[1. RZN25-003: REZONE. Rezone from HC, Highway Commercial to LC, Limited Commercial. 1.46 acres in the SE ¼ of Section 6, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of E 33rd North, east of N Boulevard, south of Recycle Road, west of N 5th East. ¹]

VERY GOOD. ALL RIGHT. FIRST WE'LL HAVE ITEM NUMBER ONE, A PUBLIC HEARING REZONE FROM H C HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO LC LIMITED COMMERCIAL. WE HAVE FIRST AN APPLICANT. GOOD EVENING. I'M SORRY. OH, IT'S THE TRICKY ONE. YEAH. GOOD EVENING THERE. EVENING WITH CONNECT ENGINEERING 2295 NORTH YELLOWSTONE, SUITE SIX. PRETTY EASY REZONE. WELL, I'LL SAY WE FEEL A PRETTY EASY REZONE FOR THE COMMISSION TODAY. THIS LOCATION OF THIS TRIANGLE SHAPED PROPERTY IS JUST SOUTHWEST OF BISHOP AND JUST WEST OF THE NEW MAVERIK. OFF OF. SO THIS PROPERTY IS JUST UNDER ONE ACRE, ONE AND A HALF ACRES. AND WE'RE SEEKING TO CHANGE IT FROM THE CURRENT ZONE OF. H TO LC. YOU'LL SEE THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE WEST OF IT IS LC. THIS LITTLE TRIANGULAR PIECE HAS RECENTLY BEEN PURCHASED ALONG WITH THE SOME OF THE LC PIECE THAT'S NEXT TO IT. AND THE DEVELOPER WOULD LIKE TO DO A PUD ON THIS. IN ORDER TO DO SO, WE HAVE TO REZONE IT INTO THE LC FOR THAT. SO. YOU'LL SEE A PUD AND A PRELIM PLAT AND A FINAL PLAT ON ON THE REST OF THE ITEMS ALSO. SO THIS AREA IS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS MARKED AS MIXED USE CENTERS AND CORRIDORS, WHICH THE LC IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS WELL. WE DID HOLD A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR THIS, AND JUST LIKE TONIGHT, NOBODY SHOWED UP. SO AGAIN, ONE OF THE REASONS WE FEEL IT'S PRETTY PRETTY CUT AND DRY. BARE GROUND NOW. SO I'D SAY ANY QUESTIONS IF THERE ARE ANY. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU.

[00:05:05]

WE'RE HERE FOR THE STAFF. AND THE COMMISSION. IT'S GOOD TO SEE EVERYONE IS HERE. THE REQUESTED ACTION TONIGHT IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REZONE FOR 1.46 ACRES FROM HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL TO LC LIMITED COMMERCIAL RECOMMENDING REQUEST TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY IN 2020, WITH THE INITIAL ZONING OF H C AND IS IN THE LIMITED DEVELOPMENT. AIRPARK OVERLAY ZONE. THE RED ZONE WILL ONLY BE AFFECTING THE UNDERLYING ZONE OF HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL, NOT THE AIRPORT OVERLAY. ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE EAST ARE LC AND THE REST TO THE EAST OR TO THE WEST IS LC, AND EVERYTHING TO THE EAST IS HCA. THE LC ZONE.

SORRY. EXCUSE ME. THAT THAT ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LC ZONE WILL NEED TO MEET R3 A STANDARDS AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES AS THE PLAN MENTIONED IS DESIGNATES THIS AS MIXED USE CENTERS AND CORRIDORS. THE LC ZONE IS CONSISTENT WITH THAT DESIGNATION AS IT ALLOWS MIXED USE SERVICES AND HIGHER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE ZONE. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICATION TO REZONE AND FINDS THAT IT'S CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING OF THE AREA, AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I HAVE JUST ONE BARRY HAD MENTIONED AND MAYBE THE FUTURE PLATS AND THINGS. THAT'S NOT TONIGHT. THOSE ARE COMING.

FUTURE MEETINGS. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTOOD CORRECTLY WHAT YOU WERE REFERENCING. THANK YOU. YES. AND THEN JUST ON TOP OF THAT, THE ZONE CHANGE REALLY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR ALL USES ALLOWED, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS PLANNED TO BE PART OF ANOTHER DEVELOPMENT.

YEAH. ALL USES AN LC ZONE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE AN APPROPRIATE CHANGE TO THE AREA. OKAY. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. WE WILL TAKE THE. IMPORTANT STEP OF OPENING A PUBLIC HEARING. I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH ALL THE COMMENTS OF WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO SAY IT, BECAUSE NOBODY'S HERE TO SPEAK. SO WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEE IF ANYBODY IN THE HALLS WANTS TO JUMP IN. AND SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. PUBLIC FOR YOUR COMMENTS. AND WE'LL NOW DISCUSS AS A COMMISSION ANY COMMENTS, THOUGHTS? CONVERSATION. YEAH. YEAH I'M OKAY WITH THAT. I JUST REALIZED SOMETHING. YOU'RE LIKE OH MY GOSH DUDE. OH THIS ISN'T ON THE EXISTING. DUMP OR THE HA OKAY. YEAH. WE'RE GOOD. OKAY, EVERYONE. WE'RE ALL GOOD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO OTHER COMMENTS OR DISCUSSION, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. COUPLE YEARS AGO. I'LL MAKE THE MOTION. THANKS. COMMISSIONER CANTU, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REZONING 1.46 ACRES AS DESCRIBED BY THE APPLICANT, HC HIGHWAY.

COMMERCIAL TO LC LIMITED. COMMERCIAL TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER TYLER. WE'LL DO JUST A VOICE VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THANK YOU. THE VOTE IS UNANIMOUS. ALL RIGHT. NEXT UP.

[2. PLAT23-007: FINAL PLAT EXTENSION for The Reserve at Snake River Landing Division No. 1. SW ¼ of the NE ¼ and NW ¼ of the SE ¼ of Section 26, Township 2 North, Range 37 East. Located north of the Sidehill Canal, east of Pioneer Road, south of Event Center Drive, west of Snake River Parkway. ¹]

THANK YOU. BARRY. THANK YOU. SEE YOU. THE FINAL PLAT EXTENSION. THANK YOU. YEP. FOR THE RESERVE AT SNAKE RIVER LANDING. WE'LL HEAR FROM STAFF. THANK. THERE. OKAY, SO THE FIRST BUSINESS ITEM TONIGHT IS A PLAT EXTENSION. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE RESERVE AT SNAKE RIVER LANDING DIVISION NUMBER ONE. THIS PLAT WAS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN APRIL 4TH 20, 2023. AN EXTENSION WAS GIVEN LAST YEAR AS WELL. ON OF APRIL 2024. AND WE ARE ASKING FOR ANOTHER EXTENSION FOR THIS FINAL PLAT AS THE RESERVE AND THE DEVELOPER CONTINUES TO WORK THROUGH. REALLY, THEY'RE THEY'RE STILL WORKING THROUGH THERE'S A DIVISION TWO AND THE DIVISION

[00:10:06]

ONE. AND SO THEY'RE STILL TRYING TO WORK THROUGH THAT TIMING. SO THEY ARE ASKING FOR ANOTHER EXTENSION. THIS YOU'LL SEE THAT THE ONLY DIFFERENCE REALLY IS THERE IS A SMALL CHANGE IN THE BOUNDARY. I CAN SEE IF I CAN GET THE THIS HERE WAS REMOVED FOR THE ORIGINAL THAT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED. SO IT'S JUST THE CANAL BRIDGE THAT'S BEING REMOVED FROM THIS DIVISION ONE.

AND AGAIN, THAT PLAYS INTO THE TIMING BETWEEN THE TWO DIVISIONS. AND IS THAT REMOVED BECAUSE A DIVISION ONE WILL BE PUTTING IN THAT CANAL BRIDGE. OR THE BRIDGE WOULD BE ON WHATEVER PLAT IT'S ON. THEY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE TO PUT THAT CANAL IN THE MULTIFAMILY THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING FOR. DIVISION ONE WOULD NOT NECESSARILY REQUIRE THAT SECOND ACCESS AT THAT TIME.

SO SOME OF IT IS JUST THAT BETWEEN DIVISION ONE AND TWO AND ACCESS AND THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT THEY'RE DOING, AND THEY'RE STILL WORKING THROUGH THAT OUT. SO IT'S A SMALL ENOUGH OR LIGHT ENOUGH DENSITY THAT THE ACCESS TO PIONEER ROAD IS SUFFICIENT. THE WHAT THEY'RE PLANNING FOR IS MULTI UNIT APARTMENTS. AND SO THAT'S A DIFFERENT THRESHOLD FOR A SECOND ACCESS THAN TOWNHOMES TOO. OKAY. OKAY. BUT BUT AGAIN THEN IT'S LIKELY THAT THEY ONLY ACCESS OR EGRESS FROM THAT DIVISION WILL BE PIONEER. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. IS THIS IS THIS THE ONLY ISSUE THAT THEY'VE BEEN WORKING ON? I MEAN, I'VE BEEN DOING THIS NOW FOR TWO YEARS, AND I JUST I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING ELSE NEED TO BE EXTENDED SO MANY TIMES BEFORE.

AND I'M SURE YOU GUYS ARE HANDLING IT, BUT IT THEN STARTS TO MAKE ME A LITTLE WORRIED, YOU KNOW, AND I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE LIST OF STUFF, BUT I DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M GETTING AT. WHY DOES IT CONTINUE TO BE EXTENDED? YES. YEAH. IT A LOT OF IT IS DEVELOPER FINANCING AND KNOWING WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO WORK THROUGH THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS ON DIVISION ONE, TOWNHOMES ON DIVISION TWO. AGAIN, THEY'RE STILL WORKING INTERNALLY ON THEIR SITE THROUGH THE TIMING. OKAY. SO SOUNDS GOOD. OKAY. SO THERE'S AN ONGOING CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH MULTIFAMILY UNITS I THINK ADJACENT TO THIS. IT'S NOT THE SAME COMPLEX. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION, PLEASE. ARE THERE ANY LIMITATIONS AS TO HOW MANY EXTENSIONS ARE ALLOWED OR JUST DEPENDS ON HOW THE PROJECT GOES? IT REALLY DOES DEPEND ON HOW THE PROJECT GOES. THIS THIS PLOT WAS THIS CLOSE TO GO TO COUNCIL PROBABLY THIS LAST FALL. AND SO AGAIN, THE DEVELOPER JUST KIND OF RAN INTO MAKING SURE THEY KNEW WHICH ONE THEY WANTED TO KIND OF GO WITH FIRST. AND SO IT'S REALLY THIS IS REALLY BEING PUSHED BY THE DEVELOPER. SO WE'RE JUST TRYING TO FACILITATE THAT. OKAY. DO WE POTENTIALLY RUN INTO AN ISSUE WHERE DIVISION ONE, IF IT GETS BUILT WITHOUT THE BRIDGE OVER THE CANAL, WE HAVE A PIECE OF LAND THAT CANNOT BE REACHED. IF THE SAME DEVELOPER NEVER BUILDS THAT BRIDGE. NO, BECAUSE THEY'D HAVE ACCESS. DIVISION TWO ALSO HAS ACCESS FROM PIONEER ON THE OTHER SIDE. ON THE BOTTOM. IT WOULD NOT BE LANDLOCKED. NO. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ITEM? OKAY. WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL TAKE THIS ONE. I MOVE THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND THE EXTENSION BE GRANTED. OKAY. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER STEUER. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER SCOTT. WE'LL JUST DO A VOTE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. THE VOTING WAS UNANIMOUS. ITEM

[3. PLAT24-006: FINAL PLAT EXTENSION for Rose Nielsen Addition Division No. 101, sixth Amended. A portion of Lot 11, Block 101 of Rose Nielsen Addition, Division No. 101, Third Amended, located in the E ½ of the NE ¼ of Section 28, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of Teton Plaza, east of Channing Way, south of E 17th Street, west of S 25th E. ¹]

NUMBER 2 OR 3. THIS IS ONE MORE PLAT EXTENSION. THIS IS ROSE NIELSON ADDITION DIVISION NUMBER 1016 AMENDED THE MALL. AND SO THIS ONE CAME TO YOU LAST APRIL. YOU RECOMMENDED APPROVAL ON APRIL 2ND, 2024. AND AGAIN, THEY HAVE CONTINUED TO WORK THROUGH THIS ONE IS REALLY WORKING THROUGH UTILITY EASEMENT ISSUES. LEGAL LANGUAGE, 101 PLAQUES AND SIX AMENDMENTS. TAKES A MINUTE TO GET THROUGH SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE. SO THEY'RE DEFINITELY STILL WORKING THROUGH THAT ONE AS WELL. AND I'M HAPPY TO ATTEMPT. THIS IS NOT MY PROJECT. THIS IS CARRIE'S PROJECT. HE'S

[00:15:04]

OUT. BUT I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY OTHER CHANGES TO THIS PLAT FROM LAST TIME? IT'S AS IS AS WAS BEFORE. AND I SEE THE NOTES. THANK YOU FOR PUTTING THOSE FROM THE MEETING LAST YEAR. THAT WAS HELPFUL TO READ THROUGH TO REFRESH WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR. SO. QUESTIONS PLEASE, COMMISSIONER SCOTT. SOMEWHERE ALONG THE LINE I MUST HAVE MISSED IT. BUT WHY DOES THE CITY WANT TO TAKE OVER THE WATER LINES? WHAT'S THE BENEFIT TO THE CITY WHEN YOU'RE TRYING TO REMEMBER? BECAUSE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT 50 YEAR OLD. SURE. IT IS ALSO A LARGE. A LARGE DEVELOPMENT. I MEAN, THE MALLS ARE PRETTY ESTABLISHED AND SO TO BETTER SERVICE MOVING FORWARD WOULD BE FOR THE CITY TO TAKE IT OVER. YEAH. WE SO ON THAT LAST PAGE FROM LAST YEAR'S MEETING, WE DID ADDRESS QUITE A BIT ABOUT THE WATER. VERY END STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO WORK THROUGH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS BEFORE IT GOES TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING. THEY WILL BE THE APPROVING BODY. AND THEN THEY'LL ESTABLISH THE EASEMENTS OR STATED IF THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO ACCEPT THE WATER SYSTEM AND THEY'RE PUTTING OFF THE DEDICATION OF THE EASEMENTS AS WELL AS ACCEPTANCE OF THE LINES. AND THAT WILL BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO GOING TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. THE COUNCIL APPROVED THIS PLAT. IT NO, IT STILL HASN'T GONE TO. IT HASN'T GONE TO COUNCIL YET. THAT'S WHY WE'RE BACK HERE. BECAUSE IT'S NOT HERE. YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS. SO? SO THAT STATEMENT, COMMISSIONER SCOTT WILL, I THINK, RESOLVE YOUR QUESTION, THAT IT STILL HAS TO GET RESOLVED BEFORE GOING TO COUNCIL OR THAT IT IS NOT RESOLVED AT THIS POINT. OKAY. SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS IF STATES HERE THE WATER DIVISION. TO BACK UP A SECOND IN DISCUSSION WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEERING TEAM, AND THEY DO UNDERSTAND THEY ARE ACQUIRING A DATED SYSTEM, BUT THE WATER DIVISION HAS A STATUTORY REQUIREMENT TO DO IT.

AND IF THEY DO NOT, THEY ARE OUT OF COMPLIANCE. SO EXACTLY WHAT REQUIREMENT DO THEY HAVE TO DO? WHAT. I MEAN, I BET I'M NOT SURE. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, I'M I'M STILL I GUESS CONFUSED ABOUT THAT. BUT MAYBE THAT'S NOT THE ISSUE BEFORE US AT THIS TIME. WELL, AND LET ME ASK STAFF DOES IF THEY DID IF THIS WAS TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL. NOW ARE OUR PRIOR COMMENTS AND NOTES FROM APRIL GIVEN TO THE COUNCIL, OR DO WE NEED TO RESTATE THOSE SO THAT IT'S CURRENT? NO. ANYTHING THAT'S PART OF THE RECORD WOULD GO TO COUNCIL. SO THE LAST MEETING AND THIS MEETING. YES.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NO I THINK I HAVE STILL THE SAME CONCERNS, SAME ISSUES, BUT THEY ARE DELINEATED IN THIS DOCUMENT THAT I'M I'M COMFORTABLE AS LONG AS COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THAT. AND THAT GETS RESOLVED BEFORE. OKAY. JUST TO NOTE, I HAD THE SAME CONCERN WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE NO WATER LINE THAT WAS NOTED IN THE MINUTES. I STILL HAVE THE SAME CONCERN.

YES, YOUR NAME IS WELL DOCUMENTED IN THIS ONE. I WASN'T HERE THIS TIME. THAT'S RIGHT.

YOU DID A GOOD JOB. WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERNS. SO YES, I AGREE WITH THAT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. WE'LL HAVE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION. THANKS. COMMISSIONER ISLER. I. WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO EXTEND THE ROSE NIELSEN ADDITION DIVISION OF HER 101 SIX AMENDED EXTENSION REQUEST. OKAY. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER MEEHAN. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. I. ANY OPPOSED? VOTES UNANIMOUS. OKAY. AND I DON'T HAVE TO SIGN ANYTHING FOR EITHER OF THESE. OKAY. THANK YOU. WITH THAT MEETING'S ADJOURNED. DO WE GET TO ENJOY A MORE ROBUST MEETING IN MAY, OR ARE WE STILL, LIKE, RIGHT NOW? YOU HAVE THREE BUSINESS ITEMS AND POSSIBLY A MINOR AMENDMENT. OKAY. YEAH. OKAY. DO YOU WANT A POSSIBLE PRELIM PLAN? OKAY.

PERFECT. WELL, THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR WORK. I HOPE YOU GET TO ENJOY EVENING WITH YOUR FAMILY.

THANKS. THANKS. THANK YOU ALL. APPRECIATE IT.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

1. RZN25-003: REZONE. Rezone from HC, Highway Commercial to LC, Limited Commercial. 1.46 acres in the SE ¼ of Section 6, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of E 33rd North, east of N Boulevard, south of Recycle Road, west of N 5th East. ¹

Apr 01, 2025 Planning Commission

1. RZN25-003: REZONE. Rezone from HC, Highway Commercial to LC, Limited Commercial. 1.46 acres in the SE ¼ of Section 6, Township 2 North, Range 38 East. Located north of E 33rd North, east of N Boulevard, south of Recycle Road, west of N 5th East. ¹

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item