Oct 17, 2024 Redevelopment Agency

ANY OPPOSED? SAY NAY.

AND LISA, I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE LINE THERE SHE IS.

CLV.

SHE'S OKAY.

I JUST NEED TO MAKE SURE I CAN HEAR IF SHE HAS ANY OPPOSITION.

LISA, ARE YOU THERE? MIGHT CHAT ALL WE CAN, WE CAN MOVE FORWARD.

SHE SAYS SHE HAS VIDEO BUT NO SOUND.

CAN YOU OKAY.

VALIDATE SO I CAN, UH, TELL HER, TELL HER TO USE THE CHAT FEATURE.

KNOW WHAT? UM, YOU NEED VOTES SHE CAN HEAR.

OH, SHE CAN'T, SHE HAS NO SOUND.

YEAH, SHE HAS A VIDEO BUT NO SOUND.

CAN MEGAN HEAR US? MEGAN CAN HEAR, YEAH.

I THINK WE'RE OKAY UNTIL WE GET DOWN TO THE, UH, NUMBER FIVE.

HOPEFULLY LISA CAN GET THAT GOING.

MAYBE SHE, UM, IF WE NEED TO, I CAN CALL HER.

SHE REALLY NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO HEAR AND PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.

OR DO WE HAVE QUORUM IN THERE, MR. CHAIR? I'M SORRY.

YEAH, WE HAVE, WE HAVE FOUR WITHOUT HER.

UM, BUT WE WILL NEED HER, WE'LL NEED HER FOR ITEM FIVE.

'CAUSE THERE WILL BE ONE RECUSAL.

SO HOPEFULLY SHE CAN, WE CAN GET HER, UM, BACK.

AND THE NEXT ITEM, THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED BY THE VOTE OF, UH, CHRIS , BRENT THOMPSON, TERRY GABY, AND LEE RADFORD.

LET'S KEEP WORKING ON THESE OTHER THINGS.

UM, SO THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED.

UM,

[3. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Expenditures and Finance Report]

UH, RENEE ABLE TO GET A VOTE FROM, UM, LISA HAW.

UH, THE THIRD ITEM IS AN ACTION ITEM ON THE APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND FINANCE REPORT.

UM, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF EXPENDITURES IN THE RIVER COMMONS FUND, $225 FOR BECKY SERVICES, $1,650 TO RENEE MCGEE FOR ELIGIBILITY STUDY.

$5,762 TO ELAND BURKE SERVICES, $1,720 TO CITY OF OUR FALLS FOR THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT.

$2,600 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO FOR OUR ANNUAL PAYMENT TO SUPPORT THEIR EFFORTS.

UH, AND THEN OWNER, UH, UH, REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS TO BB LANDING, UH, $316,053 AND 22 CENTS.

AND ABANDONED RIVER RE $90,387 AND 25 CENTS.

AND THEN A PAYMENT TO IREM FOR, UM, RISK MANAGEMENT INSURANCE, $3,733 EAGLE RIDGE FUND, $200 TO CITY OF BATTLE FALLS, $10,982 58 CENTS TO EAGLE RIDGE DEVELOPMENT AS A OWN REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT.

AND TO JACKSON HOLE JUNCTION, $200 TO THE CITY OF BATTLE FALLS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND $135,000 $112 62 CENTS AS AN OWNER REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT TO JACKSON HOLE JUNCTION.

I DON'T KNOW, IS THAT THE FIRST ONE WE'VE MADE TO THEM? UM, IT'S GOOD THAT WE'RE STARTING TO GET SOME OF THE MONEY BACK TO, FOR THEIR CONSTRUCTION AND FOR OUR COMMITMENTS ON THAT.

UM, LET'S SEE.

SO THAT'S OUR FINANCE REPORT.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE FINANCE OR THE BUDGET REPORTS FOR THIS MONTH? IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINANCE REPORT FOR OCTOBER 17TH, 2024? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE FINANCE REPORT.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

ANY? HE OPPOSED A NAY? DID WE GET, DID WE GET LISA ROLLING? YEAH, I'M WORKING ON IT.

CHAIR? YES.

THE VOTES OF CHRIS , LEE, BRENT THOMPSON, LEE R AND TERRY.

THAT MOTION PASSES WITH

[00:05:01]

ICK.

UM, LISA BURDEN SHALL NOT YET ABLE TO PARTICIPATE.

UM, THE

[4. ACTION ITEM: Resolution Authorizing a Limited Expenditure Authority to the Agency Chair and/or Vice-Chair Without Prior Agency Board Approval]

NEXT ITEM IS AN ACTION ITEM.

UM, A RESOLUTION OF APPROVED, AUTHORIZED AN LIMITED EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY TO THE AGENCY CHAIR OR, AND OR VICE CHAIR WITHOUT PRIOR AGENCY BOARD OF APPROVAL.

MEGAN, YOU WANT TO TALK TO US ABOUT THIS ONE, SIR? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

AND COMMISSIONERS.

UM, THERE ARE EXPENSES AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURES THAT CAN OCCUR IN BETWEEN MEETINGS.

OH, NO PROBLEM.

LEMME OKAY, LEMME PUT YOU ON, ON SPEAKER HERE REAL QUICK.

AND, UH, IT IS FAIRLY COMMON FOR THE BOARD TO DELEGATE SOME EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY TO THE, UH, CHAIR AND OR VICE CHAIR, UM, TO INCUR COSTS IN BETWEEN MEETINGS.

UM, THE CONCEPT IS, IS THAT THE CHAIR OR VICE CHAIR WOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE.

THE EXPENDITURE WOULD THEN BE INCORPORATED INTO THE FINANCIALS AS OF THE NEXT MEETING AND CONSIDERED BY THE FULL BOARD AT THAT TIME.

THIS IS WHAT I WOULD CONSIDER TO BE MORE THE EXCEPTION, UH, NOT THE RULE.

UM, BUT IT DOES PROVIDE JUST A LITTLE BIT OF NEEDED FLEXIBILITY, UH, ESPECIALLY AS YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF PROJECT AREAS.

UM, AND SOMETIMES THESE TYPES OF EXPENDITURES DO ARISE.

SO THIS PROVIDES SOME DELEGATION TO THE CHAIR AND HER VICE CHAIR TO AUTHORIZE THE APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,000, ANY AND ALL EXPENDITURES ABOVE $5,000 WITHOUT PRIOR BOARD AUTHORITY, PRIOR BOARD APPROVAL.

ANY EXPENDITURE IS ABOVE $5,000.

CERTAINLY COME, UH, BEFORE THE BOARD, BEFORE THE EXPENDITURE IS MADE.

AND CERTAINLY TO THE EXTENT THERE ARE EXPENDITURES THAT, UH, DO NOT REQUIRE, UM, CONSIDERATION, UH, PRIOR TO A MEETING.

THOSE, EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE LESS, EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE $5,000 OR LESS, THOSE ARE STILL ANTICIPATED TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS.

SO, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

SO, UM, AND JUST SO YOU KNOW, CHAIR, I DO HAVE LISA HAW.

SHE'S ON.

WELCOME.

LISA, CAN YOU HEAR US? I HI GUYS.

SORRY IT, THE AUDIO WASN'T .

NO PROBLEM.

SO MEGAN, SO IF, IF WE GOT IN TO SPEND YOUR UNDER $5,000, IT SOUNDS LIKE EITHER I, OR I GUESS BRENT, THE VICE CHAIR, RIGHT? UM, CAN, UM, CAN AUTHORIZE THAT EXPENDITURE WOULD THEN COME UP FOR RATIFICATION OF THE NEXT MEETING THAT'S NOT RATIFIED.

I GUESS I PAY IT OUT OF MY POCKET.

IS THAT WHAT HAPPENS? HOW DOES THAT WORK? NO, IT'S NOT SO MUCH RATIFIED AT THE MEETING FOLLOWING IT IS JUST YOU HAVE THE DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE EXPENDITURE AND IT JUST COMES BACK TO THE BOARD.

IN THE NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, I, THERE WOULDN'T BE A PERSONAL LIABILITY.

IT IS JUST THE EXPENDITURE OF THE BOARD.

UM, I SUPPOSE IF IT'S AN EXPENDITURE THAT IS BEYOND, UM, ANY REASONABLE ASSOCIATION WITH AGENCY BUSINESS, THEN THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER ISSUE.

BUT CERTAINLY I THINK IN COORDINATION WITH STAFF AND EVEN IN CON CONSULTATION BETWEEN THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR, UM, YOU KNOW, I, I WOULDN'T HOPE THAT WOULD BE A PROBLEM.

I JUST TRUST MY FELLOW BOARD MEMBER BECAUSE THEY'LL TRUST ME AND NOT TELL ME I HAVE TO PAY.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

THAT SOUNDS GOOD.

UM, UH, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS AUTHORIZATION? I THINK IT'S A GOOD POLICY TO HAVE IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FLOW OF CASH THROUGH THE SYSTEM IS, UM, TIMELY.

BUT I'M WONDERING WHY WE'LL, JUST NOW YEAH.

AS OPPOSED TO NOT HAVING IT PLACE 10 YEARS AGO.

THERE CIRCUMSTANCES CAUSED THIS TO COME IN THE CIRCUM.

I THINK THAT IS THE NEXT ACTION ITEM, ISN'T IT? LIKE WE WERE KIND OF WORRIED ABOUT THIS LAST ONE.

YEAH, I CAN ADDRESS THAT IF YOU'D LIKE OR I CAN ADDRESS IT, RIGHT? YEAH, NO, GO AHEAD IF YOU LIKE.

IT RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE OF THE TIMEFRAME OF WHAT HE COULD DO TO WORK AND, OKAY.

THIS, THIS CAME UP BECAUSE, UM, FOR YELLOWSTONE SQUARE, WHAT HAD HAPPENED WAS TYPICALLY OUR SURVEYOR IN THE CITY WOULD DO IT, AND HIS WORKLOAD IS PRETTY HEAVY RIGHT NOW.

AND SO HE, UM, HAD REQUESTED THAT WE LOOK OUTSIDE THE CITY AND BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THAT WITH UH, YELLOWSTONE SQUARE, WE NEEDED SOME TIME TO BE ABLE TO FIND A SURVEYOR, BUT THEN ALSO BE ABLE TO HIRE ONE.

AND SO THAT'S WHAT IT CAME ABOUT AND, AND WHY WE NEEDED, AND WHY WE NEEDED MONEY TO PAY FOR

[00:10:01]

DOES THAT ANSWER THAT QUESTION? WE REALLY HAVEN'T.

I HAVEN'T.

I THINK THERE'S BEEN A FEW TIMES.

IT'S GOT A LITTLE TIGHT, BUT I CAN'T REMEMBER WE'VE EVER HAD TO DO IT.

SO, SO DID WE HIRE AN OUTSIDE SURVEYOR FOR UH, YES.

WE'RE UNDER CONTRACT WITH THEM, CORRECT.

DO WE HAVE IN PLACE ONE OF THOSE, MEGAN, DON'T WE NEED SOMETHING WHERE WE'VE APPROVED SURVEYORS IN ADVANCE OFF OF A PUBLIC BID REQUIREMENTS? WELL, BECAUSE, UH, OF THE EXIGENT NEED TO RETAIN A SURVEYOR, AND BECAUSE THE SURVEYING AMOUNT IS DI MINIMUS, IT'S UNDER 5,000.

AND BECAUSE THE TIMELINE WITHIN WHICH WE NEED IT, I THINK WE'RE IN GOOD STANDING TO PROCEED.

I HAVE TALKED WITH, UM, UM, MR. SANNER AND OTHERS ABOUT, I THINK IT, IF THE CITY GIS IS TOO BUSY, IT MIGHT MAKE SOME SENSE TO ISSUE AN RFQ AND HAVE A IDENTIFY A COUPLE OF SURVEYORS THAT WE MAY JUST PULL FROM IN A LIST IN THE FUTURE.

UM, BUT JUST BECAUSE THE TIMETABLE WE'RE ON THIS IS, THIS IS THE APPROACH WE'RE TAKING.

SOUNDS GOOD.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS RESOLUTION? ALRIGHT, UM, MEGAN, UM, DO YOU WANT TO READ THE RESOLUTION 24 10 BY TITLE? CERTAINLY RESOLUTION NUMBER 24 DASH 10 BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENAL AGENCY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE URBAN RENAL AGENCY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO, AKA IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROVIDING A LIMITED EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY TO THE AGENCY CHAIR AND OR VICE CHAIR AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT RESOLUTION? SO MOVE.

SECOND.

LET'S, UH, LET'S HAVE A, A, UH, ROLL CALL VOTE.

'CAUSE LISA, UM, LET'S GO THROUGH THE ROLL CALL.

LISA BURDEN SHAW? YES.

CHRIS BUCKLE.

LEE AYE.

BRENT THOMPSON? YES.

UH, LEE RADFORD? YES.

THANK YOU, MEGAN, FOR GETTING THAT PORTAL TOGETHER.

UM, YELLOWSTONE SQUARE, URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT.

THE NEXT ACTION ITEM,

[5. ACTION ITEM: Ratify the Cost for Retention of Surveyor for the Map and Legal Description for the Proposed Yellowstone Square Urban Renewal District]

AND I RECUSED MYSELF ON THIS.

UM, I'VE GOT PEOPLE IN MY OFFICE THAT ARE REPRESENTING THE BUSINESSES THAT STEVE K HAS OWNERSHIP IN.

SO I'M GONNA RECUSE MYSELF AND TURN THIS ONE OVER TO BRENT.

I'M GONNA WAIT OUT, I'M GONNA TURN IT BACK OVER TO YOU.

SURE.

TELL US WHAT'S GOING ON HERE.

YEAH, AND I, I PRETTY MUCH UPDATED YOU.

WE, WE GOT HUNG UP ON THIS ONE A LITTLE BIT, UM, JUST BECAUSE WE WERE LOOKING FOR A SURVEYOR AND WE'RE RUNNING INTO SOME TIMELINES THAT WE NEED TO GET THIS BEFORE YOU AND INFRA.

SO WE, WE HAVE A SURVEYOR.

HE, HE HAS ACTUALLY WORKED ON THE PROPERTY IN THE PAST, AND SO HE ALREADY HAD THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION, UH, NEEDED FOR THE SURVEYOR.

SO WE WERE, WE WERE COMFORTABLE WITH THAT, BUT WE DIDN'T WANNA MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT THE WEIGHING IN ON THAT.

SO THAT'S WHERE THAT ONE IS.

WE DO HAVE A SURVEYOR.

WE'RE HOPING TO HAVE THAT.

I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER WHAT WE'RE AT.

WE'RE ON THE ELIGIBILITY REPORT ON THAT ONE, IF I REMEMBER RIGHT.

UM, SO THAT'LL BE MOVING FORWARD TO YOU, HOPEFULLY HAVE IT TO YOU SOMETIME IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

NOW, IS THIS, UM, IS THIS FOR AN EXHIBIT? DID THE, UH, YEAH, COPY.

SO WITH THAT, THE SURVEYOR IS FRANK PETERSON, AND SO WE'RE JUST, UM, AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WAS PROVIDED.

THE REVIEW DISTRICT NEEDS TO BE SERVED DONE BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, AND THAT'S WHAT WE WERE GETTING HUNG UP ON.

UM, I THOUGHT WE HAD SUBMITTED THAT THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL.

HAVE WE DONE THAT? YEAH.

SO I CAN JUMP IN HERE IF THAT'S, IF THAT'S OKAY.

MR. CHAIR, COMMISSIONER? YES.

THE, I BELIEVE THE YELLOWSTONE SQUARE URBAN PLAN WAS ACTUALLY CONSIDERED BY THIS BODY, AND IT WAS CONTINGENT UPON MOVING IT FORWARD ON RETAINING THE SURVEY MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.

AND SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE, UM, SORT OF IN A, I GUESS, UH, WE HAVE TO GET THIS EXHIBIT DONE AND WE'RE UNDER SOME SIGNIFICANT TIME CONSTRAINTS TO CONTINUE TO MOVE THIS FORWARD FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION PRIOR TO YEAR END.

SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS, UH, THERE, UH, THE SCOPE OF WORK IS APPROXIMATELY GONNA TAKE THREE WEEKS FROM, UH, ABOUT OCTOBER 7TH.

SO WE SHOULD HAVE THESE EXHIBITS FINALIZED AT THAT TIME.

UM, THERE IS, UH, UH, ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE OF $4,500 TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE OF WORK, AND THAT'S ON THE HIGH SIDE.

IT'S, UM, IT DEFINITELY COULD COME IN AT LESS THAN THAT COST.

UM,

[00:15:02]

SO JUST WANTING TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BOARD IS AWARE AND CAN RATIFY THIS AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED AGAIN UNDER TIGHT TIME CONSTRAINTS AND, UH, FAIRLY DI MINIMIS AMOUNT IN TERMS OF THE SCOPE OF THE SURVEY, UH, AGREEMENT.

SO THIS WILL, THIS WILL BE PART OF THE, UH, PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE END OF THIS MONTH PRIOR TO THEIR NEXT MEETING FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNCIL AT THAT TIME.

IS THAT CORRECT? SO WE ARE A BIT ON HOLD IN TERMS OF THE TIMELINE 'CAUSE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD THE, UH, A GOOD UNDERSTANDING AS TO THE TIMING OF WHEN WE WOULD RECEIVE THE FINAL SURVEYED MAP AND LEGAL.

BUT THE NEXT STEPS WOULD BE FORMAL TRANSMITTAL OF THE PLAN.

AND MAYBE, UM, I'M JUST CHECKING HERE FOR THE RESOLUTION.

YES.

THE, SO THE AGENCY CONSIDERED THIS PLAN AT THE TIME, IT LOOKS LIKE, UH, ITS NOVEMBER MEETING, AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG ON THAT, BUT WE'VE BEEN IN A HOLD IN TERMS OF TRANSMITTING THE PLAN, UM, AND ALL OF THE ADJACENT ATTACHMENTS UNTIL WE FIGURED OUT THE SURVEY MAP AND LEGAL EXHIBIT.

SO NOW THAT WE HAVE SOME DIRECTION ON THE TIMING OF THAT, WE WILL MAKE THE FORMAL TRANSMITTAL TO THE CITY OF THE PLAN, THE AGENCY RESOLUTION, AS WELL AS THE, UM, THE PREP FOR THE CITY TAKING OVER THE, UM, THE WORK IN, IN TERMS OF GETTING THIS PLANNED BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL.

SO THE, THE FORM OF THE TRANSMITTAL LETTERS AND THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE.

SO ONCE WE GET ALL OF THAT TRANSMITTED OVER TO THE CITY, WE WILL FINALIZE THE TIMELINE FOR CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION.

BUT THE GOAL IS TO, UH, HAVE THAT HEARD AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO YEAR END.

UM, SO WE'RE, WE'RE FIRMING UP THOSE, UH, TIMELINES ON WITH CITY STAFF.

SO WE'RE JUST, EXCUSE ME.

AT THIS POINT, WE'RE JUST LOOKING FOR RAMIFICATION OF THE, THE COST OF THE SURVEYING.

IS THAT, THAT IT? YEP.

SO THAT WE JUST YES.

DO WE NEED TO VOTE ON THAT? YES, PLEASE.

SORRY.

YES.

WELL, WE HAVE A, WE, WE NEED FOR A MOTION TO RATIFY THE COST FOR RETENTION OF THE SURVEYOR FOR THE, UH, PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE SQUARE URBAN RENEWAL RENEWAL DISTRICT.

IS THERE, UM, DIDN'T WE JUST DO THAT, MEGAN, OR FOR, DIDN'T WE JUST APPROVE THE CHAIR TO DO EXHIBIT? NO, WE APPROVE THE RESOLUTION.

THAT WAS JUST THE RESOLUTION.

YEAH, THANK YOU.

SO I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

I WAS INCORRECT.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RATIFY THE COST FOR THE RETENTION OF THE SURVEY FOR THE MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE SQUARE URBAN RENEWAL DESCRIPTION.

THERE SECOND? SECOND.

I SECOND IT.

WE HAVE A, UH, A, A MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND A SECOND.

UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AND AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? THE MOTION PASSES.

ITEM IS AN UPDATE ON THE URBAN, UH, RENEWAL DISTRICT FOR YELLOWSTONE SQUARE.

[6. DISCUSSION ITEM: Update on Yellowstone Square Urban Renewal District]

AND DO YOU WANT TO TAKE US IN THROUGH THAT? I, I THINK I'VE PRETTY MUCH SAID WHERE WE'RE AT.

YEAH, THAT'S TOTALLY FINE, GREG.

UH, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE WE NEED TO DO ON THAT AT THIS POINT? MEGAN, ON YELLOWSTONE SQUARE? UH, NO THANK YOU.

I, YEAH, WE WE'RE SORT OF ALL FOUR, FIVE, AND SIX AGENDA ITEMS ARE ALL A LITTLE BIT RELATED, BUT, UM, NO, WE WILL BE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE TRANSMITTAL OF THE PACKET TO THE CITY AND PROCEEDING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE STATUTE AND FOR THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF THE ORDINANCE.

SO NOTHING, UM, TO DO, JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS, UM, AND WHAT'S OCCURRED RELATED TO THIS ITEM SINCE THE LAST MEETING.

UM, I GUESS AT THAT POINT I WILL TURN THE, UH, MEETING BACK OVER TO THE CHAIR FOR, UH, THE REMAINING I DISCUSSION ITEMS. ALL RIGHT.

WADE, THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE IS ITEM SEVEN, THE UPDATE ON THE PROPOSED 33RD AND FIFTH DISTRICT.

[7. DISCUSSION ITEM: Update on Proposed 33rd and 5th District]

YEAH, THERE'S NOT, THERE'S NOT A LOT UPDATE ON THAT ONE.

UH, THIS ONE CAME BEFORE YOU FOLKS A COUPLE MONTHS AGO ABOUT A, AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT AT THE CORNER OF 33RD AND, AND FIFTH WEST.

UM, THEY

[00:20:01]

HAD COME BACK AND TALKED TO US, UH, ABOUT THAT.

UM, WE HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM 'EM SINCE THAT CONVERSATION, SO THAT'S KIND OF WHERE IT'S AT RIGHT NOW.

WHAT ARE THEY ASKING FOR? THE, THE LAST TIME WE TALKED, THEY WERE ASKING FOR GAP FINANCING, AS I RECALL.

YES.

WHICH IS NOT A PRODUCT THAT WE HAVE, CORRECT.

AT ALL.

CORRECT.

SO WE WALKED 'EM THROUGH WHAT TIFF IS, AND I, I DON'T KNOW IF, I THINK THEY WERE AN OUT OF STATE COMPANY, IF I REMEMBER RIGHT.

IT'S A NATION, AND SO I THINK THEY JUST HAVE THESE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS AND GO AROUND TO DIFFERENT STATES AND DIFFERENT LOCATIONS.

AND THIS ONE WAS JUST HAPPENED TO BE AT THE CORNER AND IT WAS JUST THAT PROPERTY AND WE THOUGHT IT WAS A LITTLE SMALL FOR A URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT.

AND, UM, SO YEAH, SO THEN WE COMMUNICATED THAT BACK TO THEM.

THE UPDATE ON WILLOW CREEK URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT.

UM, THEN

[8. DISCUSSION ITEM: Update on Willow Creek Urban Renewal District]

YEAH, SO THAT ONE AT THE, UH, LET'S SEE.

THE ELIGIBILITY REPORT, UH, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 26TH OF SEPTEMBER.

UH, THEY HAVE SIGNED THAT THE MOU, UM, I FOLLOWED UP WITH THE DELAWARE.

I WAS OUT LAST WEEK SICK.

AND SO I FOLLOWED UP WITH HIM EARLY THIS WEEK.

I HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM MR. FITZGERALD.

UM, AND THE PART THAT WE'RE NEEDING ON THAT ONE FOR THE PLANNING PROCESS TO CONTINUE IS THAT THE 15,000 BE PAID, UM, FOR, UH, FROM THE DEVELOPER.

AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED THAT YET.

THAT HAS BEEN COMMUNICATED TO THE DEVELOPER.

I REACHED OUT TO HIM EARLY THIS WEEK, UH, AND SAID THAT WE WERE STILL LOOKING FOR THAT.

I, I HAVEN'T HEARD BACK FROM HIM YET ON THAT.

SO THAT'S WHERE, THAT'S WHERE THAT ONE IS RIGHT NOW.

UM, THE NEXT DISCUSSION ITEM IS JUST RAI.

UM, SO I THINK THAT'S ALL WE HAVE.

[8. DISCUSSION ITEM: RAI and Legislative Update]

ANYTHING GOING ON WITH, UH, REDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO MAYBE? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR.

COMMISSIONERS, NOTHING SPECIFIC.

UH, EVERYONE'S ATTENTIONS ARE TURNED TO THE UPCOMING NOVEMBER 5TH ELECTION FOLLOWING THE ELECTION.

WE MOVE PRETTY QUICKLY INTO LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP DISCUSSIONS, WHICH, UH, THOSE POSITIONS ARE THEN DETERMINED AROUND THE FIRST WEEK OF DECEMBER.

UM, SHOULD HAVE SOME STRATEGY AND DIRECTION HOPEFULLY FOR THIS UPCOMING SESSION OVER THE NEXT MONTH.

SO HOPE TO HAVE A MORE ROBUST, UH, DISCUSSION IN NOVEMBER.