* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. DID ANYBODY ELSE COUNT HOW [00:00:01] MANY MISSISSIPPI'S THERE IS? I'M GONNA DO IT SOMEDAY. ALRIGHT, [1. Call to Order.] WELL WELCOME TO THE IDAHO FALL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THIS, UH, TUESDAY NIGHT, WHICH IS AN UNUSUAL NIGHT, BUT IT, UH, MAKES SENSE. UH, FOR THANKSGIVING WEEK, UM, WE WOULD, UH, CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND INVITE OUR CITY CLERK TO CALL THE ROLE FOR US. COUNCIL PRESIDENT SHAW. HERE. COUNCILOR RAP. PRESENT. COUNCILOR ZELMAN? HERE. COUNCILOR FREEMAN? HERE. COUNCILLOR FRANCIS. HERE. COUNCILOR LARSON. HERE YOU HAVE A COURT MAYOR. VERY GOOD. WE HAVE A FULL HOUSE. THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR MAKING AN EFFORT TO BE HERE. UH, DURING THIS HOLIDAY WEEK, UH, WE HAVE, UM, INVITED, UM, ONE OF OUR LONG TERM, UH, LONG SERVING CITY EMPLOYEES, TIM REKEY, UH, OUR LEAD GOLF PRO TO LEAD THE PLEDGE THIS EVENING. AND, UH, WE WOULD INVITE YOU TO STAND IF YOU'D LIKE TO JOIN US. SO, MR. REKEY WILL COME TO THE MIC ON MANY. TURN IT ON. WELL, WHAT'S UP? I ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION OF AMERICA INDIVIDUAL WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH MR. RAINEY. UM, [Additional Item] AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO, UM, TURN, UM, THE TALKING STICK OVER TO COUNCILOR FRANCIS FOR A COUPLE OF, UH, REQUESTS THAT YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE. YES. I COULD DO THE REMOVAL SET AGENDA IF YOU WANT US DO THE PUBLIC COMMENTS. NO, WE'LL DO THE, WE'LL, WE'LL SET THE AGENDA NOW AND THEN WE'LL, WE'LL GO. OKAY. SO I, UH, REQUEST THAT UNDER AGENDA B PARTS AND REC ONE BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE REGULAR AGENDA. AND ITEM C, POWER ONE, BE MOVED TO THE SECOND THING ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. QUOTE. NEED, COMMENT PLEASE. ALRIGHT. AND THEN EVERYTHING ELSE MOVES DOWN. ONE OR TWO DOWN TWO LETTERS OF THE ALPHABET THERE. UM, ALRIGHT. THANK YOU FOR, UH, THAT NOW OUR AGENDA IS SET WITH, UH, THAT ORDER. UH, SO LET'S NOW TURN TO THE THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS PUBLIC COMMENT. AND IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO OFFER PUBLIC COMMENT, GUIDELINES ARE PRINTED AND THE MIC IS AVAILABLE. I DO THINK EVERYONE WHO'S IN THE ROOM TONIGHT IS HERE FOR ANOTHER REASON. AND SO, UM, UNLESS SOMEBODY WAVES THEIR ARMS WILDLY, WE'RE GONNA MOVE [4. Consent Agenda.] RIGHT ON AND GO TO THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH IS, UM, OUR CONSENT AGENDA. UH, AND, UH, AS, UM, AMENDED BY, UM, THE REQUEST OF COUNCILOR FRANCIS. WE NOW HAVE, UM, JUST WHAT, THREE ITEMS ON THERE AND WE'LL INVITE THE CITY CLERK TO READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD. AND THEN I'LL TURN TO THE CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR A MOTION. ALRIGHT. MUNICIPAL SERVICES HAS TWO ITEMS. PURCHASE INVENTORY OF DUCTILE PIPE FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND S REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER OF 2024. AND OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK HAS ONE ITEM, LICENSE APPLICATIONS, ALL HEARING REQUIRED APPROVALS. VERY GOOD CITY. UH, COUNCIL PRESIDENT. OKAY, I'M GONNA, THE COUNCIL APPROVE EXCEPT OR RECEIVE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED. SECOND. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK. WE ARE READY FOR VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO 19 FREEMAN. YES. BRADFORD A ? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. DAM? YES. LARSON? YES. MOTION. CARRIE? [4.B.1) Purchase and Installation of Turnkey Golf Barrier Netting System for Sand Creek Golf Course.] GOOD. ALRIGHT, SO THEN NOW WE'RE RETURNING TO THE FIRST ITEM, WHICH IS THE ONE FOR PARKS AND RECREATION. AND WE'RE GOING TO INVITE TO MR. REINKE TO COME FORWARD AND, UM, HELP GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THIS ONE, UH, TO THE COUNCIL. AND, UH, COUNCIL FRANCIS, UH, YOU AND, AND, UH, COUNCIL PRESIDENT, OR EXCUSE ME, FORMER COUNCIL PRESIDENT ZEL. THEN MAY HAVE SOME MORE BACKGROUND ON THIS. SO BETWEEN THE THREE OF YOU, WE'LL, UH, WE'LL LOOK TO YOUR GUIDANCE AS TO HOW TO CONSIDER THIS ITEM. OKAY. THANK YOU. UM, JUST TO COMMENT ON IT, UH, JUST A LITTLE HISTORY IF YOU HAVEN'T READ IT, BUT WE'LL PROVIDE A, WE'RE WE'RE GONNA PUT A 60 FOOT BY 600 FOOT, UH, BARRIER NETTING ON IT. SAND CREEK GOLF COURSE. UNFORTUNATELY, AS FAR AS GOLF BALLS GO THESE DAYS, THEY'RE GOING OVER THE FENCE HITTING CARS AND UNFORTUNATELY HAD QUITE A FEW OF THOSE HAPPEN THIS YEAR. SO, UM, THE COST OF THIS PROJECT, THERE WAS THREE BIDS. AND THE REASON WE WANTED TO MOVE THIS, UH, AS, AS WE'RE MOVING IT TONIGHT, IS, UH, JUDGE NETTING, IF YOU LOOK IN YOUR, IN YOUR DEAL, JUDGE NETTING ACTUALLY IS THE, UH, IS THE, UH, UH, CONTRACTOR THAT WON THE AWARD OR SHIP WIN THE AWARD AT 119,900. UM, IN, IN AIR. THEY HAD ANOTHER 16,900 ADDED TO THAT FOR A BASEBOARD THAT NONE OF THE OTHER, UH, VENDORS HAVE INCLUDED. AND WE WE'RE NOT SURE WE'RE GONNA DO THE, UH, THE BASEBOARD. I DON'T THINK WE'LL DO THE BASEBOARD, BUT BASICALLY WE WANT TO DO THE, UH, THE BARRIER NETTING. SO THEIR, THEIR BID WAS 119 NINE, THE OTHERS WERE 120, AND THEN THE OTHER ONE WAS 130 OR A HUNDRED, 220,000. SO THE ACTUAL WINNER OF THAT BID WOULD BE, UH, [00:05:01] JUDGE DE. OKAY. UM, IS EVERYBODY CLEAR ON THAT? ANY QUESTIONS? ANYTHING YOU WANNA ADD? COUNCILLOR FRANCIS? NO, I DON'T THINK, I THINK THAT'S THE KEY POINT. THE MEMO IS JUST INCORRECT. AND YEAH, WE WILL DO THE MOTION TO IDENTIFY THE CORRECT WINNING BID. ALRIGHT, SO, UH, CITY CLERK WILL UM, I GUESS NOTE THAT THERE'S GONNA BE SOME THERE VARIATION IN THE WORDING ON THE MOTION. UH, AND, UH, THERE'S NO DISCUSSION OR IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, COUNCIL MEMBERS, I GUESS WE'LL TURN RIGHT TO THE MOTION NOW. OKAY. THANK YOU MR. RANGE. SO I MOVE COUNSEL, ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE PROPOSAL FROM JUDGE NETTING MOUNTAIN WEST, WHICH HAS THE LOWEST PRICE OF THREE QUOTES FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN INSTALLATION OF THE BARRIER SYSTEM AT SAND CREEK GOLF COURSE IN THE AMOUNT OF 119,900. I'LL SECOND. ALRIGHT, UM, CITY CLERK, I THINK WE HAVE A MOTION THAT'S READY FOR A VOTE. WILL YOU CONDUCT THAT FOR US? FRANCIS AYE. AMEN. YES. FREEMAN? YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. ? YES. MOTION. VERY GOOD. UM, THEN THE NEXT [4.C.1) IFP 25-01 Bid Award to Ormond Builders Inc. for Idaho Falls Power Administration Building Remodel] ITEM, UH, ITEM OF INVOLVES POWER. WE'LL INVITE MR. GOMAN TO COME FORWARD AND, UH, HELP US BETTER UNDERSTAND, UH, THE BID WARRANTY ORMAN BUILDERS THAT THAT'S LISTED HERE. OKAY. UM, IF, SHOULD I GUESS WHAT THE QUESTION IS? YEAH, OR I CAN, I CAN EXPLAIN IT. 'CAUSE I, MY WELL I MEAN I BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE SO I'M GLAD TO EXPLAIN IT, BUT IT'S OKAY. IS IT THE QUESTION ON, ON THE CLAUSE WITH THE YEAH. ON THE THREE MISSING CLAUSES. YEAH. SO OUR ORIGINAL CONTRACT DID NOT HAVE THE, THE CLAUSES THAT ARE REQUIRED BY IDAHO FALLS, FALLS POLICY AND STATE LAW OF THE NON-DISCRIMINATION AND ISRAEL CLAUSE AND, AND THE, UM, CHINESE CLAUSE AND OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT GOT THAT AFTER THE DRAFT WENT OUT AND, UH, THEY DID THEIR JOB. SO IT IS IN THE FINAL COPY OF THE VARIOUS, AND THIS IS ABOUT A $1.1 MILLION REMODEL FOR, FOR THE BACKSIDE OF OUR OFFICE TO ADD OFFICE SPACE. ALRIGHT. THEN TO CLARIFY THE UH, CORRECT, UH, DOCUMENT IT WILL BE, IS THE ONE THAT WILL BE SIGNED TONIGHT. UM, BUT THE WHAT IF, WHAT'S IN YOUR PACKET, IF YOU HAVE A PACKET, UM, OR IF YOU LOOK ONLINE OR SUBMITTED, YOU'LL SEE THE OLD DOCUMENT THAT'S MISSING THOSE CLAUSES. IS THAT RIGHT? UM, SO IF ANYBODY DESIRES, I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S WRONG, I HAVE A FROG IN MY THROAT. IF ANYBODY DESIRES THE, THE ACCURATE CONTRACT, THEY CAN JUST, UH, REACH OUT TO OUR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE AND GET THE REQUEST THAT COPY. UM, BY THE WAY, I FAILED TO MENTION THAT THERE IS, UM, A QR CODE OVER THERE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE FULL PACKET IF ANYBODY WANTS THAT INFORMATION OR IT'S ONLINE POSTED WITH, UH, TONIGHT'S AGENDA. UM, AND WITH THAT, UM, ARE THERE QUESTIONS FOR MR. BOARDMAN? IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. UM, ALRIGHT. UM, COUNCILOR FRANCIS, SINCE THIS WAS YOUR ITEM, EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE NOT A LIAISON, WILL YOU GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION? YEAH, I GOT IT. I MOVE. COUNSEL, APPROVE THE BID OF AWARD TO ORMAN BUILDERS INC. OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF 1 MILLION 1 79 98 40 CENTS AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION TO THE MARIN CITY CLERK. EXECUTE 30 DOCUMENTS. I'LL SECOND. ALRIGHT, VERY GOOD. WE, UH, NOW HAVE A MOTION READY FOR A VOTE. CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT THAT? BRADFORD AYE. FREEMAN? YES. ? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. YES. LESLIE? YES. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, WE'RE NOW, UH, MOVING [5.A.1) Bid Award - Idaho Falls Fire Station #6] TO UM, THE THIRD, THE NEW THIRD ITEM. UH, THE NEW NUMBER FOR LETTER C ON THE AGENDA. IT'S AN ITEM FROM PUBLIC WORKS. UH, THIS RELATES TO, UM, MAKING A BID AWARD FOR IDAHO FALLS FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AND WE TURN TO COUNT, UH, DIRECTOR FREDERICKSON TO GIVE US A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THAT. THANK YOU MAYOR COUNSEL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE. AS MENTIONED, THIS IS THE BID AWARD FOR IOWA FALLS FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX. THIS IS A PROPOSED NEW STATION, UH, BE LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST, UH, PORTION OF OUR TOWN LOCATED AT 27 67 SPITFIRE STREET. WE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THIS AT WORKS Y YESTERDAY. UM, AS UH, BIDS WERE OPEN, WE HAD SEVERAL QUESTIONS THAT WERE RAISED BY SOME OF THE BIDDERS. WE WORKED THROUGH THAT WITH A NUMBER OF THE DEPARTMENTS AND ALSO LEGAL HAD WEIGHED IN ON THAT AS WELL. UM, AND SO WITH THAT TONIGHT WE DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU TO AWARD THE, THE BASE BID AND ALTERNATE TWO DEDUCT TO BIG DECONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,632,708. UM, BUT WITH THAT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT THEY'RE GONNA NEED. AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR DIRECTOR? I KNOW, UH, JUST FOR THE, UM, VIEWING AUDIENCE, WE DID, UH, ADDRESS THIS ISSUE IN OUR WORK SESSION YESTERDAY AFTERNOON. AND SO COUNCIL IS ALREADY VERY WELL VERSED IN THIS AND THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. UM, BUT, UH, IF WE DON'T HAVE QUESTIONS, UH, COUNCIL MEMBERS, ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTARY TO OFFER? [00:10:01] ALRIGHT, THEN I'LL TURN TO OUR, UH, PUBLIC WORKS LIAISONS. IF ANYBODY, UM, YOU, JIM OR KIRK, IF YOU WANNA MAKE A MOTION. OH, I'M GOOD FOR THE MOTION. OKAY. I MOVE COUNSEL, APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AWARD TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE RESPONSIBLE BIDDER BD CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,632,708, WHICH INCLUDES THE BASE BID AND ALTERNATE TO DEDUCT AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENT. SECOND. ALRIGHT, VERY GOOD. UH, THE CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MOTION THAT WAS JUST MADE. LARSON? YES, FRANCIS. AYE. BRADFORD AYE. DAMON, YES. HAW? YES. FREEMAN? YES. MOTION CARRIED. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU EVERYONE. UM, MOVING [5.B.1) Sale of Used Law Enforcement Vehicles to Idaho State University, Law Enforcement Program] NOW TO, UH, LETTER D. UM, IT WOULD BE MUNICIPAL SERVICES. WE HAVE A SINGLE ITEM COMING FORWARD, UH, REGARDING, UH, SELLING OF THE CITY PROPERTY TO UH, IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY. OKAY, THANK YOU MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THIS EVENING. I WAS HOPING TO, UM, HAVE ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE TO ANSWER ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS, BUT SO THE WAY IT WORKS IS FROM TIME TO TIME WHEN WE HAVE ITEMS ON SURPLUS OR WE'RE NOTIFYING AGENCIES OF ITEMS ON SURPLUS, UM, WE DO FROM TIME TO TIME DO GET, UH, OPPORTUNITIES FOR, UM, SOME OF OUR, UH, SUB GOVERNMENTAL UNITS, UM, INTEREST IN ACQUIRING THOSE. AND IN THE PAST WE HAVE DONATED SOME FIRE TRUCKS. WE'VE DONATED, UM, A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS TO SOME OF OUR, UM, OUR TRANSFER IF YOU WILL. UH, SOME OF OUR SURPLUS EQUIPMENT. SO THIS EVENING WE HAVE, UM, THREE VEHICLES THAT WERE DUE TO GO INTO SURPLUS. THEY ARE LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES, SO THEY'RE FULLY EQUIPPED WITH LIGHTS AND, UH, LIGHT BARS AND THE CAGES AND, AND ALL THAT STUFF THAT, THAT GOES INTO THOSE VEHICLES. UH, TWO OF THE VEHICLES ARE SUVS OR FORD EXPLORERS AND THOSE ACTUALLY GAIN MORE, UH, VALUE WHEN WE SURPLUS THOSE VERSUS, UH, THE THIRD ONE, WHICH IS A CHARGER. IT'S A 2016 CHARGER. UM, SO IN CONVERSATION, UM, THE IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY HAD SEEN THESE, UH, SURPLUS VEHICLES AND THEY HAD APPROACHED THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO SAY, HEY, WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO SELL US TWO OF THE FORD EXPLORERS FOR $2,500 A PIECE? 'CAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY WOULD BE WORTH, UM, ON PUBLIC SURPLUS. AND THEY ALSO EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN THE CHARGER, BUT THEY WEREN'T SURE IF THEY HAD THE MONEY AT THE TIME TO PURCHASE THE CHARGER OUTRIGHT. UM, IN CONVERSATION WITH IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY AND OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, UM, I WAS ASKED TO, UH, REVIEW THIS, UH, OPPORTUNITY FOR A, UM, A SALE AND POTENTIALLY A TRANSFER OF THE CHARGER OVER TO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY TO BE USED FOR THEIR LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. UM, AND SO FOR THOSE OF YOU, UM, WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE PROGRAM, THEY WILL ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO USE THESE, UH, VEHICLES IN THE COURSE OF THEIR TRAINING, UM, FOR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. SO, UM, WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU IS THE APPROVAL TO SELL, UH, TWO OF THE FORD EXPLORERS FOR $2,500 A PIECE AND THEN ALSO OFFER A SALE OF THE CHARGER FOR $2,500. AND, UM, ALSO IF THE, UM, UNIVERSITY CANNOT AFFORD TO BUY THE CHARGER, CONSIDER, UH, ALLOWING THAT CHARGER TO GO AS A TRANSFER OVER TO THE IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. IT'S NOT JUST THE UNIVERSITY SPECIFICALLY FOR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. AND I ALSO WANNA ADD THAT THEY, UM, DO TRAIN UP SOME OF THE OFFICERS THAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE AS RECRUITS, UH, HERE AT THE CITY. SO IT, IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY, UM, FOR THE, UH, THE TRANSFER OF, UH, TO ANOTHER, UM, GOVERNMENTAL POLITIC, UM, GOVERNMENTAL UNIT CITY ATTORNEY. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH, IT'S A GOVERNMENTAL UNIT. IT'S A GOVERNMENTAL UNIT. UM, SO THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THAT. AND I JUST, I WAS ASKED TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION. SO, UM, SO THE LAST, UH, 20 OR SO VEHICLES, UH, THAT WERE LAW ENFORCEMENT, UM, THEY AVERAGE ABOUT $2,500. UM, AND AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, EXPLORERS ARE MORE VALUABLE, IF YOU WILL, THAN THAN CHARGERS. SO THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I THINK THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS SAYING, WELL, MAYBE WE COULD JUST, YOU KNOW, TRANSFER THE CHARGER OVER INSTEAD OF CHARGING, UM, THE $2,500 FOR THAT. AND THEN THE OTHER THING I WANT TO BRING UP TOO IS, UM, TO TAKE OUT THE EQUIPMENT, IT'S VERY LABOR INTENSIVE. AND SO WE ARE ESTIMATING OUR, UM, FLEET MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT IS ESTIMATING A THOUSAND DOLLARS. IT COSTS US ABOUT A THOUSAND DOLLARS, WHETHER WE DO IT IN-HOUSE OR WE TAKE IT OUTSIDE, UM, DUE TO, UH, THE WORKLOAD THAT'S REQUIRED IN ORDER TO REMOVE ALL OF THOSE LAW ENFORCEMENT PIECES OUTTA THOSE VEHICLES. SO BASICALLY YOU'RE STRIPPING DOWN THE VEHICLE BACK DOWN TO THE BASE AND THEN ALSO TAKING OFF THE DECALS. THEY'RE NOT JUST STICK ONS WHERE YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, TAKE 'EM OFF AND PUT 'EM SOMEPLACE ELSE THAT ACTUALLY REQUIRES SOME KIND OF ROTOR MECHANISM THAT ACTUALLY REMOVES THOSE [00:15:01] VERY SLOWLY, BUT IT TAKES A WHILE TO GET THOSE OFF SO YOU'RE NOT RUINING THE PAINT OF THE ACTUAL VEHICLE ITSELF. UM, SO WE'RE ESTIMATING THAT THE EQUIPMENT REMOVAL WOULD BE ABOUT $600 AND IT WOULD BE $400 TO REMOVE THE DECAL AND, UM, ON THE DECAL OF THESE THREE VEHICLES. AND, UM, I THINK THAT WAS ALL I WANTED TO ADD UNLESS I HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. SO IS IT THAT ISU WILL REMOVE THE DECALS OR DO OUR DECALS STAY ON THEIR TRAINING VEHICLES? WELL, I BELIEVE THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT LEAVING THE DECALS ACTUALLY ON THOSE VEHICLES, UM, IF WE HAD IT AS PART OF THEIR LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. UM, SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING WE WOULD HAVE TO TALK TO THE UNIVERSITY ABOUT BEFORE THOSE VEHICLES, BEFORE THEY COME AND PICK 'EM UP. 'CAUSE OBVIOUSLY WE DON'T WANT OUR CITY DECAL TO BE PART OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM THERE. THAT'S WHAT I, OKAY. I I MUST HAVE MISHEARD. YEAH. OKAY. YEAH, BUT IT IS A, IT IS A ROTATING TOOL, SO IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, YOU JUST KIND OF GO AROUND. IT'S KIND OF LIKE A, IT'S KINDA LIKE A MAGIC ERASER, IF YOU WILL. IT'S APPARENTLY THAT'S KIND OF WHAT STAN DESCRIBED TO ME. SO, UM, SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TO PRESENT THIS EVENING. I HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS. IT'S A LOT OF INFO. OKAY. WOW. VERY GOOD. WE HAVE, UM, SORRY, OUR COUNCIL PRESIDENT AND MR. LARSON ARE BOTH, UH, LIAISONS FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES. I DON'T KNOW WHICH ONE OF YOU IS GONNA MAKE THE MOTION. UM, I HAVE SOME COMMENTS MAYBE FIRST. OH, FIRST, OKAY. YEAH. UM, I, AS WE LEARNED ABOUT THIS TODAY, UM, THAT YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING. UM, IT, IT FEELS WEIRD TO SAY, BUT YOU CAN PAY FOR IT IF YOU CAN PAY FOR IT. OTHERWISE WE'LL GIVE IT TO YOU FOR FREE. LIKE THAT, THAT TO ME JUST SEEMS LIKE A STRANGE MOTION TO SAY. SO AS, AS WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IT AND RUNNING THE NUMBERS, IF, IF WE WERE TO CHARGE FOR ALL THREE VEHICLES, IT WAS $7,500, WE KNOW THEY CAN AFFORD TWO VEHICLES, WHICH IS $5,000. IF, UM, WE WERE TO SURPLUS THEM AND SEND THEM OUT THE DOOR WITH THE SUBTRACTION OF A THOUSAND DOLLARS PER VEHICLE, IT'S 4,500. SO MY MOTION IS GOING TO BE TO SELL THE TWO VEHICLES AND TRANSFER THE CHARGER. I THINK THAT IT'S A, IT'S A BENEFIT TO US TO HAVE, UM, THEM BE ABLE TO, TO USE IT. THAT'S, THAT'S MY MOTION. IF AND IF ANYBODY IS GOING TO DISAGREE, THAT'S FINE, BUT WE'LL JUST TAKE THE VOTE. BUT THAT IS MY MOTION RATHER THAN TO SELL OR TRANSFER. IT JUST IS SELL THE TWO AND TRANSFER THE CHARGER. SO TO BE CLEAR, THAT'S, THAT'S WHY I'M MAKING THAT MOTION IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE NUMBERS AND I THINK IT'S GOODWILL TO ISU, THEY BECOME POLICE OFFICERS IN OUR AREA. ALRIGHT. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO WANTS COMMENT, QUESTION? COUNCIL, PRESIDENT, OR DIRECTOR? I DUNNO. SO, OKAY. YOUR MIC IS ON, ISN'T IT? OKAY, WHAT MY QUESTION IS, DO WE JUST SUBTRACT THE 400 FOR THE DECAL REMOVAL OR BECAUSE WE'RE LEAVING THE EQUIPMENT, RIGHT? WE'RE LEAVING THE EQUIPMENT IN. THAT WAS THE PART THAT WAS KIND OF NEW TODAY IS IT WAS, AS WE TALKED ABOUT IT EARLIER, IT WAS JUST A THOUSAND. SO I WOULD SAY IF WE GIVE THEM THIS DEDUCTION, THEY NEED TO REMOVE THE, THAT MAKE THAT PART OF THEIR DEAL THAT THEY REMOVE THE DECAL BEFORE THEY USE THE VEHICLE. SO WE'RE NOT PAYING THE, I WOULD SAY WE DON'T WANNA PAY TO REMOVE THE DECAL. THAT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING IF WE TRANSFER THE CHARGER, IT WOULD BE TO, IT WOULD INCLUDE REMOVAL OF THE DECALS. AND WHEN I WAS TALKING TO THE SUPERINTENDENT AFTER THAT TODAY, YOU KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN ROLL THOSE VEHICLES IN AND JUST REMOVE IT IN HOUSE AND THEN HAVE THEM COME PICK IT UP AFTER THE DECALS ARE REMOVED. IT JUST WOULD BE THE COST OF LABOR. WE WOULDN'T SEND IT OUT TO HAVE SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT. OH, WE WOULD, WE WOULDN'T MAKE IT A STIPULATION THAT THEY REMOVE THE DECALS BEFORE THEY USE THOSE VEHICLES. WE, WE COULD DO THAT, BUT I WOULD IMAGINE WE'D WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE REMOVED BEFORE THEY GO DOWN DRIVING DOWN THE STREET. OKAY, SO THEN IT'S JUST $600 PER VEHICLE. YEAH. SO THE MATH THEN IT'S $700. YEAH, EXACTLY. NEGATIVE. NO, IT'S JUST $400. WELL, IT'S $400 TO APPROXIMATELY TO REMOVE THE DECALS, SO YES. BUT IT'S $600 TO PULL THAT OUT. SO YOU HAVE THE 2,500 MINUS 600 IS LEAVES YOU AT 1900 PER VEHICLE IF YOU WERE TO SELL 'EM, IF YOU WERE TO SURPLUS THEM WITHOUT ALL OF THE COMPONENTS. CORRECT. CORRECT. SO THAT DOES CHANGE. AND IT, AND IT COULD VERY WELL BE THAT THE CHARGER DOESN'T EVEN GO, I MEAN THEY, THEY DO ACTUALLY HAVE COMMITTED TO PURCHASE THE TWO FOUR EXPLORERS, BUT IT'S JUST ONE OF THOSE, YOU KNOW, WE HAD, WE KNEW, THEY KNEW WE HAD TO COME TO COUNCIL TO GET IT APPROVED. YEAH. SO, SO, BUT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE, IT'S APPROVE THE SALE AND OR TRANSFER RIGHT. OF THREE. SO THAT'S WHAT IS CONFUSING ABOUT IT IS THAT EXACTLY IS WE'RE GONNA SAY, WELL WE WILL SELL, [00:20:01] BUT IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD, WE WILL GIVE IT TO YOU . SO I SO THAT IT'S CLEAR YEAH. TO JUST, JUST TO SAY WE'RE GONNA SELL THE TO AND TRANSFER THE CHARTER THAT, SO THAT WOULD BE MY EMOTION. AND SOMEONE AND OR YEAH, FOR ME IT'S THAT WE WOULD APPROVE THE SALE. SO I WOULD MOVE THE COUNCIL, APPROVE THE SALE OF, UM, UNIT 57, 57 AND 57 78, UM, TO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY AND TRANSFER VEHICLE 57 95 TO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE, THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. OKAY. UM, WITH THAT, UM, BEFORE WE TAKE A VOTE, ANY COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO, UH, HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR ANYBODY? ANY COMMENTS? CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT A VOTE ON THIS? MOTION IS, UH, SLIGHTLY MODIFIED BY COUNCIL. COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAW HAW? YES. LARSON? YES. DINGMAN? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. MOTION HEARING. ALRIGHT. CONGRATULATIONS. ISU LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. ALRIGHT, WITH THAT THEN [5.C.1) Amendment to Joint Fuel Facility Agreement ] WE'LL MOVE TO AN ITEM COMING FROM OUR CITY ATTORNEY. UM, THIS IS, UM, A, UH, AN ITEM RELATING TO AMENDING THE JOINT FUEL FACILITY AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH BONNEVILLE COUNTY. AND THE, UH, SOME, THE LANGUAGE IN THE AGREEMENT, VERY LITTLE LANGUAGE IN THE AGREEMENT IS CHANGED, BUT WE DO HAVE COPIES OF THAT UP HERE, UM, AT THE DAYS. UM, AND IF ANYBODY IS INTERESTED IN SEEING THAT, YOU'RE WELCOME TO HAVE MY COPIES, UM, AFTER THE MEETING. AND, UM, THE ACCURATE COPIES WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY CLERK IF ANYBODY NEEDS THOSE. SO I'LL TURN IT OVER TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY TO EXPLAIN, UH, THE GIST OF THE, UH, ACTION TONIGHT. THANK YOU MAYOR. THIS IS, UH, WE DISCUSSED THIS AT THE WORK SESSION YESTERDAY. IT SEEMED LIKE FOR THE PUBLIC'S BENEFIT, THIS IS A JOINT FUEL AGREEMENT THAT THE CITY HAS BEEN, UH, CONDUCTING A OR JOINTLY COOPERATING WITH THE COUNTY AND RUNNING, UH, BASICALLY A GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL STATION, UH, THAT BOTH THE COUNTY AND THE CITY USE. WE ENTERED INTO THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT IN 2010. IT'S A 30 YEAR AGREEMENT AND WE'RE ABOUT HALFWAY THROUGH THAT. THERE'S ANOTHER, UH, 16 YEARS IN THE CONTRACT LEFT TO GO. UH, AT THIS TIME, UH, THE COUNTY APPROACHED THE CITY AND ASKED IF THERE'D BE SOME APPETITE IN MAKING SOME CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. UH, NAMELY ADDING A CANOPY OVER THE FUEL PUMPS AT THE STATION AND ADDING, UH, SOME ADDITIONAL FUEL CAPACITY. AND SO THE AMENDMENT TO THAT AGREEMENT THAT YOU HAVE FOR TODAY, UH, DETAILS THOSE TWO. CAPITAL EXPANSIONS ADDS IN A PROVISION THAT ONCE THE FUEL CAPACITY OF THAT FUEL STATION IS INCREASED, THAT THE CITY AND COUNTY WILL MAINTAIN EMERGENCY FUEL SUPPLIES AT THE STATION AT ALL TIMES IN THE CASE OF AN EMERGENCY SO THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS FUEL TO RESPOND TO AN EMERGENCY THAT HAPPENS HERE IN BONGO COUNTY. THE AMENDMENT ALSO DOES SOME VARIOUS CLEANUP LANGUAGE THAT WAS NEEDED AND, UH, CLARIFIES, UH, A LITTLE BIT THE PROCESS OF HOW THE CITY AND COUNTY MIGHT EXCHANGE, UH, MANAGEMENT RIGHTS FOR THE FACILITY. SO IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS I HAVE PRINTED OUT FOR YOU, UH, THE CHANGES THAT I MADE BASED OFF OF THE DISCUSSION THAT COUNCIL HAD IN THE WORK SESSION, THERE IS A DRAFT VERSION THAT'S A RED LINE AND THEN THERE'S A CLEAN COPY THERE AS WELL. SO IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, UH, OR IF THERE IS SOMETHING THAT I DIDN'T INCLUDE THAT YOU WANTED TO BE INCLUDED, JUST LET ME KNOW AND WE'LL MAKE THOSE FIXES. ALRIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, ANYBODY, UM, I'LL GIVE YOU A MOMENT TO I GUESS LOOK AT THE, SORRY, THE DOCUMENTS THAT ARE IN FRONT OF YOU. UM, I THINK THE RIGHT LINE WAS SIMPLY CHANGING THE DATE, UM, THAT, UH, WE, THERE'S A FEW TYPOS IN THAT. OH, THAT'S FINE. WE CAUGHT AS WELL. OKAY. INNOCENT, NORMAL, EVERYDAY TYPOS. OKAY. UM, WITH THAT I'LL LOOK TO, UM, ONE OF THE LIAISONS FROM, OR THE LIAISON FOR LEGAL TO MAKE A MOTION AND WE'LL NEED A SECOND. OKAY. I WOULD MOVE THE COUNCIL, APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT FUEL FACILITY AGREEMENT. UM, SECOND. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A FIRST, DO WE HAVE A SECOND? FROM COUNCILOR REDFORD. UH, CITY CLERK, WOULD YOU CONDUCT A ROLE CALL VOTE FRANCIS. AYE. DAMON, YES. FREE? YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. HAW? YES. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THE [5.D.1) Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, First Amended Plat of Virlow Village Division No. 1.] LAST DEPARTMENT TO HAVE ITEMS BEFORE US IS OUR, UH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. UM, THIS EVENING REPRESENTING, UH, THE DEPARTMENT IS, UH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CARRIE LER. UM, [00:25:01] THE, THE FIRST FEW ITEMS ARE, UH, APPROVALS OF FINAL PLATS AND, UH, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS HAVE GOTTEN SO GOOD AT THAT, THAT THEY DON'T NEED THE, UH, DEPARTMENT TO, UH, COME FORWARD AND, AND, UH, DISCUSS IT. UM, AND SO COUNCIL MEMBERS, I'M GOING TO TURN TO, UM, FIRST FINAL PLAT AND REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR OUGH VILLAGE DIVISION NUMBER ONE. AND, UH, COUNCILORS, UH, LARSON AND RADFORD ARE OUR LIAISONS TO THAT DEPARTMENT. UM, BEFORE COUNCILOR LARSON MAKES THE MOTION, UH, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT, UH, THE PROPOSED ACTION? ALRIGHT, THEN WE WILL LET TURN COUNCIL LARSON FOR THE MOTION. I MOVE COUNSEL EXCEPT OR APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF VILLAGE DIVISION ONE AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR, CITY ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE FINAL PLAT. SECOND. ALRIGHT, VERY GOOD CITY CLERK, CAN YOU CONDUCT THE ROLL CALL? VOTE DEMAN. YES. HAW? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. FREEMAN? YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. MOTION TAKE. ALRIGHT. AND EVERY TIME WE APPROVE A PLAQUE WE ALSO APPROVE A REASON STATEMENT, UM, OF THE RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS THAT GOVERN THE DECISION THEY MADE. AND SO WITH THAT, I'LL TURN TO COUNCILOR LARSON FOR THE SECOND MOTION. I MOVE THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE FIRST AMENDED PLAT OF VERLO VILLAGE, DIVISION ONE AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. VERY GOOD CITY CLERK, CAN YOU CONDUCT THIS VOTE FOR US. . YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD AYE. DEMON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. MOTION HEARING. ALRIGHT, [5.D.2) Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Ivywood Division No. 6] UH, WE HAVE ANOTHER VERY, VERY SIMILAR ACTION, UH, FOR THE FINAL PLAT, UM, APPROVAL AND, UH, REASON STATEMENT OF STANDARDS FOR THIS ONE. AND THAT'S FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SIX. COUNCIL LARSON, ONCE AGAIN, I MOVE THE COUNCIL, APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION SIX AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SET AGREEMENT. SECOND. THANK YOU. COUNCILOR RADFORD, CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT THE VOTE? LARSON? YES. HAW? YES. DAMON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. RADFORD. AYE. MOTION CARRIED ALL. SO THAT WAS THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. NOW WE HAVE THE FINAL PLAT. I MOVE THE COUNCIL. ACCEPT OR APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SIX AND GIVE AUTHORIZATIONS THE MAYOR, CITY ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN. SAID FINAL PLAT. SECOND. ALRIGHT. CITY CLERK. YEAH. ONCE AGAIN REVEREND AYE. FREEMAN. YES. SHAW? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. DINGMAN. YES. LARSON? YES. MOTION CARRIED. THANK YOU. AND NOW THE REASON STATEMENT I MOVE THE COUNCIL. APPROVE THE REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY A DIVISION NUMBER SIX. AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. ALRIGHT. UH, CITY CLERK, ONE MORE VOTE FOR US PLEASE. DAMON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. FRANCIS. AYE. HAW. YES. LARSON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. MOTION HEAR. ALRIGHT. UH, [5.D.3) Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Ivywood Division No. 7] TWO MORE, UH, SIMILAR SUCH ACTIONS HERE. NUMBER THREE IS THE FINAL PLA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF REASON STATEMENT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SEVEN. COUNCIL LARSON, I MOVE THE COUNCIL, APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SEVEN AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SET AGREEMENT. SECOND. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT THE VOTE? FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. LARSON? YES. RADFORD. AYE. HAW. YES. DAMON? YES. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD. NOW WE'LL GO TO THE FINAL PLAT, I, BOTH THE COUNCIL ACCEPT OR APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SEVEN AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR, CITY ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK CLERK TO SIGN. SET. FINAL PLAT. SECOND. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK. ANOTHER VOTE PLEASE. FRANCIS AYE. DEMON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. HAW. YES. MOTION HEARING. I KIND OF LIKE CITY PLAQUE. THAT'S KIND OF A CUTE FOR YOU. ALL RIGHT. UH, THE REASON STATEMENT PLEASE. IF IT WAS ENGLISH, IT'D BE CLARK. BUT CLERK, I MOVE TO COUNCIL, PROVE THE RECENT STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR IVY WOOD DIVISION NUMBER SEVEN. AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. THANK YOU. ONE MORE VOTE. CITY CLERK FREEMAN. YES. FRANCIS. AYE. LARSON? YES. RAPTOR. AYE. HAW. YES. DMA? YES. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD. AND I THINK, UH, [5.D.4) Final Plat and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards, Idaho Falls Fire Station 6] WE HAVE, UM, ONLY TWO VOTES FOR THE NEXT. NO, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT. I'M THE WRONG PAGE. UM, YEAH. TWO VOTES FOR THE NEXT ITEM. SORRY. AND THIS IS, UM, RELATED TO ITEM FALSE FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX. I'LL GO AHEAD AND DO THAT. I MOVE TO ACCEPT OR APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE ITEM FALSE FIRE STATION SIX. AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR, CITY ENGINEER AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN. SAID FINAL PLAT. SECOND. [00:30:01] RIGHT. THANK YOU. CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT THIS VOTE? DINGMAN? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. FRANCIS. AYE. HAW. YES. LARSON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. MOTION. C. ALRIGHT. AND THEN THE REASON STATEMENT PLEASE. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THE REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE OT FALLS FIRE STATION SIX. AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. VERY GOOD CITY CLERK. ONE MORE ROUND OF VOTING. FRANCIS AYE. DAMON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. LAWSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. PER SHALL? YES. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, [5.D.5) Legislative Public Hearing-Part 1 of 2 of the Annexation and Initial Zoning-Annexation Ordinance and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 18.866 acres in the N ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 37 East.] UH, THESE NEXT TWO ITEMS, UM, UH, REQUIRE A HEARING. UM, WE'RE ONLY GONNA HAVE ONE HEARING, UM, BUT OUR SOFTWARE MAKES US DIVIDE THESE INTO TWO, UM, SETS OF MOTIONS. AND, AND SO, UM, THE FIRST, UM, NUMBER FIVE WILL BE, UH, SET OF MOTIONS BASED, UM, ON ANNEXATION. AND THEN THE SECOND TWO, UM, CONTAINED IN ITEM NUMBER SIX ON THE AGENDA ARE RELATED TO THE, UM, INITIAL ZONING THAT WILL BE ASSIGNED TO, UH, PROPERTY IF IT'S, IF IT IS INDEED ANNEXED. AND SO, UM, WITH THAT, UM, THIS IS A LEGISLATIVE HEARING AND SO ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY PARTICIPATE. UM, THAT MEANS THAT THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT THAT THEY, UM, THAT THEY COULD HAVE HAD ANY CONVERSATIONS, UM, WITH ANYBODY ABOUT THIS BECAUSE IT'S A LEGISLATIVE ACT. UM, SOMETIMES WE HAVE CLASSI JUDICIAL HEARINGS AND THOSE HAVE A DIFFERENT SET OF STANDARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THOSE. SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND DECLARE THE HEARING TO BE OPEN AND INVITE ALL ITEMS, UM, THAT ARE PRESENTED AND ALL TESTIMONY GIVEN, UM, TO BE PART OF THE RECORD. UM, AND AS A PART OF THAT, UM, TODAY, UH, EMAILED TO MY OFFICE, UM, WAS A SET OF LETTERS FROM, UM, SWIRE, COCA-COLA, UM, COMPANY THAT HAS AN INTEREST IN THIS ANNEXATION. AND, UH, I MADE COPIES OF, OR MY ASSISTANT MADE COPIES OF THOSE THAT I DISTRIBUTED TO ALL OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. AND SO THEY HAVE THIS INFORMATION AND, AND THIS WILL, UH, BECOME, INDEED BECOME PART OF THE RECORD. AND, UM, IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE A COPY OF THIS, UM, THEY'RE WELCOME TO MY HARD COPY. BUT, UH, IF ANYBODY WANTS, UH, TO REQUEST THAT THE CITY CLERK WILL HAVE, UH, THAT AND CAN MAKE THAT AVAILABLE, UH, UPON REQUEST, UM, ALL CITY DOCUMENTS ARE PUBLIC RECORD AND THERE IS A PROCESS TO REQUEST THEM. IT STARTS WITH OUR CITY CLERK, BUT IT, THEY'RE AVAILABLE TO ANYONE. SO, UM, WITH THAT, UM, I BELIEVE, UM, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND, UH, PROCEED AS FOLLOWS. WE'LL FIRST HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND, UM, AFTER THAT WE'LL MOVE TO, UM, SORRY, TESTIMONY FROM STAFF OR A STAFF PRESENTATION ACTUALLY, AND THAT MR. BUTLER WILL, WILL PROVIDE THAT. UM, AT THAT POINT WE'LL OPEN THE, UH, TESTIMONY UP TO ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO SHARE ANY INFORMATION OR INSIGHT ON THIS. AND, UM, THEN WE'LL TURN TO THE APPLICANT ONCE AGAIN, LET THEM, UH, REBUT OR GIVE ANY SUMMATION. UH, ALL THROUGHOUT COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY ASK QUESTIONS, UM, 'CAUSE THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING IS TO INFORM THEIR VOTE. AND SO WE LET THEM ASK QUESTIONS ALL ALONG. UM, ONCE WE THINK WE'RE DONE AND EVERYBODY'S SPOKEN AND EVERYBODY, UH, HAS HAD, UH, THEIR QUESTIONS ANSWERED, WE'LL CLOSE THE HEARING AND THEN PROCEED TO COUNSEL DELIBERATION. UM, THE HEARING IS, UM, NOW IT'S, IT'S ALREADY OPEN. AND SO WE'LL TURN TO THE APPLICANT, UH, AND, UH, OR THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE IF YOU WANT TO COME AND YOU'RE A FAMILIAR FACE. BUT GO AHEAD AND SHARE YOUR NAME AND, AND, UH, TEACH US KURT ROLAND WITH, UH, EAGLE ROCK ENGINEERING 1331 FREMONT AVENUE WIDE. IDAHO FALLS ALL, THERE YOU GO. THERE WE GO. SORRY, YOU WANT ME TO START OVER? UH, CITY CLERK. WE GOT IT. MR. ROLAND FROM EAGLE ROCK ENGINEERING. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO REPRESENTING FOR SWIRE PACIFIC HOLDINGS AND FOR THE, UM, PROPERTY, IT'S 18.86 ACRES AND THE PROPERTY IS ON SOUTH 15TH WEST. UM, SO DO YOU GUYS ALL, I DUNNO IF OUR, OUR PACKETS DO CONTAIN MAPS, BUT I, UM, WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF THE, IF WE DON'T HAVE SOME MAPS. THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO. SO THIS IS OUT BY ANHEUSER-BUSCH AREA. UM, AND WE'RE ASKING FOR, UM, SEE THE, THE EXISTING ZONE IS IN THE COUNTY. IT IS, UH, M UM, ONE A AND ALL THE ZONING AROUND THE PROPERTY. THE NORTH PART IS, UH, IM UM, SOUTH IS COUNTY A ONE, EAST IS COUNTY A ONE, THE WEST IS COUNTY A ONE. AND I, I AND M ALSO, UH, WE'RE PROPOSING THAT WE'D LIKE, UH, I AND M FOR THIS PROPERTY. [00:35:01] UM, IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. SO HE'S GIVEN A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON, WELL, THE DESIRE TO ANNEX AND THEN, UH, THE ZONING AND UH, REQUEST. UM, A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THE COUNTY ZONING. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT FOR MR. ROLAND? COUNCILLOR LARSON? JUST CURIOUS THE NOTCH, WHAT, WHAT'S IN THAT? I MEAN, IT LOOKS LIKE A, A HOME, BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS. YEAH. THAT IS EXISTING HOME. ARE THERE FOLKS LIVING THERE? THERE, YES, THERE IS. I DO HAVE A QUESTION. MR. ROWLAND, DID YOU SAY THAT IT'S ZONED M LIKE FOR MANUFACTURING RIGHT NOW OR IT'S AGLAND IN THE, IN THE COUNTY EXISTING IS M1 A? SO IS THAT MANUFAC? IS IT ALREADY MANUFACTURING OR IS THAT A AG DESIGNATION FOR COUNTY? OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU. I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT WHERE THE CONTIGUOUS LINE, WHERE THE POINT IS, IS CONTIGUOUS WITH A CITY, IS IT ACROSS THE ROAD? IS THAT WHY YOU'RE ANNEXING THE ROAD? MM-HMM. OKAY. NO, NO, IT'S CONTIGUOUS TO THE NORTH AND TO THE WEST. OKAY, GREAT. THAT'S, THAT'S THE, WHICH, YEAH, TO THE NORTH IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ON, IT'S KIND OF, YOU SEE I'M SAYING OKAY, ON THIS MAP IT'S THE TO NOT THE TAM . YES. YEAH. SO, OKAY. AND THAT MAY AND THAT'S, THAT MAY BECOME CLEARER UH, AFTER MR. UELER UM, STANDS UP. BUT UH, FOR NOW, UM, WE THINK WE HAVE IT ANSWERED PROPERLY. THERE YOU MORE OF AN OVERALL IT SHOWS THE, AND I THINK THAT'S ANHEUSER BUSH. YES. SO A LITTLE TO THE WEST AND SLIGHTLY NORTH. OTHER QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, WELL THANK YOU MR. ROLAND. DON'T GO ANYWHERE. WE MAY HAVE MORE. OKAY. ALRIGHT, MR. BUTLER, WE DO INVITE YOU FORWARD TO GIVE A STAFF REPORT, PLEASE. YES. THANK YOU MAYOR AND COUNSEL. UM, SO THIS FIRST SLIDE IS THE ZONING AND THE AREA OF THE EXISTING ZONING. I DO APOLOGIZE ON THESE AERIAL MAPS. THE GRAY, UH, WHICH IS THE INDUSTRIAL ZONE, GETS A LITTLE BIT LOST WITH THE AERIAL. UM, BUT YOU DO SEE THE HEAVY BLACK LINE THAT'S KIND OF, UH, DASH THAT RUNS ALONG THE NORTH AND THEN ALONG THE WEST. THAT IS THE CITY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY. UH, SO AS WAS STATED, THE PROPERTY IS CONTIGUOUS BOTH TO, UH, THE WEST AND THE NORTH. THE ADJACENT ZONING IN THE CITY IS AN I AND M INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING ZONE, WHICH IS, UM, WHAT'S BEEN REQUESTED. UH, SO THE REQUESTED ZONES CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING ZONING IN THE AREA AS WELL. WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE ANNEXATION IS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR SOUTH 15TH WEST. UH, WE DO ANNEX THE ROADS, UH, AS WE, AS WE END UP WITH ON BOTH SIDES, UH, IN CONVERSATION WITH BONGO COUNTY TO TRY TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE THAT WORK BETWEEN THEIR PUBLIC WORKS AND OUR PUBLIC WORKS. UM, 15TH WEST IS A MAJOR COLLECTOR AS FAR AS THE STREET CLASSIFICATION. THIS MAP THAT DOES SEEM OUT THIS, UH, SLIDE TWO IS OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. SO YOU CAN SEE HERE THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION IS INDUSTRIAL. SO THE REQUESTED I AND M ZONING WOULD BE CONSISTENT, UH, WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSAL FOR THIS AREA AS WELL. JUST AN AERIAL VIEW WITH ALL THE OTHER OVERLAYS TAKEN AWAY. UM, THE PROPERTY DOES, BUT THE CANAL ON THE EAST, I CAN SEE THERE A LITTLE BIT BETTER AS WE, WE ZOOM IN. THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL HOMES BOTH TO THE, TO THE NORTH TO THE SOUTH, ALONG, UH, SOUTH 15TH WEST. OUR INDUSTRIAL ZONE THOUGH, DOES HAVE BUILT IN BUFFERS AS PART OF THE ZONING DESIGNATION. SO, UH, AS THE PROPERTY, UH, DEVELOPS, THAT WILL BE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING AND UM, TREES, ET CETERA TO BUFFER THE INDUSTRIAL USES FROM ANY EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USES. UM, THE ANNEXATION, IT IS WITHIN THE AREA OF IMPACT. THE CITY DOES HAVE THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THIS AREA. UH, THE ANNEXATION DID GO BEFORE, UH, PLANNING AND ZONING, UM, AND THEY DID, UH, ALSO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION WITH THE INITIAL ZONING OF LINE IN STAFF. WOULD CONCUR WITH THAT RECOMMENDATION? I'D TRY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE MR. BUELLER AT THE HEARING. THERE WAS TESTIMONY FROM SOMEONE WHO, UH, ADDRESS IS ALONG 15TH WEST. I SEE THAT THERE ARE, IT LOOKS LIKE POSSIBLY THREE HOMES ALONG THERE. AND I JUST, I DIDN'T DO THE, THE SEARCH OF THIS ADDRESS TO IDENTIFY WHICH PROPERTY, UM, WAS ZONED BY THE PERSON WHO GAVE TESTIMONY. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW? I BELIEVE IT IS THE PROPERTY THAT WILL BECOME AN ISLAND, A COUNTY ISLAND IN THE CENTER. OKAY. UH, THANK YOU FOR THAT. SURE. [00:40:01] UM, IS THERE A REASON WHY WE CHOSE, DO WE HAVE UNDER THE NEW ZONING LAWS? I COULDN'T, I COULDN'T QUOTE THE HOW THEY OPERATE NOW WITH THE SINGLE OWNER PROPERTY. COULD WE HAVE OPTED TO ANNEX THEM AT THE SAME TIME RATHER THAN CREATE AN ISLAND? UM, SO THERE'S A SEPARATE, UH, PROCESS THAT WE WORKED THROUGH WHEN THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT REQUESTING THE ANNEXATION. OKAY. SO WE COULD HAVE DONE THAT, BUT IT WOULD'VE, UM, INVOLVED SOME ADDITIONAL STEPS THAT WE WOULD NEED TO TAKE IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE A CITY INITIATED ANNEXATION ALSO. SO WE TYPICALLY SEPARATE 'EM. JUST 'CAUSE THE PROCESS IS DIFFERENT. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S RIGHT. I THAT MUCH I SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO, TO SAY I JUST CAN'T REMEMBER IF WE'RE, WHEN IT'S ONE WE CAN DO A CITY INITIATED, INITIATED. IT'S WHEN IT IS MANY, MANY MORE THAT WE CAN'T. CORRECT. THANK YOU. I I HONESTLY DIDN'T MEMORIZE THE CHANGE. UM, ALRIGHT. UM, BEYOND THAT, ARE THERE OTHER QUESTIONS? COUNCILLOR REDFORD? JUST ONE QUESTION. ARE WE CREATING AN ISLAND OF THE ROAD? WHERE DOES THE CITY OWN FOR THE ROADWAYS? SORRY, SOUTH 15TH, 15TH WEST. SO, I MEAN, CURRENTLY IT IS A COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY AND I BELIEVE IT'S A PRESCRIPTIVE USE RIGHT OF WAY YOU ISSUES. UH, AS YOU SEE THE PARCEL LINES, THEY, THEY APPEAR TO GO TO THE SOMEWHAT TO THE CENTER OF THE ROAD AND THAT'S GENERALLY MEANS THAT IT WASN'T SOMETHING THAT WAS DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY. BUT IT'S UM, HAS BEEN AN ESTABLISHED ROAD AND SO THERE'S A PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT THERE THAT PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT AND USES THE RIGHT OF WAY WOULD ALSO COME IN OUR JURISDICTION AS WE ANNEX THE PERSON. COUNCIL COUNCILOR FRANCIS. AND I JUST WANT VERIFY I'M UNDERSTANDING YOU RIGHT. THERE WAS SOMEBODY WHO SPOKE, I THINK HE SAYS HE LIVED IN THE HORSESHOE DRIVEWAY AREA, THAT'S HIS HOUSE. AND HE SAID HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT WATER, BUT THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT WE'RE DOING TONIGHT, CORRECT? RIGHT. I MEAN THERE IS A QUESTION I THINK FOR THE COUNCIL AS WELL, WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY CAN PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE PARCEL AS WE ANNEX IT. THERE IS AN EXISTING WATER LINE IN FIFTH SOUTH, 15TH WEST. OKAY. UH, SEWER IS ALSO IN THE VICINITY. UM, IT'S NOT IMMEDIATELY, UH, ADJACENT, BUT IT COULD BE EXTENDED. SO I THINK THAT'S REALLY THE QUESTION BEFORE YOU IS, YOU KNOW, IS CAN WE PROVIDE SERVICE TO IT AND YES. AND YOU'RE VERIFYING? YEAH. YES. OKAY. OKAY. I MISS RED. SO IT WASN'T THE GUY WITH THE THE ISLAND, IT'S THE GUY WITH THE HORSESHOE DRIVEWAY. ONLY ONE GUY. I THINK THERE'S ONLY ONE. YEAH. SORRY, I DIDN'T READ, I DIDN'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SENTENCE VERY CAREFULLY. OKAY. UM, WITH THAT, UM, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COUNCIL MEMBERS? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU MR. LER. WE APPRECIATE IT. AT THIS TIME WE'LL TAKE TESTIMONY FOR ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO WANT TO, UH, SHARE THEIR THOUGHTS ON THE CITY'S ANNEXATION AND ZONING OF THIS PROPERTY. ALRIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, BEFORE WE CLOSE THE HEARING, DO YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR EITHER MR. ELLER OR, UH, MR. ROLAND? ALRIGHT. IT APPEARS THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE SATISFIED WITH THAT. WE'LL CLOSE THE HEARING AND I WILL TURN IT TO, UH, THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. YOU HAVE COUNSELORS, UH, RADFORD AND UH, LARSON WHO, UH, CAN KICK OFF. UH, ANY COMMENTS THAT YOU WANNA MAKE OR OR FRAMING OF THAT YOU WANNA DO WITH THE ISSUE? NO, I'M JUST HAPPY TO SEE THAT BUSINESSES ARE WANTING TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE CITY AND, AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WANT TO BE PART OF US. SO, UM, WITH THAT I'LL TAKE ANY DISCUSSION OR ANY COMMENTS BEFORE I MAKE ANY MOTIONS. ALRIGHT, WELL THEN, UM, UH, COUNCILLOR RADFORD, WE ARE READY FOR THE MOTION. TERRIFIC. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE ANNEXING APPROXIMATELY 18.866 ACRES IN THE NORTH QUARTER, SORRY, NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION ONE, TOWNSHIP ONE NORTH RANGE 37 EAST. ASSIGN A A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF INDUSTRIAL AND UNDER A SUSPENSION OF THE RULES REQUIRING THREE COMPLETE AND SEPARATE READINGS REQUESTED TO BE READ BY TITLE AND PUBLISHED BY SUMMARY. SECOND QUESTION, UM, WAS THAT ASSIGNING INDUSTRIAL OR WAS IT INM WAS JUST INDUSTRIAL. THE PROPER NAME OF THE ZONE IS I AND M INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING. OKAY. OKAY. UM, JUST SO THAT THERE'S THAT CLARITY. AND THEN THE SECOND WE GOT THE SECOND FROM CASLER, UH, LARSON CITY CLERK, WILL YOU CONDUCT A VOTE? BRADFORD AYE. FREEMAN? YES. HAW? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. DINGMAN? YES. LARSON? YES. MOTION CARRIED. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT WE'LL GO TO THE REASON STATEMENT. THANK YOU. YOU MAYOR. OH, WHICH BY TITLE? YEAH, SORRY. IN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE STATE OF IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 18.866 ACRES AS DESCRIBED, EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CITY, THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY AND STATE AUTHORITIES AND PROVIDING SERVICEABILITY PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVELY. ALRIGHT, UM, THANK YOU. [00:45:01] UM, I AM MISSING SOMETHING. LEMME JUST, OKAY. UM, WE'LL GO, GO NOW TO THE RECENT STATEMENT. THANK YOU. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THE REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 18.866 ACRES IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION ONE, TOWNSHIP ONE NORTH RANGE 37 EAST, AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. SECOND. ALRIGHT, CITY CLERK, WE'RE READY FOR A VOTE. HAW? YES. LARSON? YES. BRADFORD. AYE. DINGMAN? YES. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. MOTION. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, NOW WE'RE GOING TO TURN [5.D.6) Legislative Public Hearing-Part 2 of 2 of the Annexation and Initial Zoning of I&M, Industrial and Manufacturing, Initial Zoning Ordinance and Reasoned Statement of Relevant Criteria and Standards for approximately 18.866 acres in the N ½ of the SW ¼ of Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 37 East.] TO THE, UM, INITIAL ZONING. AND THIS IS WHERE I WAS CONFUSED, UM, WHERE I THOUGHT THAT I HAD MESSED UP BECAUSE THIS, THIS MOTION SAID THAT WE ARE GOING TO PROVE THE ORDINANCE ANNEXING AND ASSIGNING A COMP. OH, PLAN. THAT'S WHERE I GOT MIXED UP. I APOLOGIZE FOR MY STUPID QUESTION ABOUT INM VERSUS INDUSTRIAL. THANKS EVERYBODY FOR ATION. ALL RIGHT, SO NOW WE ARE READY FOR THE, UH, MOTIONS RELATED TO THE ZONING. UH, AND WITH THAT I'LL TURN TO COUNCIL THE RECORD. YOU BET I WOULD'VE MOVED TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE INITIAL ZONING FOR I AND M INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING AS SHOWN IN THE ORDINANCE EXHIBITS UNDER A SUSPENSION OF THE RULES, REQUIRING THREE COMPLETE AND SEPARATE READINGS AND REQUEST THAT IT BE READ BY TITLE AND PUBLISHED BY SUMMARY THAT THE CITY LIMITS DOCUMENTS BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE AREA ANNEXED HERE WITH, AND THAT THE CITY PLANNER BE INSTRUCTED TO REFLECT, SAID ANNEXATION AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND INITIAL ZONING ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND ZONING MAPS LOCATED IN THE PLANNING OFFICE. SECOND. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. CITY CLERK, WILL YOU RE UH, CONDUCT THE VOTE ON THIS PLEASE? LARSON? YES. HAW? YES. DINGMAN? YES. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. WRAP? AYE. MOTION CARRIED. VERY GOOD. AND LET'S GO AHEAD AND READ THE, READ IT BY TITLE PLEASE. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, PROVIDING FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 18.866 ACRES DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A OF THIS ORDINANCE AS I AND M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING AND PROVIDING SERVICEABILITY PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY AND ESTABLISHING EFFECTIVE DATE. THANK YOU. UM, WE ARE READY FOR THE LAST MOTION ON THIS ITEM, WHICH IS THE REASON STATEMENT. I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THE REASON STATEMENT OF RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR THE INITIAL ZONING OF I AND M, INDUSTRIAL AND MANUFACTURING AND GIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENT. SECOND, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CITY CLERK. WE'RE READY FOR THAT VOTE. SHAW? YES. LARSON? YES. RADFORD. I DEMON? YES. FREEMAN? YES. FRANCIS. AYE. MOTION CARRIED. THANK YOU SO MUCH. UM, WE HAVE REACHED THE END OF THE AGENDA. I WANTED [6. Announcements.] TO, UM, JUST MAKE A COUPLE OF ANNOUNCEMENTS BEFORE WE'RE DONE HERE. UM, FIRST, UM, COUNCIL MEMBERS, COULD I JUST, UH, FOR MY OWN REFERENCE, UH, GET A, UM, AN INDICATION OF WHO'S ATTENDING THE, UM, ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO CITY'S LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT ON TUESDAY, COUNCILOR FRANCIS TUESDAY THIS COMING WEEK? UM, THE LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT IS WHEN THEY DO A REVIEW OF, OF, UH, ISSUES THAT ARE LIKELY TO AFFECT CITIES, UM, THAT ARE, THAT ARE EXPECTED TO COME FORWARD IN THE, IN THE, UH, 2025 LEGISLATIVE SESSION. SO FOR RIGHT NOW, IT'S COUNSELOR FRANCIS. OKAY. UM, AND WE CAN CERTAINLY MAKE TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU DESIRE TO DO. COUNSELOR LARSON. UM, BEYOND THAT, UM, I WILL TURN TO ANY OF YOU WHO, IF YOU HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS THAT YOU WISH TO MAKE OF A COMMUNITY NATURE. ALRIGHT. WELL, THE ONLY THING I'LL SAY IS THAT, UH, WE'VE COME OFF A BUSY SEASON, A LOT OF ACTIVITIES, ESPECIALLY IN THE MONTH OF, UH, OCTOBER AND, AND, UH, SOME IN NOVEMBER. AND HERE WE ARE, UH, LOOKING AT ANOTHER BUSY SEASON, UH, TO KICK OFF, UH, SHORTLY. BUT, UH, FOR THIS WEEK, OTHER THAN THESE MEETINGS AND FOR NEXT WEEK, UH, WE HAVE NO PUBLIC ACTIVITIES AND NO PUBLIC MEETINGS GOING ON. UM, WE ALSO HAD A REALLY WONDERFUL CHRISTMAS TREE, UH, LINING, UH, FOR THE, UH, DOWNTOWN, UH, IN CELEBRATION OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA. AND, UH, THAT WAS A REALLY BEAUTIFUL, UH, EVENING WITH, UH, THE WINTER MARKET AND ADDED A LOT OF VALUE TO THE HOLIDAY SEASON. AND I EXPECT IN FUTURE YEARS IT'LL, IT'LL BECOME EVEN MORE EXCITING. BUT, UM, WE HAVE NOTHING TO ANNOUNCE OTHER THAN ON THE NINTH IN THIS ROOM. WE'LL HAVE OUR WORK SESSION, OUR FIRST ONE FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, AND, UH, TWO WEEKS FROM TONIGHT ON THE 12TH OF WHATEVER THAT MONTH IS, DECEMBER, WE'LL BE IN THIS ROOM FOR ANOTHER CITY COUNCIL MEETING. UM, AND SO I GUESS WE'LL JUST WISH EVERYONE, UH, PEACEFUL COUPLE OF WEEKS AND, UH, A WONDERFUL, UH, THANKSGIVING BREAK WITH, UH, HOPEFULLY WITH SOMETHING TO YUMMY TO EAT WITH, UH, PEOPLE THAT YOU LOVE TO BE AROUND. UH, YOU'LL HAVE THAT PRIVILEGE IF, UH, YOU DON'T HAVE SOME PLACE TO BE. UH, THE SALVATION ARMY IS, UH, UH, SPONSORING A MEAL, UM, THAT'S FREE TO ANYONE WHO WANTS TO COME AND JOIN. AND THERE'S USUALLY A VERY FESTIVE ATMOSPHERE THERE. [00:50:01] I BELIEVE THEY OPEN THE DOORS AROUND 11 11 30. UM, AND IT'S USUALLY QUITE CROWDED AND, AND LIKE I SAID, KIND OF FESTIVE. SO, UH, COUNCILOR FREEMAN, YOU DID HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANTED TO SAY. I WAS JUST GONNA GIVE, UH, PINECREST A PITCH ABOUT THEY'RE STILL, EVEN THOUGH THE GOLF COURSES ARE CLOSED, THE PRO SHOPS ARE OPEN AND THEY'RE SELLING GIFTS FOR CHRISTMAS. VERY GOOD FOR THOSE WHO WANT THEIR BLACK FRIDAY SHOPPING. I FORGOT ABOUT THAT. BUSINESS SEASON . ANYWAY, UM, HAPPY BEGINNING OF THE HOLIDAYS. TALK TO YOU ALL LATER. THANK YOU SO MUCH. GOOD NIGHT. AWESOME. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.