BUT IT IT COSTS MONEY TO REPLACE BODIES AND THE TRAINING, THE EQUIPMENT, THE EVERYTHING LIKE THAT. SO I THINK IT COMES DOWN TO SERVICE DELIVERY AND WHAT THE COUNCIL REALLY WANTS TO DO TO MAKE YOUR ASSUMPTIONS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN REALLY WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE. AND, YOU KNOW, LIKE BROOKE SAID, YOU KNOW, WE CAN'T PUT ROBOTS IN THE STREET IN PUBLIC SAFETY ON ON THE POLICE AND FIRE SIDE. AND IT IS YOU KNOW, TECHNOLOGY ONLY GETS US SO FAR. SO, YOU KNOW, THOSE THOSE TYPES OF THINGS ARE HAPPENING WHEN YOU LOOK AT OUR BUDGETS THAT YOU KNOW IT, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO LOOK AT THE PEOPLE THAT WE'VE GROWN OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST 15 OR 20 YEARS AND GO, OH YEAH, THEY THEY'RE SUSTAINABLE BECAUSE THEY'RE GROWING PEOPLE. WELL, IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT KEEPING UP WITH THE GROWTH OF 10% OF POPULATION GROWTH IN THE COAL VOLUMES AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT'S HAPPENING. SO, YOU KNOW, IT IS DIFFICULT. BUT I THINK IT'S A HARD DECISION OF WHAT ACTUALLY IS THE SERVICE DELIVERY THAT THIS COUNCIL WANTS TO SEE AND WHAT IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO BE SUSTAINABLE IN THOSE PRIORITIES. OKAY. CAN I ASK A QUESTION THEN? SO IF SOMETIMES IT FEELS LIKE WHEN WE WHERE DO WE GET THE ANSWERS? I MEAN, BECAUSE WE HAVE THE LIAISON SYSTEM AND THEN IT'S LIKE, OH, I'M ASKING FOR A PERSON OR, OR WHATEVER, BUT SOMETIMES WITHOUT REALLY DIGGING IN, IT'S LIKE THE ANSWERS ARE. FLEETING. WELL, I THINK I THINK WHAT I THINK, WHAT I THINK WHAT'S HAPPENING IS YOU HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF DIRECTORS THAT WANT THE CITY AS A WHOLE TO SUCCEED. AND SO WHEN WE'RE ASKED TO CUT OUR BUDGETS AND MAKE, YOU KNOW, MAKE DIFFERENT PRIORITIES WITHIN THE, WITHIN THE CITY, WE DO THAT COLLECTIVELY. WE ALL BASICALLY ROLL UP OUR SLEEVES AND WE MAKE THOSE CUTS THAT ARE NEEDED SO THAT THE CITY CAN CONTINUE AS A WHOLE. WELL, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT AT TIMES TO GO BACK TO OUR DEPARTMENTS AND GO, WE HAD TO CUT ANOTHER QUARTER MILLION DOLLARS. WE HAD A QUARTER CUT ANOTHER 600,000. I'LL USE THE SAFER GRANT AS AN EXAMPLE. I HOPE THIS COUNCIL NEVER APPROVES ANOTHER SAFER GRANT IN THIS ENDEAVOR, BECAUSE THREE YEARS AGO, WE MADE THE DECISION TO HIRE 12 PEOPLE THAT WERE GOING TO BE FUNDED IN THREE YEARS. THAT WAS PAID FOR BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR THREE YEARS. AND THEN THIS YEAR, I WAS EXPECTED TO FIND THAT ONE. WELL, THAT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO FIND $1.1 MILLION IN A BUDGET THAT BASICALLY MIRRORS ONE FOUR YEARS AGO. SO ARE THINGS BEING CUT? YEAH, TRAININGS BEING CUT. IS EQUIPMENT BEING CUT? YES.EQUIPMENT IS BEING CUT. YOU KNOW, ARE WE DOING MORE WITH LESS? YES. BECAUSE WE OPEN NEW STATIONS AND NOW WE HAVE TO MOVE OPERATIONAL PEOPLE AROUND. SO, YOU KNOW, THOSE THINGS ARE VERY DIFFICULT. BUT WE'RE ALL WE'RE ALL HERE FOR THE CITY AND THE DIRECTORS ARE, ARE, YOU KNOW, TO USE OUR TERM, ONE CITY, ONE TEAM. AND WE WILL DIG IT, DIG IN AND BASICALLY FIND THE ANSWERS AND THE RESOURCES THAT ARE NEEDED FOR THE CITY TO CONTINUE TO RUN. BUT THIS IS THE KIND OF THING THAT WE HAVE TO DOCUMENT FOR THE LEGISLATURE. AND THE BIG SIGN WOULD BE NOT JUST EXACTLY WHAT DWAYNE SAID, BUT BRYCE, THAT THERE'S THAT STATEMENT IN THIS BUDGET PUTTING PAUSE ON THE
[02:20:07]
FIVE YEAR PLAN THAT WE PUT TOGETHER LAST YEAR TO BRING STAFFING UP TO WHAT IT WAS RECOMMENDED, THAT WERE PAUSED ON A PLAN THAT WE MADE FOR FIVE YEARS, IS A SIGN WE ARE GETTING BEHIND, AND THOSE SIGNALS ARE OUT THERE. WE HAVE TO DOCUMENT THEM AND PRESENT THEM TO OUR LEGISLATORS. I DON'T KNOW ANY OTHER WAY TO DO IT. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY, I DO I AGREE WITH THE SAFER GRANT. RIGHT. THOSE ARE THOSE ARE DEPARTMENT DRIVEN REQUESTS THAT IT'S LIKE, OH YEAH. YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO BE WE'RE REQUESTING IT NOW. I MEAN AND SO THIS ISN'T ANY RIGHT. THIS ISN'T DIRECTED TO CHIEF NELSON. BUT BUT WE DIDN'T COME FORWARD WITH THE SAFER GRANT. BUT I FEEL LIKE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THAT BUDGET YEAR THAT WE SAID, YOU KNOW, A YEAR LATER OR A YEAR LATER, DO WE HAVE SAFER COVERED IN TWO YEARS? IN TWO YEARS, THAT'S WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED. NOT IN THIS YEAR, BUT ARE WE HALF OF IT? ARE WE HALFWAY IN THIS YEAR? ARE WE HALFWAY IN NEXT YEAR AND THEN MAYBE NOT DONE A FURNACE OR DONE SOMETHING ELSE BECAUSE WE DIDN'T MEMORIALIZE THAT SO THAT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE IT WASN'T LIKE I THINK THAT'S A IT'S A IT'S OUR BUDGETING PROBLEM. TO AN EXTENT. IT IS A LACK OF SOME SYSTEMATIC FORESIGHT. HOWEVER, FOR A THREE YEAR AGO DECISION TO BE IMPACTED BY ROLLING A BUDGET BACK TO A FOUR YEAR AGO LEVEL, THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE SAID FOR WE DIDN'T. WHEN OUR PROJECTIONS CHANGED, IT BECAME VERY DIFFICULT TO STAY WITH THE PLAN FOR THE SAFER GRANT BECAUSE DWAYNE DID MAKE A PLAN, JUST THAT. THERE'S LESS GENERAL FUND REVENUE TO GO AROUND RIGHT NOW. SO AND THAT WASN'T PLANNED FOR THAT PART, BECAUSE WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT WE'D HAVE A BUDGET THAT WAS TIGHTER THAN THAN IT WAS EVEN BEFORE THE PLAN WAS MADE? RIGHT. SO THERE THERE ARE CIRCUMSTANCES ON BOTH SIDES, I THINK. SO I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT. BUT NOT ALL THE WAY, NOT COMPLETELY COMPLETE IN THE ASSESSMENT. SO IT'S KIND OF BUT I'M JUST SAYING THE MEMORIALIZATION OF WHAT ARE OUR COMMITMENTS INTO THE NEXT YEAR AND THE NEXT YEAR HAVE TO BE PART OF, I THINK, THE THIRD YEAR OF REALLY BEING BETTER AT THAT. I DO THINK YOU'VE BEEN HEARD ON THAT IN THE PAST, AND I'M GLAD YOU'RE UNDERLINING IT NOW, BECAUSE IT'S A VERY IMPORTANT POINT TO MAKE. OKAY, BROOKS, DO YOU FEEL LIKE THERE ARE THERE'S MORE THAT WE COULD BE DOING TO CAPTURE THE LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES OF, YOU KNOW, THE TWO SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH YEAR IMPACTS OF DECISIONS WERE BEING MADE. OR DO YOU THINK WE HAVE STARTED TO GET. YEAH, I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE'RE WE'RE ON THE RIGHT TRACK NOW OF TRYING TO DOCUMENT IT IN THE BUDGET, BUT ALSO MAKING SURE WE DON'T LOSE THOSE TO THE NEXT YEAR AND THE NEXT YEAR GRANTS, ESPECIALLY, ESPECIALLY IF THAT FUNDING IS TRAILING OFF OR DROPS OFF AT A CERTAIN RATE, THOSE ARE THE ONES ARE THE WORST, RIGHT.BECAUSE YOU CAN LIVE HAPPY AND NOT REALLY THINK ABOUT IT. BUT THE COPS GRANT NOT APPLYING FOR THAT. THAT'S A BIG IMPACT OF THE STAFFING PLAN, BUT WE KNEW WE DID NOT HAVE THE FUNDING GOING FORWARD FOR THE NEXT THREE YEARS, EVEN MEET THE MATCH NEEDED, LET ALONE THE ONGOING AT THE END WHERE IT'S I CAN'T REMEMBER THE IMPACT. IT WAS A MILLION AND A HALF OR SOMETHING.
AT THE END OF THE THREE YEAR GRANT. WE DIDN'T. WE KNEW WE DIDN'T HAVE THE MONEY THIS YEAR TO BE ABLE TO COMMIT TO THAT. SO I THINK WE'RE LOOKING AT IT AT A DIFFERENT LENS, WHICH IS GOOD, BUT IT IS TOUGH BECAUSE IT'S IMPACTING THE DEPARTMENTS TRYING TO SUPPORT THE SERVICES THAT ARE NEEDED. BUT THE ONE THING I WOULD ALWAYS SAY ABOUT GRANTS IS PRETTY SPECIFIC TO GRANTS, WHETHER IT BE A GRANT OR WHATEVER. YOU GOT TO LOOK AT IT AS, DO WE NEED TO ADD THIS OR DON'T WANT TO ADD IT? AND IF WE NEED TO ADD IT, WE NEED TO COME UP WITH THE MONEY TO ADD IT. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO KNOW HOW MUCH WE'RE PAYING FOR IT. AND THAT GRANT HELPS SOFTEN THAT. WE SHOULDN'T LOOK AT GRANT. OH, WE CAN GET THIS BECAUSE WE HAVE A GRANT FOR IT. IT WOULD BE REALLY NEAT. SO WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT GRANTS, IN MY OPINION THE GRANT SHOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE IT'S NOT LIKE A BONUS. IT'S WE REALLY NEED THIS. IF WE DID HAVE THE GRANT, WE'D STILL NEED IT AND WE WOULD COME UP WITH A WAY TO FINANCE IT BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT WE REALLY NEED TO DO.
AND YOU LOOK AT GRANT AS, OH, THAT'S GREAT. WE HAVE AN OFFSET TO ACTUALLY HELP US OUT. THAT'S THAT'S HOW WE TRY TO LOOK AT THOSE GRANTS. NO, THIS IS REALLY TEMPTING. I CAN GET A GRANT FOR THIS. OUR VICTIM ADVOCATE GRANT, YOU TALKED A LOT ABOUT VICTIM ADVOCATE GRANT, RIGHT. IF YOU REALLY NEED A VICTIM ADVOCATE, I SHOULDN'T BRING THAT TO YOU. IT SHOULD BE SOMETHING. WE REALLY NEED THIS, AND WE'VE GOT THIS WAY TO PAY FOR IT. ALSO, THAT CAN HELP ON DIRECTORS. WHEN YOU TALK, GO AHEAD AND USE YOUR MIX. YOU'RE NOT USED TO IT, BUT GO AHEAD AND DO IT. I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY THE FACT THAT WHAT YOU'RE DESCRIBING IS VERY SIMILAR TO HOW, ONCE UPON A
[02:25:02]
TIME, I USED TO FAITHFULLY PUT THE COUPONS IN THE SUNDAY NEWSPAPER, AND I FOUND THAT SOMETIMES I WAS SO EXCITED BY A COUPON THAT I BOUGHT THE THING BECAUSE I HAD THE COUPON. AND WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS USE THE COUPONS TO SUPPLEMENT WHAT YOU WERE ALREADY GOING TO BUY. AND THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THE IMPACT TO YOUR BUDGET. SO YEAH, I'VE HAD SIMILAR EXPERIENCES. I THINK WHAT DWAYNE WAS POINTING OUT THAT WHEN YOU USE GRANT MONEY TO FUND AN ONGOING EXPENSE AND THE GRANT MONEY IS GOING TO EXPIRE, WHETHER IT'S THIS YEAR OR NEXT YEAR, A FEW YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, THAT IT'S ALWAYS INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO FUND THAT DOWN THE ROAD. WHEN YOU USE GRANT MONEY TO FUND A ONE TIME THING, LIKE YOU GOT GRANT MONEY TO BUILD A BUILDING, IT'S BUILT, IT'S DONE, AND YOU MOVE FORWARD. THAT TENDS TO WORK MUCH BETTER THAN FUNDING POSITIONS THAT ARE GOING TO STAY IN THE BUDGET. WHEN THE GRANT MONEY RUNS OUT, IT CAN WORK. BUT LIKE WE'VE BEEN TALKING HERE ABOUT DIFFERENT PLANS, THE ONE'S BEEN PUT ON HOLD THAT YOU'VE NOW HAD TO FIND $1.1 MILLION IN THE BUDGET. I'VE SEEN THAT HAPPEN AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN, BECAUSE THE FUNDING WASN'T THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE FOR AN ONGOING EXPENSE. WE USE TEMPORARY FUNDING TO COVER IT. AND THEN WHEN YOU HAVE TO COME BACK AROUND AND FIND IT, IT'S JUST AS DIFFICULT AS IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WHEN YOU FIRST STARTED TO FIND IT. OH, SORRY. ONE THING THAT I WOULD POINT OUT, WE'VE TALKED FOR QUITE A WHILE AND THAT SOME HAVING SOME BENCHMARKING AND WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REALLY THE GENERAL FUND. RIGHT. WE HAVE LIMITED RESOURCES IN WHICH TO GROW THE REVENUE SOURCES THAT WE HAVE. BUT AS A COMMUNITY THAT WE HAVE, IT'S PRETTY EASY FOR US TO TRACK INTO GENERAL FUNDS. DO WE USE 80% OF THAT IN SALARIES AND BENEFITS? AND AS THAT GROWS, HEY, IF WE IF WE GET OUT OF THAT, THAT'S IN THE RED LINE, RIGHT? WE'RE OUTSIDE OF THAT TRACKING IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS. THAT'S THE SIMPLE WAY TO TRACK THAT. BUT WE ALSO HAVE TONS OF STUDIES THAT PLANNING DOES. SOME OF THOSE GO ON WITH OUR IMPACT FEES, HOW WE PREDICT THE CITY'S GOING TO GROW. YOU KNOW, THE ENTERPRISE GROUPS REALLY POLICE, FIRE AND PARKS ARE BIG PARTS OF THAT TO KEEP A LEVEL OF SERVICE. SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE PROJECTIONS AND WHAT WE HAVE AND THE REVENUE THAT WE'RE LIMITED TO, TO PAY FOR OUR COST OF LIVING POTENTIALITIES, ALSO OUR STEP AND GRADE PROGRAM HEALTH CARE, WE CAN PROJECT ALL OF THOSE. AND AT SOME POINT WHEN WE SAY THIS IS UNSUSTAINABLE, THOSE TWO LINES ARE REVENUE VERSUS EXPENDITURES ARE CROSSING. RIGHT. AND ALL THAT IS, IS THAT'S THAT PROJECTING THOSE COSTS. THAT'S NOT REAL DIFFICULT TO DO THAT. BUT I DO THINK THAT THAT BENCHMARKING THAT HISTORICALLY IT'S BEEN 80% OF THE GENERAL FUND. WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT THAT IS AND TALK ABOUT IT EVERY YEAR THAT, HEY, WE'RE GETTING OUTSIDE OF WHAT WE'VE HISTORICALLY BEEN ABLE TO FUND.THE ONLY WEIRD THING ABOUT THAT, IN MY MIND, IS I THINK FOR A LOT OF WHAT WE DO, IT'S NOT JUST OUR GROWTH THAT MATTERS. AND IDAHO FALLS, WHERE WE'RE REGIONAL. IF YOU DRIVE UP AND DOWN THE VALLEY, THOSE PEOPLE ARE SHOPPING HERE. THEY'RE HAVING HEART ATTACKS, THEY'RE HAVING CAR ACCIDENTS, THEY'RE HAVING. SO IT'S NOT JUST OUR GROWTH, BUT IT'S REGIONAL GROWTH THAT'S IMPACTING A LOT OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND EVEN OUR PARKS AND REC PROGRAMS, TOO. SO BUT I THINK THOSE NUMBERS ARE THERE. IT'S JUST AN IDEA. HEY, WHAT DO WE WANT TO AGREE ON? BUT THAT BENCHMARKING HAS BEEN SOMETHING THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT FOR QUITE SOME TIME. AND JUST A, YOU KNOW, KIND OF A POSITIVE NOTE. THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE THAT ARE THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE TOOLBOX. ONE OF THOSE THINGS, A FEW YEARS AGO, WE DID THE PUBLIC SAFETY PACKAGE WHERE WE USED THE 1% FOREGONE, AND WE SPECIFICALLY TOLD THE PUBLIC, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO SPEND THE 1% FOREGONE. AND IT WAS A PUBLIC SAFETY PACKAGE. WE'VE DONE SOME, YOU KNOW, SOME OTHER THINGS. YOU KNOW WHAT COUNCIL PRESIDENT MADE EARLIER? GROWTH AND ANNEXATION. YOU KNOW, THAT SHOULD YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME THOUGHT THAT THAT SHOULD BE DEDICATED TO GROWTH. AND, YOU KNOW, MAYBE SETTING THAT ASIDE. BUT ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE DID IN THE TOOLBOX, IN ADDITION TO POSITION CONTROL, IS THAT WE ACTUALLY SET ASIDE THOSE ONE TIME FUNDS INTO A SEPARATE ACCOUNT, IF YOU WILL, OR IT WAS REALLY A FUND THAT IT WAS A DESIGNATED. SO IT DIDN'T INADVERTENTLY GET ABSORBED INTO A DEPARTMENT'S OPERATING BUDGET. IF YOU RECALL, ONE TIME WAS APPROVED AND WE SET ASIDE THOSE FUNDS FOR THOSE SPECIFIC PROJECTS THAT WE TOLD COUNCIL WE WERE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD ON. AND BY SETTING ASIDE THAT MONEY JUST DIDN'T INADVERTENTLY GET ROLLED INTO SOMEONE'S OPERATIONS BUDGET INADVERTENTLY. I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY THAT SO THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO, BUT I WOULD CONCUR WITH WITH WHAT DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON SAID, AS WELL AS WHAT CHIEF NELSON HAS SAID, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE DO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PLAN AHEAD, AND WE DO HAVE SOME TOOLS IN THE TOOLBOX THAT WE HAVE AT SOME INSTANCES ALONG THE WAY IMPLEMENTED. BUT THERE ARE MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE LONG TERM PLANNING. AND THE CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF WHERE THAT PAID OFF WAS WHERE YOU IDENTIFIED THE $2 MILLION FROM ONE TIME PROJECTS
[02:30:03]
LIKE THE AQUATIC CENTER IMPROVEMENT THAT MILLION. WHEN YOU SAID TO US VERY DIRECTLY, WE CAN KEEP THAT MILLION. AND THEN THERE WAS ANOTHER MILLION, WE COULD KEEP THAT ONGOING. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE ABLE TO SAVE THE TAXPAYERS TONS OF MONEY. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY, I THINK WE CAN MOVE ON. THERE ARE SOME OTHER SLIDES. AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE GOING TO LEAVE THESE BARREN OR IF YOU ARE. SO THIS IS JUST A SUMMARY OF OUR PERSONNEL COSTS OVER TIME. AND I WANTED TO FOLLOW UP ON YOUR QUESTION, COUNCILOR BURTENSHAW, ON THE BENEFITS NOT CHANGING.LAST YEAR'S BUDGET WAS PROJECTED HEALTH INSURANCE AT 20%, BUT IT ACTUALLY CAME IN AT 9.9. SO THAT'S WHY IT'S RELATIVELY FLAT. SO IT WAS THE IT WAS THE BUDGETED 2025 BUDGET THAT WAS HIGH. SO IT WAS HALF MAYBE HALF OF THAT. AND SO THE INCREASE WASN'T NINE IT WAS SIX OKAY.
YES. THANK YOU A SMALL HEART ATTACK. BUT NO NO NO NO IT GAVE ME A LITTLE HEART ATTACK I'M SORRY FOR CAUSING THAT FOR YOU, BUT THANK YOU. I UNDERSTAND THAT, YEAH. SO THIS IS JUST SHOWING OUR OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS. SO 22 THROUGH OUR CURRENT PROPOSED BUDGET, THE COST OF OUR PERSONNEL. THIS IS PERSONNEL BENEFITS, ALL OF OUR SEASONALS, TAXES. IT'S ALL THINGS INCLUDED.
THIS ALSO IS CLOTHING RELATED TO EMPLOYEES, THINGS LIKE THAT. THIS THE TOP SECTION IS OUR PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED. SO NOT EVEN THE FULLY TAX SUPPORTED. SO THIS INCLUDES STREETS. IT INCLUDES RECREATION AND LIBRARY ON TOP OF OUR GENERAL FUND. OUR CURRENT INCREASE FOR PERSONNEL FOR THOSE PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED IS 5%. AND THAT'S MADE UP OF THE 3% COLA. AND THEN SOME OF THE STEP AND GRADE FOR THE MOST PART. AND THEN THE BENEFIT CHANGES. OUR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS HAVE INCREASED 6.4%. AND THEN OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS HAVE INCREASED BY 0.7% FOR PERSONNEL.
SO THAT'S JUST A SUPER HIGH LEVEL SUMMARY OF THOSE PERSONNEL CHANGES. I'D BE INTERESTED TO KNOW WHAT WHAT ACTUAL FTES WERE. I'M NOT EXPECTING YOU TO GIVE IT TO ME NOW, BUT MOVING THOSE SAME VERSUS THE APPROVED CALENDAR. SO 802 APPROVED. I'M MORE CONCERNED WITH WHAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE DURING I THINK YOU SAID IT WAS 750 TO. YEAH. NO. LIKE RIGHT NOW WE CURRENTLY HAVE 760 FTE CURRENTLY FULL TIME EMPLOYEES HIRED IN THEIR JOBS DOING THEIR WORK. WE'VE GOT APPROVED 802 POSITIONS. IT USUALLY HOVERS SOMEWHERE IN THAT RATIO. SO IF I WENT BACK TO 22 WITH THE ACTUALS, BE PRETTY CLOSE TO THAT. 760 NO, BECAUSE THE FTES WERE PROBABLY SOMETHING LIKE 700 THEN. AND THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I'M TRYING TO SEE IS DO WE HAVE MORE PEOPLE, OR IS IT JUST THAT THE COST OF THE SAME PEOPLE THIS KEEPS GOING UP OR SOME COMBINATION? IT'S A COMBINATION.
YEAH. AND I'M TRYING TO GET A FIX ON THAT RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE IT'S NOT. YEAH. OKAY. SO. WE NEED. OKAY. SO WE KIND OF ALREADY COVERED THESE I MEANT TO PULL THESE OUT OF THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET CHANGES BECAUSE SOME OF THEM ARE INCLUDED SOME ARE NOT. THIS IS THE SUMMARY OF FTE REQUESTS. OUR GENERAL FUND ONES ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET. THE ENTERPRISE WATER POWER, THOSE ARE INCLUDED IN THEIR BUDGETS BECAUSE THEY HAVE FEES TO SUPPORT THEM. BUT IT'S A MUNICIPAL SERVICES UTILITY. BILLING CUSTOMER SERVICE REP.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HAS INVESTMENT FOR A PLANNER, POLICE, A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER, PUBLIC WORKS, A GIS TECHNICIAN, PARKS CEMETERY MAINTENANCE OPERATOR, AND A ZOOKEEPER. SO MY ACCOUNT IS FIVE FROM EACH FUND. BUT PJ, I'M TRYING TO CLARIFY, IS HIGHER WOULD WORK BOTH IN THE ZOO AND IN THE CEMETERY. NO. SO IT'S TWO SEPARATE TWO HARD. BUT YES, BUT I'D ACTUALLY LIKE EXCUSE ME, I WOULD ACTUALLY LIKE TO RETRACT THAT ONE FOR THE FOR THE CEMETERY, JUST FOR OUR FUTURE CONVERSATIONS. JUST SO BE OKAY WITH THAT. WITH THAT ONE. ONE QUESTION IF I COULD. YOU BROUGHT THIS UP EARLIER AND I THOUGHT WE'D RESOLVED IT, BUT WE'LL DO THIS WHILE WE HAVE ALL THE ELECTED OFFICIALS IN THERE. SO GIS IS FUNDED BY ENTERPRISE GROUPS, HALF BY POWER, HALF BY PUBLIC WORKS. SO ONE EIGHTH FOR GET TECHNICAL. ONE EIGHTH OF THAT POSITION IS FROM STREETS. SO MAYBE 1/16 OF THEIR SALARY IS TAX DRIVEN. SO I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THAT MAKES SENSE. IT'S LISTED AS A GENERAL FUND EXPENSE OR AS AN ENTERPRISE EXPENSE. BUT WOULD THAT BE A TRANSFER OR WITH THE COST ALLOCATION? IT'S DONE THROUGH COST ALLOCATION. BUT THE IMPACT TO OUR PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED. SO STREETS IS 13,380 FOR THAT POSITION. SO WHEN WE GO INTO DETAIL ON THE DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THERE'S DOLLARS ASSIGNED TO THESE ITEMS. AND THEN ALSO THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE THAT IS 100% FUNDED BY THE UTILITIES. SO OUR
[02:35:06]
PUBLIC WORKS. POLICE, THE SCHOOL RESOURCE SRO. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE ACTUAL HIT TO THE GENERAL FUND IS QUITE SMALL AND I APPROVE OF THAT. SO 70% IS FUNDED BY THE SCHOOL AND SO ABOUT 33 600 IS NOT FUNDED BY THE SCHOOL. BUT THEN THERE'S ALSO THE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS ALSO PARTLY FUNDED. BUT IN THE IT GETS A LITTLE BIT COMPLEX AS IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT. BUT IN THE IN THIS FISCAL YEAR, THE WAY WE DO IT, BECAUSE WHAT WE END UP DOING IS IT'S NOT A BRAND NEW POLICE OFFICER THAT FILLS THAT POSITION. IT'S A VETERAN OFFICER. SO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PICKS UP 70% OF A VETERAN OFFICER. AND THEN WE BACK HIRE IT. THE ENTRYWAY FOR THE NEW OFFICER. AND SO THOSE OFFSET IN THE FIRST YEAR. SO IN THIS FIRST YEAR THERE WON'T BE A REQUEST FOR ANY MONEY FOR THAT POSITION. YOU WOULD NEED TO ADD ANY MONEY. WE CAN COVER IT BECAUSE WE ACTUALLY MAKE A LITTLE BIT OFF OF IT IN THAT FIRST YEAR, THE FOLLOWING YEARS THAT 30% WOULD GET BUDGETED. YOU WOULD SEE IN THE FOLLOWING YEAR. SO IN THIS CURRENT BUDGET, AS YOU'RE DIVVYING OUT WHATEVER IT IS, THERE WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL ASK FOR MONEY. BUT YOU JUST NEED TO REMEMBER THAT IN FUTURE YEARS THAT 30% WOULD WOULD BE A REAL NUMBER FOR THE CITY. BUT YOU STILL HAVE THE FIRST OR NEW HIRE UPFITTING THAT'S INCLUDED IN WHAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS. I'M SORRY, THIS IS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. THAT'S A SEPARATE CONTRACT THAT'S INCLUDED IN WHAT WE CHARGE THEM SO THEY PAY FOR THE VEHICLE LEASE. THEY PAY FOR ALL THE UPFITTING AND EVERYTHING, 70% OF IT. SO THAT INCLUDES ALL ALL OF THAT STUFF. WOW. I DIDN'T REALIZE THAT. SO THERE IS A STRAIGHT SALARY THERE. THERE, THERE IS PROJECTED TO NOT BE A COST TO THE CITY THIS YEAR. WE HAVE TO SAVE SOME GENERAL FUND MONEY. THIS THIS PARTICULAR YEAR IS BECAUSE OF THAT DIFFERENCE IN A ROOKIE OFFICER AND A VETERAN OFFICER. FUTURE YEARS. YOU, YOU, YOU LOOK AT ABOUT A 25, 30, $35,000 DIFFERENCE. SO IT WOULD LOOK LIKE AT THIS POINT THAT I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR YOU, BUT MOVING FORWARD, HAVING JUST HAD THIS CONVERSATION ABOUT ADDING FTES AND THAT YOU FINDING THAT MUCH MONEY IN YOUR BUDGET PROBABLY IS DOABLE KIND OF A THING, OR IS THAT A WRONG THING TO THINK? IT DEPENDS ON HOW YOU DEFINE FINDING MONEY IN YOUR BUDGET. THE WAY, THE WAY THE CITY USUALLY BUDGETS, THEY TAKE ALL THOSE FTES AND THAT GETS PUT INTO THE BASE BUDGET. SO IT WOULD BE THERE TO BEGIN WITH AND NOT BE PART OF WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE BECOME PART OF THE BASE BUDGET. AND IT'S NOT A I MEAN, IT'S REAL MONEY, BUT IT'S YOU'RE LOOKING AT 20 PLUS MILLION DOLLAR BUDGETS. IT'S A VERY SMALL PORTION OF THAT.THANK YOU. AND IF I COULD CLARIFY ON THE CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE, JUST IN CASE, WE DON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO, THAT ACTUAL POSITION WAS ACTUALLY REVIEWED WITH DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON AND GENERAL MANAGER PRAIRIE PRIOR TO THE REQUEST. AND THERE WAS SUPPORT OF THAT.
AND THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE GROWTH OF CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS THAT WE'VE BEEN RECEIVING AND PHONE CALLS AND WALK INS AND THAT TYPE OF THING. SO WE DID HAVE A WE DID HAVE A CONVERSATION. WE DID GET SUPPORT FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS TO HELP PAY FOR THAT POSITION. AND JUST IN CASE IT DOESN'T COME UP WHEN WE TALK ABOUT IT AGAIN. ALL RIGHT. SO THERE WILL BE TIME FOR GOING THROUGH EACH DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTS TO THE EXTENT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS COMING UP. BUT DIRECTORS DON'T DON'T FEEL DON'T EVEN BOTHER TO TRY TO PREPARE PRESENTATION.
JUST BE AVAILABLE AS A RESOURCE. BUT IS THAT FAIR, AT LEAST FROM WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT. YES.
BUT I MEAN, I THINK FOR EVERY EVERY ONE OF THOSE, WE WOULD HAVE THAT DIRECTOR SAY, YOU KNOW, WE NEEDED NOT NEED. WE EXPECT OR WANT AN EXPLANATION OF IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE LONG, BUT WHAT WHAT THE IDEA IS BEHIND THE PERSON AND THE FUNDING SOURCE. YEAH. CORRECT. THE NEED, THE FUNDING SOURCE AND ANYTHING UNIQUE AND BUT ALL RIGHT. SO DO WE WANT TO DO THAT. BUT BUT THAT WAS WHAT WHEN WE WERE THINKING OF GOING THROUGH EACH DEPARTMENT RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT THIS SLIDE.
SHOULD WE JUST GO THROUGH IT AND DO GET THIS INFORMATION IN OUR HEADS NOW. YEP. TIME WISE I THINK WE CAN FIT IT IN. I MEAN, THEN WE HAVE TO CALL THEM BACK TO GET THEIR OTHER REQUESTS CORRECT. I DON'T CARE WHETHER WE DO IT BY DEPARTMENT OR BY PERSONNEL. DOES IT MATTER TO ANYONE ON COUNCIL? NO, I'D RATHER DO IT BY DEPARTMENT, BECAUSE PARTLY I THINK THIS THIS MIGHT BE ADJUSTED A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE IT'S NOT ALL GENERAL FUND IMPACT AS I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT. OKAY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? I MEAN, BECAUSE I THOUGHT, OH, THIS IS ALL GENERAL FUND. OH, THIS IS A LOT OF PART. BUT IT ISN'T ALL GENERAL FUND MONEY. DOES THAT MAKE. YEAH.
YEAH. SO I'D RATHER SEE IT AGAIN IN A DEPARTMENT OKAY. YEAH. GREAT. SO WE CAN DO BUT WE'RE NOT DOING DEPARTMENT PRESENTATIONS. RIGHT. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS MAKING ASKING DIRECTORS
[02:40:03]
WHO CARE TO BE HERE TO COME. AND TO THE EXTENT THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT DEPARTMENT REQUESTS NEXT TUESDAY, THEY CAN ASK THOSE QUESTIONS. YEAH. YES. OKAY. BUT ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WILL BE ASKED IS TELL US ABOUT YOUR BOOK. YES, YOUR FTE REQUEST AND WHAT THE ACTUAL IMPACT ON GENERAL FUND. YES. THAT'S WHAT I MEANT WHEN I SAID FUNDING SOURCE. RIGHT. WE HAVE THAT. OKAY. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT. AND WE'RE READY TO MOVE ON FROM THIS[Finance Team ]
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
ALL RIGHT. IT'S SIMILAR TO PULLING OUT THE CAPITAL. SO YOU CAN SEE IT'S NOT AS BIG OF A INCREASE. OKAY. THEN WE PULLED TOGETHER. THIS IS ALL OF OUR PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED DEPARTMENTS. AND IT'S FIVE YEARS WORTH OF HISTORY. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE BOTTOM IT'S EACH DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT THAT'S PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED. SO WITHIN PUBLIC WORKS IT INCLUDES STREETS NOT JUST THEIR ENGINEERING GIS TEAMS AND GIFT PARKS IS PARKS AND RECREATION.
EVERYBODY ELSE IS JUST IN GENERAL IN THERE. BUT YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE SWING OF WHAT THOSE PERCENTAGES ARE. OBVIOUSLY OUR POLICE AND FIRE AND PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS MAKE UP THE BULK OF OUR SPENDING OF OUR PROPERTY TAXES. THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES. YOU'LL SEE A BIG EXCUSE ME, YOU'LL SEE A BIG CHANGE ON POLICE AND FIRE FROM 22 TO 23. THAT IS AN ACCOUNTING ISSUE RELATED TO LEASES. SO THE BIG JUMP IS ACTUALS RELATED TO LEASES BECAUSE WE HAVE TO WHEN A LEASE IS ISSUED YOU HAVE TO BOOK THE WHOLE THING ESSENTIALLY AS A FOOD ISSUE DEBT. THEN YOU'LL SEE WITH FIRE YOU'LL SEE IT RELATIVELY FLAT AND THEN A BIG JUMP. THAT'S THE IMPACT OF THE
[02:45:05]
SAFER GRANT GOING AWAY PRIMARILY. YOU'LL ALSO SEE ON THE FAR LEFT THE THIRD SECTION, THAT IS GO TO THE LEFT OF IT, OUR ERP. I PULLED THAT OUT IN MUNICIPAL SERVICES JUST BECAUSE IT IS A KIND OF ONE TIME CAPITAL PROJECT. JUST SO WE DIDN'T SWING THE CIVIL SERVICES NUMBERS SO MUCH. AND THEN YOU'LL ALSO SEE THE IMPACT OF A LOT OF OUR DEPARTMENTS, THE GENERAL FUND AMOUNT GOING DOWN THIS YEAR BECAUSE OF THAT TRANSITION OF HAVING TO PART ENTERPRISE FUNDS PAY DIRECTLY FOR THOSE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON THESE TRENDS OF THE DIFFERENT PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED DEPARTMENT COSTS? HOW DO WE HOW DO WE AVERAGE TAKE TAKE ALL OF THESE LINES AND SORT OF GET AN IDEA OF A GROWTH RATE, NOT AVERAGES IS THE RIGHT WORD, BUT HOW DO WE HOW WOULD HOW DO WE CREATE A GROWTH RATE. SO YEAH, PERCENTAGE CHANGE. WE COULD DO KIND OF TREND LINES ON THESE. I WAS WANTING TO DO KIND OF A PIE CHART. SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE GENERAL FUND GOES TO EACH DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT. BUT YEAR OVER YEAR THAT'S HARD TO COMPARE. BUT LIKE CURRENTLY, ARE YOU LOOKING AT JUST TAX SUPPORTED OR TOTAL OPERATING? I AM MOSTLY INTERESTED IN GENERAL FUND GROWTH RATE BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS, WE'RE PRETTY AWARE AND THEY'RE TIGHTLY MANAGED AND WE'RE NOT GOING CRAZY. BUT WITH GENERAL FUND, IT'S KIND OF JUST IMPORTANT TO SEE, ARE WE ACCIDENTALLY PUTTING ALL OF OUR EGGS IN TWO BASKETS INSTEAD OF ACROSS THE BOARD? I MEAN, HOW ARE WE HANDLING THIS AND ARE WE NEGLECTING SOME DEPARTMENTS, OR DO WE HAVE SOME THAT VOLUNTEER TO TIGHTEN THEIR BELT MORE THAN OTHERS? I MEAN, WHERE ARE WE? HOW DO WE LOOK AT THIS? YOU KNOW, AND ANOTHER FACTOR IS, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE DO THE ONE TIME CAPITAL FOR SOME OF OUR LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, DIRECTOR HOME, YOU KNOW, 255,000 FOR OIL, THAT'S JUST ONE TIME. SO THAT'S GOING TO HAVE A SPIKE IN THIS YEAR. AND THEN NEXT YEAR IT WILL DROP OFF AND SOMEBODY ELSE MIGHT INCREASE BY, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND. BUT THE OTHER THING WE WANTED TO POINT OUT, AND IT'S NOT JUST PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED, BUT, YOU KNOW, THE TOTAL DOLLAR NUMBER OF THE BUDGET, YOU KNOW, IT'S A BIG NUMBER. AND WHY IT'S SUCH A BIG NUMBER IS WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE CAPACITY TO DO OUR CAPITAL PROJECTS. BECAUSE IF WE HAVE A SEASON THAT'S REALLY GREAT WEATHER, LIKE IN THE CASE THAT WE HAD WITH THE WITH THE FRONTIER CENTER, WE WERE ACTUALLY ABLE TO START BREAKING GROUND IN APRIL. SO WE REALLY DO LIKE TO LEVERAGE THOSE WEATHER OPPORTUNITIES WE CAN. SO BY ALLOWING US TO HAVE THE POTENTIAL CAPACITY OF WHAT THE DEPARTMENTS THINK THEY ARE REASONABLY ABLE TO PROCESS IN ONE YEAR, THAT'S REALLY HELPFUL TOO. AND SO THAT SOMETIMES MAKES IT A REALLY BIG IN TOTAL. SO IT'S GOING TO BE A QUESTION FOR BROOKS AND CHRIS IF THAT'S OKAY. WHEN WE LOOK AT THE PUBLIC WORKS IS PROPERTY TAX SUPPORTED. IS THAT ALMOST ALL STREETS. LOOK AT THE. YES. AND THAT DECREASES THE FUNCTION OF STREETS AND SANITATION AND TO POWER. SO BROOKS DOES THAT. DOES THAT STREET TOTAL JUST HAVE THE 4 MILLION HISTORICALLY GIVEN TO STREETS OR THE ENTIRE EXPENDITURE FOR STREETS? THIS IS JUST THE EXPENSE SIDE. SO IT'S SO IT'S THE FULL $10 MILLION BUDGET FROM STREETS. BUT BUT ONLY 4 MILLION OF THAT HISTORICALLY HAS CAME FROM PROPERTY TAX. SO IT'S SO SOME OF THIS SO SOME IS GAS TAX AND RIGHT. YEAH. SO REALLY THE PUBLIC WORKS SIDE HISTORICALLY WE HAD 4 MILLION FOR STREETS FROM PROPERTY TAX. WE HAD 790 FOR PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND THEN 1.5 MILLION FOR ENGINEERING. SO WHAT'S THAT FIVE AND A HALF. SIX TWO IS PROPERTY TAX NOT THE REST OF. THAT'S OTHER FUNDING SOURCES. YEAH. THERE'S ANOTHER NUMBER THAT THE GRAPH MISLEADS ME WHEN I FIRST LOOK AT IT. SO WANTING TO KNOW THE ACTUAL PROPERTY TAX PORTION. YEAH. AND THAT'S A LITTLE TRICKY BECAUSE ON THE GENERAL FUND SIDE WE DON'T ALLOCATE THE TAX TO EVERY DEPARTMENT. WE JUST KEEP IT IN THE GENERAL FUND. SO IT'S NOT HERE. POLICE'S PORTION OF AND MAYBE THIS IS ENOUGH CLARIFICATION, BUT SOMEBODY COULD REMIND ME OF THOSE NUMBERS. YOU GAVE SOMEONE TO US IN LIAISON. IT'S NOT THE SAME BECAUSE IT'S NOT COUNTING THIS MONEY WE'RE GETTING FROM THE STATE. WE WERE WRONGLY ACCUSED.WE HAVEN'T SPENT THAT MUCH PROPERTY TAX MONEY, SO. YEAH, THEY ARE NOT FULLY FUNDED BY THE PROPERTY. AND OTHER DEPARTMENTS HAVE FEES AND THINGS AS WELL. BUT AGAIN, THESE ARE DEPARTMENTS THAT HEAVILY RELY ON PROPERTY TAXES. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR BRAIN STORMS THAT YOU HAVE AS
[02:50:01]
YOU LOOK AT THIS? I JUST I APPRECIATE IT. I THINK THE TRENDS AND ALL OF THAT THAT YOU'VE PRESENTED IN ALL OF THIS IS VERY IT'S JUST VERY HELPFUL TO LOOK AND SEE. THE OTHER PART I APPRECIATE IS EVERY TIME WE ASK FOR US TO GET SOMETHING, SHE GETS THE NUMBERS RIGHT THERE.YEAH. SO I'VE BEEN I'VE BEEN LIVING IN THESE NUMBERS FOR A WHILE. I'M IMPRESSED THAT WE CAN CHOOSE A GIVEN DEPARTMENT OUT THERE. AND SOMEBODY AT THAT TABLE AND ADDING THEM, YOU KNOW, BUT THEY KNOW THE NUMBERS, RIGHT? A LOT OF TIMES THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE TO LOOK THEM UP. SO I'M PRETTY IMPRESSED. TWO YEARS AGO WE DID IT ON THE STAGE AT THE CIVIC. YEAH, THAT WAS MY FIRST YEAR. I'VE BEEN HERE TWO. AND WE DON'T TALK ABOUT THIS OVER DINNER. I MEAN, IF YOUR HUSBAND MUST THINK THAT'S INCREDIBLE, I THINK YES HE DOES. BROOKS, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU SEE HERE THAT POPS OUT THAT AS A BUDGET PERSON, YOU THINK THAT LAY BUDGET PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW? NO, I THINK I THINK IT COULD BE HELPFUL TO HAVE AS KIND OF LIKE WE SAID, WHAT IS THAT PERCENTAGE THAT IS ALLOCATED FOR EACH DIVISION SO THAT THEY CAN LIVE WITHIN THE MEANS THAT THEY'RE GIVEN? AND NOW IT'S KIND OF EVERYBODY HAS TO FIGHT FOR THEIR OWN RIGHT. AND IT'S A DIFFICULT WAY TO HAVE TO MANAGE YOUR BUDGET BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW. DO I FIND A PERSON RIGHT NOW OR DO I GET A VEHICLE OR SO I THINK IT COULD BE HELPFUL TO SAY, HERE IS THE AMOUNT WE HISTORICALLY FUND OF THE ZOO, OR HERE'S HOW MUCH WE FUND OF THE BY EACH OF THOSE GENERAL FUNDS. SO STATE SHARED PROPERTY TAXES LIKE WHAT'S EACH DEPARTMENT'S ALLOCATION. I THINK THAT COULD BE HELPFUL SO THAT EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT THEY HAVE TO LIVE WITHIN WHEN THEY'RE PREPARING THEIR BUDGET. INSTEAD OF, I'M GOING TO THROW IT ALL IN THERE AND SEE WHAT STICKS, BECAUSE THAT CAN BE TRICKY PLACE TO MANAGE FROM. AND THEN THIS YEAR WE JUST HAVE WE HAVE THE TIGHT BUDGET. SO YOU ARE SEEING DIFFERENT TRENDS THAN WHAT YOU WOULD NORMALLY SEE AS JUST KIND OF AGRIPPINA. FOR THOSE PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENTS, IS THERE ANYTHING VISUALLY THAT WOULD BE MORE BENEFICIAL? I THIS WAS I AM A NUMBERS PERSON. I'D RATHER LOOK AT THOUSANDS OF LINES OF DATA. SO PUTTING IT VISUALLY TOGETHER IS NOT MY FORTE. BUT IF JUST THINKING, IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO REPRESENT WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET AT? IF IT'S WHAT'S THE CURRENT COST OR THE OPERATING COSTS VERSUS CAPITAL PERCENTAGE TRENDS VERSUS JUST BARS? I'D LIKE THIS GRAPH HERE.
I'D LIKE TO SEE IN A IN A PERCENTAGE. BUT I MEAN I CAN GO DO THAT MYSELF IF YOU DON'T. BUT IT'S JUST THOSE ARE THOSE ARE TOTALS. BUT I THINK TO DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON. SORRY. PAGE 17. I THINK TO HIS POINT THAT IT'S 1234. YEAH. YES. SLIDE 1334. YEAH. WE COULD WE COULD ADD THE PERCENT CHANGE THAT PERCENTAGE. IT'S LIKE THEN YOU'RE WITHIN A PERCENTAGE. IT'S HARD TO DO THOSE I MEAN YEAH. WELL YEAH. AND IN FACT WHETHER WE LOOK AT SLIDE 34 OR SLIDE 35, IT'S HARD TO UNDERSTAND. AND MAYBE PEOPLE CAN HELP ME UNDERSTAND. IT FEELS AS THOUGH HERE WE ARE PROPOSING A TIGHTER BUDGET AND IT'S A SMIDGE TIGHTER THAN LAST YEAR. LET'S LOOK AT 35. THE ORANGE, FOR EXAMPLE, IS SMALLER THAN LAST YEAR, BUT LAST YEAR, THE CURRENT YEAR THAT WE'RE IN, THERE'S QUITE A BIT BIGGER THAN THE 23 OR THE 24 ACTUALS. ARE WE ARE THESE GIANT ORANGE BARS COMPARED TO RELATIVE THE FIRST THREE? THE LAST TWO ARE BIGGER. ARE THEY A BECAUSE ONE IS PROPOSED AND ONE IS FROM A NON CLOSED OUT YEAR. THAT'S A BIG PART OF IT. OKAY. SO IT'S NOT THAT THERE ARE BIG EXPLANATIONS FOR ALL OF A SUDDEN WE HAD MONSTROUS GROWTH LAST YEAR THAT THAT ESCAPED ME. CORRECT. OKAY. PART OF IT IS THAT IT'S BUDGETED. IT'S ALSO ON THE CHANGE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE 25 CHANGE TO 26 FOR THAT CURRENT OPERATING, THAT'S THE ORANGE.
THE LARGER ORANGE ONE WENT DOWN. YEAH. THAT IS THE BIG CHANGE OF DIRECTLY ALLOCATING TO DEPARTMENTS RATHER THAN THE ALLOCATION THAT HAS TO DIRECTLY ALLOCATED TO OUR ENTERPRISE FUNDS, THOSE SERVICES. SO THEY NO LONGER HAVE THAT EXPENSE IN THEIR BUDGET. IT'S A DIFFERENT WAY IT'S SHOWN. OKAY. AND OUR PERSONNEL COSTS ACTUALLY FOR THE LAST. ALL OF THE FIRST YEAR, I'M JUST EYEBALLING IT SEEM PRETTY CONSTANT. SO I THINK ANOTHER CHALLENGE AND IT'S MORE AN ISSUE I THINK WITH SLIDE 36 IS THE THOSE ONE TIME EXPENSES WHEN YOU SORT OF MENTIONED THE BOILER AND PARKS AND REC. SO IT LOOKS LIKE THEIR BUDGET IS GROWN, YOU KNOW, BY X AMOUNT. AND PARKS AND REC HAS A BIG BUDGET AS IT IS. BUT YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A WAY TO PULL OUT SORT OF THOSE ONE TIME FROM ONGOING OPERATING. THERE MAY BE THAT MIGHT BE BE HELPFUL BECAUSE THAT ONE TIME MONEY, AS YOU SAID, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT ONGOING. THEY WON'T HAVE IT NEXT YEAR. RIGHT.
YEAH. THOSE THINGS I MEAN BECAUSE THE ERP LIKE YOU KNEW LIKE, OH THIS IS GOING TO LIKE
[02:55:04]
DOUBLE THEIR BUDGET. SO YOU WERE ABLE TO. YEAH. WE COULD PULL OUT FROM LIKE FROM THIS SLIDE. WE COULD PULL OUT CAPITAL. SO THOSE NUMBERS ARE JUST THOSE OPERATING ONGOING OPERATING. THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL OKAY. AND MAYBE THAT'S ONE OF THE WAYS WE WANT TO SLICE OUR BUDGET IS LET'S LOOK AT OUR OPERATING COSTS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE FEEL LIKE WE CAN CONTROL WITH THE PROGRAMS AND SERVICES.LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT OUR PERSONNEL COSTS AND SEE IF THEY'RE GROWING REALLY FAST AND CHECK OURSELVES THERE. LET'S LOOK AT OUR CAPITAL AND THAT ONE WE HAVE A LOT MORE INTEREST IN BUT NOT ALARMED BY BECAUSE IT'S PLANNING AND EXECUTING, BUT IT'S REALLY DONE. AND THEN LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT OUR, YOU KNOW, ALL THESE DIFFERENT COLORS. LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT HOW IT SLICES AND DICES BY COLOR RATHER THAN BY DEPARTMENT OR FUND. I DON'T KNOW, JUST OTHER WAYS OF HELPING US TO BE SAVVY ABOUT CATCHING THINGS. I KNOW THAT WE LOOK AT FROM ALL ANGLES, RIGHT? AND I WILL SAY BEFORE SHE CLOSED THE LAPTOP, SHE, YOU KNOW, SHE'S GOT PIVOT TABLES. SO THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT SHE CAN DO WITH THE DATA. I'M JUST NOT SURE HOW MUCH WE CAN BREAK DOWN SOME OF THE ONE TIME STUFF, BECAUSE THIS YEAR IS OUR FIRST YEAR THAT WE ACTUALLY HAD A DESIGNATED ACCOUNT FOR ALL THOSE, BUT IT'S PALAVELA. SO THERE YOU GO. BUT SHE DOESN'T HAVE A STAFF OF EIGHT ANALYSTS TO HELP HER. SO THERE WE GO. ALL RIGHT. SO OTHER THAN GOING BACK TO SOME INFORMATION YOU HAVE PREPARED THAT WE COULD DO NOW OR LATER, LATER NEXT WEEK WITH THE
[All Participants]
CONVERSATION ABOUT SORRY DEPARTMENT REQUESTS. WE COULD CLOSE OUR MEETING NOW AND PICK UP BUDGET OR DEPARTMENT REQUESTS SYSTEMATICALLY, DEPARTMENT BY DEPARTMENT. NEXT TIME. WE COULD HURRY THROUGH DEPARTMENT BY DEPARTMENT THIS TIME. PUT SOME THINGS IN YOUR HEAD AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE QUESTIONS FOR NEXT WEEK. READY TO GO OR I DON'T KNOW. WHAT'S YOUR PREFERENCE FOR? DO YOU WANT TO END THE MEETING NOW. AND PART OF THE MEETING WOULD BE TO SURVEY AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ON THE RIGHT TRACK, AND MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT TIME. BUT OR DO YOU WANT TO? THESE GUYS HAVE ALL HEARD WHAT OUR CONCERNS ARE TODAY, RIGHT? KIND OF. AND I THINK IT HELPS THEM BE BETTER PREPARED. HAVE SOME TIME TO PREPARE FOR NEXT WEEK FOR PRESENTING. NO PRESENTING, JUST ANSWERING QUESTIONS. WELL, OKAY.BUT IT'S STILL OKAY. I MEAN, LIKE LAST YEAR, THEY DID COME AND SIT RIGHT HERE. LIKE, YOU KNOW, WE INVITED THEM TO WHEN WE NEEDED TO DEEP DIVE WITH THEM. YEAH, I WOULD EXPECT THAT KIND OF THAT SAME THING IF YOU'RE EXPECTING OKAY. NOT NOT A PRESENTATION. NO NOT A CDS AND THEN AIRPORT AND THEN. NO, I'M JUST SAYING LIKE I DON'T WANT TO TURN AROUND AND LIKE, YEAH LIKE HAVE THAT. IT'S JUST EASIER TO ASK THE QUESTIONS IN THE, IN THE CIRCLE THAN IN THE. OKAY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL YEAH, NOT A PRESENTATION. AND WE HAVE THE DETAILS BY DEPARTMENT.
SO WE COULD DO IT SYSTEMATICALLY GOING THROUGH THAT. IT'S IN THE SAME FORMAT AS LAST YEAR WHERE WE'VE GOT HERE'S THE ASK, HERE'S THE OFFSETTING REVENUES IS EXPECTED. AND THEN WHAT'S KIND OF REMAINING AND THEN WHAT FUNDING SOURCES WE HAVE POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE. SO WE CAN TOGGLE THAT ON AND OFF FOR THE EVENING. THAT'S THAT'S WORKS. SUPER SUPER WORKSHEET. RIGHT, RIGHT. THAT WENT OVER REALLY WELL. SO THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BUILD OUR QUESTIONS UP THESE PAGES. SO YOU GAVE US TODAY OKAY I DID GET FEEDBACK I MISSED AN ITEM FROM DIRECTOR SANDER. THEY ALSO ARE ASKING FOR SOME PERMITTING PROCESS FOR 40 TO 60,000. THAT'S ONE THAT'S MISSING ON THEIR OKAY. AND I WILL GIVE THE CAVEAT. WE ONLY GAVE THIS TO DIRECTORS YESTERDAY NIGHT, SO THEY HAVEN'T HAD A LOT OF CHANCE TO MAKE SURE WE'VE INCLUDED EVERYTHING THEY ASKED FOR. SO THERE COULD BE TWEAKS TO THAT AS WELL. AND THEN BROOKS, HOW WILL WE WHEN WILL WE SEE THE UPDATE SO THAT THE BUDGET DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT'S $500 MILLION. LIKE, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT THAT THAT PROBABLY WON'T BE EVEN NEXT WEEK. THAT PROBABLY WOULD BE THE NEXT BUDGET TUESDAY, BECAUSE WE HAVE TO ENGAGE GRAVITY IN THAT. AND THEY'RE THEY'RE SOMETIMES REALLY RESPONSIVE, LIKE THE SAME DAY. BUT THIS IS A BIGGER CHANGE. SO IT MIGHT TAKE A BIT OKAY. OKAY.
SO IN THE MEANTIME WE WOULD CAUTION ANYONE TO NOT TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS BASED ON WHAT THEY SEE IN TERMS OF AVAILABLE NUMBERS OR THE GROWTH IN OUR REVENUES, BECAUSE IT'S FRAUGHT WITH THE NEED FOR LOTS OF EXPLANATION. SO JUST DON'T LOOK AT IT YET. WITH THAT SAID, THANK YOU. YOU KNOW, YOU DO HAVE A DRAFT, BUT IT'S A ROUGH DRAFT FROM THE WEEKEND. WORKS TEAMS PRETTY MUCH WORKED ALL WEEKEND ON IT, AND IT'S JUST BECAUSE WE'RE TRYING TO WORK IN A PLATFORM THAT TURN THINGS OFF, LOAD THINGS IN THAT TYPE OF THING. NOW, I DID SEE BROOKS
[03:00:03]
THIS MORNING. THERE IS SOME THERE'S ANOTHER DRAFT AND THERE'S SOME STICKY NOTES ON THERE. I DIDN'T KNOW WHEN WE COULD EXPECT. YOU MAY BE A VERSION TWO OF A DRAFT. SO YOU WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT? YEAH. WE'RE SO THE NUMBERS WERE LITERALLY CHANGING UP UNTIL LAST WEEK. SO TO COMPILE THE 200 PAGES AND REVIEW IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME. SO THIS UPCOMING WEEK WE'RE WORKING WITH GRAVITY GROUP TO DO SOME OF THE ROUTINE THINGS THAT WE NEED THEM TO CHANGE. SO IT JUST TAKES A WHILE. I WOULD HOPE BY THE END OF THIS WEEK, WE CAN GET A DRAFT OUT TO YOU, AND A LOT OF IT IS JUST COSMETIC THINGS OF PUTTING THINGS IN A CONSISTENT ORDER. THAT KIND OF STUFF IS WHAT WE'RE USING GRAVITY TO DO. BUT REALLY, WHAT YOU GAVE US IS ALL WE'RE GOING TO NEED FOR NEXT WEEK IS JUST THIS, BUT IT'S JUST THE OVERALL. IT'S THE PRESENTATION IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT. OKAY. THANK YOU. BUT THE NUMBERS SUBSTANTIVELY SHOULD NOT BE CHANGING. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO NEXT WEEK WE HAVE LISTED IN THE AGENDA POINTS NOT NECESSARILY IN THIS ORDER. WE ANTICIPATE STARTING WITH THE PRESENTATION OF REQUESTS BY DEPARTMENT. BY BY DEFINITION I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE. THAT WOULD BE THINGS THEY'RE ASKING FOR ABOVE AND BEYOND OPERATING EXPENSES. SO THAT WOULD BE FTES AT THE FLEETS AND ANY OTHER EXPENSES. WE WOULD ALSO CAN I CLARIFY ON THAT? DO YOU WANT GOVERNMENTAL OR ALSO ENTERPRISE TO PRESENT OR TO FOR US TO PRESENT ENTERPRISE AS WELL? THAT'S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION, AND I THINK I'LL GIVE YOU WHAT I THINK THE ANSWER OR WHAT THE ANSWER IS IDEALLY. AND THEN EVERYBODY TELL ME WHAT WHAT IS REALITY. IDEALLY, COUNCIL IS ALREADY PRETTY MUCH PASSED OFF ON THE RUDIMENTS OF THE POWER BUDGET AND POWER AND FIBER COUNCIL HAS ALREADY PASSED OFF ON THE AIRPORT BUDGET AND COUNCIL HAS ALREADY PASSED A WILL WILL PASS OFF ON THE PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET ON THE 16TH, WHICH IS NEXT WEDNESDAY. AND SO FOR THAT REASON, IT WOULD ONLY BE THE GENERAL FUND, PART OF PUBLIC WORKS AND EVERY OTHER GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENT. AM I WRONG? NO, THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING. OKAY. AND THAT AND I WANTED TO CLARIFY BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T PROVIDED THAT TO YOU YET EITHER. SO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE'RE STILL REVIEWING AND MAKING SURE IT ACTUALLY LOOKS RIGHT. SO OKAY, THAT WE CAN GET TO YOU, BUT WE DON'T NEED TO GO THROUGH IT IN DETAIL. SO AFTER WE DO THE PRESENTATION, THE BUDGET REQUEST IN Q&A, WHICH IS THE FIRST PART OF OUR MEETING, THEN I HAVE HERE A BULLET POINT AND LISA AND KIRK HELP ME TO REMEMBER THIS BULLET POINT SAYS IMPACT FEES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DISCUSS ABOUT IMPACT FEES FROM A BUDGET PERSPECTIVE? ANYTHING? SO THE PROJECTIONS ARE WHAT THEY ARE AND THE INTENDED SPENDING IS PART OF THE PLAN THAT WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF APPROVING IN A DIFFERENT WAY. IS THERE ANY CONCERN THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN BUDGET TUESDAY? THE ACTUAL NUMBERS WE END UP WITH, DOLLARS THAT WE END UP WITH ARE BASED ON THE TISSUE PRICE NUMBER. SO IT'S HOW WE GET THERE THAT WE'RE STILL TALKING ABOUT BY HOW MUCH WE, YOU KNOW, WE SET ASIDE TIME IN THE WORK SESSION FOR. RIGHT, RIGHT. YEAH.SO MY POINT IS, NO MATTER WHAT WE COME UP WITH, THE DOLLAR AMOUNT IS ABOUT THE SAME. SO WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NUMBER AM I CORRECT. WELL IT WOULDN'T BE DOLLAR AMOUNT BECAUSE THAT'S DEPENDENT ON WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS THE MAXIMUM WE CAN. RIGHT OKAY. BUT BUT I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS WE'RE NOT GOING TO BUY THE POLICIES WE PUT IN PLACE IN THE ORDINANCE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO CHANGE THE FINAL OUTCOME, THE WE'RE GOING TO MASSAGE IT WITHIN THAT NUMBER.
IS THAT. YEAH. I DON'T REALLY THINK WE HAVE. I CAN'T THINK OF ANY WORK THAT WE STILL NEED TO DO ON. I MEAN, OTHER THAN THE DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT WE WERE GOING TO PUT MONEY FROM IMPACT FEES INTO, LIKE, IF WE DID, OH, WE'RE GOING TO SUPPORT 30% OF THIS HOUSING PROJECT, AND THEN WE'D HAVE TO FIND THAT MONEY FROM GENERAL FUND. BUT I THINK WE'VE DECIDED, WELL, WE HAVEN'T MADE THE DECISION, BUT WE'RE MOVING TOWARDS TAKING THAT OUT OF THE ORDINANCE ALTOGETHER.
SO I DON'T SEE ANY REASON TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION, BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONE THING THAT COULD AFFECT THE BUDGET IS BECAUSE ARE WE GOING TO PUT SOME KIND OF SMALL AMOUNT OF REPLACEMENT? RIGHT, SO THAT ONE WOULD GET THROWN TO CATHERINE AND PUTTING YOU ON THE SPOT, YOU WON'T BE PRESENT WHEN WE HAVE THE DISCUSSION ON THE 28TH. AND WHEN WE DO HAVE THE DISCUSSION AT THE FIRST WORK SESSION IN AUGUST, WE WILL HAVE WE'RE ALREADY TOO FAR ALONG TO CHANGE OUR BUDGET AT THAT POINT BECAUSE WE'RE WE'RE PAST THE ADOPTION OF THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET. AND SO HAVE YOU IN YOUR BUDGET PUT ANY MONEY ASIDE IN ANTICIPATION OF THIS CONVERSATION FOR A HOUSING, LOW IMPACT, LOW INCOME HOUSING OR PROJECTS? NO. WE CAME UP WITH THE MAYOR'S OFFICE BUDGET, SO
[03:05:01]
THERE WAS NO MONEY SET ASIDE FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PIECE. OKAY, SO MAYBE SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO HAVE BE PREPARED TO HAVE A, I'D SAY A TEN MINUTE CONVERSATION ON NEXT WEEK IS ARE WE RECOMMENDING AS A REQUEST SOMEWHERE? IT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE TO HAVE A HOME YET, BUT JUST A DOLLAR, AN INFORMED DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT WILL BE THE MAX THAT WE MIGHT RECOMMEND WHEN WE HAVE A FUTURE POLICY DISCUSSION THAT WOULD IMPACT NEXT YEAR. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO ANYBODY? YEAH. ONE OTHER QUESTION. THE $4 MILLION SELF-INSURANCE FUND, THAT PORTION OF IT, IS THAT ON THE TABLE FOR THIS YEAR? THAT IS MONEY THAT'S AVAILABLE. BUT BECAUSE IT REQUIRES A CONVERSATION AND STUDY, IT WASN'T WE HADN'T ANTICIPATED HAVING ALL OF THAT DONE TO UNLOCK THOSE DOLLARS IN THIS MONTH. AND THAT'S WHAT I EXPECTED BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE I WAS GOING NEXT, IS THE NEXT. WE HAVE TO KNOW WHAT WE COULD LEGALLY DO. AND THERE'S A LOT OF DISCUSSION THAT HAS TO HAPPEN. SO GIVEN THE TIME CONSTRAINTS, IT'S KIND OF IT'S A FALL THING IN MY MIND. OKAY. SO CAN I CAN I ADD ONE THING THAT MAYBE WE CAN GET TOGETHER MAYOR AND KURT OR.NO, NOT RELATED TO IMPACT FEES, BUT JUST RELATED TO WHAT WE'RE DOING ON THE 15TH AND ON THE 22ND. I MEAN, I HAVEN'T FINISHED THE LIST, BUT I WILL GO AHEAD. NO, GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD. SO IMPACT FEES I'M ONLY GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO MAKE IT VERY LIMITED MULTIYEAR COMMITMENTS.
THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE THAT THAT I'M NOT SURE HOW WE PULLED THAT OUT FROM REGULAR BUDGET REQUESTS AND HOW WE PULL IT OUT FROM PRIORITIES. BUT DO YOU HAVE A MULTIYEAR COMMITMENTS COLUMN? YEAH. WE'RE NO, IT'S NOT A COLUMN. IT'S ITS OWN SCHEDULE. SO THAT'S SOMETHING WE WILL PROVIDE AS WELL THIS WEEK. SO WE'LL COVER THAT. SO THAT'S THINGS LIKE I CRIMP OUR HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDER OUR DEBT OUR LEASES OKAY. THOSE THINGS SO THAT THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL EVERY SINGLE TIME. ALL RIGHT. ANOTHER BULLET IS COUNCIL PRIORITIES. AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT CURRENT YEAR PRIORITIES. WE CAN TALK ABOUT UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR PRIORITIES.
WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS THAT HAVE BEEN ASKED FOR BY PRIORITIES. BUT THAT'S NOT A WORKSHEET THAT YOU HAVE BECAUSE THOSE WILL HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET REQUESTS. RIGHT? RIGHT. AND MOST OF THE COUNCIL PRIORITY MEETING OF THOSE NEEDS DIDN'T HAVE FINANCIAL IMPACT. SO IT WAS ABSORBED INTO ONGOING OPERATIONS. MOST OR MOST OF THOSE WORK. SO COUNCIL MEMBERS, TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE ARE COUNCIL PRIORITIES THAT DON'T HAVE A FISCAL IMPACT, DO YOU WANT TO SPEND BUDGET TUESDAY TIME ON THAT, OR DO YOU JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT PRIORITIES THAT HAVE A FISCAL ASPECT TO THEM IN THE COMING YEAR? I'D LIKE TO SEE AN UPDATE ON THE PRIORITIES THAT WE ALLOCATED THIS YEAR THAT DID HAVE FISCAL IMPACT FOR THE CURRENT BUDGET, LIKE THERE ARE SOME THAT ARE STILL OUTSTANDING. I'D LIKE TO JUST HAVE A THEY'RE ALL OUTSTANDING. AND THAT'S THE FUNNY THING ABOUT THE MISMATCH THAT WE HAVE BETWEEN OUR PLANNING YEAR, OUR BUDGET YEAR, FISCAL YEAR AND OUR PRIORITIES, WHICH ARE ALIGNED TO THE FISCAL YEAR, IT'S JUST, WELL, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, I CAN THINK OF ONE OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD AND MAYBE THAT'S THE ONLY ONE IS LIKE THE LANDSCAPING ONE, BUT THE LOW WATER ONE THAT DIFFERENT DIRECTORS ALL CONTRIBUTED SOME MONEY LAST YEAR TO. YEAH, I MEAN THAT'S JUST ONE OF THEM. WELL, MAYBE YOU BETWEEN YOU AND ME, WE'LL BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT IF THERE'S A THEME THERE THAT SUGGESTS THAT WE TALK ABOUT OTHER THINGS, OR IF IT'S HOW WE WANT TO PRESENT. OKAY. THEN THE NEXT ONE IS CAPITAL REQUESTS. AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT WE MEANT BY THAT. THAT WON'T BE SHOWING UP SOMEWHERE ELSE. THAT'S THOSE DEPARTMENT REQUESTS OKAY. OKAY. SO THAT'S ALREADY CHECKED OFF.
OTHER REQUESTS NOT YET CONSIDERED. I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT MIGHT BE BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING IS IN THAT REVIEW PRIORITY. I THINK THAT MAYBE REQUESTS THAT WERE CANCELED BECAUSE OF THE CUTTING WE DID EARLIER, AND THAT IF THERE'S MONEY LEFT OVER, WE GO BACK AND REVISIT THEM. OKAY, I LIKE YOUR OPTIMISM. OKAY. AND THEN SO THEN LISA IT'S YOUR NOW IT'S YOURS. TAKE IT AWAY ON WHATEVER YOU WERE THINKING. WELL IT JUST DOESN'T FEEL I JUST I'M NOT SURE THAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED IT AN ENTIRE AFTERNOON TO MANAGE THAT PARTICULAR AGENDA.
SO I WAS JUST THINKING MAYBE IT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE WOULD WANT TO RECONSIDER. THE KIND OF THE START TIME. I DON'T THINK WE'LL HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO CONDENSE THE TWO BUDGET TUESDAYS. I DON'T THINK WE'LL NEED ONE ON THE 29TH, BUT I WAS JUST WONDERING IF WE WANTED TO CONSIDER A DIFFERENT TIME ON THE 15TH, BECAUSE I FELT LIKE YOU MANAGED TO GIVE US SUCH A GOOD AMOUNT OF INFORMATION. THAT WAS ALL IT WAS, JUST HOW MUCH, HOW MUCH DO WE NEED? I'M GOING TO THROW THAT OUT TO EVERYBODY. I PERSONALLY, I LOVE CONSISTENCY AND GETTING DONE EARLY, SO
[03:10:02]
ALWAYS STARTING AT THE SAME TIME AND GETTING DONE EARLY IS GOOD. BUT I ALSO KNOW THAT I THIS IS MY JOB. I'M HERE FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE TO LEAVE A WORKPLACE, MICHELLE AND JOHN IN PARTICULAR. IT DOES STRIKE ME THAT IF YOU ONLY HAD TO LEAVE THE WORKPLACE ONCE AND BE GONE AND IT'S SIMPLER OR DOESN'T BOTHER ME AT ALL, EITHER, PLAN MY LIFE AROUND THESE MEETINGS.OH, OKAY. SO YOU'RE FLEXIBLE, LISA. YOU'RE THINKING IT'S MORE COMPACT TO TRY TO SMUSH IT.
WELL, WE RUN THE RISK OF GOING OVER 5 P.M, BUT YEAH, THAT'S FINE. IT'S FINE TO. BUT I'M OKAY WITH STARTING. I FELT LIKE JUST KNOWING THAT YOU HAVE THOSE SPREADSHEETS READY TO GO, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE JUST KIND OF TALKING. IT'S REALLY FIRM. I REALLY APPRECIATE IT. THAT'S MY PERSONALITY. IT'S JUST SO. FUN. AND LET'S START AT ONE. IS MICHELLE'S ALREADY BUDGETED FOR 1:00 AND THEN WE'LL GET OUT EARLY. YEAH. GREAT. OKAY. SO WE'LL START AT 1 P.M. LUNCH WILL BE OUT AT 1230. PERFECT. IS THAT OKAY, EVERYBODY? JOHN, ARE YOU ON BY ANY CHANCE. DO YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS? HE'S HE'S NOT ON THERE. HE'S GOT HE'S WATCHING HE'S WATCHING THE LIVE FEED BUT HE'S NOT COMMUNICATIVE OKAY. AND THEN ANOTHER QUESTION TO ASK EVERYBODY IS THERE ANY OTHER DATA, ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT YOU WANT US TO BE PREPARED WITH OR TO THINK ABOUT INFORMATION YOU NEED? I FEEL LIKE NEXT WEEK IS YET ANOTHER GATHERING SESSION, AND I DON'T KNOW WHETHER IT WOULD BE THE 15TH OR THE NEXT MEETING, BUT THAT QUESTION THAT I DIDN'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO, AND I DO NOW THAT WE COULD TAKE SOME OF THAT ONE TIME MONEY AND FOREGONE, AS WELL AS THE 1%. SO IF WE TAKE A LITTLE BIT THERE, WE CAN DEFRAY THE IMPACT ON THE STREETS DEPARTMENT. SO WE HAD TO MAKE A MAJOR CUT FOR PAYMENTS. IT MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO EXPLORE HOW FAR WE CAN GO BEFORE WE'RE STILL WE'RE GETTING TOWARD THE 8%. LIKE IF WE'RE THINKING, OKAY, LET'S JUST STOP AT SEVEN AND A HALF BECAUSE THEY'VE GOT A LITTLE CUSHION IN THERE DEPENDING ON WHAT WE END UP WITH. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? WELL, WE CAN DO, WE CAN DO WE CAN DO 1% OF THE FOREGONE FOR ONGOING AND UP TO 3% FOR ONE TIME. I DON'T THINK WE COULD I THINK WE MIGHT GO TO THE 8%. WHAT'S THE ONE TIME PROJECT YOU WANT TO. I WANT TO HELP BECAUSE WITH PUBLIC WORKS, CHRIS, ABOUT WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE CUT WE'VE HAD TO MAKE ON STREETS TO FIGURE OUT OUR BUDGET BASED ON THE CHANGE THIS YEAR? AND IT'S 1.6, I THINK. IS THAT RIGHT? THAT'S MAINTENANCE. SO THAT FROM POTHOLES TO EVERYTHING ELSE THAT KEEPS THE STREETS IN NICE, THAT'S A BIG LUMP OF MONEY TO GIVE UP ON. IF WE CAN GET HALF 1 MILLION OR 600,000 BACK INTO THAT FUND, IT'LL HELP THIS NEXT YEAR. KEEP THE MAINTENANCE AT IT, BECAUSE IT SHOULD BE. SO THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO THINK OF ONE TIME MONEY. WE COULD USE THAT ONE TIME STREET UPDATE, BUT THEN IT'S STILL A ONE TIME. IT'S GOING TO BE GONE NEXT YEAR. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT THE NEXT YEAR. BUT IT'S FOR A PROJECT THAT'S FOR ONE YEAR. THE STREET MAINTENANCE JUST I MEAN, IT'S NOT GOING TO FUND THE WHOLE THING, BUT 1.6 MILLION IS A BIG CUT FOR STREET.
I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU THERE AT ALL. AND IT'S PAINFUL. THE ONLY THING TO JUST BEAR IN MIND THAT NOT ONLY IS IT ONLY AVAILABLE FOR ONE TIME, IT BURNS IT. IT'S GONE. IT'S NOT AVAILABLE FOR PICKUP LATER, FOR THE 1% FOR THE NEXT YEAR, RIGHT? NO, NOT AUTOMATICALLY, BUT WE COULD VOTE FOR IT FOR ANOTHER YEAR TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT MORE. IF WE CAN DO BOTH, AT SOME POINT WE RUN OUT OF FOREGONE. AT SOME POINT THAT GOES DRY. I KNOW THAT THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. SO YOU WANT TO USE IT FOR ONE TIME EXPENSES, EXCEPT FOR THE PART THAT GOES INTO THE BASE. SO EVEN IF WE COULD GET A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY IN THAT STATE UNDER THE 8% AND GET ENOUGH TO HELP MAKE THAT CUT MUCH SMALLER, YES. IT JUST DOESN'T ADD TO THE BASE. SO, SO IN FUTURE YEARS. SO NEXT YEAR YOU HAVE TO DECIDE IT AGAIN. YEAH, THAT. MY ONLY POINT WAS SIMPLY THAT WHEN YOU WHEN YOU TAKE THAT, WHEN YOU DIP INTO THAT 3% RANGE, THAT MONEY NEVER GOES TO THE BASE AND IT GOES AWAY THAT THAT WAS JUST TO KEEP IT FOR LATER. USE AND THEN THE 1%. SO I HAVE REASONS TO THINK THAT THAT THAT MIGHT NOT BE THE BEST OPTION BASED ON FUTURE BODIES IN THE STATES. OKAY, I DO HAVE ONE BIT OF DATA. I UNDERSTAND IT GOES BACK TO WHAT I SAID BEFORE. I'D LIKE TO HAVE A CHART THAT SHOWS ME THE AND I HAVE THAT THE COST OF PERSONNEL AND THEN SHOW ME THE GROWTH RATE IN THE ACTUAL WELL, I DON'T KNOW WHICH ONES I WANT BECAUSE THE, THE ACTUALS ARE ACTUALS. SO THEY'RE BASED ON ACTUAL FTES, NOT PROJECTED. I MEAN NOT APPROVED ESTIMATE. SO PROBABLY THE ACTUAL WHAT I'M TRYING TO SEE IS, IS THAT RELATIONSHIP STAY LIKE THIS OR IS IT CREEPING UP ON IT OR YOU KNOW, WHAT'S THAT LOOK LIKE THAT GAP BETWEEN THOSE TWO. THANKS. AND HOW FAR
[03:15:04]
BACK DO YOU WANT TO GO? WHAT IS THE ONE GOAL 22. WAS THAT. YEAH THAT'S FINE 22 OKAY. ALL RIGHT.SO NOW BEFORE WE SAY GOODBYE, ANY ANY OTHER BUDGET RELATED THOUGHTS FROM ANYONE IN THE ROOM? QUESTIONS, THINGS THAT WEREN'T CLEAR. ALL RIGHT THEN, ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? WE DON'T COME TOGETHER AGAIN UNTIL THURSDAY GOING ON FOR THE NEXT TWO DAYS. ANY WEATHER ADVISORIES REALLY HOT OUT. ALL RIGHT. THIS HAS BEEN PRETTY SMOOTH AND PRODUCTIVE, EVEN WITH ME NOT KNOWING EVERYTHING I WANTED TO KNOW. SO ANYWAY, GREAT COUNCIL MEMBERS, WE ARE ADJOURNED AND SEE YOU THURSDAY NIGHT.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.